ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Browns Trade OL Cam Erving To Chiefs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=309685)

DaneMcCloud 08-30-2017 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 13046492)
MAYBE, if the Chiefs training staff makes this kid do 5,000 squats and 5,000 power cleans a day, this kid will get some anchor strength by next season. Until that happens, this kid is nothing but a ****ing rag doll. Terrible player. Athleticism only goes so far and it doesn't get him all that far.

He wasn't worth giving a pick up for. Not even a 7th.

The Chiefs offensive line coaches have done a masterful job of coaching up guys with a high ceiling.

Maybe this trade works, maybe it doesn't but a 5th round pick would be a pittance if he actually meets his ceiling.

If that never happens, it's not a big deal, as history has shown that the Chiefs haven't had much luck with 5th round draft picks in the past 20+ years.

DaneMcCloud 08-30-2017 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 13046512)
Its still early, but Veach so far is coming off like a younger John Dorsey

He is maybe being even more aggressive, but still using the same basic template... and I'm not gonna argue with that

What these trades say to to me is that Veach sees more value in guys with high ceilings than late round draft picks.

Ragland for a 2019 4th is a steal because it's highly unlikely that a 4th round linebacker would have the pedigree of Ragland.

The Chiefs need more top end talent, not less. This roster has enough JAG's already.

mdchiefsfan 08-30-2017 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 13046526)

ROFL at the one where he falls like a baby that lost its balance.

kccrow 08-30-2017 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13046538)
The Chiefs offensive line coaches have done a masterful job of coaching up guys with a high ceiling.

Maybe this trade works, maybe it doesn't but a 5th round pick would be a pittance if he actually meets his ceiling.

If that never happens, it's not a big deal, as history has shown that the Chiefs haven't had much luck with 5th round draft picks in the past 20+ years.

Coaching him up is the least of my worries at this point. Guy has zero lower body strength, which was a huge knock on him in pre-draft evaluations. It hasn't improved yet. I don't exactly put alot of stock in the Chiefs training staff. If he can get stronger in the lower half, then maybe that coaching up will matter, but Cleveland hasn't had bad O-line coaches either. We'll see. I think KC would have been better served waiting to try and get him for free.

chiefzilla1501 08-30-2017 05:57 PM

Interestingly, just down the street from the browns is another team that made a habit of stockpiling picks and trade downs. The Cavs had to fire Chris Grant so they could hire a gm who didn't try to get too cute. I think the browns are in the same danger. They keep stockpiling picks, ditching their veterans, and passing on qbs on a wait for next year approach. Only in Cleveland.

DaneMcCloud 08-30-2017 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 13046545)
Coaching him up is the least of my worries at this point. Guy has zero lower body strength, which was a huge knock on him in pre-draft evaluations. It hasn't improved yet. I don't exactly put alot of stock in the Chiefs training staff.

I disagree with the notion that the Chiefs training staff hasn't helped players. There's a big difference between Ramik Wilson last year and this year, LDT is way stronger, as is Fisher. Morse made a jump from his rookie season to 2016.

Not everyone can be a physical freak like Eric Berry or Justin Houston but I think the training staff has done a fine job, especially with the lineman.

kccrow 08-30-2017 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13046551)
Interestingly, just down the street from the browns is another team that made a habit of stockpiling picks and trade downs. The Cavs had to fire Chris Grant so they could hire a gm who didn't try to get too cute. I think the browns are in the same danger. They keep stockpiling picks, ditching their veterans, and passing on qbs on a wait for next year approach. Only in Cleveland.

In Cleveland's (Browns) defense, they really had nothing when Sashi and company took over except a decent O-line. They really have to re-tool everywhere and set a foundation.

I do agree with the fact that they were absolute idiots to pass on Wentz, but outside of that decision I think stockpiling picks for the next couple of years was their best course of action.

We're going to get to see how that action starts to pay off beginning this year, since several players from the 2016 and 2017 classes will be starting.

As it stands, it looks as though Coleman (WR, Rd 1-16), Ogbah (DE, Rd 2-16), Coleman (RT, Rd 3-16), Schobert (MLB, Rd 4-16), Louis (Slot WR, Rd 4-16), Kindred (FS, Rd 4-16), Garrett (DE, Rd 1-17), Peppers (SS, Rd 1-17), Kizer (QB, Rd 2-17), and possibly Gonzalez (K, Rd 7-17) will all start (Louis may be the one exception but likely significant playing time). That's 10 starters in 2 drafts that have been replaced.

Kiimo 08-30-2017 06:20 PM

Dude has one goal.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzBr6wof1mw

Easy 6 08-30-2017 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13046540)
What these trades say to to me is that Veach sees more value in guys with high ceilings than late round draft picks.

Ragland for a 2019 4th is a steal because it's highly unlikely that a 4th round linebacker would have the pedigree of Ragland.

The Chiefs need more top end talent, not less. This roster has enough JAG's already.

Boiled down to its essence, that first sentence seems to define the Dorsey/Veach template

Lunch bucket try hard guys are a dime a dozen, this method demands top shelf physical traits... then count on coaching, and team culture to develop that try hard for the team mentality

Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesnt... but it always works out more often than not, when you have a great team behind them

chiefzilla1501 08-30-2017 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 13046572)
In Cleveland's (Browns) defense, they really had nothing when Sashi and company took over except a decent O-line. They really have to re-tool everywhere and set a foundation.

I do agree with the fact that they were absolute idiots to pass on Wentz, but outside of that decision I think stockpiling picks for the next couple of years was their best course of action.

We're going to get to see how that action starts to pay off beginning this year, since several players from the 2016 and 2017 classes will be starting.

As it stands, it looks as though Coleman (WR, Rd 1-16), Ogbah (DE, Rd 2-16), Coleman (RT, Rd 3-16), Schobert (MLB, Rd 4-16), Louis (Slot WR, Rd 4-16), Kindred (FS, Rd 4-16), Garrett (DE, Rd 1-17), Peppers (SS, Rd 1-17), Kizer (QB, Rd 2-17), and possibly Gonzalez (K, Rd 7-17) will all start (Louis may be the one exception but likely significant playing time). That's 10 starters in 2 drafts that have been replaced.

I think the moneyball guy on the browns is trying to outclever the competition. He wants to prove he can win with diamonds in the rough. The same strategy that had the Cavs reach for Anthony Bennett and Dion Waiters. We will see how the browns drafts actually wind up. But they gave up a lot of veteran talent to get these picks. And they passed up several excellent picks to trade down. Those guys are starting because they traded away all the veterans and their backups are horrible. We will see but last year's browns picks didn't do very much.

rico 08-30-2017 06:40 PM

I'm talking to my friend who is a FSU fan. He is very excited about Erving being traded to KC. He was one of his favorite players at FSU. He thought he went to a terrible fit in Cleveland with their power blocking scheme. Apparently FSU utilizes a zone blocking scheme. Therefore he obviously thinks that it's a perfect fit in KC. Thinks we may have picked up a steal. Says he was very raw, for he was a DE until his Junior year at FSU. Says that it may take him a year or two yet, but the upside is huge.

I am excited about this.

rico 08-30-2017 06:41 PM

I had no idea that the guy played DE in college.

rico 08-30-2017 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 13046526)

Yay, another Chief not named Alex for Sandy to hate.

ChiefRocka 08-30-2017 06:51 PM

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...dc592bf731.jpg

DaneMcCloud 08-30-2017 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 13046572)
In Cleveland's (Browns) defense, they really had nothing when Sashi and company took over except a decent O-line.

I think tanking and loading up on draft choices is the right way to rebuild a franchise.

They didn't like Wentz. So what. They added pieces and added even more this year.

Their defense could be downright nasty.

Mav 08-30-2017 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rico (Post 13046616)
I'm talking to my friend who is a FSU fan. He is very excited about Erving being traded to KC. He was one of his favorite players at FSU. He thought he went to a terrible fit in Cleveland with their power blocking scheme. Apparently FSU utilizes a zone blocking scheme. Therefore he obviously thinks that it's a perfect fit in KC. Thinks we may have picked up a steal. Says he was very raw, for he was a DE until his Junior year at FSU. Says that it may take him a year or two yet, but the upside is huge.

I am excited about this.



Cleveland is a Zone Blocking scheme under Hue. They were last year too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

RunKC 08-30-2017 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 13045728)
Our draft in 2018 as of right now?

2nd
3rd
6th
6th (comp)

Per overthecap, the Chiefs are projected to get a 5th rd pick for Nick Foles, so this trade does not hurt KC's draft projections for 2018.

rico 08-30-2017 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mav (Post 13046702)
Cleveland is a Zone Blocking scheme under Hue. They were last year too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Just googled that. You are right.

staylor26 08-30-2017 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rico (Post 13046617)
I had no idea that the guy played DE in college.

Pretty sure he's only been playing OL for 4 years total.

That combined with the fact that he's played all over the place on the OL makes him worth the gamble. Maybe it clicks for him at some point.

KChiefs1 08-30-2017 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13046661)
I think tanking and loading up on draft choices is the right way to rebuild a franchise.



They didn't like Wentz. So what. They added pieces and added even more this year.



Their defense could be downright nasty.



Tanking is the new black.

KChiefs1 08-30-2017 09:11 PM

https://twitter.com/stagdsp/status/902952257746022410

DaNewGuy 08-30-2017 09:36 PM

He should just fall down every play and just try to buy alex a second or two

OldSchool 08-31-2017 12:46 AM

Erving gets shaken up on this terrible play. Or was it just embarrassment?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0Sm7KR4z_5k" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

BlackOp 08-31-2017 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 13046756)
Tanking is the new black.

I think watching the Bills/Jets games will be entertaining...they are both tanking...it just depends on who wants to suck more.

Neither one wants to win...they want a top QB. That's going to be some conflicted shit...both starting QBs are probably going to be sick that weekend.

CoMoChief 08-31-2017 02:24 AM

Obviously the Chiefs OL depth is absolute crap.

Erving was a prospect a lot of people on this board mocked/wanted.

Having that said, his game hasn't been able to translate well into the NFL from what I've read, I also don't pay any attention to the Browns.

But maybe this is part of the Browns plague. Maybe a change of scenery to a more winning culture will light a fire under his ass and he'll perform more up to his draft hype/potential.

Seriously being drafted by the Browns has to keep some of these kids up at night knowing they're going into a failing situation.

notorious 08-31-2017 06:56 AM

Not one team has OLine depth.


I will take talent working with outstanding coaching every time over a loser franchise that is so bad it receives empathy from it's own division rivals.

Titty Meat 08-31-2017 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13046517)
Let's see here. What has this Browns new management done?

-thought Carson Wentz was a shit QB and wouldn't draft him.
-let Alex Mack go
-let Mitchell Schwartz go
-let Terrell Pryor go

They don't exactly have smart people there...

They are also idiots for not drafting Ruben Foster at 29.

ct 08-31-2017 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MODSAUTO (Post 13046451)
Uhhhhh no.

Landon Collins slipped because someone put out a video of him gas masking it

and an OLineman but man u were so close

chiefzilla1501 08-31-2017 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scooter Libby (Post 13047088)
They are also idiots for not drafting Ruben Foster at 29.

I don't think the browns approach is wrong. I wonder if it's a little arrogant. It's almost like they're trying to prove moneyball works by passing on highly touted prospects. They're not just trading high priced veterans. They're also giving away cheap ones, repeatedly trading down in the first round, and passing up on highly ranked prospects.

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2017 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13047230)
I It's almost like they're trying to prove moneyball works by passing on highly touted prospects

The Browns are NOT employing "Moneyball".

NFL teams have to spend within 99% of the Cap Limit over a 4 year period. Baseball has no such rule.

The Browns are NOT going out and getting guys on the cheap, they're loading up on draft picks in order to select the best player that fits there system that's available.

They have SIX picks in the Top 100 in 2018 and they'll probably continue to stockpile talent and move around in the draft.

It won't be very long until they're a contender year in and year out.

RunKC 08-31-2017 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13047235)
The Browns are NOT employing "Moneyball".

NFL teams have to spend within 99% of the Cap Limit over a 4 year period. Baseball has no such rule.

The Browns are NOT going out and getting guys on the cheap, they're loading up on draft picks in order to select the best player that fits there system that's available.

They have SIX picks in the Top 100 in 2018 and they'll probably continue to stockpile talent and move around in the draft.

It won't be very long until they're a contender year in and year out.

I guess it depends on how you look at it.

I would give up every pick they made last year for their original 2nd overall to pick Carson Wentz.

The Franchise 08-31-2017 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13047255)
I guess it depends on how you look at it.

I would give up every pick they made last year for their original 2nd overall to pick Carson Wentz.

Carson Wentz over Garrett, Njoku, Peppers and Kizer?

No thanks.

O.city 08-31-2017 09:39 AM

I've been shucking wisdom teeth all morning, what have I missed

RunKC 08-31-2017 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13047259)
Carson Wentz over Garrett, Njoku, Peppers and Kizer?

No thanks.

Garrett was from them sucking. He wasn't a traded pick. I'm talking about the 2016 draft.

Carson Wentz or...

Corey Coleman
Emmanuel Ogbah
Carl Nassib
Shin Coleman
Cody Kessler
Joe Schobert
Ricardo Louis
Etc

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2017 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13047255)
I guess it depends on how you look at it.

I would give up every pick they made last year for their original 2nd overall to pick Carson Wentz.

I don't blame them for passing over Wentz. While he was my favorite and IMO, far more advanced than Jared Goff, he was coming from a small school.

Plus, they clearly had a vision of what the team would look like in the following 3 years, as well as the draft, so they didn't need to force the pick.

Their 2016 draft turned out pretty well, they added a nice piece in Jamie Collins and by all accounts, Myles Garrett is for real.

AND they have two 1st's, two 2nd's and two 3rd's in the 2018 draft.

The Franchise 08-31-2017 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13047266)
Garrett was from them sucking. He wasn't a traded pick. I'm talking about the 2016 draft.

Carson Wentz or...

Corey Coleman
Emmanuel Ogbah
Carl Nassib
Shin Coleman
Cody Kessler
Joe Schobert
Ricardo Louis
Etc

That makes more sense. Yeah.....I'd trade all that garbage for Wentz.

O.city 08-31-2017 09:48 AM

Am I the only one that's not a big fan of Wentz?

The Franchise 08-31-2017 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13047271)
I don't blame them for passing over Wentz. While he was my favorite and IMO, far more advanced than Jared Goff, he was coming from a small school.

Plus, they clearly had a vision of what the team would look like in the following 3 years, as well as the draft, so they didn't need to force the pick.

Their 2016 draft turned out pretty well, they added a nice piece in Jamie Collins and by all accounts, Myles Garrett is for real.

AND they have two 1st's, two 2nd's and two 3rd's in the 2018 draft.

And with that....it makes a ton of sense to see what you have in Kizer this year. He could be your QBoTF or he could be another Jimmy Clausen scenario.

Titty Meat 08-31-2017 09:50 AM

I don't disagree with how the Browns are building their team. The draft is the way to go. I just disagree with how they drafted. I would rather have a Von Miller like player AND Patrick Willis instead of Von Miller and a Greg Olson like player.

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2017 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13047273)
Am I the only one that's not a big fan of Wentz?

It's a little difficult to judge Wentz because his receiving corp was just so awful last year.

He reminded me of Rothlisberger pre-draft and looked the part for a while.

It'll be interesting to see if Goff makes any type of advancement this year but the Rams roster is so depleted that it could be difficult to assess him, too.

I still can't figure out why Les Snead has a job but that's a different subject altogether.

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2017 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13047275)
And with that....it makes a ton of sense to see what you have in Kizer this year. He could be your QBoTF or he could be another Jimmy Clausen scenario.

Exactly. And with all of their picks, they could still take a QB in the Top 5, let him sit for a year (especially if they choose Josh Allen) and flip Kizer for a pick.

They basically have endless options.

staylor26 08-31-2017 09:54 AM

I agree with Dane here.

I love what the Browns are doing.

O.city 08-31-2017 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13047279)
It's a little difficult to judge Wentz because his receiving corp was just so awful last year.

He reminded me of Rothlisberger pre-draft and looked the part for a while.

It'll be interesting to see if Goff makes any type of advancement this year but the Rams roster is so depleted that it could be difficult to assess him, too.

I still can't figure out why Les Snead has a job but that's a different subject altogether.

Yeah Snead sucks.

I dunno, I just don't see wentz as this can't miss type guy. Maybe I need to watch him more

Pasta Little Brioni 08-31-2017 10:07 AM

B
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13047283)
I agree with Dane here.

I love what the Browns are doing.

Lulz...CP for the last ten years

RunKC 08-31-2017 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13047283)
I agree with Dane here.

I love what the Browns are doing.

This year, but not last year IMO. They let 2 elite OL walk last year in Mack/Schwartz.

They could have kept 3 of Joe Thomas, Joel Bitonio, Alex Mack and Mitchell Schwartz. Instead they only kept 2 and tried overpaying for FA's this season.

Rausch 08-31-2017 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13047283)
I agree with Dane here.

I love what the Browns are doing.

:facepalm:

Rausch 08-31-2017 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13047275)
And with that....it makes a ton of sense to see what you have in Kizer this year. He could be your QBoTF or he could be another Jimmy Clausen scenario.

They took a rookie QB high after gutting their offensive weapons and then further degraded their O line.

Brilliant...

staylor26 08-31-2017 10:26 AM

Coleman, Peppers, Garrett, Kirksey, Ogbah, Shelton, Njoku, Biotnio

You guys can laugh and facepalm all you want, but the Browns are going to be good if they continue to add talent like this, and they will.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-31-2017 10:28 AM

None of those guys has proven anything

RunKC 08-31-2017 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13047350)
Coleman, Peppers, Garrett, Kirksey, Ogbah, Shelton, Njoku, Biotnio

You guys can laugh and facepalm all you want, but the Browns are going to be good if they continue to add talent like this, and they will.

All depends on Kizer. I loved what they did this year, but goddamn did they **** up last year.

Think of how good would they be if they just kept Mitchell Schwartz and drafted Carson Wentz instead of trading for a speed receiver?

Give me the best QB since Luck.

Rausch 08-31-2017 10:35 AM

Body balance and agility/footwork are most important at C and T.

At G you can have a slow-footed mauler who's only job is to march forward and muscle a guy away.

There's enough NFL tape on this guy to know he plays too high, doesn't anchor well, and has $3it footwork. At G he's got a former OL in Reid to coach him up and only ask him to go hunt.

On a ton of our misdirection running plays we use zone blocking and he'd be attacking the defender at an angle instead of marching backwards and trying to hold ground (which he's clearly terrible at.)

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2017 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13047372)
All depends on Kizer. I loved what they did this year, but goddamn did they **** up last year.

Think of how good would they be if they just kept Mitchell Schwartz and drafted Carson Wentz instead of trading for a speed receiver?

Give me the best QB since Luck.

Jameis Winston wasn't available last year

:p

Chiefnj2 08-31-2017 10:45 AM

Partially gutting your OL and starting a rookie QB behind the new line is rarely a good idea.

Rausch 08-31-2017 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 13047396)
Partially gutting your OL and starting a rookie QB behind the new line is rarely a good idea.

Combine that with almost 0 talent at HB and WR...

chiefzilla1501 08-31-2017 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13047235)
The Browns are NOT employing "Moneyball".

NFL teams have to spend within 99% of the Cap Limit over a 4 year period. Baseball has no such rule.

The Browns are NOT going out and getting guys on the cheap, they're loading up on draft picks in order to select the best player that fits there system that's available.

They have SIX picks in the Top 100 in 2018 and they'll probably continue to stockpile talent and move around in the draft.

It won't be very long until they're a contender year in and year out.

Two years in a row they traded out of a top 15 pick.

And they hit their cap minimum because they traded for osweiler so they can absorb his ridiculous contract in order to hit the cap floor.

Again, nothing wrong with stockpiling picks and giving away veterans in a rebuild. The strategy isn't wrong. I just wonder if there's some arrogance in constantly trading out of high first round picks and believing your entire roster should be built in the later rounds. Especially at the qb position.

And depodesta is a moneyball guy. Its fair to ask if he's trying to prove that he can win on value picks. Maybe he can. But there's clearly an agenda.

jjchieffan 08-31-2017 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13045737)
More proof that the LG position is a dumpster fire. Ehinger and Witzmann won't even be on this roster next year.

Excellent trade. Erving sucked at LT but I bet he can plug in at guard and be a big upgrade immediately.

This is some more stupid crap. The sig I made for you fits you perfectly. Do you just try to be wrong constantly? Seriously. Ehinger won the starting guard position as a rookie. He needed to bulk up, but still showed enough to win the job immediately and you think he won't be on the team next year?? That is beyond dumb.

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2017 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13047417)
And depodesta is a moneyball guy. Its fair to ask if he's trying to prove that he can win on value picks. Maybe he can. But there's clearly an agenda.

"Moneyball" doesn't and can't exist in the NFL.

What Podesta and Sashi Brown are doing is the wave of the now.

Jon Robinson, the Titans GM, is doing the same exact thing: Stockpiling picks to use as ammo for the draft's most talented players each year, then move those picks forward if your "guy" isn't available at the slot.

Quite frankly, I'm surprised it took this long for "tanking" and trading picks to hit the NFL, but then again, it's run by a bunch of old farts.

Rausch 08-31-2017 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 13047424)
Ehinger won the starting guard position as a rookie. He needed to bulk up, but still showed enough to win the job immediately and you think he won't be on the team next year?? That is beyond dumb.

Ehinger was a clear upgrade over what we had at the time.

Erving is a guy who's upside is far more than that of Ehinger (should he actually stay healthy and stay at G) and we gave up nothing for him.

At worst we added depth to an area of our squad that had almost none (O line.)

It's a smart deal and our Doogie Howser GM is looking pretty good right now...

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2017 11:09 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Terms: The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Lions?src=hash">#Lions</a> trade guard Laken Tomlinson to the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/49ers?src=hash">#49ers</a> for a 5th rounder in 2019, sources tell <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo">@MikeGarafolo</a> and me.</p>&mdash; Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/903291582828380160">August 31, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Franchise 08-31-2017 11:12 AM

Is it me....or is there just a huge amount of trades happening this season? Maybe because the cut down has been changed now.

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2017 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13047463)
Is it me....or is there just a huge amount of trades happening this season? Maybe because the cut down has been changed now.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Tomlinson trade to the 49ers makes 12 deals this month, the most trades in the month of August in the last decade</p>&mdash; Evan Kaplan (@EpKap) <a href="https://twitter.com/EpKap/status/903293842140655616">August 31, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

oldman 08-31-2017 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13047463)
Is it me....or is there just a huge amount of trades happening this season? Maybe because the cut down has been changed now.

I think you're right about the trades. I think the single cut down has forced many GMs into hedging their bets on who would be available on waivers.

SAUTO 08-31-2017 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13046456)
lol That wasn't Landon Collins. That was Tunsil.

ROFLsilly me

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2017 11:33 AM

NFL GM's are simply realizing that late round picks have far less value and far less of a chance to make the 53, than former 1st round players that have higher ceilings but haven't found early success.

A "change of scenery" is often needed for these types of guys.

Rausch 08-31-2017 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13047532)
NFL GM's are simply realizing that late round picks have far less value and far less of a chance to make the 53, than former 1st round players that have higher ceilings but haven't found early success.

A "change of scenery" is often needed for these types of guys.

And teams that lose tend to get higher picks that tend to play for teams that lose that tend to change coaching staffs and then players aren't a fit.

O.city 08-31-2017 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13047532)
NFL GM's are simply realizing that late round picks have far less value and far less of a chance to make the 53, than former 1st round players that have higher ceilings but haven't found early success.

A "change of scenery" is often needed for these types of guys.

Only one cut down day as well, guys are flipping picks for guys they want instead of chancing wavers

Quesadilla Joe 08-31-2017 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13047532)
NFL GM's are simply realizing that late round picks have far less value and far less of a chance to make the 53, than former 1st round players that have higher ceilings but haven't found early success.

A "change of scenery" is often needed for these types of guys.

How many first round busts turn it around elsewhere?

I know these guys didn't... Brandon Weeden, Jonathan Cooper, Jason Smith, A.J. Jenkins, Jonathan Baldwin, Aaron Maybin, Josh Freeman, Amobi Okoye, Brady Quinn, Jarvis Moss, Vince Young, Matt Leinart, etc.

keg in kc 08-31-2017 12:05 PM

The change in the cut down process is probably responsible for some of these trades. There's a possibility for a crazy amount of waver wire activity on Saturday, with something like a thousand players being released, and I think teams are making trades ahead of the deadline this year that may not have happened in the past.

Chiefshrink 08-31-2017 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldman (Post 13047523)
I think you're right about the trades. I think the single cut down has forced many GMs into hedging their bets on who would be available on waivers.

BINGO !!!

Chiefshrink 08-31-2017 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 13047583)
The change in the cut down process is probably responsible for some of these trades. There's a possibility for a crazy amount of waver wire activity on Saturday, with something like a thousand players being released, and I think teams are making trades ahead of the deadline this year that may not have happened in the past.

As competitive as Veach has been you wonder how many players on other teams he is still salivating for to pick up that will probably be cut.

The Franchise 08-31-2017 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink (Post 13047591)
As competitive as Veach has been you wonder how many players on other teams he is still salivating for to pick up that will probably be cut.

He already said that they won't be very active this season.

keg in kc 08-31-2017 12:13 PM

We're so far down the waiver order, we don't really have a choice but to be aggressive if we like a player.

The thing I like is that we're trading for young former first-rounders. Players we were high on back when we scouted them that we must think we can coach up.

Chiefshrink 08-31-2017 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13047385)
Jameis Winston wasn't available last year

:p

and Mariota. IMHO both Winston and Mariota have progressed past Newton in the actual intellectual knowledge and study of the game and you will see it very poignantly this year. Cam has gotten by on athletic ability and big arm but he still is not a student of the game and Wade Phillips exposed his arse big time that he cannot read NFL defenses nor cadence bluff them out to see where the real pressure is coming from.

Mav 08-31-2017 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13047266)
Garrett was from them sucking. He wasn't a traded pick. I'm talking about the 2016 draft.

Carson Wentz or...

Corey Coleman
Emmanuel Ogbah
Carl Nassib
Shin Coleman
Cody Kessler
Joe Schobert
Ricardo Louis
Etc



Coleman Ogbah Shon Coleman Schobert are all starters and Peppers came out of that trade as will the 18 first rounder from Houston. The Browns murdered Philly on that trade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Mav 08-31-2017 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 13047331)
They took a rookie QB high after gutting their offensive weapons and then further degraded their O line.



Brilliant...



Degrading the oline? They drafted Rod Johnson, have the best back up olineman in football in John Greco and added Kevin Zeitler and JC Tretter. The Browns by PFF are said to have a top 3 oline. Losing Mack hurt but he didn't want to stay.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jettio 08-31-2017 04:25 PM

I hope he gets to play tonight.

I have only seen the plays in this thread and the dude definitely brings pure joy.

kccrow 08-31-2017 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13046661)
I think tanking and loading up on draft choices is the right way to rebuild a franchise.

They didn't like Wentz. So what. They added pieces and added even more this year.

Their defense could be downright nasty.

The 10 players I listed as probable starters coming from the 16/17 drafts all look like really damn good football players. Ogbah looked like he's going to become something pretty good especially. Kindred looked good when he finally started. I loved Schobert coming out, I think he's going to give them a physical player at ILB. I don't question Sashi Brown just yet, except passing on Wentz, but if it works out who cares? He's definitely put some talented young players on the field. It'll take a couple more years for that core to mature, but it's got a good start.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.