Englis please

Clancy Pendergast is a ****ing tool that Arizona fans bless the day he got shit-canned.

Get ****ing real you clown.

No one here thinks Pendergast was even a remotely decent hire.

You are just an illiterate dickbag who loves to generalize.

They did not draft Sanchez?

No shit but people here were saying how he was good and how Arizona didnt have much more talent then the Chiefs.

I'm not too pissy about this, because Pendergast was a really late hire when there weren't many options left and because I think he's actually done quite a bit despite having limited 3-4 talent to work with.

That being said... the interesting thing about Pendergast is, he fielded an awesome defense a few years ago when Arizona was in a 4-3. I think he takes a lot of unnecessary heat for coaching a transition defense and arguably a defense he wasn't that comfortable with.

I don't remember very many people (if any) that were excited about Pendergast

You're such a stiff its funny. You gonna beat me up internet tough guy?

I'd correct that statement only to add "today" at the end. I have some faith held out that this won't continue into coming games/seasons, but that line is a joke and until something is done about it, unfortunately I don't see a lot changing this year.

On an aside, regardless of piss-poor line play, Larry is done.

I don't fault them for bringing in their QB. Pioli saw Cassel as his long term man, even over those they had the potential of drafting. With that as the case, you pull the trigger regardless of whatever else you have in place.

Now should they have focused on OL above DL this year? One could make a damn good argument for it, but they chose the path they chose. If, 3 years from now, the OL's been fixed, Cassel is still in one piece and playing well, and Jackson and Magee are important pieces of a solid 3-4 line, nearly everything in this thread will be moot and forgotten.

On the other hand, if the OL's still in tatters, Cassel's been broken in half, and our DL picks are more like Ryan Sims, Junior Siavii, and Eric Downing then Haley most likely will be gone, and Pioli will have shown to be a major fraud.

They've made their bed for the year, we all know it's going to be a multi-year process... might as well sit back, enjoy the ride, and be glad we're not the detroit lio...crap, never mind on that last one...

Also The Internet Tough Guy thoguht Crennel would be the defensive line coach and Pendergast the D-cordinator. Talk about being teh stupid.

I'm not sure it matters who is running this defense... it's really devoid of talent outside of Flowers and possibly T. Jackson and Dorsey... you can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit...

Shouldn't those roles be reversed? I mean, you know, in a SANE world?

who ended up hiring Decosta?

He's the Director of Player Personnel for the Raven's

http://www.baltimoreravens.com/Peopl...c_DeCosta.aspx

I'm pretty sure there were only three openings, and in two of those, the owner hired the Head Coach first, and then hired the GM that was pretty much hand picked by the head coach.

The Chiefs were the only team to hire the GM first.

Make that 4 openings.

the Lions just promoted from within.

i know. the question was actually to make that very point. people say we should have hired decosta all the time. MAYBE decosta didnt WANT the job. oh and why didnt ANY other team hire him?

You got the point there.:D milky always comes through. good response, but i feel as though if he was such a HOT prospect he would have at least gotten some play.

The thing about the Cardinals not having much more talent than KC on defense was used numerous times I recall those posts.

I said things about the talent level of the cards. I never compared them to us though, just said maybe they werent as talented as YOU thought

With the minimal openings, the Lions not even looking outside the organization, The Browns and Donkeys letting their HC hand pick the GM they wanted to work with, and Clark Hunt seemingly single minded in his focus on Pioli, the fact that DeCosta didn't get any play isn't surprising at all.

I think that is exactly what a number of people said.

how many others did clark supposedly interview? was decosta one of them?

yeah i dont remember many others comparing us to them either. maybe some but definitely not the majority

I don't remember if we ever were told any names.

If we did, they weren't memorable.

spilt milk sure is sour.

i hope haley has till at least the end of next season before he gets canned

i dont remember either, but maybe we did talk to decosta.


Then again maybe he didnt want to talk, and with the way things are could you blame him?

I'm always sour.

Thanks for noticing.

...that's why you're a milkman!

We weren't told any names, dates, or places, and Hunt WAS fixated on Pioli. They were talking WELL before the end of the season.

did you get the same message on your answering machine that the assclown did?

The folks that couldn't get their minds wraped around the fact that the 2009 season is really an extended 2010 preseason are going to have a cornary before the end of the year.

I predicted all of this after our draft and I have peace of mind right now.

Accept it don't fight it. Without an oline this team can't do anything. Hopefully we can have a decent one next season. No amount of good coaching can overcome this weakness. It can only be fixed during the offseason. We just have to wait until next year.
Posted via Mobile Device

You really put thought into this post?

ROFL at best!

I imagine that's supposed to be an insult of some kind, but I'm not insulted.

I like doing what I do, and don't concern myself with people that think it's somehow demeaning and beneath them.

No, that phone call went to PetroDouche, who passed it on to all of us.

point remains the same

What point is that?

That if you didn't directly hear it come from someone's mouth, that you'll doubt its legitimacy?

ALL KC MEDIA ARE LIARS!!11!!1111one!!!!1111eleventy

America would have weak and brittle bones without the Milkman. What would the world be without if "Chiefs Elvis" never existed?

Everything is awesome, there are no problems, and Pioli is TEH GOD-MAN!

the point is that some media members have things called agendas that sometimes skew the way they portray the things they hear. i dont put much stock into "anonoymous sources". if you want to believe that go right ahead. Me? if someone wont put a name to the quote i take it with a grain if salt.

milk.goes.sour.

there are plenty of jobs to be done, and more importantly, done well.

nope but thanks anyway

My apoloigies then for misunderstanding.

Claiming a guy has an agenda, and implying a guy is flat-out lying are two different things.

If you want to spend the season wearing one of these, go right ahead:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2274/...5543da1791.jpg

...no prob, I blame floppy...you can too if you want.

I can't blame my boy.

I still owe him too many child support payments.

I am afraid that Haley might have lost the team today.

My hope is that he's not able to find it again. (I haven't read the entire thread so sorry if this is a repost. :harumph:)

ROFL

Really? but having an agenda WILL make someone skew a story to make it sound different than what ACTUALLY happen. How hard is this to understand?

Really?

People can't have an agenda without flat-out lying in the process?

Must suck to live life with trust issues.

Where did i say that? oh i didnt.

Look man there are plenty of sandy vaginas here that need a douchebag, i'm not one of them so go answer THEIR page, i must have dialed the wrong number or something.

Sometimes it's better to be a sandy vagina than a dumb ****.

how do YOU differentiate? YOU are both at the same time.

Where did you say that? Look in your own post.

If what is reported is any different than what actually happened, then they are ****ing lying.

You'd rather bury your head in the sand and think that Petro, Whitlock, et al are lying, skewing, whatever you want to call it - rather than use your brain and realize that if they were doing what you claimed, they'd be fired as journalists.

You're claiming neither of them have any journalistic integrity.

I'm calling BS - neither are going to risk their job and reputation over the things that you're disputing.

Not bad.

For a dumb ****.

You are one stupid mother****er. Who would KNOW if what they are saying is true or not? WHO?

oh and i never said that they HAD to be lying to have an agenda. read that post again. i said an agenda will make someone skew a story to make it sound different. happens all the time. you leave out some words, move some around and you have all the basics of the story but it sounds totally different than what ACTUALLY happened. If YOU dont think it happens in journalism then you sir are VERY naive, but i wouldnt doubt that you have lived a life in a glass box just gazing out on the perfect world around you

I don't recall anybody suggesting Pendergast was "good".

As for the talent, there were people here trying to suggest that Arizona's defense was loaded with top-tier talent and the only thing holding them back was Clancy.

Meh. They promoted from within as opposed to trying to secure a name.

THAT'S LYING, YOU CARBON MONOXIDE BREATHING ****STICK.

NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.

EMBELLISHMENT = NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.

SKEWING A STORY = NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.


*Caps emphasis courtesy of the author

Perhaps you would like to borrow 'Sauto Discipline Stick'?

http://k-9sportsupply.com/images/cat...ane%20whip.JPG

Sauto, Sauto, Sauto.

:shake:

Nice to see that you are still sucking off hamas, or are too stupid to come up with something original.

and i will stand by my statement. it's not lying if you just change around the words to make it seem like what you want it to say. Sorry if you and your little brain cant figure that out. happens all the time in news articles. and in an OPINION, again OPINION piece there isnt the same level of scrutiny on what you are writing. Hell he writes about fictional stuff all the time.