ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Thoughts on Preseason Game #2 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=262553)

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8832051)
The thing is....Dexter is looking like a guy that will play A LOT more than he thinks

Based on what?

He is not the #3 when Bowe returns.

He is the #4.

Dunno why it's so hard for people to see this.

As for me sticking to my guns, if all Dex continues to do is catch dumpoffs, well, shit, I win this whole argument.

Chiefs=Champions 08-19-2012 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8832050)
I'll get over it when people stop defending the pick.

The dude isn't close to our best receiver. LMAO

WHO ****ING CARES WHAT SOME IDIOTS THINK!? Most of the time its people just defending him and not the pick anyway. But you insist upon ruining thread after thread berating the guy.

Honestly you give a lot to this site, but **** it gets annoying.

crazycoffey 08-19-2012 02:00 AM

Oh and mccluster is the least of our worries on offense

DaneMcCloud 08-19-2012 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8832056)
Based on what?

He is not the #3 when Bowe returns.

He is the #4.

Dunno why it's so hard for people to see this.

As for me sticking to my guns, if all Dex continues to do is catch dumpoffs, well, shit, I win this whole argument.

It's all about the defensive matchups.

There will be some teams in which Breaston matches up better and some teams in which McCluster will match up better.

It's a good problem to have.

Chiefs=Champions 08-19-2012 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8832052)
:thumb:



He's only a shitty pick if you compare him to Gronk. Any of other positions that Clay listed weren't positions of need.

Misi wasn't going to replace Belcher. Dunlap is a 4-3 guy. Benn is garbage. So on and so forth.

A very valid argument.

TimeForWasp 08-19-2012 02:01 AM

1 Attachment(s)
What in the hell is NFL.com thinking? That gay ass Irishman with the blue suit?

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs=Good (Post 8832059)
WHO ****ING CARES WHAT SOME IDIOTS THINK!?

I do.

It pains me to see people supporting worthless players like Dexter and Matt.

Chiefs=Champions 08-19-2012 02:02 AM

BTW im of the opinion that Dex will have a good year. After all the looks hes been getting this preseason, the odds are in favor of him featuring a lot this year.

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8832061)
It's all about the defensive matchups.

There will be some teams in which Breaston matches up better and some teams in which McCluster will match up better.

Steve Breaston had 61 catches last year. We won games because of plays he made.

If we take him off the field for a guy who is worthless down the field....and this is one point even the Dexter homers can't argue, the dude IS worthless past 10 yards...Daboll is asinine.

Asinine.

Chiefs=Champions 08-19-2012 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8832064)
I do.

It pains me to see people supporting worthless players like Dexter and Matt.

Im going to walk away now, because i cant bare the thought of typing one more word (good or bad) about Dexter McCluster. The results will speak for themselves, well see...

DaneMcCloud 08-19-2012 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8832066)
Daboll is asinine.

I'd prefer to wait until the regular season before making that determination.

crazycoffey 08-19-2012 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8832056)
Based on what?

He is not the #3 when Bowe returns.

He is the #4.

Dunno why it's so hard for people to see this.

As for me sticking to my guns, if all Dex continues to do is catch dumpoffs, well, shit, I win this whole argument.

Mccluster may well lead the receivers in production. But only because casshole is blind and/or scared

BigMeatballDave 08-19-2012 02:07 AM

Clay, I'm moving to Florida soon and I'm going to visit Dex' restaurant and post pics on here just to spite you.

LOL

DaneMcCloud 08-19-2012 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazycoffey (Post 8832070)
Mccluster may well lead the receivers in production. But only because casshole is blind and/or scared

Whoa. That would be awful.

If McCluster led the Chiefs in receiving yards, they're looking at a 1-15 or 2-14 season.

BossChief 08-19-2012 02:08 AM

Breaston 2011 yards: 810
McClusters 2011 yards: 844 yards

And the trend continues into 2012.

DaneMcCloud 08-19-2012 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8832072)
Clay, I'm moving to Florida soon and I'm going to visit Dex' restaurant and post pics on here just to spite you.

Are you really? Cool man, congrats!

:thumb:

Somehow, I think you'll like it better than Ohio (plus, IIRC, you'll be close to your son).

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8832072)
Clay, I'm moving to Florida soon and I'm going to visit Dex' restaurant and post pics on here just to spite you.

LOL

Take a massive shit and clog one of the toilets.

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazycoffey
Mccluster may well lead the receivers in production. But only because casshole is blind and/or scared

I think this is a real possibility. And Dane is right, we'd suck in this case.

And then I could champion Dexter as the worst Chiefs player ever. :evil:

DaneMcCloud 08-19-2012 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8832074)
Breaston 2011 yards: 810
McClusters 2011 yards: 844 yards

And the trend continues into 2012.

Isn't that total yardage for McCluster and not just receiving yards?

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8832074)
Breaston 2011 yards: 810
McClusters 2011 yards: 844 yards

And the trend continues into 2012.

Pretty sure you're trolling with this post, because only a ****ing idiot would compare RB yards to WR yards, especially when one player is no longer even a RB.

:facepalm:

DaneMcCloud 08-19-2012 02:11 AM

Okay, as "enlightening" as this has been, I'm off to bed.

'Night, All!

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8832077)
Isn't that total yardage for McCluster and not just receiving yards?

Yeah. He had 328 yards receiving.

Mostly on BS dumpoffs.

BossChief 08-19-2012 02:12 AM

Are you claiming that versatility is a hinderance and not a strength?

He averaged 4.5 yards per rush...not exactly poor performance.

crazycoffey 08-19-2012 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 8831238)
well, now there is absolutely no question, this team is ****ed if Cassel goes down.


cough spit ugh

I disagree. We'll be better with an injured matt and Brady's arm throwing deep at least three times a game.

BossChief 08-19-2012 02:15 AM

Let me also say that when you have "bs dumpoff" options like Hillis, Charles and Dexter....I have no problem with Cassel checking down as long as he is throwing passes to the receivers and spreading the ball around.

He does that and those "bs dumpoffs" will be highly effective.

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8832081)
He averaged 4.5 yards per rush...not exactly poor performance.

It was poor enough that he's no longer a RB.

Game, set, match.

Now we get to see him fail as a WR. A position he already failed at as a rookie.

Rasputin 08-19-2012 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8832084)
It was poor enough that he's no longer a RB.

Game, set, match.

Now we get to see him fail as a WR. A position he already failed at as a rookie.

Well he sure has the coaches fooled doesn't he? He is going have a bunch of LBs & DBs fooled too when he makes assclowns out of them. Yep Dex is going have the league fooled just how good he is, but not Clay that is for damn sure.

BossChief 08-19-2012 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8832084)
It was poor enough that he's no longer a RB.

Game, set, match.

Now we get to see him fail as a WR. A position he already failed at as a rookie.

He isn't a running back because the team needed to replace Jones and Battle.

That added with the need to fill the slot receiver role and DMCs hard work towards earning that role have us where we currently are.

With DMC as the full time slot receiver...at least until if/when Wylie takes the job from him.

crazycoffey 08-19-2012 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8831692)
Were we really all that prepared, or were we playing a shitty Arizona team?

The starting D got gashed tonight.

We talked about this at the game. I agree the d got gashed, but I also don't think the d playcalling was anything more than vanilla either. No blitz packages. Just safe regular calls. Don't know if that was planned or if I missed something.

Agree Baldwin was open almost all night, stanzi sucks, poe was on the ground too many times, casshole plays too safe, team didn't seem prepared, and Kellen Clemens isn't much worse than casshole.

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 8832086)
Well he sure has the coaches fooled doesn't he? He is going have a bunch of LBs & DBs fooled too when he makes assclowns out of them. Yep Dex is going have the league fooled just how good he is, but not Clay that is for damn sure.

Dex won't have 400 yards this year.

#4 WR = shit

BigMeatballDave 08-19-2012 02:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8832075)
Are you really? Cool man, congrats!

:thumb:

Somehow, I think you'll like it better than Ohio (plus, IIRC, you'll be close to your son).

Thanks, and yes, I'm moving to be closer to him.

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 02:43 AM

Last thought before bed.

http://i.imgur.com/kdSU4.jpg

bevischief 08-19-2012 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8831902)
Positives:

Charles looked like he trusts the knee and that he hasnt lost his explosion, vision or strength in his runs. Definitely a good sign.

Cassel looked like he is trying to take the next step in his development (sad that at 30 that is even an issue) by trying to push the ball more on intermediate routes. His arm looks visibly stronger and his accuracy seems to have improved...as does his poise, albeit not by leaps and bounds.

Playcalling is much better on offense. I know, I know preseason blah blah...but the plays are in on time and most of the time have been effective.

Hillis looks to be ready for another 2010 year...dude reminds me of a more talented Mike Alstott...hopefully he continues to secure the ball and isnt careless with it in crucial situations like he was in 2010...if he does, our running backs will be in beast mode.

Jerrell Powe looks to be a guy that should probably get some sub package work and is probably deserving of more than that. He is seemingly disruptive on a lot of plays he is in for and if this team is gonna blitz more and use man coverage as much as they are, he can be an asset in a "Jay Ratliff" type role as a penetrating nose when we blitz.

Allen looked to be in beast mode and should be promoted immediately to starting left guard.

Dexter McCluster is kicking big time ass out there and is arguably our best receiver (until Bowe gets his back into the swing of things. He is getting consistent separation and is catching almost everything thrown his way. If he keeps it up, he will provide a valuable weapon to this offense.

Kevin Boss is looking like a stud pickup more and more aqnd should allow our offense to use he and Moeaki similarly to how Gronk/Hernandez get used in NE. Really good value signing.

Dontari Poe is already starting to flash, if you look close enough. He is splitting doubles and beating blocks regularly and had a couple pressures tonight. They need to put him at the3 nose and keep him there...LIKE THEY SAID THEY WERE GONNA DO.

The negatives:

Stanzi looked like hot garbage. No redeemable features were on display tonight. Just a poor showing.

Dorsey/Torbino/Jackson all looked like ass. Not sure what was up tonight with them, but they all looked soft.

The whole secondary...even Berry looked bad tonight and whats really bad is that the Rams have one of the weakest receiving cores in the league and we couldnt even slow them down.

Did I mention Stanzi?...biggest opportunity of his life to show something and he really played poorly.

Bailey...where the **** was he?

Albert has a rough game, too...gave up a couple pressures and a sack iirc. Its a shame...I figured he would be looking very impressive this time of the year in a contract year.

Baldwin...another of "my guys" that underachieved tonight...although I think a large part of that is because he is a guy you just need to throw a few passes a game to him and let him go get it and these guys arent doing that for the kid....they need to show some confidence in him by making it a point to do that.

I hope Romeo turns it up a couple notches in practice this week to get the starters some good work before next week...thats the game that these guys need to be almost ready to line up in a regular season game and if we look out of rythem...that will almost undoubtedly carryover into the regular season.

This team has a lot of work to do to start to realize their potential and if we dont get it going pretty fast, Clay is gonna end up looking like a genius at the end of the year.

I agree.

Rasputin 08-19-2012 03:42 AM

We are going see the starters into the second have against Seattle & I think we are going have a much better outing then. The regular starters should be set to go & D Bowe show is back. I don't expect a lot out of him rest of the preseason just going be nice he is back with the team atcivities.

jspchief 08-19-2012 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8832083)
Let me also say that when you have "bs dumpoff" options like Hillis, Charles and Dexter....I have no problem with Cassel checking down as long as he is throwing passes to the receivers and spreading the ball around.

He does that and those "bs dumpoffs" will be highly effective.

This is true. The problems is, based on what we've seen from Cassel in his first 3 years, the short passing game is 95% of his game. It's not like he throws short when the defense is spread and goes deep when the D plays up. He just throws short high percentage passes almost exclusively. It stunts the entire offense.


As for McSpinmove, Clay won't have to worry about him for much longer. Every defense in the league is going to know that Matty Pro Bowl does nothing but throw short crossing patterns to him and its only a matter of time before a safety or LB finds Dex stretched out for an off target throw. He's going to get blown up.

DBOSHO 08-19-2012 04:24 AM

On a semi sidenote, I love the whitr jerseys

lcarus 08-19-2012 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8831951)
I don't think we'll know where Cassel is until five or six games ino the regular season. The early returns look promising but that could change quickly.

I think the biggest problem with this team is just going to be consistency honestly. It's gonna be a rollercoaster season I think.

milkman 08-19-2012 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8832087)
He isn't a running back because the team needed to replace Jones and Battle.

That added with the need to fill the slot receiver role and DMCs hard work towards earning that role have us where we currently are.

With DMC as the full time slot receiver...at least until if/when Wylie takes the job from him.

You don't move a RB that you believe is a productive RB to WR.

That 4.5 YPC is a mirage.

Handoffs on passing downs, when the defense doesn't care if the RB gains 6 or 7 yards.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-19-2012 06:41 AM

Typical Planet overreaction. Happened one way after Game 1, but the pendulum has swung the other way and it's panic time.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-19-2012 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8831374)
I think the AFC West is safe in confirming it's "worst division in football" status. Yet, once again.

Holy crap your pro takes are worse than your college ones ROFL

Ace Gunner 08-19-2012 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8832116)
You don't move a RB that you believe is a productive RB to WR.

That 4.5 YPC is a mirage.

Handoffs on passing downs, when the defense doesn't care if the RB gains 6 or 7 yards.

114 carries is a mirage to you?

milkman 08-19-2012 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsfootballfan (Post 8832132)
114 carries is a mirage to you?

Pay attention, you useless ****.

I didn't say the carries were a mirage.

I said the 4.5 ypc were.

Ace Gunner 08-19-2012 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8832135)
Pay attention, you useless ****.

I didn't say the carries were a mirage.

I said the 4.5 ypc were.

You are kind of spineless.

milkman 08-19-2012 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsfootballfan (Post 8832136)
You are kind of spineless.

That makes all kinds of sense.

Ace Gunner 08-19-2012 07:06 AM

Is it possible a dwarf can run the rock on an NFL crap team and avg 4.5 ypc on more than 100 carries? Ya. Is it possible some dumbshit is going to call it a lie based in the fact the player is pint sized? Ya.

Ace Gunner 08-19-2012 07:06 AM

The Chiefs' weakness was once again exposed during last night's game.

The OL could not get the run game hooked up and had trouble blocking inside during pass plays.

The DL had zero pressure and allowed huge gaping holes for Jackson to run through.

OctoberFart 08-19-2012 07:08 AM

Well hold off on that Superbowl for KC. I wanted KC to look good so that you fools would get all homered up and get your mullet curls tightened up.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-19-2012 07:11 AM

Fart, you need to worry about your own flawed team.

OnTheWarpath15 08-19-2012 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 8831901)
Love the people that are all up on Cassel's bag. He's like a con man. He has this style that leaves a box score making him look like a pro bowl QB, but its like he makes plays with absolutely no regard to what impact it has on the teams actual chances of winning. He's whoring QB rating at the expense of an offense that can actually compete with playoff caliber teams. Need 9 yards for the first down? Box score says Matty completed it (for 7). Down by 14? Matty went on a 12-14 streak (for a FG and the team lost by 18).

Buckle your seatbelts football fans. Matty is gonna take us on another Pro Bowl season ride. Yes, we'll get embarrassed by the true competitors of the league, but we may fall assbackwards into the playoffs by winning the worst division in the NFL. And boy oh boy, look at Matty's stat line.

This pretty much sums it up.

The friend I took to the game last night said something similar after a dumpoff to Charles:

"This is going to be our offense this year - 1 yard pass to [insert player here] and hope they pick up 6 yards."

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 07:17 AM

Wow... a preseason game and everybody is acting like it is a game to get into the playoffs...

I would love to be giving you people hell about your team as I usually do but I can't ever find enough interest to try...


It's nothing but a glorified scrimmage , if you come out of the game without injuries regardless of the score you win. Raiders lost because acquired injuries in the game.

milkman 08-19-2012 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsfootballfan (Post 8832147)
Is it possible a dwarf can run the rock on an NFL crap team and avg 4.5 ypc on more than 100 carries? Ya. Is it possible some dumbshit is going to call it a lie based in the fact the player is pint sized? Ya.

I dont give a rat's ass about his size.

Jackie Battle is a hell of a lot bigger, and he is every bit as useless.

McCluster was drafted because he was touted as this fast and elusive playmaker.

He is neither exceptionally fast, nor elusive.

He is far from a playmaker.

He's a guy that got a bunch of meaningless yards on a bunch of meaningless carries.

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AutumnWind (Post 8832149)
Well hold off on that Superbowl for KC. I wanted KC to look good so that you fools would get all homered up and get your mullet curls tightened up.

Mullet Curls LMAO ROFL LMAO

Pasta Little Brioni 08-19-2012 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8832158)
Wow... a preseason game and everybody is acting like it is a game to get into the playoffs...

I would love to be giving you people hell about your team as I usually do but I can't ever find enough interest to try...


It's nothing but a glorified scrimmage , if you come out of the game without injuries regardless of the score you win. Raiders lost because acquired injuries in the game.

You've stuck to your guns all along when it would be easy to fling shit(unlike your buddy September Fart). Props. I might feel a biiiiit guilty owning that av after the season :D

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8832162)
You've stuck to your guns all along when it would be easy to fling shit(unlike your buddy September Fart). Props.

You got to admit though, the "Mullet Curls" shit was funny as hell LMAO

Ace Gunner 08-19-2012 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8832159)
I dont give a rat's ass about his size.

Jackie Battle is a hell of a lot bigger, and he is every bit as useless.

McCluster was drafted because he was touted as this fast and elusive playmaker.

He is neither exceptionally fast, nor elusive.

He is far from a playmaker.

He's a guy that got a bunch of meaningless yards on a bunch of meaningless carries.


So, Jackie Battle and Dex are similar players. That is hilarious how you think.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-19-2012 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8832165)
You got to admit though, the "Mullet Curls" shit was funny as hell LMAO

Well, when you have a shaved, tatooed forehead, it's easy to get jealous of those of us with hair.

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8832167)
Well, when you have a shaved, tatooed forehead, it's easy to get jealous of those of us with hair.

Reckon he has a face tattoo too?

milkman 08-19-2012 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsfootballfan (Post 8832166)
So, Jackie Battle and Dex are similar players. That is hilarious how you think.

JFC, you a ****ing moron.

I didn't say they were similar.

I said they are both useless, just like your dumb ass.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-19-2012 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8832173)
Reckon he has a face tattoo too?

Probably some of those stick ons. He's trying to "look" tough after all. It's the Raider Way.

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8832177)
Probably some of those stick ons. He's trying to "look" tough after all. It's the Raider Way.


I have a Raiders Mask, I may take a pic of me in it and use it for my avatar.

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 07:30 AM

Tell the truth

If you had a choice of two RB's that NEVER got hurt...

Would you picK JC or DMC?

Pasta Little Brioni 08-19-2012 07:30 AM

Do it. Don't forget to put on the Road Warrior shoulder pads too. You could still be a wrestler.

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8832184)
Do it. Don't forget to put on the Road Warrior shoulder pads too. You could still be a wrestler.


I have a big head so it will have to be a glamour shot

Pasta Little Brioni 08-19-2012 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8832182)
Tell the truth

If you had a choice of two RB's that NEVER got hurt...

Would you picK JC or DMC?

Can't go wrong with either one really. Of course I'm going to be partial to Charles after he nearly set the YPC alltime record though. Unfortunately, durability is the only thing holding either back from raping the league.

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8832188)
Can't go wrong with either one really. Of course I'm going to be partial to Charles after he nearly set the YPC alltime record though. Unfortunately, durability is the only thing holding either back from raping the league.

Yup... Right now, our season teeters on the health of DMC... We have no room at all for injury... The Raiders are going in the right direction and will compete this year very well but this won't be our year I will predict atleast 8-8 though. Carson is a good QB but he is not a good QB for the offense we are running now, that rollout stuff is not a Carson strength.. I am not particularly impressed with the offensive scheme so far with the exception of DMC.. Front 4 on D will be impressive though.. DVD getting roasted by scrubs don't make me happy either... But what the hell, just like the economy... Over Spend and you will eventually have to pay the piper.... we are going to have to do that now I guess.

milkman 08-19-2012 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8832182)
Tell the truth

If you had a choice of two RB's that NEVER got hurt...

Would you picK JC or DMC?

The funny thing is, JaMaal Charles has actually been more durable, and has averaged nearly a full yard and a half per carry better than McFadden in their respective careers.

McFadden's best season for YPC is only .1 yard better than Charles worst.

So, yeah, I am taking Charles.

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 07:39 AM

Cheaps are a couple players away from being a legitimate contender, I just don't know why they won't spend some of that surplus money to get them over the hump since they are close... A real QB would make the Cheaps scary

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8832198)
The funny thing is, JaMaal Charles has actually been more durable, and has averaged nearly a full yard and a half per carry better than McFadden in their respective careers.

McFadden's best season for YPC is only .1 yard better than Charles worst.

So, yeah, I am taking Charles.


Meh, either one is a luxury... I will take a healthy DMC personally because of the punishing running style.

milkman 08-19-2012 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8832208)
Meh, either one is a luxury... I will take a healthy DMC personally because of the punishing running style.

I don't know.

I think speed wears down a defense quicker and more effectively than power.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-19-2012 07:55 AM

...and the Chiefs have both :fire:

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8832214)
I don't know.

I think speed wears down a defense quicker and more effectively than power.

I may be wrong but I think the 40 times for both are 4.33 for DMC and 4.34 for Charles so speed should not even be compared with the two.

milkman 08-19-2012 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8832219)
I may be wrong but I think the 40 times for both are 4.33 for DMC and 4.34 for Charles so speed should not even be compared with the two.

I am not comparing speed, but rather comparing styles.

As you pointed out, McFadden is a more punishing runner, so he's not using that speed with the same effectiveness that Charles uses his.

That is, of course, the product of their size difference, but's it relevant to the issue.

Charles is stronger than most give him credit, but he doesn't seek out contact the same way that McFadden does.

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8832225)
I am not comparing speed, but rather comparing styles.

As you pointed out, McFadden is a more punishing runner, so he's not using that speed with the same effectiveness that Charles uses his.

That is, of course, the product of their size difference, but's it relevant to the issue.

Charles is stronger than most give him credit, but he doesn't seek out contact the same way that McFadden does.

I would take either one on my team and if we had JC instead of DMC and if the Cheaps had DMC I doubt either one of us would be complaining when they are both healthy.

milkman 08-19-2012 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8832227)
I would take either one on my team and if we had JC instead of DMC and if the Cheaps had DMC I doubt either one of us would be complaining when they are both healthy.

Well, I would not have even gone to make comparisons if you hadn't asked.

R8RFAN 08-19-2012 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8832233)
Well, I would not have even gone to make comparisons if you hadn't asked.

Obviously we are going to differ on this question, I didn't even think the results would have been different, although I expected a dumbass to reply instead of cordial fans like yourself and PGM

In58men 08-19-2012 08:35 AM

Last time Chiefs went 2-0 in preseason was back in 2003 lol

bricks 08-19-2012 08:47 AM

I don't worry too much about the preseason but I'll say this,

Yesterday's game gave us an indication of how important Flowers is to the Chiefs football team. The Rams did the smart thing by attacking Flowers replacement.

They exposed the team weakness really well. I also think Belcher is a big liability in coverage. I wouldn't be surprised come season time that teams decide to attack in his area.

bricks 08-19-2012 08:53 AM

And Cassel is clearly the starter.

Competition at QB isn't even close. There just is none. I'm trying to figure whether Stanzi has a long ways to go or if he just isn't that good? Quinn forget about it. Im not gonna place my hopes in him.

*At least Cassel is playing well though. That's the only positive I can take from this point.

Coogs 08-19-2012 08:58 AM

BossChiefs take on the game 100 posts or so ago was probably the closest to what I took out of it.

And I will throw in a couple of additional thoughts to that.

For better or worse, it appears we are going to have the 2010 Matt Cassel.

Game one featured the run over the pass, and went into the win column. (first half)

Game two featured the pass over the run, and went into the loss column. (first half)

And the MO for the passing game for both games followed much along the Charlie Wies plan... which makes sense.

TEX 08-19-2012 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bricks (Post 8832263)
And Cassel is clearly the starter.

Competition at QB isn't even close. There just is none. I'm trying to figure whether Stanzi has a long ways to go or if he just isn't that good? Quinn forget about it. Im not gonna place my hopes in him.

*At least Cassel is playing well though. That's the only positive I can take from this point.

You're correct - it's not close. That was the plan from the get go though we were told otherwise. Quin is clearly # 2. Wish we had a # 2 that was better but we don't. Stanzi doesn't belong in the NFL.

TEX 08-19-2012 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bricks (Post 8832255)
I don't worry too much about the preseason but I'll say this,

Yesterday's game gave us an indication of how important Flowers is to the Chiefs football team. The Rams did the smart thing by attacking Flowers replacement.

They exposed the team weakness really well. I also think Belcher is a big liability in coverage. I wouldn't be surprised come season time that teams decide to attack in his area.

The bigger weakness is the non existent pass rush. The DL is the weak link of the defense. Has been for years, which is why the Chiefs can look great on defense one week and next get run all over. The Rams had no problems running the ball up the middle at will. Their # 1 OL totally dominated our #1 DL. Until the Chiefs get a solid DL, the up and down play will continue. This is the reason why I couldn't understand how all off season some kept saying how awesome our defense is / was. It's only gonna be as good as the DL will let it be.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.