ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I like Herm's method better... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=208217)

kcbubb 05-27-2009 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5796375)
So you were all for dumping Gonzalez then, right?

under the right circumstances, I would have been for trading Tony. But I don't think a 2nd next year was enough.

tooge 05-27-2009 01:35 PM

They say Herms methods are unsound

Pasta Little Brioni 05-27-2009 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5796798)
under the right circumstances, I would have been for trading Tony. But I don't think a 2nd next year was enough.

That is the most you are going to get for a tight end that age. Even one as good as Tony.

Anyway, I agree with signing the stop gap vets and letting them play a year and replace them with superior younger talent next year. You can't fix all the holes in one offseason. Vrabel, Thomas, Goff, and Engram aren't going to be keeping young super studs off the field.

38yrsfan 05-27-2009 01:52 PM

Edwards was one of the worst coaches the Chiefs ever had. His first season was a carry over from better times. IMO

FAX 05-27-2009 02:08 PM

Herm didn't really have what you call a "method". The Chiefs were absolutely forced to go young when Herm arrived. Heck, he didn't even start the "rebuild" soon enough. Not only that, but when faced with the decision to put an old vs. young quarterback on the field, we got Humpty DumpedOnHisAss and the Amazing Nerf Ball Of Mystery.

If anything, Herm's "method" was to endlessly BS everybody until their eyes glazed over, their drool turned blue, and they started mumbling nursery rhymes. And when that stopped working, he turned to outright lies.

If he weren't such a fantastic game day coach, I'd say the guy was kind of a failure.

FAX

Pioli Zombie 05-27-2009 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 5796032)
Yes, Herms way was the best. He just needed more time.

I just spit my drink up m$y nose I was laughing so hard
Posted via Mobile Device

Just Passin' By 05-27-2009 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5796798)
under the right circumstances, I would have been for trading Tony. But I don't think a 2nd next year was enough.

Then you're a hypocrite. Gonzalez was old and was not going to be helping the team win in 3 years. Since the Chiefs aren't going to win this year, he needed to be gotten rid of so that the team could bring in a young player.

Your logic, not mine.

wild1 05-27-2009 02:45 PM

Herm's method: from 10-6 to 2-14 in three years flat.

DeezNutz 05-27-2009 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5796023)
I would really rather see Brian Johnston play rather than Vrabel.

Pioli says, "Fail."

LaChapelle 05-27-2009 02:54 PM

Confidence is too big of a factor in a pro athlete's sucess to waste on surrounding them with lottery picks. Two to three seasons of celler dwelling could be the difference between pro bowl and average to bust.

kcbubb 05-27-2009 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5796987)
Then you're a hypocrite. Gonzalez was old and was not going to be helping the team win in 3 years. Since the Chiefs aren't going to win this year, he needed to be gotten rid of so that the team could bring in a young player.

Your logic, not mine.

the logic behind it would be that Tony would be different than other players mentioned bc he could have such a huge effect on the QB.

Tony is in a different class than these other players and he could help the team by helping develop the QB. Developing the QB is something that could help down the road.

milkman 05-27-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5797100)
the logic behind it would be that Tony would be different than other players mentioned bc he could have such a huge effect on the QB.

Tony is in a different class than these other players and he could help the team by helping develop the QB. Developing the QB is something that could help down the road.

JPB is right.

You are a hypocrite.

kcbubb 05-27-2009 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5797113)
JPB is right.

You are a hypocrite.

ummm... on somethings yes. on this topic. no.

If Tony could help bring Cassel along, it would help this team three years from now.

Who is Zach Thomas going to help three years from now??? give me a break.

milkman 05-27-2009 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5797128)
ummm... on somethings yes. on this topic. no.

If Tony could help bring Cassel along, it would help this team three years from now.

Who is Zach Thomas going to help three years from now??? give me a break.

He's going to help the young guys on defense transition to a new scheme and help them learn how to prepare to play in the NFL, as is Mike Vrabel.

The fact is, those guys will do more to help the young guys grow on defense than Tony would have helped Matt Cassel.

Tony is a selfish player who would have been unhappy with the fact that Cassel will be spreading the ball around.

Just Passin' By 05-27-2009 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5797128)
ummm... on somethings yes. on this topic. no.

If Tony could help bring Cassel along, it would help this team three years from now.

Who is Zach Thomas going to help three years from now??? give me a break.

Are you really going to claim that there are no young defenders on the Chiefs for guys like Thomas and Vrabel to bring along?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.