ChiefsPlanet
Page 5 of 27 1234 5 678915 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Now Who is the #1 Pick??? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270714)

RealSNR 03-04-2013 03:47 PM
When Albert signs long term are you assholes going to continue to project LTs to that pick?

It's Geno or Floyd. A trade down is wholly unlikely, but all it takes is one team who wants Geno that damn badly.

Frosty 03-04-2013 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rick (Post 9463919)
I've been saying for a while now that I wouldn't be surprised if Geno is still the pick. Still feel that way.
I would be surprised.

And ecstatic.

The Rick 03-04-2013 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shox (Post 9463921)
I think they will try to keep Jackson on a cheaper deal, but I think they will let Dorsey walk.
Yup...agreed.

ToxSocks 03-04-2013 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9463918)
They took Rodgers late in the first with their own pick...and they did not trade for Favre. That is a horrible comparison.
It's not a comparison. It's stating that both men have drafted early round QB's just to sit them under vets while they developed, so drafting Geno can't be ruled out yet. Oh...and yeah, GB traded for Favre if you wanna be technical about it.

Frosty 03-04-2013 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9463934)
When Albert signs long term are you assholes going to continue to project LTs to that pick?

It's Geno or Floyd. A trade down is wholly unlikely, but all it takes is one team who wants Geno that damn badly.
Of course they will. Albert to guard.

The Franchise 03-04-2013 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9463918)
They took Rodgers late in the first with their own pick...and they did not trade for Favre. That is a horrible comparison.
It's not a horrible comparison.

I'm sure Reid and Dorsey both saw how shitty the QBs on our roster are/were. They trade for Alex Smith to solidify the position and then draft one at 1.1 for the future. Maybe they really like Geno Smith....but they don't think that he can come in and instantly start the first year. They let him sit behind Alex for a year. It's not like Alex Smith is ****ing young or proven that he's a franchise QB.

ILChief 03-04-2013 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9463934)
When Albert signs long term are you assholes going to continue to project LTs to that pick?

It's Geno or Floyd. A trade down is wholly unlikely, but all it takes is one team who wants Geno that damn badly.
People will project OT and DL to us forever no matter how many we have

B14ckmon 03-04-2013 03:49 PM
Dear lord lol. You guys are torturing yourselves if you think Geno is a chance.

DaneMcCloud 03-04-2013 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9463885)
No thanks. If we trade down, I want a top 10 pick.
Why? Most people say that you're getting the same value at #1 as you are at #25.

I hope they trade down several times and pick up not only a second in 2013, but picks in 2014.

Spott 03-04-2013 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9463882)
We already traded for that guy 4 years ago.

Mav 03-04-2013 03:50 PM
I defintely see geno smith now.

Mojo Jojo 03-04-2013 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9463918)
They took Rodgers late in the first with their own pick...and they did not trade for Favre. That is a horrible comparison.
But they did trade for Farve...just not the same year.

ToxSocks 03-04-2013 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9463953)
It's not a horrible comparison.

I'm sure Reid and Dorsey both saw how shitty the QBs on our roster are/were. They trade for Alex Smith to solidify the position and then draft one at 1.1 for the future. Maybe they really like Geno Smith....but they don't think that he can come in and instantly start the first year. They let him sit behind Alex for a year. It's not like Alex Smith is ****ing young or proven that he's a franchise QB.
Exactly. And it's something both men have ALREADY DONE BEFORE.

ceebz 03-04-2013 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9463934)
When Albert signs long term are you assholes going to continue to project LTs to that pick?

It's Geno or Floyd. A trade down is wholly unlikely, but all it takes is one team who wants Geno that damn badly.
There's just so much smoke around the "concerns about his back" rumor, that I believe they have real concerns.

Do I want them to draft a LT #1? No. But, I think you have to be kidding yourself if you believe there's no chance it will happen. They did just trade away what amounted to a mid first rounder for Alex ****ing Smith.

B14ckmon 03-04-2013 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9463944)
It's not a comparison. It's stating that both men have drafted early round QB's just to sit them under vets while they developed, so drafting Geno can't be ruled out yet. Oh...and yeah, GB traded for Favre if you wanna be technical about it.
Not when they took Rodgers derp a derp.

That is not even remotely close to the same scenario. Favre was an aging franchise QB they already had. They did not just trade for a vet and then draft Rodgers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo Jojo (Post 9463969)
But they did trade for Farve...just not the same year.

Obviously I meant in the same year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:07 AM.
Page 5 of 27 1234 5 678915 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.