Originally Posted by Bump (Post 17742575)

if it weren't for the golden age of the Chiefs, which is right now, I'd probably still be saying "Marty shoulda kept that mother****ing Grbac on the bench!" and be a little bitter. They probably would have won the Superbowl if they kept Gannon in, he had the offense rolling pretty good.

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 17742590)

urban legend

https://i.imgur.com/HCzDyal.png

unless marty had convinced tim brown, jerry rice and charlie garner to play for the chiefs it wasn't happening

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 17742597)

I think most of the Gannon love is purely based on that SF game.

He was very good that day.

It's true he was a lot less chokey than Grbac, but in the end I don't believe he was good enough to beat Denver or Pittsburgh and certainly not Dallas.

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 17742597)

I think most of the Gannon love is purely based on that SF game.

He was very good that day.

It's true he was a lot less chokey than Grbac, but in the end I don't believe he was good enough to beat Denver or Pittsburgh and certainly not Dallas.

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 17742605)

there was definitely a different vibe with Gannon that year, even if they weren't putting up stats

Originally Posted by DJay23 (Post 17742737)

It definitely looked and felt different with Gannon.

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 17742605)

there was definitely a different vibe with Gannon that year, even if they weren't putting up stats

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 17742918)

That was all KCGannonStalker generated.