ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   How Many Yards Will Deshaun Foster Rush for Sunday (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=98862)

Mr. Laz 09-17-2004 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
There's that double-standard again.

it would be a double standard if i was doing what i think your implying


i ASSume your talking about a larry johnson/Foster comparison?



i think you have me confuse with someone else again (apparently like the McCardell deal)


my complaint about Johnson is AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN primarily a complaint about picking a RB, when we didn't need a running back.


we should of pick a defensive player


i didn't say Larry johnson was a bust ... i have said that we may have the best group of running backs in the league. I told you that before.


i dont see a double standard here... i see you getting me confused with someone else's comments about larry johnson.

i think lots of people do that same around here

lazarus = negative ... so revisionists history sooner or later everybody remembers that it was me that said whatever negative comment was made.

i've made no decision about larry johnson's talent ... but i have made a decision that the chiefs picking larry johnson was a bad fuggin pick.


being redundant here to try and get my point across... and see if someone can actually remember it.


larry johnson = possible good RB

chiefs using 1st RD pick on a RB in the 2003 draft = crappy


any questions??

htismaqe 09-17-2004 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazarus
it would be a double standard if i was doing what i think your implying


i ASSume your talking about a larry johnson/Foster comparison?



i think you have me confuse with someone else again (apparently like the McCardell deal)


my complaint about Johnson is AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN primarily a complaint about picking a RB, when we didn't need a running back.


we should of pick a defensive player


i didn't say Larry johnson was a bust ... i have said that we may have the best group of running backs in the league. I told you that before.


i dont see a double standard here... i see you getting me confused with someone else's comments about larry johnson.

i think lots of people do that same around here

lazarus = negative ... so revisionists history sooner or later everybody remembers that it was me that said whatever negative comment was made.

i've made no decision about larry johnson's talent ... but i have made a decision that the chiefs picking larry johnson was a bad fuggin pick.


being redundant here to try and get my point across... and see if someone can actually remember it.


larry johnson = possible good RB

chiefs using 1st RD pick on a RB in the 2003 draft = crappy


any questions??

Nope, my bad. I must have confused you with someone else.

alanm 09-17-2004 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990
Not yet...but you know whats gonna happen...we will go anywhere from 10-6 to 12-4. We will make the playoffs based on the strength of our offense....But once we get into the playoffs and have to face a real team we will choke once again......i can see another letdown coming.

That's it. Turn in your rose colored glasses and mail me all your Chiefs gear. I'll PM my address. Just make sure you wash your shit before you box it up.ROFL

patteeu 09-17-2004 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Foster's career long rush is TWENTY ONE yards.

In that case, all signs point toward a career afternoon for Foster this Sunday.

*edit* I see that you've covered this territory already. Nevemind. */edit*

Hammock Parties 09-17-2004 11:16 PM

Htismaque is right, fellas.

Throw in the fact that the Panthers have no one to stretch the field, unless you count Keary Colbert, and Our Dbs will be playing closer to the line as well.

I'm going to be pissed if Foster goes for over 120 on us.

KcMizzou 09-17-2004 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBret
I'm going to be pissed if Foster goes for over 120 on us.

He won't break 80.

David. 09-17-2004 11:20 PM

He could run for 400 for all I care as long as we win.

htismaqe 09-18-2004 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBret
Htismaque is right, fellas.

Throw in the fact that the Panthers have no one to stretch the field, unless you count Keary Colbert, and Our Dbs will be playing closer to the line as well.

I'm going to be pissed if Foster goes for over 120 on us.

Please don't agree with me. Thanks.

the Talking Can 09-18-2004 06:48 AM

not sure what stats have to do with it....our D usually allows people to have career days.....that's why our defense sucks

patteeu 09-18-2004 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Please don't agree with me. Thanks.

ROFL

Gaz 09-18-2004 06:55 AM

Marginal improvement, at best...
 

Between 50 & 100 yards; somewhere at the top of that range.

Our Defense is still raw. Add to that the loss of Holliday [not a HUGE loss, IMO] and Wesley [that’s a biggun] and the addition of Mitchell [along with some dreadful rookie mistakes], and you can see why I do not expect huge improvements in our D Sunday.

xoxo~
Gaz
Trying to be patient.

the Talking Can 09-18-2004 06:59 AM

I think we need to take baby steps....I'm less concerned with rushing yards than points...let's hold someone to 21 points, I'd consider that a huge victory (even against a wounded offense)

I want this D to show some spine and shut people down in the red zone....field goals instead of TDs, good coverage on 3rd etc....we need to see some more (well, any) 3-and-outs

Hammock Parties 09-18-2004 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Please don't agree with me. Thanks.

ROFL Heaven forbid...

Bowser 09-18-2004 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gaz

Between 50 & 100 yards; somewhere at the top of that range.

Our Defense is still raw. Add to that the loss of Holliday [not a HUGE loss, IMO] and Wesley [that’s a biggun] and the addition of Mitchell [along with some dreadful rookie mistakes], and you can see why I do not expect huge improvements in our D Sunday.

xoxo~
Gaz
Trying to be patient.

Browning may be an improvement over Holliday. Holliday looked like he was sleep walking against the Donkeys, with the exception of his sack. But he wasn't even blocked on that play.

htismaqe 09-18-2004 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser
Browning may be an improvement over Holliday. Holliday looked like he was sleep walking against the Donkeys, with the exception of his sack. But he wasn't even blocked on that play.

I really want to see Browning on the outside with Siavii starting next to Sims.

The future is NOW!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.