ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Bucs abused the defense... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=303875)

Beef Supreme 11-20-2016 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12567666)
You think Alex Smith called that play?

I think Reid called that play because he knows Alex Smith can't throw a hail mary to save his life.

SAUTO 11-20-2016 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567657)
Did they say he couldn't kick? Quit making all these assumptions about it was going to have to be a 54 yard kick. For the 2nd time, they bypassed the 54 yard kick because of the wind in the 3rd Q. Which is why TB didn't try the same kick in the 4th Q.

JFC

I didn't say it had to be a 54 yard kick'

Once again...

Kicker is healthy they bypass a 54 yard kick because of wind.

Kicker is healthy and they throw an int in the end zone, would have been a gimme fg.

Kicker gets hurt and you expect us to drive 40-50 yards in 2 minutes with no timeouts and automatically kick a fg in the same windy conditions. With the Same offense that took over 4 minutes to score a td on the previous drive.

You aren't making sense dude.

MeatRock 11-20-2016 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12567674)
He scored two TDs today.

Two Td's. That's always enough.:rolleyes:

splatbass 11-20-2016 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12566914)
dude that shit is going to happen....the defense had to get a stop and didn't. really they didn't get a stop all game

Exactly. The Bucs only punted twice. Pathetic D performance today.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-20-2016 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 12567100)
No Peters, Bailey, Howard and Dee Ford left early. What ya think was going to happen?

I double took on your post. It's amazing to see how far Ford has come along that we consider him a huge loss when he's not on the field.

Beef Supreme 11-20-2016 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12567682)
Exactly. The Bucs only punted twice. Pathetic D performance today.

That's right. The defense played bad. But they still held them to 19 points. If our offense can't score 19 points, at home, they suck.

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatRock (Post 12567457)
He rarely throws TD's too, unfortunately. 9 td's to 4 int's? Not getting it done through 10 games.

Jeez...you'd associate those numbers with an option QB in the NCAA who throws less than 20 passes a game, not a starting NFL QB. Wow.

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefTablet (Post 12567688)
That's right. The defense played bad. But they still held them to 19 points. If our offense can't score 19 points, at home, they suck.

Amen.

If the offense doesn't turn the ball over, the Chiefs kick the FG instead of coming up with the goose egg.

Only a total dipshit can't see that the defense actually played good; considering how long they were on the field, every time Alex went 3 and out, they went back out there, getting their shit pushed in like a slut on prom night, and somehow kept holding them to FGs, and only gave up 19 PTs. Penis Winston had 311 yards, ran the Bucs up and down the field, and yet had to settle for 4 FGs.

Only a truly inept offensive team can't score 20 points at home.

All the Chiefs had to do to get to 20 was not turn the ball over...

NJChiefsFan 11-20-2016 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12567682)
Exactly. The Bucs only punted twice. Pathetic D performance today.

Agreed. The offense had a chance to pick up the D today and failed. Kelce's drop, Alex's INT, and missing some 3rd down chances. Alex's throw to Conley in double coverage when he could have ran for it was pretty bad. Not scoring a TD on the first drive killed what was an incredible amount of momentum to start the game.

The defenses horrid play today doesn't cancel out all that. We don't have to pick one thing to blame here. There is plenty to go around. Sutton sitting on his thumb and not bringing pressure, Andy still not knowing how a clock ****ing works, ect. The D caused the offense to not have enough plays, but the offense could have and should have done more with the big moments they had.

This is what is going to happen in the playoffs. Good teams are going to make us have to win a way we aren't used to. It isn't going to go to script, and this result is part of the concern some have. That off script, the coaches and stars aren't going to do enough.

mcaj22 11-20-2016 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12567692)
Jeez...you'd associate those numbers with an option QB in the NCAA who throws less than 20 passes a game, not a starting NFL QB. Wow.

correct, those are numbers are basically Carson Wentz's year 1 numbers in the NFL. Fresh out of college and Wentz stats so far are Alex Smith in year 11. Quite sad really.

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12567706)
Agreed. The offense had a chance to pick up the D today and failed. Kelce's drop, Alex's INT, and missing some 3rd down chances. Alex's throw to Conley in double coverage when he could have ran for it was pretty bad. Not scoring a TD on the first drive killed what was an incredible amount of momentum to start the game.

The defenses horrid play today doesn't cancel out all that. We don't have to pick one thing to blame here. There is plenty to go around. Sutton sitting on his thumb and not bringing pressure, Andy still not knowing how a clock ****ing works, ect. The D caused the offense to not have enough plays, but the offense could have and should have done more with the big moments they had.

This is what is going to happen in the playoffs. Good teams are going to make us have to win a way we aren't used to. It isn't going to go to script, and this result is part of the concern some have. That off script, the coaches and stars aren't going to do enough.

That's why most teams spend premium draft picks on QBs who can transcend those off script situations, improvise, and make big plays happen anyway.

The only time the Chiefs have even tried in my lifetime was when they burned a 2nd on a guy named Matt Blundin, who iirc never took a snap while sitting behind Bono, Gannon, & Grbac.

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 12567713)
correct, those are numbers are basically Carson Wentz's year 1 numbers in the NFL. Fresh out of college and Wentz stats so far are Alex Smith in year 11. Quite sad really.

Alex Smith blows.

splatbass 11-20-2016 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12567705)
Amen.

If the offense doesn't turn the ball over, the Chiefs kick the FG instead of coming up with the goose egg.

Only a total dipshit can't see that the defense actually played good; considering how long they were on the field, every time Alex went 3 and out, they went back out there, getting their shit pushed in like a slut on prom night, and somehow kept holding them to FGs, and only gave up 19 PTs. Penis Winston had 311 yards, ran the Bucs up and down the field, and yet had to settle for 4 FGs.

Only a truly inept offensive team can't score 20 points at home.

All the Chiefs had to do to get to 20 was not turn the ball over...

So the games aren't rigged?

The defense was on the field so long because they only forced two punts the entire game.

NJChiefsFan 11-20-2016 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12567723)
That's why most teams spend premium draft picks on QBs who can transcend those off script situations, improvise, and make big plays happen anyway.

The only time the Chiefs have even tried in my lifetime was when they burned a 2nd on a guy named Matt Blundin, who iirc never took a snap while sitting behind Bono, Gannon, & Grbac.

And I want to be clear. I do think KC can go somewhere with this team. Problem is because our QB isn't likely to carry a team when the other parts are struggling we likely need....

1. Our coach to call a great game and manage a great game. Good chance that doesn't happen.

2. We convert in the redzone.

3. Alex plays his best and doesn't fall into a shell. Also needs to use his legs.He pushed the ball a few times, but overall this season isn't looking good.

4. Our D helps out. I think that could happen against all possible playoff teams except vs PIT or NE.

5. Better 2nd half adjustments than the other team.

6. Not be injured at key spots. Doesn't seem good.

There is reason to be concerned about those things happening. First things first is righting this ship.

Anyong Bluth 11-20-2016 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12566779)
This!!!!

only a moron would blame just the defense

Pretty sure "just the defense" wasn't what was intimated.

milkman 11-20-2016 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth (Post 12567743)
Pretty sure "just the defense" wasn't what was intimated.

No it wasn't.

The argument is that Alex Smith bares his share of responsibility, and there are some that refuse to accept that.

Everyone bares responsibilty.

Andy Reid, Bob Sutton, Alex Smith and the offense, and the defense contributed to this losing effort.

splatbass 11-20-2016 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12567839)
No it wasn't.

The argument is that Alex Smith bares his share of responsibility, and there are some that refuse to accept that.

Everyone bares responsibilty.

Andy Reid, Bob Sutton, Alex Smith and the offense, and the defense contributed to this losing effort.

I accept that. But I still think the D was far worse than Smith today.

milkman 11-20-2016 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12567848)
I accept that. But I still think the D was far worse than Smith today.

I would agree.

petegz28 11-20-2016 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12567839)
No it wasn't.

The argument is that Alex Smith bares his share of responsibility, and there are some that refuse to accept that.

Everyone bares responsibilty.

Andy Reid, Bob Sutton, Alex Smith and the offense, and the defense contributed to this losing effort.

If I had to rank the blame for this game it would be as follows:

1. Poor tackling-Players
2. Shit defensive plan-Coaching
3. Shit defensive calls-Coaching
4. Shit offensive calls in the red zone-Coaching
5. Dropped pass-Players (Kelce)
6. Bad INT- Players (Smith)
7. TO at end of 1st half-Coaching

Some people are crying about what we did in the last 8 seconds and that's just ****ing dumb. We had no shot at anything. No QB would have. That's where this board loses touch with reality sometimes. No one is scoring anything in 8 secs from their own 30 and no TO's.

Al Bundy 11-20-2016 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12567596)
Or the defenses inability to stop them with 4 time outs (2 minute warning included) ?

No.. Alex Smith made a HORRIBLE throw right to Chris ****ing suck ass Conte....

petegz28 11-20-2016 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Bundy (Post 12567870)
No.. Alex Smith made a HORRIBLE throw right to Chris ****ing suck ass Conte....

That shit's gonna happen. There was plenty of time to come back and win. The defense allowed TB to score a TD after that INT. The defense didn't get a stop after we scored a TD and needed a FG.

That one play did not cost us the game at that point in time.

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12567848)
I accept that. But I still think the D was far worse than Smith today.

But they weren't - they gave up less than 20 pts.

Alex threw a red zone pick in the fourth qtr that was essentially a 14 point swing - at the LEAST, Santos gets 3.

20 points is all it took to beat the Bucs at home, and all Alex has to do is NOT turn the ball over. That's all. Even as bad as the defense was today, even though Penis Winston threw for 300 yards...they still gave the offense a chance to win.

This is the worst this defense will play all year, hobbled as they were...

All it would've taken was 20 points...and the offense couldn't even manage that's

At home.

Pathetic.

petegz28 11-20-2016 07:54 PM

Did we even blitz today? I swear today was like watching a classic RAC 3-4.

oaklandhater 11-20-2016 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567891)
Did we even blitz today? I swear today was like watching a classic RAC 3-4.

one blitz.....

bricks 11-20-2016 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 12566765)
Oh well, It's just a game.

Love this post.

I feel better now.

Thank you SR.

petegz28 11-20-2016 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12567895)
one blitz.....

That's terrible and I don't understand it at all.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-20-2016 07:57 PM

Win as a team, lose as a team. We pay far too much money for Maclin, Berry, Houston, Tamba, Schwartz, Smith and DJ to not make an impact on a regular basis. I argue that Jones, Sorenson, Peters, Hill have brought more to the table this year than our vets.

oaklandhater 11-20-2016 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bricks (Post 12567897)
Love this post.

I feel better now.

Thank you SR.

Red is always chill lol

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567884)
That shit's gonna happen. There was plenty of time to come back and win. The defense allowed TB to score a TD after that INT. The defense didn't get a stop after we scored a TD and needed a FG.

That one play did not cost us the game at that point in time.

At that point, the defense hadn't stopped them all day, Penis was throwing up and down the field at will...the defense had been hanging on for dear life and kept it close by forcing field goals.

At some point, your offense needs to grow a pair, step the **** up, string some first downs together, let the defense rest, and...I don't know, maybe SCORE A ****ING TOUCHDOWN IN THE FOURTH QUARTER FOR ONCE INSTEAD OF RELYING ON DEFENSE AND SPECIAL TEAMS EVERY ****ING WEEK!

The defense single handedly took the game over and won last week. Maybe you missed that.

You can't rely on that every week. At some point, the offense needs to be...productive. Duh.

New World Order 11-20-2016 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12567901)
Win as a team, lose as a team. We pay far too much money for Maclin, Berry, Houston, Tamba, Smith and DJ to not make an impact on a regular basis. I argue that Jones, Sorenson, Peters, Hill have brought more to the table this year than our vets.


Don't forget Smith

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-20-2016 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Bundy (Post 12567870)
No.. Alex Smith made a HORRIBLE throw right to Chris ****ing suck ass Conte....

First red zone interception in almost 30 games. Have some respect for yourself rather than smothering your dumbshittery on this forum.

oaklandhater 11-20-2016 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12567901)
Win as a team, lose as a team. We pay far too much money for Maclin, Berry, Houston, Tamba, Smith and DJ to not make an impact on a regular basis. I argue that Jones, Sorenson, Peters, Hill have brought more to the table this year than our vets.

Holy shit Tiger said something I agree with.

Houston got hurt so he gets a pass

Maclin was not hurt at the start of the season and still look like crap.

bricks 11-20-2016 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12567902)
Red is always chill lol

That's awesome

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567891)
Did we even blitz today? I swear today was like watching a classic RAC 3-4.

It's the same horseshit Sutton called against NE in the playoffs last year.

petegz28 11-20-2016 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12567903)
At that point, the defense hadn't stopped them all day, Penis was throwing up and down the field at will...the defense had been hanging on for dear life and kept it close by forcing field goals.

At some point, your offense needs to grow a pair, step the **** up, string some first downs together, let the defense rest, and...I don't know, maybe SCORE A ****ING TOUCHDOWN IN THE FOURTH QUARTER FOR ONCE INSTEAD OF RELYING ON DEFENSE AND SPECIAL TEAMS EVERY ****ING WEEK!

The defense single handedly took the game over and won last week. Maybe you missed that.

You can't rely on that every week. At some point, the offense needs to be...productive. Duh.

dude, we only had like 2, 3 and outs today and that was in the first half. The defense didn't get a single 3 and out. TB ran over 20 plays more than the Chiefs. And a lot of that was because they defense couldn't get themselves off the field. It isn't like we were going out there on offense and going 3 and out, drive after drive after drive. Cause we weren't. We actually moved the ball rather well on offense. And we did score a TD in the 4th. Just sayin....

WhiteWhale 11-20-2016 08:00 PM

When the offense fails to break 20 points against one of the worst defenses in the entire NFL at home, it's a huge problem.

Guys, this isn't an issue about a single game. This is a pattern. KC's offense is terrible.

KC giving up gobs of yards and few points is also a trend, but it's less alarming than the offense's inability to score points.

WhiteWhale 11-20-2016 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567912)
dude, we only had like 2, 3 and outs today and that was in the first half. The defense didn't get a single 3 and out. TB ran over 20 plays more than the Chiefs. And a lot of that was because they defense couldn't get themselves off the field. It isn't like we were going out there on offense and going 3 and out, drive after drive after drive. Cause we weren't. We actually moved the ball rather well on offense. And we did score a TD in the 4th. Just sayin....

You aren't going to win many games by scoring 17 points.

Period. Full stop.

petegz28 11-20-2016 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12567911)
It's the same horseshit Sutton called against NE in the playoffs last year.

It was bad. Compounded by shit tackling. We had so many tackles for losses and or little\no gain that we just whiffed. Not wrapping up or something. It killed us. Literally. It allowed TB so extend drive after drive after drive.

And Sutton did absolutely nothing to generate pressure on Winston.

kcxiv 11-20-2016 08:03 PM

Despite the defense playing like ass they still didn't allow more then 20 points. this offense couldn't score 20 at home. This is all on the offense. Alex Smith did not get it done. He's played 2 quarters of good football all season and that's it There is a reason why he's ranked in the bottom of the league in most passing statistics. He's just not good.

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567912)
dude, we only had like 2, 3 and outs today and that was in the first half. The defense didn't get a single 3 and out. TB ran over 20 plays more than the Chiefs. And a lot of that was because they defense couldn't get themselves off the field. It isn't like we were going out there on offense and going 3 and out, drive after drive after drive. Cause we weren't. We actually moved the ball rather well on offense. And we did score a TD in the 4th. Just sayin....

17 points

At home

Against Tampa ****ing Bay

Isn't good enough

Period.

NJChiefsFan 11-20-2016 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567884)
That shit's gonna happen. There was plenty of time to come back and win. The defense allowed TB to score a TD after that INT. The defense didn't get a stop after we scored a TD and needed a FG.

That one play did not cost us the game at that point in time.

I don't get this. There was time left so the INT wasn't terrible? The play also gave them 55 yards that helped set up their TD.

Even if we go with this, how can you have the Kelce drop as worse than the Smith INT. It happened way earlier in the game, which to your argument, gave us plenty of time. We also got points out of that drive and didn't set up the other team on our own 45. The play also didn't suck the air out of the stadium and punch the defense emotionally in the gut.

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567891)
Did we even blitz today? I swear today was like watching a classic RAC 3-4.

I remember one resulting in a holding call. Horrible tactics IMO considering that we weren't getting there.

bricks 11-20-2016 08:12 PM

It's funny when you think about it?

Even despite the Chiefs playing bad, they were in this game all along. We could knock on the defense, offense but what this loss really boils down to was terrible decision making.

I'm with most folks in that the offensive playcalling was bad, what pains the most was Reid opting to not kick the 54 yard field goal but rather punt and pin Tampa in their own end.

It worked but what if Santos hits that 54 yard field goal? Turns out, that's the difference in the game. Reid not going for the field goal cost us this game. Chiefs didn't lose just because they played bad, they lost because of their conservative approach.

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12566993)
You and the Alex ball washers on this site are by far the stupidest mother****ers here.

The fact that you can not understand how we don't cup his balls and lick them like you is a testament to that fact.

I've noticed something they all have in common...

Something...

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bricks (Post 12567962)
It's funny when you think about it?

Even despite the Chiefs playing bad, they were in this game all along. We could knock on the defense, offense but what this loss really boils down to was terrible decision making.

I'm with most folks in that the offensive playcalling was bad, what pains the most was Reid opting to not kick the 54 yard field goal but rather punt and pin Tampa in their own end.

It worked but what if Santos hits that 54 yard field goal? Turns out, that's the difference in the game. Reid not going for the field goal cost us this game. Chiefs didn't lose just because they played bad, they lost because of their conservative approach.

If Alex doesn't throw that INT, then Santos kicks a FG and we win.

OR

if Reid doesn't call TO at the end of the 1st half, then Tampa doesn't have time to score at the end of the half.

petegz28 11-20-2016 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12567976)
If Alex doesn't throw that INT, then Santos kicks a FG and we win.

OR

if Reid doesn't call TO at the end of the 1st half, then Tampa doesn't have time to score at the end of the half.

Or we kick the fg and the bucs drive down the field and kick the fg to win. .like they did all day

petegz28 11-20-2016 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12567960)
I don't get this. There was time left so the INT wasn't terrible? The play also gave them 55 yards that helped set up their TD.

Even if we go with this, how can you have the Kelce drop as worse than the Smith INT. It happened way earlier in the game, which to your argument, gave us plenty of time. We also got points out of that drive and didn't set up the other team on our own 45. The play also didn't suck the air out of the stadium and punch the defense emotionally in the gut.



I remember one resulting in a holding call. Horrible tactics IMO considering that we weren't getting there.

So swap the int and the kelcr drop....

SAUTO 11-20-2016 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567985)
Or we kick the fg and the bucs drive down the field and kick the fg to win. .like they did all day

There were over 12 minutes left in the game when we threw that int. Even if they drove right down and scored we had time to score again.

I mean they moved the ball at will all day, right?

petegz28 11-20-2016 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12568018)
There were over 12 minutes left in the game when we threw that int. Even if they drove right down and scored we had time to score again.

I mean they moved the ball at will all day, right?

According to you we would never have scored .... you need to make up your mind. Either the offense would have scored or they wouldn't have.

Congratulations. .you have successfully taken both sides of your own argument

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-20-2016 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 12567920)
You aren't going to win many games by scoring 17 points.

Period. Full stop.

You're not going to win many games giving up 24 first downs, allowing the other team to convert 68% of 3rd downs, and allowing the other team to have the ball for 35 minutes.

Period. Full stop.

SAUTO 11-20-2016 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568032)
According to you we would never have scored .... you need to make up your mind. Either the offense would have scored or they wouldn't have.

Congratulations. .you have successfully taken both sides of your own argument

We did score after that dipshit.

Again.
We threw an int. Inside the ten instead of getting a fg

They scored a td off a short field after the int return.

We scored a td.

We lost by 2.

The td we scored took over 4 minutes in a hurry up against a prevent style d.

At one point we bypassed a 54 yard fg Because of wind.

You think it's given we would go down the field and score in two minutes with a hurt fg kicker.

I disagree.


Did I cover everything?

petegz28 11-20-2016 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12568080)
We did score after that dipshit.

Again.
We threw an int. Inside the ten instead of getting a fg

They scored a td off a short field after the int return.

We scored a td.

We lost by 2.

The td we scored took over 4 minutes in a hurry up against a prevent style d.

At one point we bypassed a 54 yard fg Because of wind.

You think it's given we would go down the field and score in two minutes with a hurt fg kicker.

I disagree.


Did I cover everything?

Yeah, you've gone from can't score to can score....really well

SAUTO 11-20-2016 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12568078)
You're not going to win many games giving up 24 first downs, allowing the other team to convert 68% of 3rd downs, and allowing the other team to have the ball for 35 minutes.

Period. Full stop.

We were inside the 5 and threw an int into double coverage.

No turn over and a good fg and we win this game.

Their t.o.p., and first downs, and 3rd down conversion percentage still doesn't win them the game

SAUTO 11-20-2016 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568094)
Yeah, you've gone from can't score to can score....really well

They did score **** head. I'm not taking that off the board.

But I'm not betting on them doing it in two minutes.

You are acting like it's a givenROFL.

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567985)
Or we kick the fg and the bucs drive down the field and kick the fg to win. .like they did all day

Still have your timeouts and a fighting chance to score the Fg to win.

As opposed to Reid's patented 4 minute hurry up, guaranteed to lose the game for you ROFL

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-20-2016 08:51 PM

I put Sauto on ignore along with a few others: cupid, oak, dagna, pest, tuck, nwo, OTW . CP is much more enjoyable since I've done that.

petegz28 11-20-2016 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12568103)
They did score **** head. I'm not taking that off the board.

But I'm not betting on them doing it in two minutes.

You are acting like it's a givenROFL.

And so are you, just the opposite. You are all over the place. We scored but we can't score. I got it...

petegz28 11-20-2016 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12568115)
Still have your timeouts and a fighting chance to score the Fg to win.

As opposed to Reid's patented 4 minute hurry up, guaranteed to lose the game for you ROFL

we had our to's and the 2 min warning after we scored the td...how'd that work out?

SAUTO 11-20-2016 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568143)
And so are you, just the opposite. You are all over the place. We scored but we can't score. I got it...

I've been very clear.

Even given clear common sense reasons, not sure why you are being a ****ing dumb ass today.

We scored. It took over 4 minutes.

I'm not betting we are going to do it again in two with no time outs.

Pretty clear what I'm saying here pete

NJChiefsFan 11-20-2016 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567991)
So swap the int and the kelcr drop....

I think it's a must. But really my point was that it was obvious which was worse. That you put it the other way is probably why people accuse you of going out of your way to defend Smith more than he deserves.

petegz28 11-20-2016 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12568153)
I've been very clear.

Even given clear common sense reasons, not sure why you are being a ****ing dumb ass today.

We scored. It took over 4 minutes.

I'm not betting we are going to do it again in two with no time outs.

Pretty clear what I'm saying here pete

that was for a td...not a fg

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568032)
According to you we would never have scored .... you need to make up your mind. Either the offense would have scored or they wouldn't have.

Congratulations. .you have successfully taken both sides of your own argument

You're right; ReidSmith would've just shit the bed again if the defense HAD been able to get a stop by some miracle.

What a giant ball of Ebolaids filled with pure undiluted antifreeze suck. Aids-filled dumpster fire.

petegz28 11-20-2016 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12568160)
You're right; ReidSmith would've just shit the bed again if the defense HAD been able to get a stop by some miracle.

What a giant ball of Ebolaids filled with pure undiluted antifreeze suck. Aids-filled dumpster fire.

You could always become a Pats fan and be happier...

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568151)
we had our to's and the 2 min warning after we scored the td...how'd that work out?

Well, when you consider that the quickest ReidSmith can score is 4 minutes, then the game was essentially over once we hit 7:59 left in the 4th.

NJChiefsFan 11-20-2016 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568158)
that was for a td...not a fg

Has it been confirmed if Santos was available for a final FG? Didn't he kick the extra point? KCChiefs.com seems to be slow on releasing quotes for some strange reason. It's like a Nazi propagandists.

SAUTO 11-20-2016 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568158)
that was for a td...not a fg

Again with that.

We bypassed a 54 yard fg with a healthy kicker due to wind. If we had started from the 30 you think we were going to get 45-50 yards and kick a fg with an injured kicker in the same conditions. All in under two minutes with no time outs?

Come on man that is no where near a given with this offense. You act as though it is.

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568165)
You could always become a Pats fan and be happier...

I'm not that confused.

I'll just stop watching altogether, thanks. Which isn't far off at this point.

What a waste of a Sunday. **** Clark Hunt. **** the Kansas City Chiefs.

****ing vampires. I open my closet and I feel like an idiot for giving them so much money. I heard they raised parking...again. I wouldn't know, because I quit giving that rich ****ing asshole my money. About to quit giving him my time/ratings demographic/what the **** ever

petegz28 11-20-2016 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12568172)
Well, when you consider that the quickest ReidSmith can score is 4 minutes, then the game was essentially over once we hit 7:59 left in the 4th.

JFC, this is crazy. We took 4 mins to score a TD. All we would have needed was a FG. Forget...you guys are right...our defense who's shortest drive all game, was a 9 play drive allowing a FG, has no blame in this loss. :rolleyes:

SAUTO 11-20-2016 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12568177)
Has it been confirmed if Santos was available for a final FG? Didn't he kick the extra point? KCChiefs.com seems to be slow on releasing quotes for some strange reason. It's like a Nazi propagandists.

He kicked the extra point and got injured on the kick off is what they said in game

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-20-2016 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12568184)
I'm not that confused.

I'll just stop watching altogether, thanks. Which isn't far off at this point.

What a waste of a Sunday. **** Clark Hunt. **** the Kansas City Chiefs.

****ing vampires. I open my closet and I feel like an idiot for giving them so much money. I heard they raised parking...again. I wouldn't know, because I quit giving that rich ****ing asshole my money. About to quit giving him my time/ratings demographic/what the **** ever

Someone is super butt hurt. I'll hold you to your promise.

K. Thanks. Bye.

SAUTO 11-20-2016 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568185)
JFC, this is crazy. We took 4 mins to score a TD. All we would have needed was a FG. Forget...you guys are right...our defense who's shortest drive all game, was a 9 play drive allowing a FG, has no blame in this loss. :rolleyes:

The defense definitely had a part in this, but the offense should have still won.

They had the chances.

petegz28 11-20-2016 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12568183)
Again with that.

We bypassed a 54 yard fg with a healthy kicker due to wind. If we had started from the 30 you think we were going to get 45-50 yards and kick a fg with an injured kicker in the same conditions. All in under two minutes with no time outs?

Come on man that is no where near a given with this offense. You act as though it is.

The wind in the 3Q, which is when we didn't go for it, is not the same in the 4th when we are going the other way. And you keep going back to this having to be a 54 yard kick.

Again, you are all over the map. If your argument was even incoherent you would be light years ahead of where you are now.

kcpasco 11-20-2016 09:05 PM

Santos is hurt now? Damn this team is snake bitten with injuries.

rabblerouser 11-20-2016 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568185)
JFC, this is crazy. We took 4 mins to score a TD. All we would have needed was a FG. Forget...you guys are right...our defense who's shortest drive all game, was a 9 play drive allowing a FG, has no blame in this loss. :rolleyes:

I have no faith that Smith could've even led a late FG drive, had he even had the time. He throws no-look, one-read INTs into the end zone...

Point is, they constantly held on, keeping Tampa to FGs instead of TDs...keeping it within reach. Held them to 19. God forbid the offense actually step up, do their job and score more points than the other team.

SAUTO 11-20-2016 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568195)
The wind in the 3Q, which is when we didn't go for it, is not the same in the 4th when we are going the other way. And you keep going back to this having to be a 54 yard kick.

Again, you are all over the map. If your argument was even incoherent you would be light years ahead of where you are now.

I've never said it had to be a 54 yard kick.

I've explained my argument multiple times, very clearly.

You just keep making things up. Me saying it had to be a 54 yard kick at the end is a case in point

Hint: I never once did.

ThaVirus 11-20-2016 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 12567928)
Despite the defense playing like ass they still didn't allow more then 20 points. this offense couldn't score 20 at home. This is all on the offense. Alex Smith did not get it done. He's played 2 quarters of good football all season and that's it There is a reason why he's ranked in the bottom of the league in most passing statistics. He's just not good.

Hate to pour it on but, yeah, this is a trend.

On a perfect weather day, at home, against one of the worst defenses in the league, great pass protection, and the running game doing well, our offense failed to out up 20 points.

That is ****ing pathetic. Our offense is ****ing pathetic and it's a direct extension of lackluster QB play.

petegz28 11-20-2016 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12568209)
I've never said it had to be a 54 yard kick.

I've explained my argument multiple times, very clearly.

You just keep making things up. Me saying it had to be a 54 yard kick at the end is a case in point

Hint: I never once did.

No, you just keep using to choose not kicking a 54 yard FG into the wind in the 3rd Q, down by 1 as your crutch for not being able to kick a FG of unknown distance with the wind at your back in the 4th Q to win the game.

Yeah, that's what you said

BlackOp 11-20-2016 09:11 PM

I think there was like one offensive holding call all game combined.....at least in the first half. I'm not sure I've ever seen that. Winston was barely touched as a result. Smith didn't take a sack.

The only issue is that if a game is going to be called like that...it a distinct dis-advantage for a team with the better pass rush. I saw at least 3 overt muggings that should have been a 10 yard penalty.

That is one way a team gets off the field on 3rd downs.

Have to give Winston credit too...he was sharp today.

petegz28 11-20-2016 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12568232)
I think there was ONE offensive holding call all game combined. I'm not sure I've ever seen that. Winston was barely touched as a result. Smith didn't take a sack.

The only issue is that if a game is going to be called like that...it a distinct dis-advantage for a team with the better pass rush. I saw at least 3 muggings that should have been a 10 yard penalty.

That is one way a team gets off the field on 3rd downs.

Have to give Winston credit too...he was sharp today.

Sutton brought little of anything up the middle. Never sent any safeties or CB's on blitzes. This was about as blah of a game plan is it gets.

SAUTO 11-20-2016 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12568218)
No, you just keep using to choose not kicking a 54 yard FG into the wind in the 3rd Q, down by 1 as your crutch for not being able to kick a FG of unknown distance with the wind at your back in the 4th Q to win the game.

Yeah, that's what you said

Doubt forget that the kicker was healthy in the first instance and injured in the second also.
Convenient to leave that out

petegz28 11-20-2016 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12568261)
Doubt forget that the kicker was healthy in the first instance and injured in the second also.
Convenient to leave that out

You have yet to detail the extent of said injury......


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.