ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs We need to extend Alex Smith (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=280391)

jd1020 01-05-2014 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 10346635)
No, no you don't. People sure weren't doing that when Alex was terrible the first 8 games and the defense was playing lights out and winning the game every week.

The reality is most of you people are miserable human beings looking for an excuse to bitch. Period.

Don't need to look for an excuse to bitch when you are up 38-10 with 13 to go in the 3rd and lose.

Jakemall 01-05-2014 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 10346607)
Playing without Charles, without avery, then lost Knile, and playing against a defense that completely stepped up its intensity.

There are two plays that really bite me.

The drop by bowe on 3rd and 5, and Alex Smiths fumble.

Without those two plays. I think the Chiefs win the game.

The going out of bounds catch by bowel on 4th would have won the game too.

Red Dawg 01-05-2014 03:20 PM

Uh no. Give him one more year and see how does.

Mav 01-05-2014 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 10346630)
did I say he wouldn't take the blame? He is a stand up guy. I'm just saying lets not get carried away with the extention. You want to extend him fine but don't give him some ridiculous Cassel contract.

He would never want that. And I don't think the Chiefs should.

But if they could lock him up for say 5 years 50 mil, that's an incredible deal.

Mav 01-05-2014 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 10346659)
The drop by bowel on 4th would have won the game too.

He didn't drop it lol.

He caught it.

DeezNutz 01-05-2014 03:20 PM

He earned the extension. Yesterday is easily one of the best single games that a Chiefs QB has ever played.

But, this doesn't mean that we shouldn't be grooming a player under Smith, something this organization has never done. There should be zero loyalty to Daniel or Bray, and the team should be exploring all options, including a player who might, strangely, drop in the draft.

And I don't want to hear any bullshit about needing to get "impact" from first-round picks immediately. See: Fisher. And this player still might end up being a damn good pick; he just had a tremendous learning curve in year one, compounded with, at least, isolated pussitis.

tk13 01-05-2014 03:21 PM

You also have to realize that Jay Cutler just signed a 100 million plus contract. The contract Cassel signed is probably an average contract for a mid-range QB now.

The Bad Guy 01-05-2014 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 10346656)
WTF? I'm not looking for a reason to bitch. I'm just pointing out that this was a team loss.

Save the hyperbole.

If you think this was a team loss, then you're exactly what TK said.

A miserable human being.

No sane, rational person would put any of this loss on the offense or Alex Smith. It's cherry picking bullshit that wants to paint everyone as the culprit when there was only one side of the ball that didn't hold up their bargain.

44 ****ing points playing without Charles and his 2nd WR and you want to tell me this was a team loss. **** off with the sports cliches.

The Bad Guy 01-05-2014 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10346665)
He earned the extension. Yesterday is easily one of the best single games that a Chiefs QB has ever played.

But, this doesn't mean that we shouldn't be grooming a player under Smith, something this organization has never done. There should be zero loyalty to Daniel or Bray, and the team should be exploring all options, including a player who might, strangely, drop in the draft.

And I don't want to hear any bullshit about needing to get "impact" from first-round picks immediately. See: Fisher. And this player still might end up being a damn good pick; he just had a tremendous learning curve in year one, compounded with, at least, isolated pussitis.

That's what I like about Reid. He'll develop backups when he has the QB in place. Spot on Deez.

Alex Smith 4Ever 01-05-2014 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 10346660)
Uh no. Give him one more year and see how does.

Alex Smith turned around a 2-14 team

What would it take for you to extend him? Multiple superbowls???

Old Dog 01-05-2014 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 10346660)
Uh no. Give him one more year and see how does.

Realistically, they can't really afford to do that IMO. If he improves further he has you over the proverbial barrel. I don't like it, but he's going to be better than any other option AGAIN.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-05-2014 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10346674)
Save the hyperbole.

If you think this was a team loss, then you're exactly what TK said.

A miserable human being.

No sane, rational person would put any of this loss on the offense or Alex Smith. It's cherry picking bullshit that wants to paint everyone as the culprit when there was only one side of the ball that didn't hold up their bargain.

44 ****ing points playing without Charles and his 2nd WR and you want to tell me this was a team loss. **** off with the sports cliches.

What a perfect post.

007 01-05-2014 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10346674)
Save the hyperbole.

If you think this was a team loss, then you're exactly what TK said.

A miserable human being.

No sane, rational person would put any of this loss on the offense or Alex Smith. It's cherry picking bullshit that wants to paint everyone as the culprit when there was only one side of the ball that didn't hold up their bargain.

44 ****ing points playing without Charles and his 2nd WR and you want to tell me this was a team loss. **** off with the sports cliches.

Whatever dude. Where the flying **** did I put the whole loss on Smith you dipshit. I said team loss. IT was. Get the **** over it. JFC

The Bad Guy 01-05-2014 03:24 PM

You go into this next off-season with Alex Smith primed to his the FA market and you're going to pay 3 million more per year.

You can't let him walk and he would have all the leverage.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-05-2014 03:24 PM

5 years 90m I think Alex would take it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.