ChiefsPlanet
Page 5 of 34 1234 5 678915 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Why people are disappointed: Exhibit A - Talent Evaluation (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=219888)

OnTheWarpath15 12-14-2009 03:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6346572)
Yep the Seattle job with Microsoft money behind it.
Actually, I was talking about the Giants job after Ernie Accorsi retired.

But another example, nonetheless.

Titty Meat 12-14-2009 03:06 PM
Since Pioli is so bad why don't you mother ****ers step up and demand he be fired? Otherwise I don't see the point in this disucssion other then stating the obvious.

OnTheWarpath15 12-14-2009 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler360 (Post 6346576)
Could you give an actual reason instead of just calling me dumb?
READING IS FUNDAMENTAL.

Reasons gave been given. Quit ignoring them, and read.

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-14-2009 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler360 (Post 6346576)
Could you give an actual reason instead of just calling me dumb?
read the ****ing thread!!

tooge 12-14-2009 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6346162)
Are you saying he couldn't have signed Jason Brown? TJ Houshmanzedah? Chris Canty? Michael Boley? Igor Olshansky?

The list goes on and on.

The man took the job in mid-January. It's not like he was hired in early April.
I guess he could have signed some of those guys. We didn't have a coach until what, the end of Feb? I agree with you that more could have been done. But, I guess I agree with Keg, in that I think this is a long term plan, not a fix it now plan. I do agree with you also that to some extent, this year is wasted, just not completely. They found out all this here
1. they have a pretty darn good RB, but need another to carry some of the load
2. They need TE's
3. The entire O line sucks
4. D line is in good shape, but could use a nose guard even if for depth
5. We are good at corner
6. We need major help at safety
7. Cassel isn't gonna carry the team on his back. He needs playmakers.
8. Need receivers, bad.
Now, alot of us here thought the D line was crap. Most here including me thought Charles was decent for a third down back but not much more. I really think this season was a waste for us as fans, but not for the GM.

ChiefsCountry 12-14-2009 03:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler360 (Post 6346576)
Could you give an actual reason instead of just calling me dumb?
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...5&postcount=56

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-14-2009 03:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by billay (Post 6346578)
Since Pioli is so bad why don't you mother ****ers step up and demand he be fired? Otherwise I don't see the point in this disucssion other then stating the obvious.
Hello???

<--------

Titty Meat 12-14-2009 03:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6346586)
Hello???

<--------
HEY!

OnTheWarpath15 12-14-2009 03:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tooge (Post 6346582)
I guess he could have signed some of those guys. We didn't have a coach until what, the end of Feb? I agree with you that more could have been done. But, I guess I agree with Keg, in that I think this is a long term plan, not a fix it now plan. I do agree with you also that to some extent, this year is wasted, just not completely. They found out all this here
1. they have a pretty darn good RB, but need another to carry some of the load
2. They need TE's
3. The entire O line sucks
4. D line is in good shape, but could use a nose guard even if for depth
5. We are good at corner
6. We need major help at safety
7. Cassel isn't gonna carry the team on his back. He needs playmakers.
8. Need receivers, bad.
Now, alot of us here thought the D line was crap. Most here including me thought Charles was decent for a third down back but not much more. I really think this season was a waste for us as fans, but not for the GM.
Many of us knew all these things before Pioli was ever hired.

Like I've said before, it's not rocket science.

The Franchise 12-14-2009 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6346586)
Hello???

<--------
ROFL

Bugeater 12-14-2009 03:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6346562)
You should consider the possibility that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
Does George Blowfish not know what he's talking about?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 6345542)
Well, let me put it this way. The Hunt family is not about winning championships. Ever since they won one in 1969, and Lamar got put in the HOF in 1972, the Chiefs have been on cruise control. It's been nothing more than a business to make money first and foremost. As long as they turn a profit, the Hunts are happy. That's why King Carl lasted 20 years. He made piles and piles of money. This year has been about one thing: Stadium renovation. I've said this over and over, and it doesn't seem to sink in. Know what next year is about? Finishing the stadium renovation. Then the year after that it will be trying to get to .500 to keep enough fan interest to keep making money. We are the Chicago Cubs of the NFL. Despair springs eternal.
Dane, you said we're $41M under the cap, and I swear I just saw something posted earlier where Clark's contributions to the renovations is $40M, if that's true don't you think it's just a little more than a coincidence?

Hammock Parties 12-14-2009 03:15 PM
The Hunt family kicked in $150 million, not $40 million.

Bugeater 12-14-2009 03:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6346607)
The Hunt family kicked in $150 million, not $40 million.
Well then I'm obviously confused, which isn't very surprising. I find it hard to believe it isn't a factor at all though.

Hammock Parties 12-14-2009 03:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 6346612)
Well then I'm obviously confused, which isn't very surprising. I find it hard to believe it isn't a factor at all though.
If the Hunts really wanted to save money they could have told Pioli to stick with Thigpen. Who certainly looks good right now. Makes me sick.

Titty Meat 12-14-2009 03:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6346617)
If the Hunts really wanted to save money they could have told Pioli to stick with Thigpen. Who certainly looks good right now. Makes me sick.
Or they would have told Pioli to keep Gailey. Oh wait they did.....


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 PM.
Page 5 of 34 1234 5 678915 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.