ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Wins and losses ... you make the call (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=232705)

RedThat 08-30-2010 04:28 PM

Wk Date Game
1 Sep 13 SD @ KC L
2 Sep 19 KC @ CLE W
3 Sep 26 SF @ KC L
4 Bye
5 Oct 10 KC @ IND L
6 Oct 17 KC @ HOU L
7 Oct 24 JAC @ KC L
8 Oct 31 BUF @ KC L
9 Nov 07 KC @ OAK W
10 Nov 14 KC @ DEN L
11 Nov 21 ARI @ KC W
12 Nov 28 KC @ SEA L
13 Dec 05 DEN @ KC W
14 Dec 12 KC @ SD L
15 Dec 19 KC @ STL W
16 Dec 26 TEN @ KC L
17 Jan 02 OAK @ KC W

6-10

OnTheWarpath15 08-30-2010 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6965261)
Quite a bit, actually. Magee/Gilberry were getting absolutely manhandled that game. Bringing Dorsey back will help considerably. Berry at Strong Safety is going to help us significantly, particularly in limiting the big play. The playcalling will be a lot better (don't know how good Romeo is, but it's a clear upgrade over Pendergast) and we'll at least make adjustments that keep us from getting gashed from the same play repeatedly.

I still have this as a loss, though, because the Browns can pass the ball this year and I think they have a decent defense. They're going to be better than a lot of people think.

I'm so sick of hearing the Dorsey excuse.

You conveniently forget the rush totals against us when Dorsey WAS in the lineup:

198 to Baltimore
156 to the Giants
150 to Dallas
118 to Washington
135 to San Diego
173 to Jacksonville
182 to Oakland
114 to Pittsburgh
245 to Denver
200 to Buffalo
144 to Cincinnati

FlaChief58 08-30-2010 04:29 PM

L
W
W
-
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W


Question mark the jag game, could go either way. Based on that, best case 8-8 to 9-7


Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6964965)
predict the wins,losses and record

<table class="data-table1" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr class="thd2"><td>Wk</td> <td>Date</td> <td>Game</td> <td>Stadium</td> <td nowrap="true">Time (ET)</td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">1</td> <td nowrap="true"> Sep 13</td> <td nowrap="true">SD @ KC </td> <td>Arrowhead Stadium</td> <td>10:15 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">2</td> <td nowrap="true"> Sep 19</td> <td nowrap="true">KC @ CLE </td> <td>Cleveland Browns Stadium</td> <td>1:00 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">3</td> <td nowrap="true"> Sep 26</td> <td nowrap="true">SF @ KC </td> <td>Arrowhead Stadium</td> <td>1:00 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td>4</td> <td>Bye</td> <td colspan="4">
</td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">5</td> <td nowrap="true"> Oct 10</td> <td nowrap="true">KC @ IND </td> <td>Lucas Oil Stadium</td> <td>1:00 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">6</td> <td nowrap="true"> Oct 17</td> <td nowrap="true">KC @ HOU </td> <td>Reliant Stadium</td> <td>1:00 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">7</td> <td nowrap="true"> Oct 24</td> <td nowrap="true">JAC @ KC </td> <td>Arrowhead Stadium</td> <td>1:00 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">8</td> <td nowrap="true"> Oct 31</td> <td nowrap="true">BUF @ KC </td> <td>Arrowhead Stadium</td> <td>1:00 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">9</td> <td nowrap="true"> Nov 07</td> <td nowrap="true">KC @ OAK </td> <td>Oakland Coliseum</td> <td>4:15 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">10</td> <td nowrap="true"> Nov 14</td> <td nowrap="true">KC @ DEN </td> <td>Invesco Field at Mile High</td> <td>4:05 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">11</td> <td nowrap="true"> Nov 21</td> <td nowrap="true">ARI @ KC </td> <td>Arrowhead Stadium</td> <td>1:00 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">12</td> <td nowrap="true"> Nov 28</td> <td nowrap="true">KC @ SEA </td> <td>Qwest Field</td> <td>4:05 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">13</td> <td nowrap="true"> Dec 05</td> <td nowrap="true">DEN @ KC </td> <td>Arrowhead Stadium</td> <td>1:00 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">14</td> <td nowrap="true"> Dec 12</td> <td nowrap="true">KC @ SD </td> <td>Qualcomm Stadium</td> <td>4:15 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">15</td> <td nowrap="true"> Dec 19</td> <td nowrap="true">KC @ STL </td> <td>Edward Jones Dome</td> <td>1:00 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">16</td> <td nowrap="true"> Dec 26</td> <td nowrap="true">TEN @ KC </td> <td>Arrowhead Stadium</td> <td>1:00 PM </td> </tr> <tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"> <td class="">17</td> <td nowrap="true"> Jan 02</td> <td nowrap="true">OAK @ KC </td> <td>Arrowhead Stadium</td> <td>1:00 PM </td> </tr></tbody> </table>


Titty Meat 08-30-2010 04:29 PM

1 Sep 13 SD @ KC Loss
2 Sep 19 KC @ CLE Loss
3 Sep 26 SF @ KC Win
4 Bye

5 Oct 10 KC @ IND Loss
6 Oct 17 KC @ HOU Loss
7 Oct 24 JAC @ KC Loss
8 Oct 31 BUF @ KC Win
9 Nov 07 KC @ OAK Win
10 Nov 14 KC @ DEN Loss
11 Nov 21 ARI @ KC Loss
12 Nov 28 KC @ SEA Win
13 Dec 05 DEN @ KC Win
14 Dec 12 KC @ SD Loss
15 Dec 19 KC @ STL Loss
16 Dec 26 TEN @ KC Loss
17 Jan 02 OAK @ KC Win


Doubtful they sweep Oakland you could replace 1 of the wins vs Okaland and with Arizona. 6-10.

DaneMcCloud 08-30-2010 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flachief58 (Post 6965275)
Question mark the jag game, could go either way. Based on that, best case 8-8 to 9-7

Crack is a helluva drug

-King- 08-30-2010 04:30 PM

**** it. We're going winless. Every runningback is going to rush for 300 against us.

OnTheWarpath15 08-30-2010 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965264)
Why not? How has the Chiefs front seven improved to the point where they won't be giving up a massive amount of rushing yardage?

Has Cleveland not improved their squad, either?

No, Dane. Only the Chiefs were allowed to "improve" this offseason



Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965264)
Chiefs don't have a shot in hell to beat the Steelers with a healthy Polamalu (who didn't play that day) or a healthy Roethlisberger.

QFT, though Ben didn't get hurt until late. They just didn't play anywhere near their potential that day, and missing Troy surely didn't help.

DaneMcCloud 08-30-2010 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 6965279)
**** it. We're going winless. Every runningback is going to rush for 300 against us.

Considering that four teams last year put up more than 200 yards on the ground and given the fact that the Chiefs did nothing to address that fact, you may be very surprised at how many games they lose this year to teams that can run the ball effectively.

Hence a possible 1-7 start.

Titty Meat 08-30-2010 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965282)
Considering that four teams last year put up more than 200 yards on the ground and given the fact that the Chiefs did nothing to address that fact, you may be very surprised at how many games their lose this year to teams that can run the ball.

Indeed this team was a franchise NT or QB away from being an 8-8 or 9-7 team this year. Guess we'll have something to hang our hat on :D

-King- 08-30-2010 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965282)
Considering that four teams last year put up more than 200 yards on the ground and given the fact that the Chiefs did nothing to address that fact, you may be very surprised at how many games they lose this year to teams that can run the ball effectively.

Hence a possible 1-7 start.

Wanna bet on it? :D

All your money vs mine.

chiefzilla1501 08-30-2010 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965267)
Well, this a part of the problem for the Chiefs, probably their second biggest problem behind QB: They have no depth. They don't have a legit NT and their DE's are average on a good day and well below average on a normal day.

Hali is a liability against run, as is DJ. This team will routinely give up HUGE rushing yardage this season because they just cannot stop anyone on the ground.

Depth is undoubtedly a big problem. But better than last year? Yeah. Shaun Smith is better depth than having nobody (how a team goes through an entire half of a season without a backup NT is headscratching). Gilberry is emerging as a pretty dangerous pass specialist. We will likely have better depth in our secondary by allowing Arenas to match up against slot receivers. And you would hope that this season, you'll start to see Studebaker become featured in a lot more pass plays (or just in general).

I don't think we'll routinely give up big yards. Our biggest problem last year was giving up the big play and I think we'll cut those down significantly. Apart from that ****-up on the McCoy 18-yard run, I thought it was one of the most disciplined games I've seen in a long time with our D-line. They finally were starting to get their gap assignments right, even if they weren't getting a ton of push. That to me, more than anything, was a major reason we were finally getting pressure on the QB when we chose to blitz.

OnTheWarpath15 08-30-2010 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6965285)
Indeed this team was a franchise NT or QB away from being an 8-8 or 9-7 team this year. Guess we'll have something to hang our hat on :D

Had they taken Daryl Washington (who's flashing in Arizona) and Cody in R2, I have no doubts they would have won 8 or more games, even with Cassel as the QB.

keg in kc 08-30-2010 04:38 PM

Wk1: SD @ KC - win
Wk2: KC @ CLE - loss
Wk3: SF @ KC - win
Wk4: BYE
Wk5: KC @ IND - loss
Wk6: KC @ HOU - loss
Wk7: JAC @ KC - win
Wk8: BUF @ KC - win
Wk9: KC @ OAK - win
Wk10: KC @ DEN - win
Wk11: ARI @ KC - win
Wk12: KC @ SEA - loss
Wk13: DEN @ KC - win
Wk14: KC @ SD - loss
Wk15: KC @ STL - loss
Wk16: TEN @ KC - loss
Wk17: OAK @ KC - win

8-8. About where I expect. Most of their wins will have to come at home. I don't see many winnable road games. Think their lower limit for the season is 6-10, their upper 9-7.

DaneMcCloud 08-30-2010 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6965289)
Depth is undoubtedly a big problem. But better than last year? Yeah. Shaun Smith is better depth than having nobody (how a team goes through an entire half of a season without a backup NT is headscratching). Gilberry is emerging as a pretty dangerous pass specialist. We will likely have better depth in our secondary by allowing Arenas to match up against slot receivers. And you would hope that this season, you'll start to see Studebaker become featured in a lot more pass plays (or just in general).

I don't think we'll routinely give up big yards. Our biggest problem last year was giving up the big play and I think we'll cut those down significantly. Apart from that ****-up on the McCoy 18-yard run, I thought it was one of the most disciplined games I've seen in a long time with our D-line. They finally were starting to get their gap assignments right, even if they weren't getting a ton of push. That to me, more than anything, was a major reason we were finally getting pressure on the QB when we chose to blitz.

Sorry, I don't see and I don't agree. This defense, featuring FOUR number one draft choices, is ****ing awful. AWFUL. They have no legitimate, consistent pass rushers, NO legit NT's, weak DE's and no depth.

Teams like Cleveland, San Diego, San Fran, Houston and Jacksonville will pummel the Chiefs with their running games. Indy won't need to pummel them because the slow defense will be so exhausted by the fourth quarter from trying to get to Peyton Manning all day that it should be an easy win for them.

chiefzilla1501 08-30-2010 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6965295)
Had they taken Daryl Washington (who's flashing in Arizona) and Cody in R2, I have no doubts they would have won 8 or more games, even with Cassel as the QB.

I will take a playmaker over a 3-4 ILB any day of the week.

Neither of these guys were going to make the CHiefs an 8-win team. Especially not Washington.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.