ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football ESPN NEWS: Shanahan to KC? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200946)

Anyong Bluth 01-23-2009 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 5420520)
I think the deal may be almost done but the Chiefs need to keep it down because they need to interview a minority candidate to satisfy the Rooney Rule. If they're openly in talks with Shanahan and have a preliminary agreement they're not even going to get guys go come in for interviews because it would be a farce.

We all have seen that the front office is pretty tight-lipped these days- whose to say Herm didn't already know a few days ago? Gun took a job before anyone was fired. They could have easily kept it mum, let Herm know and to sit on it, and already conducted a minority interview while feeling out Shanny's interest...


Crazy, I know, but we live in Pioli times...

Hammock Parties 01-23-2009 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 5420598)
If you are wrong, I'm going to fly to Houston and rip out your spine.

I'm supremely confident this is happening.

The only reason to can Herm today was to allow Shanahan to settle comfortably into his office chair and eat the leftover fig newtons.

DrRyan 01-23-2009 06:37 PM

Wow, I am shocked at this. Could this be the resurgence of LJ? Shanahan has made 1,000 yard RBs of dudes off the scrap heap. Who knows what he can do with LJ if he can keep his head on straight.

dirk digler 01-23-2009 06:37 PM

Interesting tidbit from Blob Gretz
Quote:

Shanahan spoke to former Chiefs defensive coordinator Gunther Cunningham from a golf course in Cabo San Lucas in Mexico on Thursday.

BigRock 01-23-2009 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5420592)
I'm not going to argue with you.

Nick nailed this stuff. From beginning to end. No one else was close.

Does the WPI hiring process involve drinking the blood of Kali from a skull, like in Temple of Doom? If someone burned you with a torch, would you snap out of it?

The Franchise 01-23-2009 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5420613)
Interesting tidbit from Blob Gretz

Yeah....he probably spoke with him telling him to get the **** out of the building before he gets there.

KC Dan 01-23-2009 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5420592)
I'm not going to argue with you.

Nick nailed this stuff. From beginning to end. No one else was close.

F --- Nick the d*ck!!! No-nothing-sh*tbag.

jspchief 01-23-2009 06:39 PM

When someone posted that Mort was siting Jack Harry as his source, I knew this was starting to lose steam.

Hammock Parties 01-23-2009 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 5420614)
Does the WPI hiring process involve drinking the blood of Kali from a skull, like in Temple of Doom? If someone burned you with a torch, would you snap out of it?

When we ban people, we rip their still-beating hearts out of their chests and lower them into a molten pit.

The Bad Guy 01-23-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 5420623)
When someone posted that Mort was siting Jack Harry as his source, I knew this was starting to lose steam.

He didn't cite him as a source.

He said he heard this rumor from an NBC affiliate on Wednesday, and it had absolutely no legs then.

FringeNC 01-23-2009 06:42 PM

The supposed Kyle Shanahan comments take on a little more significance now....

MIAdragon 01-23-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5420611)
fig newtons.

mmmmm, fig newtons.....

The Bad Guy 01-23-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5420625)
When we ban people, we rip their still-beating hearts out of their chests and lower them into a molten pit.

And then force them to live in their parents' basement with no real job.

orange 01-23-2009 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 5420557)
From the ESPN.com article:

However, a league source said that Hunt has focused on Shanahan after hiring Scott Pioli as the team's general manager. The source said Hunt did research on the last 19 coaches who have been hired in the NFL and determined their average salary to range between $2 million and $3 million, which would be an acceptable proposal by the NFL Management Council. Broncos owner Pat Bowlen would be obligated to pay the balance of Shanahan's three-year contract at approximately $6.5 million per year.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3855917

Why on earth would Shanahan go along with this? He's going to burn up a 20 year friendship - not just between him and Pat Bowlen, but their families as well - to give the billionaire Hunt family salary relief - all the while making only as much as he would have going to the golf course every day? Get real.

Nightfyre 01-23-2009 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420640)
Why on earth would Shanahan go along with this? He's going to burn up a 20 year friendship - not just between him and Pat Bowlen, but their families as well - to give the billionaire Hunt family salary relief - all the while making only as much as he would have going to the golf course every day? Get real.

Hm. Wasn't Shanahan pretty much ambushed by his 20 year friend firing him?

Baby Lee 01-23-2009 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5420625)
When we ban people, we rip their still-beating hearts out of their chests and lower them into a molten pit.

Can't get to me, I'm hiding in a fridge.

ETA - please Fraz, don't shot!!!

The Bad Guy 01-23-2009 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420640)
Why on earth would Shanahan go along with this? He's going to burn up a 20 year friendship - not just between him and Pat Bowlen, but their families as well - to give the billionaire Hunt family salary relief - all the while making only as much as he would have going to the golf course every day? Get real.

I must have missed the memo where Shanahan quit and wasn't FIRED.

Hammock Parties 01-23-2009 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420640)
PLEASE, GOD, NO! NOT MIKE SHANAHAN! ANYONE BUT MIKE SHANAHAN! COACHING THE CHIEFS? PLEASE, GOD, NO, OH GOD, NO THIS IS TERRIBLE! WHY DID YOU HAVE TO FIRE SHANNY, PAT? WHY? WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY?

Yup.

Dylan 01-23-2009 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 5420330)
It's not a matter of NFL.com giving anything. It's a matter of people having reliable contacts close to the situation.

Then you might want to read this piece by Tim Arango, published in The New York Times. Arango is a corporate media reporter, who breaks more stories than any business journalist in the country. His news articles are highly publicized on networks and are followed closely by Wall Street and Fortune 500 companies.

The article below by Tim Arango, he writes "Who owns sports coverage." Very interesting read.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/bu...ll&oref=slogin

RedThat 01-23-2009 06:50 PM

Okay so what if the Chiefs are negotiating right now, could they negotiate with Todd Haley right now? Or do they have to wait until after the SB...just curious to know if Haley is in the picture?

dirk digler 01-23-2009 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 5420623)
When someone posted that Mort was siting Jack Harry as his source, I knew this was starting to lose steam.

Mort was just on 810 here and he said he had 3 sources and the one of his most reliable sources said that the Chiefs were negotiating with Shanahan.

I doubt that would be Jack Harry.

orange 01-23-2009 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5420649)
I must have missed the memo where Shanahan quit and wasn't FIRED.

I must have missed the memo/interview where Shanahan blew up and vowed revenge. All I recall him saying was good things about Bowlen and his time with the Broncos.

Maybe you can supply a link or something since you're so close the situation.

cdcox 01-23-2009 06:52 PM

More than anything, it looks like the Chiefs have worked a deal for Shanahan (or are very, very close) and they are just downplaying the thing to give the Chiefs the time needed to go through the motions of satisfying the Rooney rule.

Hammock Parties 01-23-2009 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 5420674)
More than anything, it looks like the Chiefs have worked a deal for Shanahan (or are very, very close) and they are just downplaying the thing to give the Chiefs the time needed to go through the motions of satisfying the Rooney rule.

Yup.

Like I said, no other reason to fire Herm today, no other reason for all this to leak today.

Nightfyre 01-23-2009 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420671)
I must have missed the memo/interview where Shanahan blew up and vowed revenge. All I recall him saying was good things about Bowlen and his time with the Broncos.

Maybe you can supply a link or something since you're so close the situation.

It looks like Schefter is still in denial!

Taco John 01-23-2009 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5420683)
Yup.

Like I said, no other reason to fire Herm today, no other reason for all this to leak today.

That doesn't even make any sense. Why would firing Herm today have any significance? Why today over any other day?

RedThat 01-23-2009 06:55 PM

Man does curiousity ever kill the cat

Nightwish 01-23-2009 06:55 PM

So, if Shanarat does come to KC, will we still get to call him Shanarat?

Hammock Parties 01-23-2009 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5420687)
That doesn't even make any sense. Why would firing Herm today have any significance? Why today over any other day?

It makes complete sense. Why today? For what other reason?

They could have fired him last week. They didn't, because Shanahan was still playing golf or getting his toes waxed or whatever the hell he does.

chiefsfan4life1978 01-23-2009 06:56 PM

I don't have any good reason why I feel this way, but I don't think Shanahan is on his way to K.C.

Archie Bunker 01-23-2009 06:57 PM

Mort is in full retreat on ESPN News.

cdcox 01-23-2009 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightwish (Post 5420691)
So, if Shanarat does come to KC, will we still get to call him Shanarat?

I plan to. He's still a rat, he'd just be our rat.

Hammock Parties 01-23-2009 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 5420700)
I plan to. He's still a rat, he'd just be our rat.

After three years of goody-two-shoes, we need a Rat.

Nightfyre 01-23-2009 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5420687)
That doesn't even make any sense. Why would firing Herm today have any significance? Why today over any other day?

Do you think they were just letting Herm's assistants walk without KNOWING they were going to fire him? They officially fired him TODAY, the last day they could before the Super Bowl. To me, this indicates that they know who they are hiring, or else they would have let him dangle until after the Super Bowl. I'm not saying it's Shanahan. I'm saying they know who they are hiring; and I suspect they will announce it tonight.

RedThat 01-23-2009 06:59 PM

The rat would be a good thing. At least we'd have a guy who'd take divisional games seriously. Unlike Herm, "ah it's just like another game."

bishop_74 01-23-2009 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5420704)
After three years of goody-two-shoes, we need a Rat.

So according to your sources are we hiring Shanahan without a shadow of a doubt?

DeezNutz 01-23-2009 07:01 PM

The Shanahan offense:

http://www.hickorytales.com/images/circus1.jpg

eazyb81 01-23-2009 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archie Bunker (Post 5420698)
Mort is in full retreat on ESPN News.

What is he saying?

I've been out of the loop all day.

What a day to not have internet or tv access.

dirk digler 01-23-2009 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5420687)
That doesn't even make any sense. Why would firing Herm today have any significance? Why today over any other day?

Probably due to the fact that is has been 10 days since Pioli's has been hired so why the long wait unless they had a candidate signed sealed and delivered.

DrRyan 01-23-2009 07:03 PM

So what is the just of what Mort and others are saying on ESPN now? Is he back tracking or is a Shanahan hire likely/imminent?

kcpasco 01-23-2009 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrRyan (Post 5420725)
So what is the just of what Mort and others are saying on ESPN now? Is he back tracking or is a Shanahan hire likely/imminent?

Chiefs are currently ressurecting the corpse of Hank Stram

bishop_74 01-23-2009 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 5420728)
Chiefs are currently ressurecting the corpse of Hank Stram

Nice...

Archie Bunker 01-23-2009 07:05 PM

Mort saying he has spoke with 5 sources.

1 says deal is near

1 says Shanahan is Clark's target

1 Chiefs official says it doubtful it's Shanahan

Then went on to discuss how secretive Clark is and talked about other candidates.

BigChiefFan 01-23-2009 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420671)
I must have missed the memo/interview where Shanahan blew up and vowed revenge. All I recall him saying was good things about Bowlen and his time with the Broncos.

Maybe you can supply a link or something since you're so close the situation.

You must have missed Bowlen saying he prefered ShanaCAN not going to KC.

orange 01-23-2009 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5420723)
Probably due to the fact that is has been 10 days since Pioli's has been hired so why the long wait unless they had a candidate signed sealed and delivered.

Scott Pioli: "Since my arrival last week, Herm and I have had several conversations as part of my overall evaluation of the football operation," Pioli said in a statement. "After careful consideration, Clark and I felt that it was best to make a change. What I conveyed last week in the press conference I still believe to be true -- Herm is a great man and a tremendous football coach. He respects the game and the league, and he is passionate about his players and his craft.

"Over the course of this last week, I have also spent time meeting and visiting with most of the assistant coaches, and I will continue to do so over the next several days. All of the coaches from last year's staff, with the exception of one, are under contract through the 2009 season."



Isn't it just barely possible that Pioli is telling the truth here?

Nightfyre 01-23-2009 07:07 PM

I love how all of a sudden the media is rushing out to their sources FOR THE CHIEFS FOR ONCE.

Nightfyre 01-23-2009 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420737)
Scott Pioli: "Since my arrival last week, Herm and I have had several conversations as part of my overall evaluation of the football operation," Pioli said in a statement. "After careful consideration, Clark and I felt that it was best to make a change. What I conveyed last week in the press conference I still believe to be true -- Herm is a great man and a tremendous football coach. He respects the game and the league, and he is passionate about his players and his craft.

"Over the course of this last week, I have also spent time meeting and visiting with most of the assistant coaches, and I will continue to do so over the next several days. All of the coaches from last year's staff, with the exception of one, are under contract through the 2009 season."



Isn't it just barely possible that Pioli is telling the truth here?

Not at all.

orange 01-23-2009 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5420736)
You must have missed Bowlen saying he prefered ShanaCAN not going to KC.

I don't know what relevance that would have one way or the other.

Here's one thing I DIDN'T miss:

But ultimately, most of his sentiments were saved for Bowlen. As he mentioned the owner's name, Shanahan had to pause more than once to collect himself.

"It's tough because he's a great friend," he said. "He'll always be my great friend. The best owner in sports. I appreciate every opportunity he gave me to be successful. You have to make tough decisions in any organization, and Pat made a tough decision. . . . I've got no problem with it."

ChiefBrad 01-23-2009 07:11 PM

We Don't want rat face
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5419571)
Per the ticker...

Kansas City near deal with Mike Shanahan to be Chiefs HC.

He is a BRONCO NOT A CHIEF

oaklandhater 01-23-2009 07:12 PM

NFLN just said that shanahan is not in the running for Chiefs HC

kcpasco 01-23-2009 07:13 PM

All this speculation and having reporters running around like chickens with their heads cut off make me want to high five Pioli.

eazyb81 01-23-2009 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefBrad (Post 5420749)
He is a BRONCO NOT A CHIEF

YEAH! Marcus Allen sucks too!!!!!1111

Nightfyre 01-23-2009 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 5420754)
NFLN just said the shanahan not in the running for Chiefs HC

monthsbehind.

DrRyan 01-23-2009 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 5420728)
Chiefs are currently ressurecting the corpse of Hank Stram

Thanks smartass.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archie Bunker (Post 5420734)
Mort saying he has spoke with 5 sources.

1 says deal is near

1 says Shanahan is Clark's target

1 Chiefs official says it doubtful it's Shanahan

Then went on to discuss how secretive Clark is and talked about other candidates.

More of what I was looking for. One of my best friend's is a life long Donkey fan and he is close to the edge ready to jump if the Rat lands in KC.

BigChiefFan 01-23-2009 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420748)
I don't know what relevance that would have one way or the other.

Here's one thing I DIDN'T miss:

But ultimately, most of his sentiments were saved for Bowlen. As he mentioned the owner's name, Shanahan had to pause more than once to collect himself.

"It's tough because he's a great friend," he said. "He'll always be my great friend. The best owner in sports. I appreciate every opportunity he gave me to be successful. You have to make tough decisions in any organization, and Pat made a tough decision. . . . I've got no problem with it."

The relevance is, he was FIRED by that so-called loyal friend. He owes Bowlen zilch now, friendship or not. What better way to say **** you and to show Bowlen how much he screwed up than to accept the KC job and kick the Broncos asses every year. Remember, revenge, is a dish, best served cold.

missinDThomas 01-23-2009 07:16 PM

I'll bet money it is Paul Pasqualoni. He is defense minded, experienced, and Parcell's boy.

BigChiefFan 01-23-2009 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 5420754)
NFLN just said that shanahan is not in the running for Chiefs HC

Yea, because they said so. Sorry, every available coach is in the running as far as I'm concerned.

ChiefsCountry 01-23-2009 07:16 PM

Denver and Oakland will be getting yearly ass kickings if Shanahan comes here.

FloridaMan88 01-23-2009 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by missinDThomas (Post 5420769)
I'll bet money it is Paul Pasqualoni. He is defense minded, experienced, and Parcell's boy.

Out of all the candidates being rumored this would be the worst choice.

dirk digler 01-23-2009 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420737)
Scott Pioli: "Since my arrival last week, Herm and I have had several conversations as part of my overall evaluation of the football operation," Pioli said in a statement. "After careful consideration, Clark and I felt that it was best to make a change. What I conveyed last week in the press conference I still believe to be true -- Herm is a great man and a tremendous football coach. He respects the game and the league, and he is passionate about his players and his craft.

"Over the course of this last week, I have also spent time meeting and visiting with most of the assistant coaches, and I will continue to do so over the next several days. All of the coaches from last year's staff, with the exception of one, are under contract through the 2009 season."



Isn't it just barely possible that Pioli is telling the truth here?

It is entirely possible. I think the confusing part for all of us is why it took him 10 days to decide to fire Herm.

Nightfyre 01-23-2009 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5420777)
It is entirely possible. I think the confusing part for all of us is why it took him 10 days to decide to fire Herm.

Yea, it would be real ****ing methodical to move forward without a plan. GG.

orange 01-23-2009 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5420767)
The relevance is, he was FIRED by that so-called loyal friend. He owes Bowlen zilch now, friendship or not. What better way to say **** you and to show Bowlen how much he screwed up than to accept the KC job and kick the Broncos asses every year. Remember, revenge, is a dish, best served cold.

That statement I quoted was from the press conference where Shanahan's firing was announced, you understand. He already knew he was fired.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he wouldn't coach the Chiefs. I'm just saying he wouldn't go along with the scheme that ESPN reported that would have Bowlen paying most of his salary while coaching the Chiefs. There's no reason to do that other than pettiness - a sentiment totally foreign to those he has already expressed regarding Bowlen.

(You would have to dig through several pages of this thread to get back to my original comment.)

RedThat 01-23-2009 07:21 PM

We need the rat we gotta break that losing streak at Mile high once and for all!!

Nightfyre 01-23-2009 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420790)
That statement I quoted was from the press conference where Shanahan's firing was announced, you understand. He already knew he was fired.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he wouldn't coach the Chiefs. I'm just saying he wouldn't go along with the scheme that ESPN reported that would have Bowlen paying most of his salary while coaching the Chiefs. There's no reason to do that other than pettiness - a sentiment totally foreign to those he has already expressed regarding Bowlen.

(You would have to dig through several pages of this thread to get back to my original comment.)

It's strategically beneficial for him to hamstring Bowlen if he were to coach here. :shrug:

kcpasco 01-23-2009 07:22 PM

Pioli just fired Herm

I'm confident whoever he hires as the next HC will be the right decision

orange 01-23-2009 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5420773)
Denver and Oakland will be getting yearly ass kickings if Shanahan comes here.

Be careful what you wish for. You know Shanahan has never been able to win in Kansas City. :doh!:

dirk digler 01-23-2009 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420790)
That statement I quoted was from the press conference where Shanahan's firing was announced, you understand. He already knew he was fired.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he wouldn't coach the Chiefs. I'm just saying he wouldn't go along with the scheme that ESPN reported that would have Bowlen paying most of his salary while coaching the Chiefs. There's no reason to do that other than pettiness - a sentiment totally foreign to those he has already expressed regarding Bowlen.

(You would have to dig through several pages of this thread to get back to my original comment.)

It is in his contract that if he got a job he would have to pay the difference for the next 3 years IIRC. I believe he owes Shanahan $7 million a year.

orange 01-23-2009 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 5420796)
It's strategically beneficial for him to hamstring Bowlen if he were to coach here. :shrug:

This wouldn't hamstring Bowlen in any way as far as football operations go - there's no salary cap for coaches.

It would just be taking money out of Bowlen's pocket and putting into Hunt's.

cdcox 01-23-2009 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420790)
That statement I quoted was from the press conference where Shanahan's firing was announced, you understand. He already knew he was fired.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he wouldn't coach the Chiefs. I'm just saying he wouldn't go along with the scheme that ESPN reported that would have Bowlen paying most of his salary while coaching the Chiefs. There's no reason to do that other than pettiness - a sentiment totally foreign to those he has already expressed regarding Bowlen.

(You would have to dig through several pages of this thread to get back to my original comment.)

Money that is not spent on Shanaha's salary can be spent on signing bonuses. Gives the rat a competitive advantage. Business, not personal.

Nightfyre 01-23-2009 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420806)
This wouldn't hamstring Bowlen in any way as far as football operations go - there's no salary cap for coaches.

It would just be taking money out of Bowlen's pocket and putting into Hunt's.

Or putting it into his own on a deferred basis.

RedThat 01-23-2009 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420799)
Be careful what you wish for. You know Shanahan has never been able to win in Kansas City. :doh!:

and thats a great thing because he wouldn't have to coach against them:p

JuicesFlowing 01-23-2009 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420799)
Be careful what you wish for. You know Shanahan has never been able to win in Kansas City. :doh!:

Herm hasn't been able to win anywhere.

DaFace 01-23-2009 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420799)
Be careful what you wish for. You know Shanahan has never been able to win in Kansas City. :doh!:

Heh. Good point.

ChiefsCountry 01-23-2009 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420799)
Be careful what you wish for. You know Shanahan has never been able to win in Kansas City. :doh!:

He won here when it really matterd.

orange 01-23-2009 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5420801)
It is in his contract that if he got a job he would have to pay the difference for the next 3 years IIRC. I believe he owes Shanahan $7 million a year.

He still owes Shanahan the full amount even if Shanahan doesn't work - and is going to pay it without any problem, as far I've heard.

Shanahan has no reason whatsoever to take less from the Chiefs. That $7 million is the market price for Mike Shanahan.

dirk digler 01-23-2009 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420806)
This wouldn't hamstring Bowlen in any way as far as football operations go - there's no salary cap for coaches.

It would just be taking money out of Bowlen's pocket and putting into Hunt's.

It is beneficial to Bowlen that Shanahan get a job so instead of paying him $7 million dollars the next 3 years he will only have to pay a portion of that.

orange 01-23-2009 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull (Post 5420810)
and thats a great thing because he wouldn't have to coach against them:p

He'd only be coaching a mere eight games a year in KC. :eek:

Color Red 01-23-2009 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5420773)
Denver and Oakland will be getting yearly ass kickings if Shanahan comes here.

And the thought of that happening is precisely why, anti-bronco sentiment aside, Chiefs should consider The Rat coming to KC.

Job 1 in the NFL: win your division.

Imagine bringing in a coach who absolutely knows the strategy of teams that you will play over a third of your yearly games against.

Some talk has been mentioned of what Pioli will do with 1) Herm; 2) Gonzo; 3) LJ. Shanny takes care of everything. He replaces Herm. His best years in Denver were when he was making Sharpe a HOF tight end. And don't you think LJ could get excited about the cutback blocking schemes perfected in Denver? (LJ just needs to quit spitting drinks in women's faces.)

I think Shanny wants a job. Bowlen already owes him a boatload for the rest of his Bronco contract, unless The Rat would take something less for just being a field manager.

And yes, Shanny has loved sticking it to his former boss Al Davis. Wouldn't he like to double his pleasure? Sure Bowlen is his friend. But Shanny is a nasty competitor and would like to bring it to Mile High City every year. You bet he would.

Mr. Flopnuts 01-23-2009 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5420640)
Why on earth would Shanahan go along with this? He's going to burn up a 20 year friendship - not just between him and Pat Bowlen, but their families as well - to give the billionaire Hunt family salary relief - all the while making only as much as he would have going to the golf course every day? Get real.

You think taking the job in KC isn't burning that friendship up by itself? Pat already said KC was the only team he didn't want to see Mike go to. Also, how friendly would you be with the guy that just fired you? Mike has a tendency to like to stick it to his former employers and KC is a perfect opportunity to do it 25% of the time. He won't get that percentage anywhere else.

The Bad Guy 01-23-2009 07:29 PM

I really don't think this is happening.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.