This article's premise comes straight out of 1968, lol

Saw a band called The Goddam Gallows at the Bottle Neck last year and after they played they mingled around in the crowd. As I'm looking at all the neck, face and scalp tattoos they were sporting I'm thinking, "Man, I sure hope this band gig works out for you."

The dumbshit sports columnist who wrote this trash column:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...32_306x423.jpg

Looks like a pedophile.

This week on The Death Of Journalism In America: Worthless Hack Creates Hype About Nothing.

The concept of this article is so outdated it was probably typed on a Commodore 64.

My thoughts exactly.
Posted via Mobile Device

Does he have any tats a short sleeve t-shirt won't cover?

Seriously??? Shouldn't this guy accomplish something on the field before worrying about being a marketable star?

It's not the concept of tattoos that will cost him marketing dollars. It's the simple fact that tattoos make people less attractive.

I am not a fan a Kaepernick's tat sleeves. But it doesn't bother me. He can do as he pleases. If big corporations decide his tats are a negative image that they don't want to deal with, I can certainly understand that.

It does have a trashy, low rent look to me.

srsly y'all old

Are you calling Kaepernick a whore?

my father told me as a kid...many times...no tattoos, no piercings

always stuck with me, and I do plan on teaching my children that some day as well

I just don't like them...and yeah, I do judge people with visible tattoos, it's human nature

that said, I think Kaepernick is a great QB and a great person

No. See nba.com

The fact that Kevin Durant has 0% bodyfat and no muscle tone makes them look really bad.