ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs "The way it looks now back-up Geoff Schwartz ... will likely sign elsewhere." (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=281764)

Direckshun 03-07-2014 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10471707)
Robert Gallery was a mean mother****er in college. Got any pictures of him?

Zack Martin is nothing special or else he'd be going a lot higher in the first round. He's not a QB. He's not a WR. And he's not a pass rusher.

He's a GUARD (at the NFL level). A fat ****ing piece of shit guard.

If we hadn't spent so many 1st-3rd round picks on offensive linemen recently, I'd see your point. But we have, so therefore I don't. I think it's stupid bullshit.

Welp, that's the dumbest thing you've said in a while.

BlackHelicopters 03-07-2014 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10471704)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>The Bills want to talk with Geoff Schwartz <a href="http://t.co/Qqet2U6znD">http://t.co/Qqet2U6znD</a></p>&mdash; Arrowhead Pride (@ArrowheadPride) <a href="https://twitter.com/ArrowheadPride/statuses/441957595805282304">March 7, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Apparently a lot of teams do.

WhiteWhale 03-07-2014 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10470684)
Who made them that way? People didn't just wake up one day and say "damn, I hope the Chiefs don't take an offensive lineman on the 1st day of the draft".

Something to do with the team not winning anything in spite of having one of the best OL's ever assembled.

Which, of course, we all know didn't propel KC's offense into the most dominant group in the NFL. We just couldn't win playoff games and it was totally the offense's fault.

If you blamed one of the worst defenses ever assembled, you're just making excuses. /sarcasm

People here are straight WEIRD about offensive linemen. Listening to some folks you'd think they're all just throw away positions you could fill with overweight hobos and not suffer for it.

Of course there's also the fact that fans have watched KC, for decades, treat the OL as if it is more important than Quarterback.

I think the reality lies somewhere in between. OL matters... especially if you have a franchise QB you want to keep off of IR.

RealSNR 03-07-2014 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10471743)
Welp, that's the dumbest thing you've said in a while.

Probably. The real point is that Zack Martins are available in every draft. And realistically, they're available in every round more than any other position.

I'm fine if Dorsey just wants to nibble around the edges at our potential hole at guard. Maybe we'll get lucky and find a Larry Warford.

But **** spending a 1st round pick on a ****ing guard.

BossChief 03-07-2014 10:53 AM

If we spend a first round pick in this draft on a guard, that might be the most infuriating pick I've ever seen this team make. At least when we burned picks on Tyson Jackson and Eric Fisher, those draft classes were weak.

CaliforniaChief 03-07-2014 11:02 AM

I might be wrong, but didn't our offensive renaissance happen around the time we started Schwartz at G? All of the sudden Smith had time to throw and running lanes were wide open. Not saying that's all him, but it seems like he's priority A-1 in terms of retaining anyone.

BossChief 03-07-2014 11:14 AM

I just don't understand how the team can value the OL so high that they took a RT first overall, but during the following offseason are letting 3 linemen walk in free agency.

It's just very strange.

Chief Roundup 03-07-2014 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10471824)
I just don't understand how the team can value the OL so high that they took a RT first overall, but during the following offseason are letting 3 linemen walk in free agency.

It's just very strange.

Albert wants too much money, Asamoah sucks, Schwartz we don't know if we are going to lose or not for sure but, it is going to be costly since other teams are wanting him as well.

ct 03-07-2014 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10471824)
I just don't understand how the team can value the OL so high that they took a RT first overall, but during the following offseason are letting 3 linemen walk in free agency.

It's just very strange.

they never intended the #1 overall pick to be a RT

#1 they wanted to trade albert, but failed
#2 they expected fisher to be better and move to LT, putting his RT stint as nothing more than temporary learning curve
#3 if he doesn't quickly develop/improve, then we can say they spend #1 on RT, for now, it's too early


signed,

somewhere between truefan/waitandsee and damnitcarl/fupioli

saphojunkie 03-07-2014 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ct (Post 10471841)
they never intended the #1 overall pick to be a RT

#1 they wanted to trade albert, but failed
#2 they expected fisher to be better and move to LT, putting his RT stint as nothing more than temporary learning curve
#3 if he doesn't quickly develop/improve, then we can say they spend #1 on RT, for now, it's too early


signed,

somewhere between truefan/waitandsee and damnitcarl/fupioli

Judges?




We'll allow it.

BossChief 03-07-2014 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10471828)
Albert wants too much money, Asamoah sucks, Schwartz we don't know if we are going to lose or not for sure but, it is going to be costly since other teams are wanting him as well.

1) Fisher is getting 5.5 million per year...the difference between that and what Albert wants isn't some wide Chasm. If the pick had been used elsewhere, signing Albert wouldn't be a big deal.

2) Asamoah doesn't suck, that's silly. His only off year was this year where he was learning a brand new blocking scheme. He only gave up 2 sacks all of last year.

3) Starters get starter pay. I'd bet ANYTHING that he doesn't sign some crazy deal. He will get average starter pay and that's money we should be giving him IMO.

penguinz 03-07-2014 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10471852)
1) Fisher is getting 5.5 million per year...the difference between that and what Albert wants isn't some wide Chasm. If the pick had been used elsewhere, signing Albert wouldn't be a big deal.

2) Asamoah doesn't suck, that's silly. His only off year was this year where he was learning a brand new blocking scheme. He only gave up 2 sacks all of last year.

3) Starters get starter pay. I'd bet ANYTHING that he doesn't sign some crazy deal. He will get average starter pay and that's money we should be giving him IMO.

If we could prorate alberts pay for the time he is actually on the field that would be OK.

TEX 03-07-2014 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10471852)
1) Fisher is getting 5.5 million per year...the difference between that and what Albert wants isn't some wide Chasm. If the pick had been used elsewhere, signing Albert wouldn't be a big deal.

2) Asamoah doesn't suck, that's silly. His only off year was this year where he was learning a brand new blocking scheme. He only gave up 2 sacks all of last year.

3) Starters get starter pay. I'd bet ANYTHING that he doesn't sign some crazy deal. He will get average starter pay and that's money we should be giving him IMO.


Not that it matters but I don't agree with most of this...

1. It's gonna cost twice as much as Fish is getting paid to sign Albert and that is a wide Chasm. Plus he's missed a lot of games the past two seasons. Not a good trend.

2. Asamoah does suck. Schwartz was learning the same scheme and played head and shoulders above Asasuckamoah. He was also hurt a lot last season, so you never knew when you could count on him. True he only gave up two sacks, BUT how many pressures did he give up? How many more sacks would he had given up had Alex Smith not been mobile? How many times was the run stuffed because he didn't block his man? No way I go out of my way to sign this guy.

DaWolf 03-07-2014 12:10 PM

Considering that Andy Reid puts the highest priority when building a team (outside of QB) on the guys in the trenches (OL, DL) and corners, there's no way there isn't a plan in place to make improvements in those areas. Especially considering his last year in Philly fell apart because of lack of healthy OLinemen.

I suspect we just aren't hearing much about the Chiefs plans with the line because they don't have anyone with loose lips in the front office, and Dorsey plays it close to the vest...

TEX 03-07-2014 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 10471886)
Considering that Andy Reid puts the highest priority when building a team (outside of QB) on the guys in the trenches (OL, DL) and corners, there's no way there isn't a plan in place to make improvements in those areas. Especially considering his last year in Philly fell apart because of lack of healthy OLinemen.

I suspect we just aren't hearing much about the Chiefs plans with the line because they don't have anyone with loose lips in the front office, and Dorsey plays it close to the vest...


That's exactly the case. Dorsey and Reid have both learned first hand how important an OL is and how not having talent/depth there can and will kill your football team.

RealSNR 03-07-2014 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10471894)
That's exactly the case. Dorsey and Reid have both learned first hand how important an OL is and how not having talent/depth there can and will kill your football team.

That's why we should spend average starting guard money on Schwartz.

It's WAY the **** cheaper than burning draft stock + 1st round salary on the position for a dude who might suck ass or not be able to contribute to close to his full potential until 2-3 years in his career.

htismaqe 03-07-2014 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 10471768)
Of course there's also the fact that fans have watched KC, for decades, treat the OL as if it is more important than Quarterback.

You hit the nail squarely on the head right here.

You're right, the truth is somewhere in between. But this is KC, we're not average in the slightest. Working on a quarter century without a playoff win.

htismaqe 03-07-2014 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10471874)
Not that it matters but I don't agree with most of this...

1. It's gonna cost twice as much as Fish is getting paid to sign Albert and that is a wide Chasm. Plus he's missed a lot of games the past two seasons. Not a good trend.

And Fisher is getting paid twice as much as Donald Stephenson, who is a better LT.

htismaqe 03-07-2014 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 10471886)
Especially considering his last year in Philly fell apart because of lack of healthy OLinemen.

GROSS oversimplification.

Chief Roundup 03-07-2014 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10471852)
1) Fisher is getting 5.5 million per year...the difference between that and what Albert wants isn't some wide Chasm. If the pick had been used elsewhere, signing Albert wouldn't be a big deal.

2) Asamoah doesn't suck, that's silly. His only off year was this year where he was learning a brand new blocking scheme. He only gave up 2 sacks all of last year.

3) Starters get starter pay. I'd bet ANYTHING that he doesn't sign some crazy deal. He will get average starter pay and that's money we should be giving him IMO.

Albert has turned down offers that average over 10 mil a year. That is a pretty big difference. Especially when Albert is nothing more than an average LT with health issues. Evidently this coaching staff didn't think much of him, Asamoah, by the middle to end of the season. Asamoah might be better in another system but, it doesn't appear that he is going to be back here because of the way he played in the system we currently use. I too hope we resign Schwartz.

ThaVirus 03-07-2014 01:46 PM

He's not an "average" tackle. Give that shit a rest..

DaWolf 03-07-2014 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10471922)
GROSS oversimplification.

Bad play by Vick, turnovers, defensive failings, etc. But a lot of it centered around OL injuries, which led to Vick getting pounded, which led to turnovers, etc. It was a big factor in that record...

htismaqe 03-07-2014 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10472068)
Asamoah might be better in another system but, it doesn't appear that he is going to be back here because of the way he played in the system we currently use.

Big John played better in a zone blocking scheme. Reports (and late season games) suggest that we're moving towards more of a zone blocking scheme this season and doing away with the system we used last year.

htismaqe 03-07-2014 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 10472117)
Bad play by Vick, turnovers, defensive failings, etc. But a lot of it centered around OL injuries, which led to Vick getting pounded, which led to turnovers, etc. It was a big factor in that record...

Vick gets pounded because he has zero pocket presence. Yes, the line had injuries but that team had more warts than just the o-line.

RealSNR 03-07-2014 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10472095)
He's not an "average" tackle. Give that shit a rest..

I think it's a coping mechanism.

"I never wanted that ****er anyway! Glad he's gone!"

Chief Roundup 03-07-2014 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10472095)
He's not an "average" tackle. Give that shit a rest..

Joe Thomas
Jake Long
Ryan Clady
Jordan Gross
D'Brickashaw Ferguson
Michael Roos
Jason Peters
Nate Solder
Duane Brown
Russell Okung
Joe Staley
Trent Williams

You think he is better than these guys?
Albert is not the worst or anything, but he is not elite either. He is very much the definition of average.

Sofa King 03-07-2014 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10472167)
Joe Thomas
Jake Long
Ryan Clady
Jordan Gross
D'Brickashaw Ferguson
Michael Roos
Jason Peters
Nate Solder
Duane Brown
Russell Okung
Joe Staley
Trent Williams

You think he is better than these guys?
Albert is not the worst or anything, but he is not elite either. He is very much the definition of average.

Yeah actually. I think he is better than quite a few of those guys.

htismaqe 03-07-2014 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10472167)
Joe Thomas
Jake Long
Ryan Clady
Jordan Gross
D'Brickashaw Ferguson
Michael Roos
Jason Peters
Nate Solder
Duane Brown
Russell Okung
Joe Staley
Trent Williams

You think he is better than these guys?
Albert is not the worst or anything, but he is not elite either. He is very much the definition of average.

I do think he's better than a few guys on that list, yes.

And by the way, Jake Long doesn't belong on that list at all.

htismaqe 03-07-2014 02:21 PM

Here's an excerpt from Neil Hornsby over at PFF - he wrote this last year when the Chiefs talked about trading him to the Dolphins.

Quote:

Despite my protestations to the contrary I’ve seen many people quote our stats to the effect “Albert is PFF’s 25th-ranked tackle in 2012 or 17th-ranked left tackle”. This paints him as a mid-tier player and as such not a huge upgrade on Martin. I think that’s taking our work out of context and not fair on Albert who I personally feel is a much better player than that.

If you, like I, assume pass blocking is the most important part of a tackle’s job and rate players in that order he becomes the 11th-rated tackle and ninth-placed left tackle. Further, when you dig into our advanced normalization data (we don’t have this on the site but it takes account of teams whose quarterback gets rid of the ball quickly, giving them an unfair advantage) he becomes the sixth tackle with only Joe Thomas, Russell Okung, Michael Roos, Andrew Whitworth and Ryan Clady ahead of him. As for his run blocking, it’s always been a little disappointing for an ex-guard but not problematic and similar to those other tackles I’ve just mentioned with the exception of Okung who is better than the rest in that regard.

Chief Roundup 03-07-2014 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 10472175)
Yeah actually. I think he is better than quite a few of those guys.

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10472178)
I do think he's better than a few guys on that list, yes.

And by the way, Jake Long doesn't belong on that list at all.

Albert has turned down contracts similar to the one that Ryan Clady recently signed. Do you think Albert is worth that 10 mil a year average like Joe Thomas gets? I sure don't.

htismaqe 03-07-2014 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10472182)
Albert has turned down contracts similar to the one that Ryan Clady recently signed. Do you think Albert is worth that 10 mil a year average like Joe Thomas gets? I sure don't.

Yeah, he's worth that to somebody.

To the Chiefs, who have Stephenson and Fisher under contract? No, probably not.

Mr. Laz 03-07-2014 02:26 PM

over/under how many years people will complain about Albert being gone?

every block he makes for his new team
every missed block by his replacement


will they bitch more about Pioli,Cassel or Albert going forward?

we need a poll.

RunKC 03-07-2014 02:28 PM

I think Direkshun is right about one thing: we are taking an OL fairly early. Wouldn't be shocked to see that in the 3rd rd

htismaqe 03-07-2014 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 10472187)
over/under how many years people will complain about Albert being gone?

every block he makes for his new team
every missed block by his replacement


will they bitch more about Pioli,Cassel or Albert going forward?

we need a poll.

ROFL

Of course, people just bitch for the hell of it. The team never makes any mistakes...

Chief Roundup 03-07-2014 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 10472187)
over/under how many years people will complain about Albert being gone?

Truly depends on how Fisher does replacing him at LT and how the team fairs from that position.

Easy 6 03-07-2014 02:46 PM

Albert may not be elite, but he's certainly an above average player, he's a second tier guy... the only thing wrong with that is he wants first tier money.

Someone else can go ahead and give it to him.

The Franchise 03-07-2014 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 10472187)
over/under how many years people will complain about Albert being gone?

every block he makes for his new team
every missed block by his replacement


will they bitch more about Pioli,Cassel or Albert going forward?

we need a poll.

Over/under on how many people bitch and moan that "Albert never played like that" when he's succeeding with another team?

OldSchool 03-07-2014 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10472190)
I think Direkshun is right about one thing: we are taking an OL fairly early. Wouldn't be shocked to see that in the 3rd rd

It's pretty much guaranteed at this point unless Reid and Co are comfortable with having to start one of our depth guys. I'd like to see Watkins, Johnson, and Kush get some snaps. All talented players, just limited experience.

But, that doesn't change the fact that we really do need a potential starting caliber swing tackle though. If Fisher and/or Stephensen goes down at any point and we don't have a capable replacement in the fold like we did last year, we're screwed with the schedule that we have coming up.

saphojunkie 03-07-2014 03:21 PM

The problem with Branden Albert is that we've seen elite. After watching Willie Roaf for those glorious years, it is next to impossible for me to say Albert is elite. He isn't.

He might be one of the best in the league right now, but that doesn't make him elite. He still struggles against speed rushers and frankly doesn't dominate his position the way you expect a franchise left tackle to. You don't look at Albert lined up against a talented pass rusher, then move down the line because you have sheer confidence in him. At least, I sure as hell wouldn't if I were QB.

It's just that you have to pay top dollar for a top tackle, even if he isn't "historically" elite - that is, he isn't elite for the position compared to the benchmark set by guys no longer in the league. But compared to the rest of the guys now, yes... he is "elite" and he commands a lot of money as such.

To put it another way, Branden Albert is a B+ tackle who will be paid like an A+ tackle. And for me, I'd rather have a B or B- tackle, but paid accordingly, and use that money elsewhere to get rid of a C player.

But that's me. I'm 100% in favor of dumping guys who are overpaid for their skill level, though they might not be overpaid according to their ranking in the league.

ThaVirus 03-07-2014 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10472144)
Big John played better in a zone blocking scheme. Reports (and late season games) suggest that we're moving towards more of a zone blocking scheme this season and doing away with the system we used last year.

Thank goodness.

Jamaal is going to rape again next season.

mcaj22 03-07-2014 03:36 PM

if you think Willie Roaf to Brandon Albert is bad

just wait for the transition from Albert to Fisher/Stephenson, when Alex Smith is getting blind sided from a clean edge rusher that whichever one of our slap dick LTs just alligator arms.

Discuss Thrower 03-07-2014 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10472322)
if you think Willie Roaf to Brandon Albert is bad

just wait for the transition from Albert to Fisher/Stephenson, when Alex Smith is getting blind sided from a clean edge rusher that whichever one of our slap dick LTs just alligator arms.

If that's the case then the playoff game will be the most productive Chiefs offense we might see for another year.

LoneWolf 03-07-2014 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10472322)
if you think Willie Roaf to Brandon Albert is bad

just wait for the transition from Albert to Fisher/Stephenson, when Alex Smith is getting blind sided from a clean edge rusher that whichever one of our slap dick LTs just alligator arms.

They played games without Albert last season and Alex had adequate protection.

mcaj22 03-07-2014 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 10472328)
If that's the case then the playoff game will be the most productive Chiefs offense we might see for another year.

I hope it's not the case, but that

"elite LT" argument is stupid, because we are about to see a major drop off with two guys that have a total of 3 years NFL experience between them. They will have major growing pains. And our QB might pay for it.

They should really bring in a veteran swing tackle as insurance.

Easy 6 03-07-2014 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10472322)
if you think Willie Roaf to Brandon Albert is bad

just wait for the transition from Albert to Fisher/Stephenson, when Alex Smith is getting blind sided from a clean edge rusher that whichever one of our slap dick LTs just alligator arms.

Too many high scouting grades on each, too much potential between them, atleast one of those two will be fine at LT... Albert is not only replaceable, its possible to upgrade from him.

mcaj22 03-07-2014 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 10472330)
They played games without Albert last season and Alex had adequate protection.

Alex got sacked 5 times when Albert sat out that Colts game Stephenson played LT at.

mcaj22 03-07-2014 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10472335)
Too many high scouting grades on each, too much potential between them, atleast one of those two will be fine at LT... Albert is not only replaceable, its possible to upgrade from him.

I heard this about Glenn Dorsey and Tyson Jackson on the defensive line and all we got out of them was a bunch of losing seasons and 1 contract departures.

The potential thing sucks when you have a 30 year old QB and the top 2 RB in the league with a NOW window.

Eric Fisher has to look like a pro bowler TODAY not tomorrow. Not potential and high grades. They have to have the best offseason program ever. So I hope that's the case.

htismaqe 03-07-2014 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10472322)
if you think Willie Roaf to Brandon Albert is bad

just wait for the transition from Albert to Fisher/Stephenson, when Alex Smith is getting blind sided from a clean edge rusher that whichever one of our slap dick LTs just alligator arms.

Stephenson is a much smaller drop-off than Fisher at this point.

htismaqe 03-07-2014 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10472351)
I heard this about Glenn Dorsey and Tyson Jackson on the defensive line and all we got out of them was a bunch of losing seasons and 1 contract departures.

The potential thing sucks when you have a 30 year old QB and the top 2 RB in the league with a NOW window.

Eric Fisher has to look like a pro bowler TODAY not tomorrow. Not potential and high grades. They have to have the best offseason program ever. So I hope that's the case.

Great post.

LoneWolf 03-07-2014 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10472342)
Alex got sacked 5 times when Albert sat out that Colts game Stephenson played LT at.

How many of those sacks were given up by Stephenson or Fisher?

Easy 6 03-07-2014 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10472351)
I heard this about Glenn Dorsey and Tyson Jackson on the defensive line and all we got out of them was a bunch of losing seasons and 1 contract departures.

The potential thing sucks when you have a 30 year old QB and the top 2 RB in the league with a NOW window.

Eric Fisher has to look like a pro bowler TODAY not tomorrow. Not potential and high grades. They have to have the best offseason program ever. So I hope that's the case.

I'm not gonna spend a half hour digging them up, but Sacc has posted some scouting reports on Stephenson that had him very highly rated, but dropped down teams boards for some reason, might've been coming out too early in a very strong class or something along those lines.

Point is that none of us will really know how to gauge things until camp/preseason... I'm sure both guys know whats at stake not only for the team but for their careers, so I'd bet both are working like mules to get ready.

We'll see, guess I'm just more optimistic.

ed* WOW cant believe the filter edited out that word, its not at ALL anything bad... that's ****ing stupid.

ct 03-07-2014 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10472294)
The problem with Branden Albert is that we've seen elite. After watching Willie Roaf for those glorious years, it is next to impossible for me to say Albert is elite. He isn't.

He might be one of the best in the league right now, but that doesn't make him elite. He still struggles against speed rushers and frankly doesn't dominate his position the way you expect a franchise left tackle to. You don't look at Albert lined up against a talented pass rusher, then move down the line because you have sheer confidence in him. At least, I sure as hell wouldn't if I were QB.

It's just that you have to pay top dollar for a top tackle, even if he isn't "historically" elite - that is, he isn't elite for the position compared to the benchmark set by guys no longer in the league. But compared to the rest of the guys now, yes... he is "elite" and he commands a lot of money as such.

To put it another way, Branden Albert is a B+ tackle who will be paid like an A+ tackle. And for me, I'd rather have a B or B- tackle, but paid accordingly, and use that money elsewhere to get rid of a C player.

But that's me. I'm 100% in favor of dumping guys who are overpaid for their skill level, though they might not be overpaid according to their ranking in the league.

Imo THIS is how you build a roster. Including the B range QB, who I certainly hope will note be receiving an A range contract. Frankly tho every QB seems to get an A+ contract these days, so I shouldn't be surprised...

Titty Meat 03-07-2014 04:15 PM

This is looking like a 5-11 6-10 team

Discuss Thrower 03-07-2014 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chocolate Hog (Post 10472414)
This is looking like a 5-11 6-10 team

2004 Chiefs all over again.

mcaj22 03-07-2014 04:38 PM

surprised ChiefsandOs hasnt posted the Darnell Dockett tweets on Albert yet (or did he?)

The Franchise 03-07-2014 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10472450)
surprised ChiefsandOs hasnt posted the Darnell Dockett tweets on Albert yet (or did he?)

I'm guessing Dockett is calling for Albert to come to the Cards?

htismaqe 03-07-2014 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10472454)
I'm guessing Dockett is calling for Albert to come to the Cards?

Correct.

The tweets have been removed.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...lbert/related/

mcaj22 03-07-2014 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10472454)
I'm guessing Dockett is calling for Albert to come to the Cards?

yea asked everyone to follow his future teammate Albert lol

Mother****erJones 03-07-2014 04:49 PM

Funny that he had to delete the tweets, while in the NBA Noah had a meeting with Carmelo Anthony telling him to come to Chicago.

Titty Meat 03-07-2014 05:00 PM

I was the first to say The Chiefs would draft an olinmen this year lol

TEX 03-07-2014 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10472342)
Alex got sacked 5 times when Albert sat out that Colts game Stephenson played LT at.

What about the other games he was out?

OldSchool 03-07-2014 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chocolate Hog (Post 10472486)
I was the first to say The Chiefs would draft an olinmen this year lol

My reaction when it happens.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/DK_9uBR0NAQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Brock 03-07-2014 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10472570)
What about the other games he was out?

8 sacks and 4 fumbles in 3 games.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 03-07-2014 06:37 PM

Albert was never respected following in Roaf's shadow.
Like Hali wasn't respected following in Jared Allen's shadow.
Now the next LT is a POS that has to follow in Albert's ROFL

Messier 03-07-2014 07:00 PM

CP gets crazier than normal around FA time.

MahiMike 03-07-2014 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chocolate Hog (Post 10472486)
I was the first to say The Chiefs would draft an olinmen this year lol

Is that Doug Flutie smoking a cig in your avi?

Brock 03-07-2014 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 10472772)
Is that Doug Flutie smoking a cig in your avi?

**** no, that's Lenny at sb1.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-08-2014 08:55 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Jets plan to make an offer to Jon Asamoah <a href="http://t.co/cfgvlsidwZ">http://t.co/cfgvlsidwZ</a></p>&mdash; ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/statuses/442312295335489536">March 8, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Mr. Laz 03-08-2014 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10473283)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Jets plan to make an offer to Jon Asamoah <a href="http://t.co/cfgvlsidwZ">http://t.co/cfgvlsidwZ</a></p>&mdash; ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/statuses/442312295335489536">March 8, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

They better be using ZBS


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.