ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs News Etc 8/17/12 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=262490)

Micjones 08-17-2012 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8825563)
sure he can help ..... AS A WR.

every chiefs fan needs to cross their fingers and hope that DMC can use his quickness to be our wes welker or Desean Jackson.

leave all the RB stuff to the good RB's

I personally wouldn't minimize him in anyway.
He averaged 4.5 ypc last season.
Why limit him?

Would I give him 10 carries per game? No, but I also wouldn't box him up.

Mr. Laz 08-17-2012 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8825565)
Not like you couldn't have both he and Charles in the backfield.
But okay.
:rolleyes:

or you could have Hillis and Charles both in the backfield

one power
one quick
both catch
both run
both block

jd1020 08-17-2012 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8825563)
sure he can help ..... AS A WR.

every chiefs fan needs to cross their fingers and hope that DMC can use his quickness to be our wes welker or Desean Jackson.

leave all the RB stuff to the good RB's

McCluster is never going to be DeSean Jackson. He's not nearly fast enough.

O.city 08-17-2012 11:23 AM

Dexter can be utilized as the 4 WR. Now you can argue that the 4th wr in a run happy offense won't get much thrown his way, and I'd agree.



But I tend to think we are a little more pass happy this year than we previously have been.

Micjones 08-17-2012 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8825575)
or you could have Hillis and Charles both in the backfield

one power
one quick
both catch
both run
both block

Or you could have multiple two back sets, with interchangeable parts.

Mr. Laz 08-17-2012 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8825580)
Or you could have multiple two back sets, with interchangeable parts.

why?

why use a lesser player when you have two better players available? Maybe even more than two better players.

unless there is an injury, DMC shouldn't see a single snap at RB.

i suppose you can pretend to have him RB and then motion him to WR to have an extra WR. But only for formation purposes.

Micjones 08-17-2012 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8825587)
why?

why use a lesser player when you have two better players available? Maybe even more than two better players.

unless there is an injury, DMC shouldn't see a single snap at RB.

Oh I don't know...Because we're going to use more than Charles and Hillis in the backfield anyway?

You can argue that he SHOULDN'T get carries, but the idea that he won't because there are two better backs in front of him is...well...silly.

He got carries in his rookie season with two better backs in front of him (as a WR).
Why wouldn't he this year?

Chiefnj2 08-17-2012 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8825596)
Because we're going to use more than Charles and Hillis in the backfield anyway?

You can argue that he SHOULDN'T get carries, but the idea that he won't because there are two better backs in front of him is...well...silly.

He got carries in his rookie season with two better backs in front of him.
Why wouldn't he this year?

There is better depth right now (per 1 preseason game and camp reports).

Micjones 08-17-2012 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8825599)
There is better depth right now (per 1 preseason game and camp reports).

Hell of a sample size.

O.city 08-17-2012 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8825596)
Because we're going to use more than Charles and Hillis in the backfield anyway?

You can argue that he SHOULDN'T get carries, but the idea that he won't because there are two better backs in front of him is...well...silly.

He got carries in his rookie season with two better backs in front of him (as a WR).
Why wouldn't he this year?

Because there aren't 2 better backs in front of him, there are 3 maybe 4.


You think he's better than either of the 4 we have out there right now?

Micjones 08-17-2012 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8825603)
Because there aren't 2 better backs in front of him, there are 3 maybe 4.

Based on training camp and ONE pre-season game?

Mr. Laz 08-17-2012 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8825596)
Because we're going to use more than Charles and Hillis in the backfield anyway?

You can argue that he SHOULDN'T get carries, but the idea that he won't because there are two better backs in front of him is...well...silly.

He got carries in his rookie season with two better backs in front of him.
Why wouldn't he this year?

and using your 3rd,4th,5th best RB when you have so many other options is...well...a complete waste.

let's just run our 4th string QB out there in every game just to use them and not be 'silly'

you play your best players on ever snap unless they need a break ... we have plenty of RB's that can keep Charles fresh without using DMC.

Micjones 08-17-2012 11:34 AM

The argument here is that no play should go to anyone other than your very best skill players at the position.

So Devon Wylie will just have to understand when Cassel looks to Bowe and Breaston on every offensive pass play.
:rolleyes:

O.city 08-17-2012 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8825605)
Based on training camp and ONE pre-season game?

And the fact that our RB coach said we were keeping 4 RB's and Dexter hasn't had one carry this TC or preseason game.

Mr. Laz 08-17-2012 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8825605)
Based on training camp and ONE pre-season game?

of course things can change

maybe it was a one game fluke and the whole team turns to shit

but as of right now .......


there is no reason to use DMC at RB at all.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.