ChiefsPlanet
Page 5 of 6 1234 5 6
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Very telling quote from Pioli on Charles' future with the Chiefs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=235989)

wazu 10-30-2010 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefs Rool (Post 7129746)
ya, he's good, he's damn good, but we need to learn our lesson on paying high priced RBs. It's not a position of longevity. Plus, running backs are a dime a dozen. I would rather us throw our money at Flowers
We aren't anywhere near the salary cap. In fact this team struggles to stay above the league's salary floor. There is no reason we can't have both, plus a bunch of other really good players.

DaneMcCloud 10-30-2010 03:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam (Post 7129750)
We aren't anywhere near the salary cap. In fact this team struggles to stay above the league's salary floor. There is no reason we can't have both, plus a bunch of other really good players.
There IS no salary cap.

Does anyone in this forum know the rules?

BigRedChief 10-30-2010 03:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam (Post 7129711)
Pioli, you damned well better have our team's payroll at least somewhere near the salary cap before you even think of letting Charles go. Our team needs to collect more talent, not say goodbye to what it already has.
I'd assume thats the case. It's a lot harder to find a good CB. You find him, you keep and pay him. If you can also keep the RB? :clap:

rtmike 10-30-2010 03:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam (Post 7129750)
We aren't anywhere near the salary cap. In fact this team struggles to stay above the league's salary floor. There is no reason we can't have both, plus a bunch of other really good players.
Since there is no more salary floor I wonder how cheap Pioli thinks he can operate at?

Quesadilla Joe 10-30-2010 03:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 7129737)
http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2010/01...-cba-rules-be/

If you are going to be stupid about a subject, at least make it a subject that I can't prove your stupidity with a one minute google search.
From your link.

Quote:
What determines whether a player is a restricted free agent in the “Final League Year?”

A: In capped seasons, a player whose contract expires becomes a restricted free agent if he has three accrued seasons. In the Final League Year (2010), a player whose contract expires becomes a restricted free agent if he has three, four or five accrued seasons.

LoneWolf 10-30-2010 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 7129783)
From your link.
RFA in an uncapped year is determined by the length of contract the player has signed. UFA is after six years in an uncapped year. You stated that the Chiefs would receive a third round pick as compensation if another team signed Charles. The Chiefs can determine what draft pick compensation they can receive by the amout of their tender offer to Charles.

Quesadilla Joe 10-30-2010 03:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 7129813)
RFA in an uncapped year is determined by the length of contract the player has signed. UFA is after six years in an uncapped year. You stated that the Chiefs would receive a third round pick as compensation if another team signed Charles. The Chiefs can determine what draft pick compensation they can receive by the amout of their tender offer to Charles.
Next year won't be an uncapped year. Who knows how the new CBA will work out. All I know is the uncapped year saved Denver's ass because Denver got extra tenders to use on their UFA's.

And Denver slapped a 1st round tender on Brandon Marshall this offseason and they didn't get it.

wazu 10-30-2010 03:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7129772)
There IS no salary cap.

Does anyone in this forum know the rules?
Okay, vagina boy, there isn't one this year. There was one last year and we were a long, long way from it. When we have a new one next year we'll still be nowhere near it.

LoneWolf 10-30-2010 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 7129830)
Next year won't be an uncapped year. Who knows how the new CBA will work out. All I know is the uncapped year saved Denver's ass because Denver got extra tenders to use on their UFA's.

And Denver slapped a 1st round tender on Brandon Marshall this offseason and they didn't get it.
Your first two sentences contradict each other.

Denver didn't get a first round pick for Marshall because they decided to work out a deal with Miami for less compensation.

BigMeatballDave 10-30-2010 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam (Post 7129750)
We aren't anywhere near the salary cap. In fact this team struggles to stay above the league's salary floor. There is no reason we can't have both, plus a bunch of other really good players.
I dont wanna be a dick here, but have you been hiding under a rock?

BigMeatballDave 10-30-2010 03:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 7129830)
Next year won't be an uncapped year. Who knows how the new CBA will work out. All I know is the uncapped year saved Denver's ass because Denver got extra tenders to use on their UFA's.

And Denver slapped a 1st round tender on Brandon Marshall this offseason and they didn't get it.
The players will vote to decertify the Union. That means they will play under the current CBA. It could be several yrs before a new CBA is in place. So, if this yr is uncapped, why would next yr be capped if there is no new CBA?

DaneMcCloud 10-30-2010 03:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 7129670)
Uhh dude you are wrong. A player is available for RFA after three seasons seasons in the league.
Bullshit.

Dude, you are truly clueless.

keg in kc 10-30-2010 03:58 PM
I don't think it's a bad strategy to have. It's one of the shortest-lived positions in the league. RBs take a beating like nobody else.

Nightfyre 10-30-2010 04:31 PM
The answer is so simple, it's astonishing. Franchise him. One year deal. We can keep him or deal him, or maybe he can deal himself and get us a first and third. Who else would we franchise?

DaFace 10-30-2010 04:33 PM
I have to agree with Dane - it's hard to even discuss this given that we don't know what the situation will be when it becomes an issue.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:00 PM.
Page 5 of 6 1234 5 6
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.