ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   News Nevada police seize house, arrest homeowners for 'tactical advantage.' (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274307)

WhawhaWhat 07-05-2013 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9793444)
I suppose the fine should be hefty as a deterrent to the police department involved but in no way do you want it to be ridiculous in amount.

We already have a litigation happy society.The fact some asshole cops stepped way over their authority is reflection on them and possibly their boss but its not like this guy was thrown in jail for 5 years.

But if the guy did the same thing to the cop he would go to prison for 30+ years. The police had no authority to detain the citizen in this case and they should be held to a higher standard as someone that represents and enforces the laws in his jurisdiction.

beach tribe 07-05-2013 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2bikemike (Post 9793364)
I don't know maybe its just me but with all the commotion of obtaining entry into the home it seems to me they would have lost all tactical advantage.

I know right.
One might notice a bunch pigs shuffling in and out of the house next door poppin the dog with pepper rounds and comparing the tightness of their shirts
Tazers on the ready, of course.

suzzer99 07-05-2013 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9793450)
well, "the news" has filters, you know :)

From MSN;



Police allegedly violate Third Amendment just in time for the Fourth

http://blu.stb.s-msn.com/i/92/2B931F..._cwGxyWTyg.jpg

The Third Amendment, which forbids forcefully quartering soldiers in people's homes, doesn't get brought up a lot. Anthony Mitchell of Henderson, Nev., is suing the city for Third Amendment violations. He was arrested for not allowing police officers to use his home as a lookout for an investigation. After Mitchell refused their initial request over the phone, officers allegedly showed up at his door with a metal ram and broke in, "Addressing the plaintiff as 'asshole,'" says the best part of the complaint, "Officers shouted conflicting orders at Mitchell." When he didn't (or couldn't) comply, they allegedly hit him and his dog with pepper spray. The really crazy thing: they also arrested Mitchell's parents, who live on the same street, for the same "crime." Everybody gets a Third Amendment violation! — By Nick Mangione [Source]

http://now.msn.com/anthony-mitchell-...ent-violations


Unfortunately(for main media), this story is gaining legs

MSN != MSNBC

Check the source of this news snippet - it's the same as the OP. Clicking around the links on that site, it looks fairly bogus.

BigMeatballDave 07-05-2013 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unlurking (Post 9793514)
At minimum, he deserves the same amount you would have to pay if you shared a dozen songs over the Internet.

I don't share anything.

I steal it, though. :evil:

Garcia Bronco 07-05-2013 10:40 AM

I think the thing to do here is imprison the officers for 1 year and seize their homes for 6 months and put their families on the street. Also a public written apology to the families they assaulted. I know it's a tough thing to do, but I see no other way for them to properly learn a lesson.

Xanathol 07-05-2013 11:04 AM

Home owner should have armed himself and thus, opened fire...

Ace Gunner 07-05-2013 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 9793593)
MSN != MSNBC

Check the source of this news snippet - it's the same as the OP. Clicking around the links on that site, it looks fairly bogus.

bogus? I don't see anything suggesting this at all. in fact, this MSN article brings forth a new detail -- the parents who live on that street were arrested during this op as well, which is why I bolded that. So, is this writer conspiring to make the event up too?

Chief Roundup 07-05-2013 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A Salt Weapon (Post 9793503)
Money is not a punishment to government. Sick and tired of hearing about this stuff and there is never any repercussions on the police themselves. The money should come from their personal assets and their pensions. Leaving the tax payers with the bill is another slap in the face.

Yeah see that is the problem. The settlements have to be paid by the taxpayer not the person that committed the act.
Police Officers should have to provide their own liability insurance like Doctors and such or something along those lines. There should be a way to shift the financial responsibility away from the taxpayer.

Pitt Gorilla 07-05-2013 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xanathol (Post 9793653)
Home owner should have armed himself and thus, opened fire...

kill a cop? Yeah, brilliant plan.

suzzer99 07-05-2013 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9793715)
bogus? I don't see anything suggesting this at all. in fact, this MSN article brings forth a new detail -- the parents who live on that street were arrested during this op as well, which is why I bolded that. So, is this writer conspiring to make the event up too?

Well since the MSN author lists nothing but the OP's site as his source, I'm still skeptical. So we have some guy, and some other guy. They could be the same writer pimping his own work for all we know.

Due to the internet echo chamber/automated blog pimping for pay-per-click ads, any viral article like this is going to have 100s of hits in a day. But a lot of times when you trace them it's all from one source.

I'm not saying the article isn't true. I'd just like to see another source before I believe it.

mikey23545 07-05-2013 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 9793948)
Well since the MSN author lists nothing but the OP's site as his source, I'm still skeptical. So we have some guy, and some other guy. They could be the same writer pimping his own work for all we know.

Due to the internet echo chamber/automated blog pimping for pay-per-click ads, any viral article like this is going to have 100s of hits in a day. But a lot of times when you trace them it's all from one source.

I'm not saying the article isn't true. I'd just like to see another source before I believe it.

Yep, this story just does not pass the smell test at all...

mdstu 07-05-2013 08:41 PM

This article links the court document filed on July 1st 2013.
The indecent apparently occurred in July 2011.

http://reason.com/24-7/2013/07/04/ne...vate-homes-arr

http://www.scribd.com/doc/151769636/...t-al-Complaint

Edit: It is however using the same article as it's source.

Tombstone RJ 07-05-2013 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhawhaWhat (Post 9793178)
I stole this from Reddit, but -

There are a lot of claims.
  • The constitutional claims
  • Assault
  • Battery
  • False arrest and imprisonment
  • Intentional infliction and emotional distress
  • Negligent infliction and emotional distress
  • Civil conspiracy
  • Defamation
  • Abuse of process
  • Malicious prosecution
  • Respondeat superior
  • Negligent hiring, retention, supervision, and training

Court Docs -
http://ia601809.us.archive.org/11/it....95379.1.1.pdf
http://ia601809.us.archive.org/11/it....95379.1.0.pdf

I'd sue the shit out of those friggen assholes if they pulled this stunt on me. This is an obvious abuse of power.

Hammock Parties 07-05-2013 11:00 PM

**** cops.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/w-WMn_zHCVo?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

J Diddy 07-05-2013 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9794568)
**** cops.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/w-WMn_zHCVo?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

**** punks.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.