Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 15893652)

This does bring up a rules question. I have a few big states - CA, TX, FL, NY, maybe one other - where I'll provide more than one candidate to get the field up to the proper 64-mansion field.

In most states, you get a good spread of houses, but in TX I think I'm picking 4 houses and all or nearly all are in one neighborhood in Houston. They're pretty different houses and are all gorgeous legitimate mansions, but they're all within a mile or two of each other. I'm torn between maintaining the system and putting them each up, or replacing at least one with a different property elsewhere in Texas. It's a pretty big state to have all of the candidates in one neighborhood. What do y'all think - stick with the most expensive or spread them out?

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 15893693)

50,000 acres is 78 square miles. That’s a….lot.

Paid for ground makes money man.

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 15893781)

With all that land, money, and time, I'd build enough stuff that future archaeologists would think that a small civilization lived in the area.

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 15893805)

By year 3 in that KS home I'd have to create some type of Squid Games death competition out of sheer boredom

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 15893555)

If you can get it from a bank, it's better. USDA sucks.

Originally Posted by mac459 (Post 15893855)

Also **** FSA, hated working with those ****s

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 15893652)

This does bring up a rules question. I have a few big states - CA, TX, FL, NY, maybe one other - where I'll provide more than one candidate to get the field up to the proper 64-mansion field.

In most states, you get a good spread of houses, but in TX I think I'm picking 4 houses and all or nearly all are in one neighborhood in Houston. They're pretty different houses and are all gorgeous legitimate mansions, but they're all within a mile or two of each other. I'm torn between maintaining the system and putting them each up, or replacing at least one with a different property elsewhere in Texas. It's a pretty big state to have all of the candidates in one neighborhood. What do y'all think - stick with the most expensive or spread them out?

Originally Posted by EPodolak (Post 15893980)

5M for that 90's era Delaware place seems steep. I like that it's waterfront there at least, and all the neighbors aren't coyotes and cornstalks. Like to know the reason the KS place is for sale two years after it was built, not that it matters. Not a fan of either of these places.