ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports NBA Off-season 2016 thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=300473)

KC_Connection 07-04-2016 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Bundy (Post 12301432)
Stephen A Smith has been acting like a petulant child on twitter.

He should read your posts during the playoffs for pointers.

RobBlake 07-04-2016 07:09 PM

if James wins against the warriors again and goes to the finals a 7th straight time.. then he will deserve all the praise.

New World Order 07-04-2016 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12301502)
What if the Cavs were to win it again?


Would need to win 'it' more than one time.

Still, Jordan conquers Lebron in just about every category.

chiefzilla1501 07-04-2016 07:25 PM

Not sure why people are giving Durant shit, other than OKC fans, who deserve to be pissed. This isn't the same as Lebron. Durant is a good player but he's probably not going to be in the same conversation as the all-time greats like Jordan. So I don't think he'll be "demoted" on the list because he flocked toward a winner.

Unfortunately, with basketball, I really wonder how much sponsorships have to do with this too. With Durant having a massive Nike contract, I'd have to imagine they were more than nudging him to pick somewhere like Golden State. Interesting that Under Armour's golden boy and one of Nike's biggest golden boys will play for the same team.

Pitt Gorilla 07-04-2016 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12301416)
That's not true. Most true NBA superstars almost always resign with their teams. They may leave later when they are past their prime but most don't do what Durant is doing. He is taking the easy way out.

OKC did everything they could for him. They drafted him and built their team around him and WB. They gave him Westbrook and Harden as well. A little loyalty would be nice instead of leaving to a team that just beat you...

He doesn't want the pressure of leading an NBA team to a championship. He'd rather play with the best instead of beat the best. It's pretty obvious.

Presti got rid of Harden. Also, Oklahoma is a shithole, while CA is pretty damn nice.

chiefzilla1501 07-04-2016 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12301502)
What if the Cavs were to win it again?

I personally don't think LBJ will ever be on Jordan's level. MJ is in my opinion the best player ever in any sport.

But there isn't any question that he belongs in the same conversation as all the other non-Jordan greats.

Needs to evolve his game as he ages and hasn't done that yet. It will be interesting to see where that takes him. But even with a few more championships, I don't see him besting MJ. I just don't think there's even been a clutcher player in any sport than MJ.

KC_Connection 07-04-2016 07:39 PM

If he wanted to play with the best instead of beat the best, he probably should have gone to Cleveland instead.

Pitt Gorilla 07-04-2016 07:44 PM

Wolves should offer Rubio and Muhammed for Westbrook. Presti might be dumb enough to do it.

;)

dirk digler 07-04-2016 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12301530)

Unfortunately, with basketball, I really wonder how much sponsorships have to do with this too. With Durant having a massive Nike contract, I'd have to imagine they were more than nudging him to pick somewhere like Golden State. Interesting that Under Armour's golden boy and one of Nike's biggest golden boys will play for the same team.

Jerry West has the magic touch. Also I am curious if Westbrook told KD he wasn't going to resign next year.

dirk digler 07-04-2016 08:35 PM

http://theundefeated.com/features/st...join-warriors/

Quote:

Kevin Durant didn’t say a lot during his meeting with the Golden State Warriors last Friday. The NBA’s most coveted free agent, however, did have one particular question that he posed to the Warriors’ core of Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, Draymond Green and Andre Iguodala while at a mansion in The Hamptons:

Could he mess up the Warriors’ team camaraderie and chemistry?
The very well-prepared Warriors collectively answered a question with a question and their team motto in mind.

“We asked him how many championships do you think we can win with the way the team is now? How many championships can you win without us? How many do you think we can win together?” Green told The Undefeated.

The Warriors’ motto through their 2015 NBA championship run and their devastating loss in the 2016 NBA Finals to LeBron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers was “Strength In Numbers.” And it’s that mentality that certainly played a role in Durant offering early fireworks to the NBA world on the Fourth of July with news that he would be departing the Oklahoma City Thunder to join the already supremely talented Warriors.

The Warriors not only brought their core four players, but coach Steve Kerr, general manager Bob Myers, owner Joe Lacob and assistant general manager Kirk Lacob, too, to talk to Durant. Having been USA Basketball teammates with him, Curry and Iguodala were most confident and comfortable speaking to Durant from a players’ standpoint about what life as a Warrior would be like on the court for him. Green also said they sold Durant on “culture, dynasty and style of play” with a team that won an NBA-record 73 games last season without him.

It must not be forgotten that Durant strongly had previously said winning was most important to him in his free-agency decision and a friend said he had previously inquired about Bay Area life. The Warriors also told the 2014 NBA MVP that open 3-pointers were awaiting him in Golden State, along with all their other weapons. They added that unselfishness and a will to not just win, but to win championships, was waiting for him in Oakland, California, too. With Durant, perhaps these already score-thirsty Warriors could be even more imposing than Magic Johnson’s “Showtime Lakers” or Michael Jordan with the Chicago Bulls.

“We told him he didn’t have to change who he is. He doesn’t have to change how he plays. We will get him shots. If he shot 40 percent from 3-point line contested, how would he shoot wide open?” Green said.

The Warriors’ meeting with Durant lasted about two hours with the “main pitch” being winning championships together, Green said. Green added that he felt very good about that meeting since the vibe in the room was perfect with the right mix of voices. Even so, Curry apparently felt it necessary to send Durant a message hours after the meeting Friday night to reassure him about his commitment to “Strength In Numbers” and unselfishness.

According to a person who saw the text messages, Curry told Durant in a text message that he could care less about who is the face of the franchise, who gets the most recognition or who sells the most shoes (Curry is with Under Armor, Durant with Nike). The two-time NBA MVP also told Durant that if Durant won the MVP award again he would be in the front row of the press conference clapping for him. In closing, Curry’s message to Durant was that all he truly cared about was winning championships and he’d like to do that as his teammate.

To push the Warriors’ sales pitch even further, Durant got a phone call from Hall of Famer and Warriors consultant Jerry West on Saturday. West had previously convinced the now retired NBA superstar Shaquille O’Neal to join the Los Angeles Lakers in 1996. According to ESPN’s Chris Broussard, West told Durant that he would be the perfect fit for the Warriors at small forward and that West’s own 1-7 record in the NBA Finals with the Lakers still haunts him. Durant lost his lone NBA Finals appearance in 2012.

When asked what was the key to landing Durant, one high-ranking Warriors executive said: “Jerry West … Everyone telling [Durant] he’d be on equal footing. No stars.”

Green woke up on the Fourth of July liking the Warriors’ chances, but also would not have been surprised if Durant returned to Oklahoma City. Green, however, got the stunning word about Durant’s decision just “20 seconds before it went public” via a text message from his new teammate’s childhood friend and business manager, Charlie Bell. Less than a minute later, Green’s phone was wildly abuzz with congratulatory text messages.

The “Strength In Numbers” sales pitch worked as the Warriors’ immediately became next season’s championship favorite with Durant saying yes to their “brotherhood.”

“I’m excited about the opportunity to add one of the best players in the world to our team and welcome him to our brotherhood,” Green said. “This will be some of the best times of our lives and I’m looking forward to it.”

New World Order 07-04-2016 08:38 PM

That team is going to be unreal.

Good thing for Cleveland they won it this year.

RunKC 07-04-2016 11:44 PM

The thing that sucks about the NBA now is the product is horrible bc there is no parity anywhere. The Western conference has turned into the Eastern conference.

LeBron wins the East every year (bc it's incredibly weak), Tim Duncan will retire causing the Spurs to rebuild a bit, KD leaves OKC and the Warriors are much stronger. It's going to be GS/CLE part tres next year and probably the year after that.

Last year OKC and SA were legit challenges for GS, but that's over now. Nobody will challenge GS or Cleveland Unless they play each other.
The NBA already had a growing problem with parity, but now the league is weaker and more unwatchable than ever before.

Fans won't really care until the Finals.

mcaj22 07-05-2016 06:26 AM

Both conferences are now complete shit from like their 4th seed playoff team to the bottom. There is a complete lack of talent everywhere. Nobody is believable besides like 4 teams (Cavs, Warriors, Spurs, Clippers)

dirk digler 07-05-2016 06:30 AM

I always thought besides shortening the season the NBA needs to have some kind of franchise tag. Parity is what makes the NFL great and the NBA needs to follow suit somehow. I know they tried in the last CBA but I don't think it is working that well.

Eleazar 07-05-2016 06:30 AM

Cleveland, Oakland, Cleveland, Oakland every year, who wants to watch that!

milkman 07-05-2016 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 12301716)
I always thought besides shortening the season the NBA needs to have some kind of franchise tag. Parity is what makes the NFL great and the NBA needs to follow suit somehow. I know they tried in the last CBA but I don't think it is working that well.

Tell us about NFL parity.

saphojunkie 07-05-2016 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12301719)
Tell us about NFL parity.

This.

BigCatDaddy 07-05-2016 04:00 PM

Lebron or Durant? Like picking between Denver and the Raiders. I just wont watch.

Demonpenz 07-05-2016 04:03 PM

I can just see milkman walking into the barbershop with a flatbill and gold chain to lay down his hot take of nba and hip hop ;)

bricks 07-05-2016 04:41 PM

I am done watching Basketball.

This is turning into a bush league.

The "elite" star players are sellouts. They (i.e., Lebron & Durant) have so much impact to the point where they've narrowed the competition into a two team league. They've bolstered the level of competition within their clubs to the point where it cannot be matched by the rest of the league.

I understand it's about them wanting to win championships, etc.....I get it but for Gods sake where does that leave everyone else? It handcuffs the rest of the other teams in the league. Forget about anybody else. It's going to be Cleveland vs Golden State again and again.

This whole building super team bs is becoming a trend over the last 15-20 years. It started with Shaq and the other stars like James, Durant copied along.

And now that we hear Wade might join Cleveland? That's when you know it's getting out of hand. But what can you do? That's the frustrating part. This stuff is difficult to regulate because no star will like it if they're restricted in their actions on where to sign.

So what can be done to control this? It's not fun watching basketball when you know that you're team is somebody other than GS or Cleveland has no chance at winning it.

Where can the league go from here? As a fan Id like to see more balance, and distribution with respect to competition.

BWillie 07-05-2016 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12301115)
I'd say Curry, Durant, and Draymond are three of the NBA's top 5 players. Pretty sure that's never happened before, let alone with somebody as good as Klay Thompson as the #4.

Draymond Green is a Top 5 NBA player??? I mean he's good but I can't go that far.

New World Order 07-05-2016 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by assman (Post 12301717)
Cleveland, Oakland, Cleveland, Oakland every year, who wants to watch that!


I miss the days of Hakeem "The Dream" and Mad Max bombing three pointers from mid court.

#Clutchcity

BWillie 07-05-2016 05:02 PM

I really would like the NBA adopt a salary strategy that would make it impossible to have 3 star players on the same team. It used to be one star & one sidekick. Now it's super teams. And, it's going to sell tickets. It's going to be marketable. And make a ton of money. But I don't like it.

Al Bundy 07-05-2016 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 12301829)
I really would like the NBA adopt a salary strategy that would make it impossible to have 3 star players on the same team. It used to be one star & one sidekick. Now it's super teams. And, it's going to sell tickets. It's going to be marketable. And make a ton of money. But I don't like it.

That second Bulls run started it.. but those Lakers and Celtics teams had 3 star players in the 80's...

New World Order 07-05-2016 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Bundy (Post 12301835)
That second Bulls run started it.. but those Lakers and Celtics teams had 3 star players in the 80's...


Phili too

BWillie 07-05-2016 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Bundy (Post 12301835)
That second Bulls run started it.. but those Lakers and Celtics teams had 3 star players in the 80's...

The Bulls had 2 stars. Rodman was a good player, but no where near a star. Ron Harper was just a volume shooter and a Jamal Crawford type of player and then toned it down when joining the balls.

dirk digler 07-05-2016 05:15 PM

David West signs with GS

dirk digler 07-05-2016 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12301719)
Tell us about NFL parity.

There is more parity in the NFL than the NBA. Every year there is multiple teams that can be SB champs and always some surprise teams. In the NBA there are no surprises.

BWillie 07-05-2016 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 12301869)
There is more parity in the NFL than the NBA. Every year there is multiple teams that can be SB champs and always some surprise teams. In the NBA there are no surprises.

That is more of a product of the seven game series in the playoffs. Nonetheless, alot of the same teams are up there every year in the NFL. In the last 8 or 9 years in the NBA, there still has been 7 different NBA champions.

Just look at this year, NOBODY thought Cleveland was going to win the NBA Finals. Spurs, Warriors, Thunder maybe. But most expected the Cavs to get wacked by the Western Conference Affiliate.

Al Bundy 07-05-2016 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 12301842)
The Bulls had 2 stars. Rodman was a good player, but no where near a star. Ron Harper was just a volume shooter and a Jamal Crawford type of player and then toned it down when joining the balls.

Rodman was a star, on and off the court...

OldSchool 07-05-2016 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 12301842)
The Bulls had 2 stars. Rodman was a good player, but no where near a star. Ron Harper was just a volume shooter and a Jamal Crawford type of player and then toned it down when joining the balls.

Right, he wasn't a star. Rodman was just a Hall of Fame caliber player.:rolleyes:

SAUTO 07-05-2016 07:38 PM

Who were the players shaq went to la to become a super team with?

SAUTO 07-05-2016 07:42 PM

Oh no one. Kobe was a ****ing rookie van exel was young, Eddie Jones? Cedric ceballos?


Once again bricks proves a brick is smarter than he is

BigCatDaddy 07-05-2016 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12302167)
Who were the players shaq went to la to become a super team with?

The Daddy just wanted to make movies and rap videos. He was going to win any place he picked.

'Hamas' Jenkins 07-05-2016 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 12302164)
Right, he wasn't a star. Rodman was just a Hall of Fame caliber player.:rolleyes:

Rodman was an excellent rebounder and defender, but the Bulls were playing four-on-five on offense.

ChiefsCountry 07-05-2016 08:25 PM

All of these guys get bitched at because they don't win championships. Then try to win by going to the best situations to get championships, and they still get bitched at.

BigCatDaddy 07-05-2016 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12302260)
All of these guys get bitched at because they don't win championships. Then try to win by going to the best situations to get championships, and they still get bitched at.

Welcome to world of an elite player. Most people size up James and Durant to how the all time greats did it. It is a hell of a measuring stick as they are finding out.

chiefzilla1501 07-05-2016 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 12301869)
There is more parity in the NFL than the NBA. Every year there is multiple teams that can be SB champs and always some surprise teams. In the NBA there are no surprises.

Yup. 10 teams have won NBA championships in the past 30 years. And that's even inflating the #'s because of the recent changing of the guard. GS and Cleveland are new winners, but we all know those 2 teams will probably clean up championships for the next few years or so.

The NFL has 10 champions the past 13 years. Only 11 teams have represented in the finals in 10 years. So NFL has had terrific parity at Super Bowl winners.

Baseball has had 16 teams represent the World Series in the past 10 years. So baseball has had terrific parity in terms of teams representing in the WS.

OldSchool 07-05-2016 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 12301849)
David West signs with GS

West is a better player than Ezeli ever was. Good signing. Looks like Golden State will be perennially signing good vets who want rings to minimum contracts in order to win their rings before retiring now. Take advantage of the prime of Curry, Thompson, Green, and Durant's careers.

KC_Connection 07-05-2016 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 12301823)
Draymond Green is a Top 5 NBA player??? I mean he's good but I can't go that far.

After watching the playoffs this year, there's not even a question in my mind anymore. His defense is just incredible and so necessary to what the Warriors do.

Pitt Gorilla 07-05-2016 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 12301712)
Both conferences are now complete shit from like their 4th seed playoff team to the bottom. There is a complete lack of talent everywhere. Nobody is believable besides like 4 teams (Cavs, Warriors, Spurs, Clippers)

Lack of talent? Towns and Wiggins have incredible talent on a team that couldn't make the playoffs.

BWillie 07-05-2016 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12302287)
After watching the playoffs this year, there's not even a question in my mind anymore. His defense is just incredible and so necessary to what the Warriors do.

I wasnt impressed with him at all for the majority of the playoffs. Alot of his assists are just a product of the system they run and having the two best shooters of all time. Still good player, but no way in hell a top 5 guy. Top 17 Id say.

RustShack 07-05-2016 09:07 PM

I bet the Warriors don't finish with a better record, and that the Cavs win it again.

'Hamas' Jenkins 07-05-2016 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12302260)
All of these guys get bitched at because they don't win championships. Then try to win by going to the best situations to get championships, and they still get bitched at.

There's a difference between winning a championship (Bob Horry) and being a guy that carries the vast majority of the load on a team that wins a championship (LeBron James).


Curry can't carry the load, which he proved over the last two years, and Durant just admitted that he can't, either.

New World Order 07-05-2016 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 12302317)
I bet the Warriors don't finish with a better record, and that the Cavs win it again.


I'll take that bet

KevB 07-05-2016 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 12302303)
I wasnt impressed with him at all for the majority of the playoffs.

You serious?

Draymond can guard 4/5 positions, including the other team's best big more times than not. And he does it very well. He's their primary rebounder, and his ability to handle on the break or secondary break is incredibly underrated. He can bring the ball down quickly while Klay and Steph spot up on the break. That gets them a number of open looks in the open floor. He can guard either side of a pick and roll, and he can run either side of a pick and roll on offense. He can get to the basket, but he's also a threat from 3. Not to mention his attitude and energy give that team their fire.

He had a couple of bad games in the playoffs, and he obviously has a dirty streak, which leads me to really not liking the dude. But his impact on the game is significant.

New World Order 07-05-2016 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 12302321)
There's a difference between winning a championship (Bob Horry) and being a guy that carries the vast majority of the load on a team that wins a championship (LeBron James).


Curry can't carry the load, which he proved over the last two years, and Durant just admitted that he can't, either.


Horry made some clutch shots in the playoffs.

Mark Madsen better example.

RustShack 07-05-2016 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 12302336)
I'll take that bet

Your bet is the Warriors do both? What's the bet?

SAUTO 07-05-2016 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 12302374)
Your bet is the Warriors do both? What's the bet?

I would think it's just what you said.

He thinks the warriors have a better record next year than they had this year and the Cavs wont win it again

New World Order 07-05-2016 10:02 PM

It sounds like Wade is going to Cleveland.

RobBlake 07-05-2016 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 12302289)
Lack of talent? Towns and Wiggins have incredible talent on a team that couldn't make the playoffs.

potential is different than seasoned talent.

RealSNR 07-05-2016 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobBlake (Post 12302406)
potential is different than seasoned talent.

The Wolves aren't potential.

They're a legitimate threat in two years.

They're like the Thunder prior to 2009 that everybody knew was going to rape faces. Except they have the chance to be even better.

staylor26 07-05-2016 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 12302404)
It sounds like Wade is going to Cleveland.

Very unlikely.

New World Order 07-05-2016 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 12302374)
Your bet is the Warriors do both? What's the bet?


No bet if Wade goes to Cle. Lol

'Hamas' Jenkins 07-05-2016 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12302411)
Except they have the chance to be even better.

They do not. That is ridiculous.

RunKC 07-05-2016 10:25 PM

If KD stayed they would have signed Horford, but Horford knew KD was gone.
KD, Westbrook, Horford, Adams, Olidipo. One hell of a starting lineup.

Would have been awesome to see that team battle the Warriors, but nope. Now it's the Warriors and Cavs and the Spurs 500 ft below them as the next best team.

NWTF 07-05-2016 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 12302404)
It sounds like Wade is going to Cleveland.

I read they were "talking", but Cleveland cant match what Wade wants. Unless of course Wade takes less, but they are calling it a long shot at this point.

Pitt Gorilla 07-05-2016 10:27 PM

Were folks as salty when LMA went to the Spurs?

New World Order 07-05-2016 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NWTF (Post 12302448)
I read they were "talking", but Cleveland cant match what Wade wants. Unless of course Wade takes less, but they are calling it a long shot at this point.


Someone associated with the Cavs announcer said it was 'a done deal.'

Who knows at this point.

KC_Connection 07-05-2016 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 12302452)
Were folks as salty when LMA went to the Spurs?

Aldridge is basically Chris Bosh/Kevin Love...except worse. Nobody cared.

KC_Connection 07-05-2016 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 12302303)
I wasnt impressed with him at all for the majority of the playoffs. Alot of his assists are just a product of the system they run and having the two best shooters of all time. Still good player, but no way in hell a top 5 guy. Top 17 Id say.

Could very well be the best defensive player in the league. And the system helps all of them, but you need to have superb court vision and a very high BBIQ to play that role that he does in that offense. The fact that he's also improved his shot to become a well above average 3PT shooter (38.8%) is also enormously helpful.

RealSNR 07-05-2016 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 12302436)
They do not. That is ridiculous.

It's a chance with KAT. He's that damn good.

Not saying it will happen, but very quickly people are going to start talking about him as a top 5 NBA player the way they do Anthony Davis.

And KAT is going to be better than Anthony Davis.

KC_Connection 07-05-2016 11:26 PM

I'd care a lot more about the Wade rumors if he was still in his 20s and his knees weren't completely gone. He could still probably manage to be a good role player on a contender, but acquiring him now would be kind of like the Nets acquiring Paul Pierce a few years back.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-05-2016 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12302411)
The Wolves aren't potential.

They're a legitimate threat in two years.

They're like the Thunder prior to 2009 that everybody knew was going to rape faces. Except they have the chance to be even better.

ROFL

chiefzilla1501 07-06-2016 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NWTF (Post 12302448)
I read they were "talking", but Cleveland cant match what Wade wants. Unless of course Wade takes less, but they are calling it a long shot at this point.

I think the Cavs will trade someone like shumpert. It also wouldn't surprise me if lebron took a massive paycut. He can afford to take a 1 year haircut given his enormous endorsement earnings. But what I'd really like is to trade love and get a little value back.

PAChiefsGuy 07-06-2016 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 12302317)
I bet the Warriors don't finish with a better record, and that the Cavs win it again.

Why? The Warriors finished 73-9 last year and lost in Gm 7 to the Cavs. They just added a top 5 NBA player and the Cavs have done what exactly?

I'm not a fan of either team but lets be realistic here. Warriors will more than likely destroy any team they face in the playoffs if they are healthy.

Stop Curry, there's Durant, stop Durant (and stopping Curry AND Durant is going to be nearly impossible), there's Klay, Stop Klay, there's Green.. Also, they still have a decent bench..

Ha! Good luck Cavs...

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12302495)
Aldridge is basically Chris Bosh/Kevin Love...except worse. Nobody cared.

He's not worse than those two, he is pretty much just as good if not a little better.

RobBlake 07-06-2016 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12302505)
I'd care a lot more about the Wade rumors if he was still in his 20s and his knees weren't completely gone. He could still probably manage to be a good role player on a contender, but acquiring him now would be kind of like the Nets acquiring Paul Pierce a few years back.

if it was wade in his 20s then i honestly wouldn't care if durant was on the warriors. I'd go all in on a Wade/Irving/James lineup

chiefzilla1501 07-06-2016 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobBlake (Post 12302522)
if it was wade in his 20s then i honestly wouldn't care if durant was on the warriors. I'd go all in on a Wade/Irving/James lineup

I'm torn on this. I like the fit better than love. And I'm assuming playoff Wade will be back. And that version of Wade was spectacular last year.
But Wade is a volume shooter and not a strong defender so I'm not really sure how the three make it work, let alone if love is in the lineup. The Cavs barely made multiple iso players work against gs last year.

'Hamas' Jenkins 07-06-2016 12:54 AM

If the Cavs traded Love (unlikely), they would need to recoup two pieces. One would be a stretch 4. The other would need to be an athletic wing or rangy five.

I don't see them being able to do that. Additionally, they will be a landing spot for post-buyout vets or league minimum guys chasing a ring. There is value in that.

PAChiefsGuy 07-06-2016 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 12302524)
If the Cavs traded Love (unlikely), they would need to recoup two pieces. One would be a stretch 4. The other would need to be an athletic wing or rangy five.

I don't see them being able to do that. Additionally, they will be a landing spot for post-buyout vets or league minimum guys chasing a ring. There is value in that.

It's going to be extremely hard to beat the Warriors. Just too much firepower for any one team to beat IMO.

It's almost unfair which is why this signing is bad for the NBA... It's starting to set a bad trend and I don't like it.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-06-2016 01:05 AM

The Warriors still suck/Bundy

chiefzilla1501 07-06-2016 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 12302524)
If the Cavs traded Love (unlikely), they would need to recoup two pieces. One would be a stretch 4. The other would need to be an athletic wing or rangy five.

I don't see them being able to do that. Additionally, they will be a landing spot for post-buyout vets or league minimum guys chasing a ring. There is value in that.

Which is why I could see lebron taking a hometown discount. If lebron and Wade get paid below value, you trade love, you can probably also keep Jr Smith, shumpert, and Jefferson in addition to already having Channing Frye. Could probably also look into exchanging shumpert for a big. Not an ideal situation. But there are some intriguing options and I really could see lebron taking a big cut if he knew it brought in Wade.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 07-06-2016 02:24 AM

GS is one injury away from allowing a lineup of either Parker, Green, Kawhi, Pau, Aldridge.....or Kyrie, Smith/Wade, LeBron, Tristan, and Love to beat their assess in the playoffs

TigeRRUppeRRcut 07-06-2016 02:26 AM

Plus GS losing Bogut and Festus to play really small ball.. Even pachulia/west can't fix that problem. The lack of interior presence gives SA and CLE the advantage

mcaj22 07-06-2016 07:25 AM

who is going to beat them inside besides Lebron

300 year old Pau Gasol? Lamarcus Aldridge? Those guys are soft, Draymond Green can handle both of them.

you make it seem like these teams have prime Shaq inside the paint. The only thing that they can't stop is a 260 lb Lebron flying down the lane running over people like a tight end playing basketball.

Even though the Jazz aren't there yet they will be the toughest front court the Warriors have to face because of their size and length.

RobBlake 07-06-2016 08:59 AM

Now Ray Allen might sign with golden state lmao

BigCatDaddy 07-06-2016 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobBlake (Post 12302786)
Now Ray Allen might sign with golden state lmao

Well he did get one for James but at 41? He can probably still hit the 3 but not much else

KevB 07-06-2016 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 12302668)
who is going to beat them inside besides Lebron

300 year old Pau Gasol? Lamarcus Aldridge? Those guys are soft, Draymond Green can handle both of them.

you make it seem like these teams have prime Shaq inside the paint. The only thing that they can't stop is a 260 lb Lebron flying down the lane running over people like a tight end playing basketball.

Even though the Jazz aren't there yet they will be the toughest front court the Warriors have to face because of their size and length.

It's not just about post defense. It's rim protection as well. Bogut (and to a lesser extent Ezeli) provided cover at the basket for the GSW perimeter defenders. Bogut had a tremendous impact on several games in the playoffs. He made things difficult at times for LeBron early in the series trying to finish around the basket. His injury was big.

That said, I don't think it changes the Warrior's place as favorites. But it will be something (rim protection) they'll have to figure out/overcome.

KevB 07-06-2016 09:15 AM

I don't see anything wrong with these vets going to favorites to get a ring. They've earned that opportunity. They bring something to the table, or the team wouldn't sign them. I have nothing against a guy nearing retirement looking for that one last rush of a title chase. The ring is important, but I think these guys have the perspective to understand it's about that life experience. You want to enjoy life, right? Would you rather "earn respect" toiling away for some crap team that can't win, or play on a team that allows you to truly enjoy your job?

chiefzilla1501 07-06-2016 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 12302819)
I don't see anything wrong with these vets going to favorites to get a ring. They've earned that opportunity. They bring something to the table, or the team wouldn't sign them. I have nothing against a guy nearing retirement looking for that one last rush of a title chase. The ring is important, but I think these guys have the perspective to understand it's about that life experience. You want to enjoy life, right? Would you rather "earn respect" toiling away for some crap team that can't win, or play on a team that allows you to truly enjoy your job?

I don't have an issue with that as much as I have an issue with a salary cap in a superstar driven league that does nothing from allowing teams to empire build. And I'm saying this as a fan of the biggest offender, the Cavs. It shouldn't be this easy to build a big three. In an ideal world a superstar would struggle to find good talent around him. And the idea that drafts have been rendered almost meaningless after the first few picks.

It's a challenge silver needs to solve.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.