![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Charles had a Great year last year- and teams KNEW what was coming- we had ZERO passing game and some of the worst QB play of all time. Hell we tied a record for Not having a lead in a game most of the year. We ran our defense to death as well with Cashole coughing the ball up every other play. If we get anything out of the TE position and Something out of Baldwin we should have a great offense this year- Light years better than last. Jeez cheer up Chiefs fans- We have a great team this year!! |
Quote:
If they didn't want a QB, I thought the best player in the draft was Jarvis Jones. Edit: There were close to ten player I would have been satisfied with. |
Quote:
If he helps turn the franchise around, but only becomes a good, but not transcendent player, he was still worth it. Examples: Drew Bledsoe, Kerry Collins |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Though I certainly take exception to the folks around here that are arguing that he can't be. Albert was a technical wreck, we all realize that - right? I mean Albert's a good tackle, but he's in that 8-10 range with a lot of other good tackles. Do people really not believe that Fisher is capable of being a hell of a lot better than that? There is literally no single area where Albert is physically a better prospect than Fisher. Albert managed to get by through some of the most unconventionally effective blocking you'll ever see. He's the Dominick Hasek of left-tackles; you would never teach anyone to do what he does. And while that made him effective, it also limited his ceiling somewhat. Fisher's is well beyond Albert's and I truly do believe Fisher will prove to be Albert's equal by mid-season. Guys, Fisher is a really really good prospect. Someone please tell me what it is they see in this kid that makes them think that he's 3-4 years removed from being a top 10 LT in this league? If he is, the pick is an unqualified failure. I don't think that will be the case. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Tony Boselli good.
|
I'm curious as to what expectations can be made?
It would seem logical that he starts game 1 and blocks well. |
Quote:
2) keep Alex on his feet while in the pocket |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I'm told over and over how great this new front office is. So if it turns out that he isn't better than either Joeckel or Johnson, that's going to be a major disappointment. |
Quote:
LMAO |
Quote:
But he's not great. His ceiling isn't great. Fisher's is. You focus on Albert's quickness. Here's all I can do to highlight the difference in their respective athleticism: http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/pictu...pictureid=1349 Fisher is bigger, he's stronger, he's faster, he's quicker, he's more explosive. He is, across the board, a significantly better athlete than Brandon Albert. In many instances it isn't even a close question. Fisher can truly be a Joe Thomas type of tackle. Now I will listen all day to people that want to debate the value of an elite LT in the modern NFL - it's a legitimate argument. But this crybaby bullshit from folks that are moping about like there's no way Fisher can ever approach the performance that we got from Albert is just silly. Fisher can be, should be, and in my opinion will be a significantly better all-around LT than Brandon Albert. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.