ChiefsPlanet
Page 5 of 20 1234 5 678915 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs JuJu to Kansas City (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343028)

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 04:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200291)
Yeah, because THAT's how you determine physical ability.

:rolleyes:
IDK dude.

You watch that clip I just posted of him dusting the entire 49ers secondary.

Pringle never does shit like that. He's good at catching the ball and falling down.

Iconic 03-18-2022 04:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16200235)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a>&#39; deal for WR JuJu Smith-Schuster comes in around $3 million on the base value with the rest of the $10.75 million max value <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RapSheet</a> reported coming in the form of incentives, sources say.</p>&mdash; Mike Garafolo (@MikeGarafolo) <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo/status/1504940830297145346?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Soooo basically JuJu let Veach **** him dry just to get the opportunity to stat pad with a future HOF QB for a year

We literally might have the greatest GM in football.

ForeverIowan 03-18-2022 04:18 PM
Chris guys please stop comparing Juju to Byron. Juju is a household name and for good reason. No one outside of the KC fanbase has any damn clue who Byron Pringle is.

staylor26 03-18-2022 04:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16200289)
Of course it is, no one is saying different.

But other people have been successful in that offense with the same QB, so let's knock off the "he sucked because of Ben" nonsense.
Your entire narrative is built around last season where JuJu played 5 games.

He just had 830 yards and 9 TDs 2 years ago.

This year, he’s was injured, and the Steelers have 2 really young talented WRs that they make more of an effort to get the ball to.

No, JuJu is not as young and talented as those 2 guys.

But he’s much better than Zay Jones and Byron Pringle.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 04:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16200272)
I won't be because I don't think he wanted a long term deal with us. He's using us and our success to build his value for next year. I'll gladly take the comp pick for him and move on with a rookie WR that we draft this year.
And again, under this structure it's a fair trade.

Okay, you don't want a LTC deal? Cool - I don't want to guarantee your $10 million then.

We meet in the middle, guarantee only a small fraction of it, get that same year 1 cap relief by plowing the remainder into NLTBE incentives and we move along.

This is a DAMN sight more palatable than $10+ million on a make-good deal.

And it's also why I'm not sure why everyone was so certain it was an amazing deal when it was announced. Most of y'all would get absolutely barbecued at a negotiating table, wouldn't you? It wasn't an amazing deal at $10 million guaranteed and hopefully the demonstration of what a fair deal in this scenario actually is helps some recognize that fact.

The Franchise 03-18-2022 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 16200301)
Soooo basically JuJu let Veach **** him dry just to get the opportunity to stat pad with a future HOF QB for a year

We literally might have the greatest GM in football.
I mean Juju is smart here. He's banking on his stats being improved because of Mahomes. He'll turn that into a long term deal with someone else next offseason.

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16200298)
LMAO
10.75M

vs

3M base and the rest in incentives is quite different.

staylor26 03-18-2022 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200305)
And again, under this structure it's a fair trade.

Okay, you don't want a LTC deal? Cool - I don't want to guarantee your $10 million then.

We meet in the middle, guarantee only a small fraction of it, get that same year 1 cap relief by plowing the remainder into NLTBE incentives and we move along.

This is a DAMN sight more palatable than $10+ million on a make-good deal.

And it's also why I'm not sure why everyone was so certain it was an amazing deal when it was announced. Most of y'all would get absolutely barbecued at a negotiating table, wouldn't you? It wasn't an amazing deal at $10 million guaranteed and hopefully the demonstration of what a fair deal in this scenario actually is helps some recognize that fact.
It’s not 10 million guaranteed…

kccrow 03-18-2022 04:20 PM
Makes a bit more sense that it's an incentive-laden contract. Makes me wonder, now, if the Chiefs were less interested in a long-term deal than JuJu.

OnTheWarpath15 03-18-2022 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16200276)
He continues to talk about JuJu’s 2021 season like he was healthy for all of it or at least the majority.

Dude played 5 games when Pitt’s offense was also at it’s worst.
Outside of his TD total in 2020, his 2019 and 2020 seasons weren't exactly special - but you knew that already.

The Franchise 03-18-2022 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200307)
10.75M

vs

3M base and the rest is incentives is quite different.
I know. I was giving you shit because the two posts were basically right next to each other.

OnTheWarpath15 03-18-2022 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200305)
And again, under this structure it's a fair trade.

Okay, you don't want a LTC deal? Cool - I don't want to guarantee your $10 million then.

We meet in the middle, guarantee only a small fraction of it, get that same year 1 cap relief by plowing the remainder into NLTBE incentives and we move along.

This is a DAMN sight more palatable than $10+ million on a make-good deal.

And it's also why I'm not sure why everyone was so certain it was an amazing deal when it was announced. Most of y'all would get absolutely barbecued at a negotiating table, wouldn't you? It wasn't an amazing deal at $10 million guaranteed and hopefully the demonstration of what a fair deal in this scenario actually is helps some recognize that fact.
This.

Iconic 03-18-2022 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16200306)
I mean Juju is smart here. He's banking on his stats being improved because of Mahomes. He'll turn that into a long term deal with someone else next offseason.
Yep huge win win. And who knows... if he likes it here and it works out might even get to keep him for the right price.

staylor26 03-18-2022 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16200310)
Outside of his TD total in 2020, his 2019 and 2020 seasons weren't exactly special - but you knew that already.
813 yards and 9 TDs with an aging Big Ben, and competing with talented young guys in Claypool and Johnson for targets is pretty damn good.

OnTheWarpath15 03-18-2022 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16200304)
Your entire narrative is built around last season where JuJu played 5 games.

He just had 830 yards and 9 TDs 2 years ago.

This year, he’s was injured, and the Steelers have 2 really young talented WRs that they make more of an effort to get the ball to.

No, JuJu is not as young and talented as those 2 guys.

But he’s much better than Zay Jones and Byron Pringle.
No it isn't, dipshit.

The Franchise 03-18-2022 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16200310)
Outside of his TD total in 2020, his 2019 and 2020 seasons weren't exactly special - but you knew that already.
2019 was his first year as a WR1. That proved that he isn't one.
2020 wasn't horrible but it wasn't top 10 WRs or anything. I'd take 97 receptions for 831 yards and 9 TDs here as a WR2.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 16200314)
Yep huge win win. And who knows... if he likes it here and it works out might even get to keep him for the right price.
Shit man, Kelce might just retire after next season.

That would clear up a lot of money for JuJu.

You never know.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200296)
Well, he is.

We are discussing the individual's athletic ability, right?

Athletic ability isn't determined by stats and years played.
I'm speaking only to physical attributes.

What exactly does Clay think Pringle is?

Guys - that dude is FAST. And he's very quick.

He just had no earthly idea what he was doing out there because he came out of a lousy offensive system. Then by the time he figured it out, he'd aged out of his prime. Shit happens.

But Pringle has exceptional physical tools. Do y'all not remember the training camp races when he was toasting everyone? My recollection was that he was stride for stride with Hardman, no?

Byron is a fantastic athlete.

SS is a technician.

I really don't understand what's difficult about this or even moderately controversial.

poolboy 03-18-2022 04:22 PM
Our offense is fine..always has been always will be....JuJu fills a void...Pat wanted a veteran receiver...

New World Order 03-18-2022 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16200310)
Outside of his TD total in 2020, his 2019 and 2020 seasons weren't exactly special - but you knew that already.
Well he did play with Devin Hodges and mason rudolph

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16200308)
It’s not 10 million guaranteed…
I am aware.

I'm contrasting reality vs. where the thread started.

Titty Meat 03-18-2022 04:24 PM
Not a fan of JuJu that's not a bad contract. Don't think this move does much though.

staylor26 03-18-2022 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16200320)
No it isn't, dipshit.
813 yards and 9 TD’s are perfectly respectable numbers in his situation.

Big Ben already started to drop off and he was competing with 2 young talented guys for targets.

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 16200309)
Makes a bit more sense that it's an incentive-laden contract. Makes me wonder, now, if the Chiefs were less interested in a long-term deal than JuJu.
The $3M base, incentive laden thing changes things quite a bit.

Now all of a sudden we're talking about a very low risk acquisition. Very little actual investment.

Really makes me think they get a shiny new rookie WR.

OR TRADE FOR METCALF MWAHAHAHAHA

The Franchise 03-18-2022 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200333)
The $3M base, incentive laden thing changes things quite a bit.

Now all of a sudden we're talking about a very low risk acquisition. Very little actual investment.

Really makes me think they get a shiny new rookie WR.

OR TRADE FOR METCALF MWAHAHAHAHA
Still waiting on 4 years, $85 million for Hill.

poolboy 03-18-2022 04:26 PM
Pringle had 3 tds in the playoffs last year

BleedingRed 03-18-2022 04:26 PM
Called it

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200323)
Guys - that dude is FAST. And he's very quick.
Holy shit. He changes direction like an elephant. His acceleration is garbage. He has some straight line speed but...****, man.

Why you think everyone wanted him replaced on kickoffs constantly?

The Franchise 03-18-2022 04:27 PM
If we can get an Alec Pierce or Jalen Tolbert in the 2nd-3rd round range....then this offense is tits. All we would need is Pierre Strong Jr. in the backfield.

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200323)

Guys - that dude is FAST. And he's very quick.

But Pringle has exceptional physical tools. Do y'all not remember the training camp races when he was toasting everyone? My recollection was that he was stride for stride with Hardman, no?

Byron is a fantastic athlete.

SS is a technician.

I really don't understand what's difficult about this or even moderately controversial.
Exactly.

And yes, your memory is correct regarding the TC race with Hardman.

OnTheWarpath15 03-18-2022 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16200331)
813 yards and 9 TD’s are perfectly respectable numbers in his situation.

Big Ben alread started to drop off and he was competing with 2 young talented guys for targets.

LOL who the **** do you think he'll be competing with here?

Do me a favor - block me. You seem to have this unhealthy fascination with needing to reply to *damn near* everything I post and taking the opposite side, representing my arguments as something they aren't.

You're exactly the type of person Parker was referencing earlier - everything has to be a ****ing fight.

Have a good night.

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 04:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200338)
Holy shit. He changes direction like an elephant. His acceleration is garbage. He has some straight line speed but...****, man.

Why you think everyone wanted him replaced on kickoffs constantly?
Worst talent evaluator on the forum.

staylor26 03-18-2022 04:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16200341)
LOL who the **** do you think he'll be competing with here?

Do me a favor - block me. You seem to have this unhealthy fascination with needing to reply to *damn near* everything I post and taking the opposite side, representing my arguments as something they aren't.

You're exactly the type of person Parker was referencing earlier - everything has to be a ****ing fight.

Have a good night.
If he puts up anywhere close to those numbers here that’s a huge win.

What exactly do you ****ing expect for 10 mil mostly in incentives and the 3rd option in the passing game?

Not my problem that you’re a ****ing moron.

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 04:29 PM
Things are getting spicy up in here.

staylor26 03-18-2022 04:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200346)
Things are getting spicy up in here.
Because OTWP is a ****ing pussy.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16200331)
813 yards and 9 TD’s are perfectly respectable numbers in his situation.

Big Ben already started to drop off and he was competing with 2 young talented guys for targets.
Where you gonna hunt up those 8 targets/gm it took him to get that in 2020?

You really rather see him getting those at 6.5 yards/target than Hill, Kelce or even Hardman?

If he's going to be worth those incentives, he absolutely has to be better than he was in 2020. That's incredibly inefficient and does more to hurt our offense than help it.

Give me his 2019 numbers and scale them up to a full season and I'll be content.

That's 6 targets/gm, roughly 100 over a 17 game season and about 800 yards receiving on SUBSANTIALLY greater efficiency.

I can live with that. I think it's still more than I'd want to spend on what I perceive as a luxury item, but I recognize that the Chiefs do not think that and as such I'll view the production in a vacuum and call it good.

The Franchise 03-18-2022 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200346)
Things are getting spicy up in here.
Have been all offseason.

BossChief 03-18-2022 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16200289)
Of course it is, no one is saying different.

But other people have been successful in that offense with the same QB, so let's knock off the "he sucked because of Ben" nonsense.
We were having a conversation about 25/26 year old JujuSS having upside snd I pointed out that Juju has been playing with a QB that’s a shell of his former self that whole time.

Most people read that post and understand it’s saying Juju has upside partly because nobody really knows what he can do with a HOF QB in his prime, like he’s going to have in KC…because Ben has been on the steep decline for awhile.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200343)
Worst talent evaluator on the forum.
Apparently Andy Reid has my back though.

staylor26 03-18-2022 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200349)
Where you gonna hunt up those 8 targets/gm it took him to get that in 2020?

You really rather see him getting those at 6.5 yards/target than Hill, Kelce or even Hardman?

If he's going to be worth those incentives, he absolutely has to be better than he was in 2020. That's incredibly inefficient and does more to hurt our offense than help it.

Give me his 2019 numbers and scale them up to a full season and I'll be content.

That's 6 targets/gm, roughly 100 over a 17 game season and about 800 yards receiving on SUBSANTIALLY greater efficiency.

I can live with that. I think it's still more than I'd want to spend on what I perceive as a luxury item, but I recognize that the Chiefs do not think that and as such I'll view the production in a vacuum and call it good.
I don’t think it will take him that many targets in this offense with a much better QB and Tyreek/Kelce opening things up.

Honestly, I’m not even all that concerned with his production. I just like the fit with Hardman and Hill, and how he compliments those guys.

I think he’ll have an impact, and gives us our best trio of WRs we’ve had during the Mahomes era. That’s all that matters to me.

kccrow 03-18-2022 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200338)
Holy shit. He changes direction like an elephant. His acceleration is garbage. He has some straight line speed but...****, man.

Why you think everyone wanted him replaced on kickoffs constantly?
You're doing Pringle little justice, and he has never lacked athletically. He may have lacked knowing wtf he was doing for a while but he improved over time quite a bit in that regard too.

Pringle actually has really good COD and so does JuJu.

Pringle 3-cone: 6.87
JuJu 3-cone: 6.93

Pringle Short-Shuttle: 4.22
JuJu Short-Shuttle: 4.18

Both are 6'1".

Not much apart in the 40 based on size either, Pringle ran 4.46 at 203 and Juju ran 4.54 at 215.

dirk digler 03-18-2022 04:34 PM
I guess we aren't trading for Metcalf

Titty Meat 03-18-2022 04:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16200348)
Because OTWP is a ****ing pussy.
OTW would **** u up. U using the wrong bathroom sis

BossChief 03-18-2022 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200346)
Things are getting spicy up in here.
It’s “I’d rather get raped by a toilet brush” and “Mother****erJones you, Scott Pioli” times resurrected.

Jk

Not even close

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 16200358)
You're doing Pringle little justice, and he has never lacked athletically. He may have lacked knowing wtf he was doing for a while but he improved over time quite a bit in that regard too.

Pringle actually has really good COD and so does JuJu.

Pringle 3-cone: 6.87
JuJu 3-cone: 6.93

Pringle Short-Shuttle: 4.22
JuJu Short-Shuttle: 4.18

Both are 6'1".

Not much apart in the 40 based on size either, Pringle ran 4.46 at 203 and Juju ran 4.54 at 215.
Those numbers don't translate to the football field.

The eye test should tell you, in pads and on the field, JuJu is far more explosive than Pringle.

staylor26 03-18-2022 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16200361)
OTW would **** u up. U using the wrong bathroom sis
Ha, that pussy can’t even handle a disagreement without crying and logging off.

He’s somehow a bigger bundle of sticks than you.

Marcellus 03-18-2022 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200093)
So just so I'm clear here...

I stated who I wanted, why I wanted them and exactly how they could be used to best effect in this offense. Simultaneously I stated exactly who I didn't want and why I did not want them.

In so doing I specifically noted that I'm not interested in spending $8-10 million on JuJu Smith-Schuster and why I felt his skills specifically were not unique or difficult to find.

And it surprises you when I'm not gung-ho about Veach's decision to do this thing that I specifically said I did NOT want to do?

It's not like I've been all "JUJU IS AWESOME!!!" and then shit on the signing. I did not want this signing. I didn't want it last year. I definitely didn't want it this year. I've provided a fair amount of explanation as to why that is the case.

For ****'s sake, stop bitching when people don't like what the Chiefs are up to. I established where I stood on this WELL before it came to fruition.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a>&#39; deal for WR JuJu Smith-Schuster comes in around $3 million on the base value with the rest of the $10.75 million max value <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RapSheet</a> reported coming in the form of incentives, sources say.</p>&mdash; Mike Garafolo (@MikeGarafolo) <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo/status/1504940830297145346?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16200356)

I think he’ll have an impact, and gives us our best trio of WRs we’ve had during the Mahomes era. That’s all that matters to me.
Eh.

I'd take 2019 w/ Watkins over this...SO FAR.

I'm getting warm and fuzzies thinking the Chiefs go WR early in the draft.

TwistedChief 03-18-2022 04:38 PM
I think DJLN is an amazing poster, but reading pages and pages of his template-based posts is like staring at the sun for an entire afternoon. I’m blind now and just want to wander through traffic.

kccrow 03-18-2022 04:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200364)
Those numbers don't translate to the football field.

The eye test should tell you, in pads and on the field, JuJu is far more explosive than Pringle.
Pringle has looked every bit that explosive when he's had the opportunities. And honestly, he played really well last year and was open a lot more than he was targeted. Shit that sucks for Pringle is he developed so slowly. You wish he were 25 instead of 29.

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 04:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200364)
Those numbers don't translate to the football field.

The eye test should tell you, in pads and on the field, JuJu is far more explosive than Pringle.
The eye test tells you straight up that Pringle is more athletic.

LMAO

You have the worst eyes on the forum.

And when the numbers come in to back up what DJ and I are telling you, you just double down on stupid.

ForeverIowan 03-18-2022 04:38 PM
How soon is the DK trade getting announced now that we have our slot?

staylor26 03-18-2022 04:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200370)
Eh.

I'd take 2019 w/ Watkins over this...SO FAR.

I'm getting warm and fuzzies thinking the Chiefs go WR early in the draft.
I said trio.

Watkins might be better than JuJu (the rare occasion he was on the field), but Hardman coming off the stretch he had towards the end of the season makes that an easy choice.

poolboy 03-18-2022 04:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200364)
Those numbers don't translate to the football field.

The eye test should tell you, in pads and on the field, JuJu is far more explosive than Pringle.
ehh....

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 04:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200377)
The eye test tells you straight up that Pringle is more athletic.
Wait for the clips of Pringle dusting entire secondaries for long ass gains.

poolboy 03-18-2022 04:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200370)
Eh.

I'd take 2019 w/ Watkins over this...SO FAR.

I'm getting warm and fuzzies thinking the Chiefs go WR early in the draft.
ehh...

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 04:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200381)
Wait for the clips of Pringle dusting entire secondaries for long ass gains.
Oh we're back to that stupid argument again.

PattyFlakes 03-18-2022 04:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16200310)
Outside of his TD total in 2020, his 2019 and 2020 seasons weren't exactly special - but you knew that already.
97 catches, just under 1000 yards, and 9 TDS might not be “special” but id absolutely take those numbers for a 3rd receiving option in this offense.

OnTheWarpath15 03-18-2022 04:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200383)
Oh we're back to that stupid argument again.
Video of one play from 3 years ago isn't good enough for you?

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 04:41 PM
And I'm a dude who absolutely loves Byron Pringle. I would have taken him back. He had a really nice season.

JuJu just brings a different element he can't.

There's nothing Pringle did that JuJu can't do, and do better.

This will be like having a healthy Watkins.

Titty Meat 03-18-2022 04:41 PM
3.5 mil hard to get worked up about even though I'm not sold on JuJu. Certainly more forgivable than that Frank Clark abortion.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200364)
Those numbers don't translate to the football field.

The eye test should tell you, in pads and on the field, JuJu is far more explosive than Pringle.
“I know what I know because I know it…”

Detox is right, you’re a dipshit.

The eye test is where I drew my conclusions to begin with. The numbers simply corroborate it.

Pringle has borderline #1 receiver baseline athleticism. You don’t know what you’re watching.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16200386)
Video of one play from 3 years ago isn't good enough for you?
Watch the clip again. There are six plays. Absolutely an explosive football player.

Marcellus 03-18-2022 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200377)
The eye test tells you straight up that Pringle is more athletic.

LMAO

You have the worst eyes on the forum.

And when the numbers come in to back up what DJ and I are telling you, you just double down on stupid.
You and DJ are both on crack on this one.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200389)
Pringle has borderline #1 receiver baseline athleticism.
Woof.

I bet his numbers tank next season without Mahomes.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 04:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16200375)
I think DJLN is an amazing poster, but reading pages and pages of his template-based posts is like staring at the sun for an entire afternoon. I’m blind now and just want to wander through traffic.
Well now I’m curious what constitutes a ‘template based’ post…

OnTheWarpath15 03-18-2022 04:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200393)
Woof.

I bet his numbers tank next season without Mahomes.
Wow, really going out on a limb there. LMAO

The Franchise 03-18-2022 04:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16200397)
Wow, really going out on a limb there. LMAO
Well it is Clay. ROFL

Marcellus 03-18-2022 04:45 PM
Byron Pringles career high in receiving yards in a game is 75. Explosive!!

Edit: wait I was wrong. 2 years ago he had a 109 yard game.

Explosive!

Rainbarrel 03-18-2022 04:46 PM
Ketchup Sammies!!!

Titty Meat 03-18-2022 04:47 PM
CP civil wars are fun. I'm supplying OTW with memes and DJ with templates. You Schusterbaters are about to be embarrassed

Titty Meat 03-18-2022 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 16200402)
Byron Pringles career high in receiving yards in a game is 75. Explosive!!

Edit: wait I was wrong. 2 years ago he had a 109 yard game.

Explosive!
His YPC nearly doubled Schusters

OnTheWarpath15 03-18-2022 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16200409)
CP civil wars are fun. I'm supplying OTW with memes and DJ with templates. You Schusterbaters are about to be embarrassed
Nah, I'm good thanks

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 16200402)
Byron Pringles career high in receiving yards in a game is 75. Explosive!!
You guys remember that play against the Colt in 2019 where he had a clear line to the first down and just...didn't get it? LMAO

EXPLOSIVE #1 RECEIVER ABILITY GETS CAUGHT BY LINEBACKER

https://i.imgur.com/OVix4dS.gif

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PattyFlakes (Post 16200385)
97 catches, just under 1000 yards, and 9 TDS might not be “special” but id absolutely take those numbers for a 3rd receiving option in this offense.
That was on a 128 targets. That's not happening unless Hill gets hurt.

Look, i'm sure JuJu is capable of having a nice 700 yard season here.

If that's the metric that people think matters, then great.

Im of the opinion that a bologna sammich could get that here, in that role, with Mahomes, Kelce and Hill doing all the real work.

Some guy to soak up free yards isn't what i had in mind, but rather a legitimate threat that a defense needs to be aware...one that could actually cause a defense to lose focus on Hill/Kelce etc, or REALLY punish a defense when they dont

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16200412)
His YPC nearly doubled Schusters
This doesn't mean shit with popgun BB throwing the ball.

OnTheWarpath15 03-18-2022 04:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200414)
You guys remember that play against the Colt in 2019 where he had a clear line to the first down and just...didn't get it? LMAO

EXPLOSIVE #1 RECEIVER ABILITY GETS CAUGHT BY LINEBACKER

https://i.imgur.com/OVix4dS.gif

https://media2.giphy.com/media/WrgAG...giphy.gif&ct=g

Titty Meat 03-18-2022 04:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200416)
This doesn't mean shit with popgun BB throwing the ball.
It's amazing how other WRs on the team were able to produce double digits YPC with the same QB

Dante84 03-18-2022 04:51 PM
1 Attachment(s)
Here ya go guys

In58men 03-18-2022 04:51 PM
Juju never received that 2nd big contract, 1 year deal filled with incentives? He’s betting on himself. I’ll take a motivated Juju all ****ing day long.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 PM.
Page 5 of 20 1234 5 678915 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.