Megatron96 |
03-24-2020 04:03 PM |
At a fundamental level intelligence is about problem-solving. The more easily one can solve a problem, and the more complex the problem is, the more intelligent that person probably is.
I found a concrete example of this when I was still pretty young, probably in my early twenties, when I became aware of a man by the name of Efren Reyes.
Efren was a Filipino national pro pool player. His story was that he was a terrible student in school (probably had some kind of learning disorder but this was back in the '50s), and dropped out of school by 6th grade. Consequently he began spending his time in a pool hall, cleaning, picking up around the place, etc. Eventually he began playing. By the time he was 19 he was one of the best players in the world. He eventually won world titles in every major billiards discipline. He was essentially unbeatable for three decades.
But to understand his genius you had to watch him actually play. He wasn't Tom Brady great; he didn't win because he played the percentages and managed the game perfectly. They called him the "Magician" because of his inventiveness and creativity while problem-solving. Watching him play, and knowing where he came from, I realized that intelligence had nothing to do with education and everything to do with how a person examined a situation and then attacked it. In billiards terms, Efren was/is Michael Jordan, or Patrick Mahomes. Efren broke the game, he was a cheat code.
And I see it nearly every week when I go out and play a few games of pool at the local pool hall. There's no such thing as a dumb good pool player. Many of the people I've played might not have the best educations, some don't speak very well, many have menial-type jobs, and some are borderline criminals, but if they can play well it's because they can think through problems well. They can see their options as they lay in a few seconds, do the 'calculus' to figure out which is the best option vs. the worst, and plan out their shots accordingly. And the good ones also always have a plan B.
A football example might be Dan Marino. He was considered pretty dumb coming out of college, but in his prime I never saw a QB that played the game any smarter. He was a genius at deciphering defenses and understanding where the blitz was coming from, understanding the on-field situations, etc. Maybe he wasn't a Rhodes scholar in the classroom, but he was an Einstein on the field.
|