ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Suh over berry if he fell to us?

Page 5 of 7

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Suh over berry if he fell to us? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=220750)

DeezNutz

12-30-2009 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6392234)

If we played 4-3 we'd still be hosed because Jackson could only play end in obvious run downs and Hali could only play in obvious pass downs otherwise we'd have 1 side that couldn't stop the run and 1 side that couldn't get a pass rush. And Hali with his hand on the ground against a LT isn't all that hot to begin with.

Jackson would have to move inside and become a rotational player, which, for Pioli, would be a bigger admission of being a dumb **** than if he outright cut Cassel.

Titty Meat

12-30-2009 02:28 PM

Jackson was a 4-3 end at LSU

DeezNutz

12-30-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bane_58 (Post 6392241)

For shits and grins 2,if Suh goes 1,berry goes 2,do you pass on Clausen @ 3?

I don't.

But I could understand the Spiller selection, too.

Has to be one of these two players. Taking Clausen would ensure the possibility of a trade, but we've already gone down this road with this logic before...

Mecca

12-30-2009 02:29 PM

Also for the Taylor Mays talk his likely scenarios have him ending up in Seattle or San Fran...if he falls past there it becomes a huge tossup where he goes you'd probably see San Diego shit their pants to try to get him.

DeezNutz

12-30-2009 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6392249)

Jackson was a 4-3 end at LSU

He and Hali would both be LDE now, though, and there's no chance in hell that Hali could move inside.

Mecca

12-30-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6392249)

Jackson was a 4-3 end at LSU

That basically never did what a 4-3 end is suppose to do, he had 1 year wher he got 10 sacks, at the NFL level that isn't happening.

Titty Meat

12-30-2009 02:31 PM

If the Chiefs were to move back to the 4-3 I'd simply trade Hali for a 2nd or 3rd and sign Aaron Kampman. Jackson is like a Jamaal Anderson 4-3 D-end.

Mecca

12-30-2009 02:32 PM

This convo is pointless anyway, the odds we ever don't play 3-4 with Pioli here are less than him admitting Cassel sucks.

philfree

12-30-2009 02:37 PM

I'd take Suh. If he is what we think he is then how could you not?

PhilFree:arrow:

BigCatDaddy

12-30-2009 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6392267)

This convo is pointless anyway, the odds we ever don't play 3-4 with Pioli here are less than him admitting Cassel sucks.

It's pointless because Suh won't drop that far.

If we were to consider going back to a 4-3 the better questions would be do you stand pat and take McCoy or would you give up our 1st and 2b to move up for Suh?

Bane	12-30-2009 02:45 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6392283)

I'd take Suh. If he is what we think he is then how could you not?

PhilFree:arrow:

When he is who we think he is goes wrong.

Deberg_1990

12-30-2009 02:46 PM

I remember when Dorsey was Suh 2 years ago....

DeezNutz

12-30-2009 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6392267)

This convo is pointless anyway, the odds we ever don't play 3-4 with Pioli here are less than him admitting Cassel sucks.

Hey you sumbitch. This is why I said for "shits and grins."

Basically, I'm curious if people think Suh is so good that he would warrant talk about the switch. That's all.

Bane	12-30-2009 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 6392310)

I remember when Dorsey was Suh 2 years ago....

:thumb:

Mecca

12-30-2009 03:01 PM

That's depending on who you talk to, the former Ravens scout who has a Twitter account was asked that question and he said the team he worked for didn't think highly of Dorsey.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 PM.

Page 5 of 7

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page