ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Would you consider the offseason FA period a success for the Chiefs? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=257424)

ChiefGator 03-18-2012 07:21 AM

Interesting quote from that link:

5. Excluding Peyton Manning, you’re a GM and can pick up one player to significantly improve your team. What team are you and what player do you choose from the available free agents?

Khaled: You know what the Kansas City Chiefs could do to continue an excellent off season? Make a move for Aubrayo Franklin on the cheap to play nose tackle. His market value dictates cost won’t be too high, he fits into their type of 3-4, and you only need to go back to 2010 to see how good he can be in that base package role.

saphojunkie 03-18-2012 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8467078)
Generally speaking, if you're looking for your QB in free agency, then you're looking in the wrong place.

Pioli has done a good job in filling holes in this free agency period.

You know what? This is an excellent point. Filled holes and upgraded a major position of need. The number one need went from worst in league to one of the best.

We need a franchise QB, but I want to get one through the draft.

007 03-18-2012 07:28 AM

Until we truly address the albatross on this team, then my answer will continue to be a resounding NO.

007 03-18-2012 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 8467369)
You know what? This is an excellent point. Filled holes and upgraded a major position of need. The number one need went from worst in league to one of the best.

We need a franchise QB, but I want to get one through the draft.

One problem. This franchise doesn't draft QBs until the second day of the draft.

BoneKrusher 03-18-2012 07:35 AM

http://i41.tinypic.com/dr89ea.png

oldman 03-18-2012 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8467078)
Generally speaking, if you're looking for your QB in free agency, then you're looking in the wrong place.

Pioli has done a good job in filling holes in this free agency period.

Agreed. While there have been some steals out there (Brees), there normally is a reason that QB is on the market. Orton didn't want to be here and got a wad of cash to be a backup so we needed a 3rd QB for camp.
We picked up a starting RT, one of the biggest holes on the team, a second TE, a CB to replace Carr, and a RB that's a huge upgrade over the duo of Jones and Battle. I would have liked to see Hillis' contract to be more than a year and rather not had to replace Carr, but that's life.
I don't think we're finished in FA just yet and we've freed ourselves somewhat in the draft. I'll give it a 92.

Mama Hip Rockets 03-18-2012 08:00 AM

As long as Cassel is the QB, nothing is a success. I'm assuming that the signing of Brady Quinn means they are not going to draft a QB, so I'm saying no.

Mama Hip Rockets 03-18-2012 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 8466214)

The only thing that really got boned is Routt over Carr, but I dont see how the team can be worse off overall.

Cassel is worse than Orton.

notorious 03-18-2012 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 8467410)
Cassel is worse than Orton.

Not in the overall scheme of things.

Mama Hip Rockets 03-18-2012 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 8467416)
Not in the overall scheme of things.

I don't know what that means, but i disagree.

notorious 03-18-2012 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 8467417)
I don't know what that means, but i disagree.

Orton is a 10-6

Cassel is an 8-8

Both of them get us the same result. No playoff wins or a SB.


Orton is waaaaay better, but would he benefit us long-term?

BoneKrusher 03-18-2012 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 8467410)
Cassel is worse than Orton.

absolutely.

Mama Hip Rockets 03-18-2012 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 8467421)
Orton is a 10-6

Cassel is an 8-8

Both of them get us the same result. No playoff wins or a SB.


Orton is waaaaay better, but would he benefit us long-term?

10-6 is good enough to win this division, easily. And once you're in, you never know what could happen. This team has enough talent to win in the playoffs with Orton, in my opinion.

BoneKrusher 03-18-2012 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 8467426)
10-6 is good enough to win this division, easily. And once you're in, you never know what could happen. This team has enough talent to win in the playoffs with Orton, in my opinion.

Pioli wanted Ortan out of the way because Cassel would never win the starting job vs Kyle.

notorious 03-18-2012 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 8467426)
10-6 is good enough to win this division, easily. And once you're in, you never know what could happen. This team has enough talent to win in the playoffs with Orton, in my opinion.

Perhaps, but a SB?



I just don't know. I am in a very bad place when it comes to the Chiefs right now, so my optimism is zero.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.