ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****The Skyy Moore Thread***** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343627)

ThyKingdomCome15 05-01-2022 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warrick (Post 16277022)
What's with all these 4.41 40 times... I seen him run a 4.39! Probably will be even faster after camp :).

https://www.giants.com/video/western...ine-highlights

I think that was his unofficial time at the combine. His official time was 4.41.

ThyKingdomCome15 05-01-2022 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16276983)
I doubt he'd do his best work in the 'X' spot, which, as you know, is the LOS spot. At his size, slot or 'Z' would make more sense.

He is very strong for his size, so the possibility that he could fight through tight press man coverage is there, I'd still probably prefer he got the free release.

I'd like to see it. If he gives a wiggle at the LOS and the CB whiffs on that jam it may be off to the races. Press coverage is kind like blitzing. If you don't hit home then you may get torched. Not to mention Skyy has some legit contact balance, unlike our good friend Mecole Hardman who is just a fast guy.

SuperBowl4 05-01-2022 12:08 PM

Mahomes passing TD's record next season is going to be Moore than Skyy high

saphojunkie 05-01-2022 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 16276976)
Did I read that Watson had major issues with drops? Or am I imagining that?

horrible horrible.

Like, George Pickens had a drop rate of a little over 2%. Best in the nation. Skyy was second best with 3%.

Watson was like 17%

ChiefsFanatic 05-01-2022 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16276932)
First of all-just stop with the OBJ stuff. We already have a mercenary rental WR here for 2022. We also aren't going to pay a premium, which OBJ would want. ALSO, dude is hurt...like...AGAIN. If you've been paying attention,, this is his story for like the last several years. Pass. No way.



Second-how does Moore translate from a MAC school? Look at the 10 yard split. It's ELITE. He goes from standing still to flying in a hurry. Don't look at the 40 time (which is still fast, just not Tyreek fast) look at the splits. It's his acceleration.



Now, go look at some video on the kid. Watch his routes. Look how he sinks his hips, look how smoothly he cuts, changes direction, and then accelerates. Watch him sell one route and then break the other way. Nice. And then watch how he catches every****ingthing. Also nice.



And finally, look what he does with the ball in his hands. He's so quick, he's hard for the defenders to get their mitts on him. Look at those broken tackles!



This kid isn't just a slot receiver.



I too didn't get the Skyy Moore hype until I watched him. The obvious measurables in size and 40 time didn't wow. But look at the splits and a different pictures emerges of the athlete. And then you can see that the video will absolutely translate.

The day he was drafted I hated this pick. I very much wanted Christian Watson at 30. Watson has had drop issues, but that can be coached up. His combination of size and speed cannot be coached up.

But, I have come around to at least appreciating how he fits in the offense.

But, after watching lots of video on him, the one thing that stands out is his lack of competition. He has not played against NFL caliber corners, with a couple of exceptions.

Yes, his split time and footwork will get him separation initially, but will he be able to maintain that on down field routes.

Will his size hinder him on 50/50 balls?

His huge hands should help, but he doesn't really have an explosive vertical.

I am just going to trust that Reid already has a plan on how to use him and I WILL ALWAYS trust that any WR with even a little talent will be maximized by Mahomes.

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk

lewdog 05-01-2022 12:39 PM

Ordered my Moore jersey.

All you doubters are going to get tired of looking at the name on the back of his jersey as he runs in for Chiefs touchdowns.

Discuss Thrower 05-01-2022 12:43 PM

Used to hate the NFL's strict jersey numbering rules... but having a #24 be potentially a starting receiver is just weird.

BossChief 05-01-2022 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 16277286)
Ordered my Moore jersey.

All you doubters are going to get tired of looking at the name on the back of his jersey as he runs in for Chiefs touchdowns.

I’m getting a Karlaftis, but it was close.

Skyy is going to be a damn star.

My only concern with him is the cost to extend his deal in 3-4 years.

He’s a really good WR in all facets

Gets off press
Elite acceleration
Elite hands
Elite quickness snd route precision

Then, once he has the ball, he’s a running back. Breaks tons of tackles, great vision

Nose for the end zone and first down markers.

lewdog 05-01-2022 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16277291)
I’m getting a Karlaftis, but it was close.

Skyy is going to be a damn star.

My only concern with him is the cost to extend his deal in 3-4 years.

Let's.

Win.

NOW!

Megatron96 05-01-2022 12:55 PM

Tough to judge accurately what Moore will become in the NFL due to the lack of competition he saw in college, but his measurables suggest he's Golden Tate. If he's close Veach did very well taking Skyy there. Should start by next season unless he came without a brain/work ethic.

RealSNR 05-01-2022 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 16277270)
The day he was drafted I hated this pick. I very much wanted Christian Watson at 30. Watson has had drop issues, but that can be coached up. His combination of size and speed cannot be coached up.

But, I have come around to at least appreciating how he fits in the offense.

But, after watching lots of video on him, the one thing that stands out is his lack of competition. He has not played against NFL caliber corners, with a couple of exceptions.

Yes, his split time and footwork will get him separation initially, but will he be able to maintain that on down field routes.

Will his size hinder him on 50/50 balls?

His huge hands should help, but he doesn't really have an explosive vertical.

I am just going to trust that Reid already has a plan on how to use him and I WILL ALWAYS trust that any WR with even a little talent will be maximized by Mahomes.

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk

You heard what Veach/scouts/Reid said (can't remember exactly who it was). They want guys who will run the right route each time and every time.

We've already got Hardman who doesn't run the right routes and can't even keep running the way Mahomes wants him to when the play breaks down. And those guys are still around.

I don't think they're interested in this "he needs to be coached up but look at the talent!!!!" shit anymore. Not until they get some reliable dudes in the WR ranks.

RealSNR 05-01-2022 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 16277289)
Used to hate the NFL's strict jersey numbering rules... but having a #24 be potentially a starting receiver is just weird.

Yeah. It went from, "Hey, we ran out of available numbers to give to our players at certain positions" to "Anybody can pick anything they ****ing want."

That's like needing a meat tenderizer and instead using a sledge hammer. I mean... I guess the job got done...

staylor26 05-01-2022 01:01 PM

I think 24 looked great on Moore in college and I’m glad he kept it :shrug:

BigRedChief 05-01-2022 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16277310)
You heard what Veach/scouts/Reid said (can't remember exactly who it was). They want guys who will run the right route each time and every time.

We've already got Hardman who doesn't run the right routes and can't even keep running the way Mahomes wants him to when the play breaks down. And those guys are still around.

I don't think they're interested in this "he needs to be coached up but look at the talent!!!!" shit anymore. Not until they get some reliable dudes in the WR ranks.

We have all have seen this on the field from Mahomes. He hardly ever shows up a player except when a receiver doesn’t run the right route or screws the route up. I can see his point. Sometimes he has to throw passes before the receiver even makes the cut. Without that trust, you’re not getting the ball thrown your way.

RealSNR 05-01-2022 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16277330)
I think 24 looked great on Moore in college and I’m glad he kept it :shrug:

It's gonna get really weird seeing QBs wear anything 20 and above. It's going to happen. May have already happened and I just don't know about it.

staylor26 05-01-2022 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16277340)
It's gonna get really weird seeing QBs wear anything 20 and above. It's going to happen. May have already happened and I just don't know about it.

Didn’t Mac Jones have a weird ****ing number in TC/preseason last year?

ChiefsFanatic 05-01-2022 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16277310)
You heard what Veach/scouts/Reid said (can't remember exactly who it was). They want guys who will run the right route each time and every time.



We've already got Hardman who doesn't run the right routes and can't even keep running the way Mahomes wants him to when the play breaks down. And those guys are still around.



I don't think they're interested in this "he needs to be coached up but look at the talent!!!!" shit anymore. Not until they get some reliable dudes in the WR ranks.

So, I guess I missed the part of all the scouting reports that said Watson was too dumb to learn a play book, and consistently ran the wrong routes in college.

Tony Gonzalez, arguably the best TE in history, led the league in drops at one point in his career. Hard work and coaching to improve a receivers hands isn't voodoo, or too much work for a professional coaching staff.

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk

TwistedChief 05-01-2022 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 16277351)
So, I guess I missed the part of all the scouting reports that said Watson was too dumb to learn a play book, and consistently ran the wrong routes in college.

No, but Watson was always more a projection pick based on athletic talent rather than a potential day 1 starter. And it's the latter we needed more.

Skyy just looks the part of a professional receiver. I think we have another Super Bowl victory if we had him on the team last year playing Pringle's snaps.

KChiefs1 05-01-2022 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 16274185)
This guy is a ****ing dynamite pick. He WILL he productive and is the perfect fit for the Andy Reid offense. Will be a monster on intermediate routes and churn our 1st downs while having big play ability.

This coming from someone who did NOT like the Hardman pick because Hardman doesn't have the skills or ability to run good routes and make good enough cuts.


We are on the same page with this guy & Hardman.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

KChiefs1 05-01-2022 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 16274192)
He's going for 800 yards THIS year and is going to make Mecole Hardman sad.


https://media0.giphy.com/media/3ohhw...sD4c/giphy.gif


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

KChiefs1 05-01-2022 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTVietnam (Post 16274246)
Steelers have a better offense than we do. . now. .


https://media0.giphy.com/media/7KUYj...JFA1/giphy.gif


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

L.A. Chieffan 05-01-2022 03:38 PM

I hope this guy works out, I was kinda wishing for a trade up and grab Jameson and we'd be set at WR for the future. But combined with the other picks if Moore can step up and be a legit Wr2 guy I'll be happy. The one pick I'm not super thrilled about is Cook

emaw1979 05-01-2022 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16277239)
horrible horrible.

Like, George Pickens had a drop rate of a little over 2%. Best in the nation. Skyy was second best with 3%.

Watson was like 17%

That’s not a accurate. Watson was 12.5% which was ballooned up during the covid shortened season where it was 22% on less that 20 catches or something. He done any have Watson/Pickens hands but to say his hands are horrible is very short sighted.

emaw1979 05-01-2022 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15 (Post 16276955)
I think Skyy can play X reciever, but not full time. He ran a stop and go on a guy one game from the X and had about two or three steps on the guy after he did it. I don't think there is a spot he can't play. Simply put, his game may best suited on the inside. Though he played a ton on the outside in college. When he's in space you're in trouble.

The only thing about his game I had a problem with is his top gear isn't next level. He is fast but he doesn't just pull away from guys. But if he was faster he had went off the board before pick 20 like several others did.

He played X last year but the MAC is like 4 steps away from NFL level CB imo. The X is almost always lined up against the best CB and on the line of scrimmage. I know he did great getting off the line against MAC CBs but I’m not sure if he has the body to do it against Elite CBs.

Almost everything I’ve read says he projects as a slot WR that can play the Z. And I agree, I don’t see his 40 time on the field like you do with Tyreek or ever Hardman.

O.city 05-02-2022 07:37 AM

"He's to small to play WR"

How ****ing big do you guys think NFL Wr's are? I mean 6 foot is about the norm. He's what, 5'10?

This also isn't like the Lions or the Bears taking this guy. It's Andy and KC. Obviously he knows WR's pretty well.

CP is the only place that doesn't love this pick. What am I missing?

tmax63 05-02-2022 08:01 AM

Everyone here had a hard-on for Williams or Watson for whatever reason.

Kiimo 05-02-2022 08:08 AM

I can't speak for anyone else and I'm not one of the draft guys but if I'm being honest I never looked into him and listened when people on here said he wasn't good.

Everything I've seen since says otherwise

Baby Lee 05-02-2022 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emaw1979 (Post 16277581)
He played X last year but the MAC is like 4 steps away from NFL level CB imo. The X is almost always lined up against the best CB and on the line of scrimmage. I know he did great getting off the line against MAC CBs but I’m not sure if he has the body to do it against Elite CBs.

Almost everything I’ve read says he projects as a slot WR that can play the Z. And I agree, I don’t see his 40 time on the field like you do with Tyreek or ever Hardman.

I must admonish, my porn name is subject to copyright protection.

RealSNR 05-02-2022 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emaw1979 (Post 16277581)
He played X last year but the MAC is like 4 steps away from NFL level CB imo. The X is almost always lined up against the best CB and on the line of scrimmage. I know he did great getting off the line against MAC CBs but I’m not sure if he has the body to do it against Elite CBs.

Almost everything I’ve read says he projects as a slot WR that can play the Z. And I agree, I don’t see his 40 time on the field like you do with Tyreek or ever Hardman.

You know another MAC receiver who was under 6 foot and played in the NFL? Greg Jennings.

Yeah he totally sucked at getting open against NFL CBs.

O.city 05-02-2022 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16278098)
You know another MAC receiver who was under 6 foot and played in the NFL? Greg Jennings.

Yeah he totally sucked at getting open against NFL CBs.

I think, on average, if you blanket statement it, yes most MAC WR's under that are going to struggle at the NFL level.

Case by case, you never know.

I understand where they're coming from, but measurables aren't everything.

RealSNR 05-02-2022 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16278102)
I think, on average, if you blanket statement it, yes most MAC WR's under that are going to struggle at the NFL level.

Case by case, you never know.

I understand where they're coming from, but measurables aren't everything.

Most Texas Tech QBs are going to struggle at the NFL level, too.

You take players one at a time. I'm not saying to draft MAC receivers willy-nilly just because Greg Jennings made it. I'm saying it's a horseshit argument to take the dude's height and say, "Well, it was the MAC conference, so it's going to be a big step from that to the NFL." Moore wasn't drafted because of his production, same as it would be if we took Watson from friggin NDSU. I don't see this emaw guy bagging on Watson for playing against FCS CBs.

Chris Meck 05-02-2022 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16278041)
"He's to small to play WR"

How ****ing big do you guys think NFL Wr's are? I mean 6 foot is about the norm. He's what, 5'10?

This also isn't like the Lions or the Bears taking this guy. It's Andy and KC. Obviously he knows WR's pretty well.

CP is the only place that doesn't love this pick. What am I missing?

"BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T TAKE THE GUY I WANTED!"

O.city 05-02-2022 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16278107)
Most Texas Tech QBs are going to struggle at the NFL level, too.

You take players one at a time. I'm not saying to draft MAC receivers willy-nilly just because Greg Jennings made it. I'm saying it's a horseshit argument to take the dude's height and say, "Well, it was the MAC conference, so it's going to be a big step from that to the NFL." Moore wasn't drafted because of his production, same as it would be if we took Watson from friggin NDSU. I don't see this emaw guy bagging on Watson for playing against FCS CBs.

Because for the most part, you'd be right. Outliers happen, but openly looking for them isn't ideal.

In the end, it's probably more luck anyway so who knows.

saphojunkie 05-02-2022 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16278107)
Most Texas Tech QBs are going to struggle at the NFL level, too.

You take players one at a time. I'm not saying to draft MAC receivers willy-nilly just because Greg Jennings made it. I'm saying it's a horseshit argument to take the dude's height and say, "Well, it was the MAC conference, so it's going to be a big step from that to the NFL." Moore wasn't drafted because of his production, same as it would be if we took Watson from friggin NDSU. I don't see this emaw guy bagging on Watson for playing against FCS CBs.

If you ignore all the data that doesn't support my argument, it's impossible to refute my argument!

kccrow 05-02-2022 08:44 AM

You ****ing guys with the MAC.

Look up Antonio Brown. All of you. Now. Look at where he played. Look at his measurables. Then look at Skyy Moore.

**** you all very much.

This kid is going to be a stud. Bank it.

CupidStunt 05-02-2022 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16278041)
"He's to small to play WR"

How ****ing big do you guys think NFL Wr's are? I mean 6 foot is about the norm. He's what, 5'10?

This also isn't like the Lions or the Bears taking this guy. It's Andy and KC. Obviously he knows WR's pretty well.

CP is the only place that doesn't love this pick. What am I missing?

The extra crazy part about that is, we had to watch WRs dropping balls more than most last year, and yet still this place overlooks hands in a WR and obsesses with size and speed.

Admittedly late in the process but I started to think KC might really love Olave. He was never the sexy trade-up prospect that others were, but what he does well should be right at the top of KC's priorities. Hands, route running and quickness, those type of things get so underrated while size and long speed gets overrated.

kccrow 05-02-2022 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 16278153)
The extra crazy part about that is, we had to watch WRs dropping balls more than most last year, and yet still this place overlooks hands in a WR and obsesses with size and speed.

Admittedly late in the process but I started to think KC might really love Olave. He was never the sexy trade-up prospect that others were, but what he does well should be right at the top of KC's priorities. Hands, route running and quickness, those type of things get so underrated while size and long speed gets overrated.

Amen.

Skyy God 05-02-2022 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 16278153)
The extra crazy part about that is, we had to watch WRs dropping balls more than most last year, and yet still this place overlooks hands in a WR and obsesses with size and speed.

Admittedly late in the process but I started to think KC might really love Olave. He was never the sexy trade-up prospect that others were, but what he does well should be right at the top of KC's priorities. Hands, route running and quickness, those type of things get so underrated while size and long speed gets overrated.

I’m ecstatic we didn’t burn draft capital to trade up for a WR.

And if Kennard pans out, PM2 will have all day to throw to 4 quality receivers.

kccrow 05-02-2022 09:11 AM

The other thing I thought of in addition to what Cupid said is that there is a real fascination with needing to have an elite #1 guy. I hate going back to it all the time but if you look at what New England did winning for years is that they got a bunch of B and C level receivers and just spread the ball around. Their A guy was a TE. Hell, they didn't even have an A guy in the first few. They never won a Super Bowl with Randy Moss, but they sure did win them with guys like Givens and Patten or Cooks and Amendola. If you have a good QB, he'll find the open guys and make plays.

saphojunkie 05-02-2022 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16278102)
I think, on average, if you blanket statement it, yes most MAC WR's under that are going to struggle at the NFL level.

Case by case, you never know.

I understand where they're coming from, but measurables aren't everything.

Not the ones who are drafted. There are so few MAC players drafted on day 1 or 2 that the hit rate is actually super high

saphojunkie 05-02-2022 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 16278200)
The other thing I thought of in addition to what Cupid said is that there is a real fascination with needing to have an elite #1 guy. I hate going back to it all the time but if you look at what New England did winning for years is that they got a bunch of B and C level receivers and just spread the ball around. Their A guy was a TE. Hell, they didn't even have an A guy in the first few. They never won a Super Bowl with Randy Moss, but they sure did win them with guys like Givens and Patten or Cooks and Amendola. If you have a good QB, he'll find the open guys and make plays.

MAC receiver

Skyy God 05-02-2022 09:22 AM

Also, this is your regular reminder than more Pro Bowl WRs are drafted in the 2nd than the 1st.

https://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/statis...an-the-1st-252

Chieftain 05-02-2022 09:32 AM

To me this kid has a very Edelman style of game. Very similar body type and seems very reliable, only had 4 drops in college.

kccrow 05-02-2022 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16278209)
MAC receiver

touche` :D

BryanBusby 05-02-2022 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 16278200)
The other thing I thought of in addition to what Cupid said is that there is a real fascination with needing to have an elite #1 guy. I hate going back to it all the time but if you look at what New England did winning for years is that they got a bunch of B and C level receivers and just spread the ball around. Their A guy was a TE. Hell, they didn't even have an A guy in the first few. They never won a Super Bowl with Randy Moss, but they sure did win them with guys like Givens and Patten or Cooks and Amendola. If you have a good QB, he'll find the open guys and make plays.

While you're not necessarily wrong, I just don't know if Randy Moss in NE is the best example.

I don't think his cost prevented the Pats from adding elsewhere and he brought it with his play.

He just lost out because the other team had a 1 in one billion catch.

Buehler445 05-02-2022 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chieftain (Post 16278261)
To me this kid has a very Edelman style of game. Very similar body type and seems very reliable, only had 4 drops in college.

He's not nearly as bulky as Edleman, but yeah, that's a pretty decent comps.

Chris Meck 05-02-2022 09:42 AM

This kid compares favorably to Antonio Brown physically. That's your ceiling. Now-will he be that? Who knows, but the tools are there.

O.city 05-02-2022 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16278292)
This kid compares favorably to Antonio Brown physically. That's your ceiling. Now-will he be that? Who knows, but the tools are there.

No, he won't.

AB was on track to be a first ballot HOF'er.

louie aguiar 05-02-2022 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16278294)
No, he won't.

AB was on track to be a first ballot HOF'er.

Yep. I think his upside is closer to Golden Tate rather than AB.

saphojunkie 05-02-2022 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16278294)
No, he won't.

AB was on track to be a first ballot HOF'er.

You have literally no ****ing idea if that's true or not, you're just talking out of your ass.

nychief 05-02-2022 09:58 AM

Skyy is bigger, but gave me Steve Smith Sr. vibes. Hope he can contribute.

RealSNR 05-02-2022 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16278294)
No, he won't.

AB was on track to be a first ballot HOF'er.

What was AB his rookie year? Not a first ballot HOF'er, that's for sure.

It is totally possible for Moore to be an elite NFL WR. Not saying it will happen or that it's likely, but it's absolutely possible.

Why is Cooper Kupp so great? Oh, it must be because he's 6'2, right? His slightly above average height for an NFL WR is the reason why! And played against Big Sky Conference CBs, unlike those super shitty MAC CBs!

O.city 05-02-2022 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16278317)
You have literally no ****ing idea if that's true or not, you're just talking out of your ass.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16278323)
What was AB his rookie year? Not a first ballot HOF'er, that's for sure.

It is totally possible for Moore to be an elite NFL WR. Not saying it will happen or that it's likely, but it's absolutely possible.

Why is Cooper Kupp so great? Oh, it must be because he's 6'2, right? His slightly above average height for an NFL WR is the reason why! And played against Big Sky Conference CBs, unlike those super shitty MAC CBs!

I mean, sure it's possible.

But it's not likely he's AB. It's ok if he's not.

I'm not setting someone's upside as a HOF'er.

O.city 05-02-2022 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16278317)
You have literally no ****ing idea if that's true or not, you're just talking out of your ass.

The odds are overwhelmingly that he won't be AB.

Just like Joe Burrow won't be Tom Brady. Or Myles Garrett won't be Reggie White.

It's ok.

staylor26 05-02-2022 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by louie aguiar (Post 16278309)
Yep. I think his upside is closer to Golden Tate rather than AB.

He’s a mix of Golden Tate and Tyler Lockett.

The Franchise 05-02-2022 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16278337)
He’s a mix of Golden Tate and Tyler Lockett.

If he can be Golden Tate....then I'll be ecstatic.

O.city 05-02-2022 10:07 AM

If he is Tyler Lockett from a numbers and player perspective, that's a great pick.

RealSNR 05-02-2022 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16278328)
I mean, sure it's possible.

But it's not likely he's AB. It's ok if he's not.

I'm not setting someone's upside as a HOF'er.

It's also getting a little silly where if you so much as compare a rookie to a great player, people freak the hell out.

A player comparison isn't saying a rookie will be as good as that player. It's saying they do many of the same things and/or have similar backgrounds and measurables.

It's okay if fans see what Skyy Moore did for a MAC school and say, "Hey, Antonio Brown did a lot of the same stuff in college. And they're kind of built the same way." They're not ****ing wrong.

NO HOW DARE YOU. YOU MAY NOT COMPARE SKYY MOORE TO AB. HE CAN BE SAMIE PARKER AND THAT'S ****ING IT! THAT'S ALL YOU GET!

RealSNR 05-02-2022 10:14 AM

Am I allowed to compare Skyy Moore to Greg Jennings, O.City? Can I do that?

O.city 05-02-2022 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16278352)
It's also getting a little silly where if you so much as compare a rookie to a great player, people freak the hell out.

A player comparison isn't saying a rookie will be as good as that player. It's saying they do many of the same things and/or have similar backgrounds and measurables.

It's okay if fans see what Skyy Moore did for a MAC school and say, "Hey, Antonio Brown did a lot of the same stuff in college. And they're kind of built the same way." They're not ****ing wrong.

NO HOW DARE YOU. YOU MAY NOT COMPARE SKYY MOORE TO AB. HE CAN BE SAMIE PARKER AND THAT'S ****ING IT! THAT'S ALL YOU GET!

"His ceiling is AB"

"Well that's a first ballot HOF'er, the odds are overwhelmingly against that"

SNR "REEEEEEEEEEEE"

If we wanna set unrealistic expectations, fine. Don't get mad when he doesn't hit that and people bitch about him not being that I guess.

staylor26 05-02-2022 10:20 AM

He didn’t say “his ceiling is AB”.

He said he “compares favorably to AB physically”.

wachashi 05-02-2022 10:20 AM

His floor is Albert Wilson.
His kitchen counter is Golden Tate.
His ceiling is Antonio Brown.

chiefzilla1501 05-02-2022 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wachashi (Post 16278366)
His floor is Albert Wilson.
His kitchen counter is Golden Tate.
His ceiling is Antonio Brown.

Glad you said this. I didn't want to say Albert Wilson. The guy wasn't great with routes, football iq or hands. But there's something about skyy Moore's movements particularly after the catch that for some really weird reason reminded me of Albert Wilson. and I thought about the game where mahomes turned him into a weapon.

ChiefsFanatic 05-02-2022 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16278112)
"BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T TAKE THE GUY I WANTED!"

I admit that I wanted Christian Watson. I am tired of having tiny receivers. The tall receivers we have actually signed recently have been basically broke dick jags.

Sammy Watkins did make a difference to the offense, but didn't produce at a level that matched his physical skills.

Christian Watson is 6'4" and ran an official 4.36. You can't teach height.

Skyy Moore is 5'10" and ran an official 4.41 at the combine (even though initially it was a 4.37 I think)

They have nearly identical hand size, and played at roughly the same level of college football, except Watson was winning National Championships. 4 of them.

Having Championship experience is a valuable intangible for any player.

Players can improve their drop % with coaching and hard work. But players can't get taller.

So, initially I wanted Watson over Moore. But, I have come around on the fact that coming out of college, he fits the offense better.

Now, I am just hoping that Tyquan Thornton doesn't become a star.

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk

RealSNR 05-02-2022 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16278354)
"His ceiling is AB"

"Well that's a first ballot HOF'er, the odds are overwhelmingly against that"

SNR "REEEEEEEEEEEE"

If we wanna set unrealistic expectations, fine. Don't get mad when he doesn't hit that and people bitch about him not being that I guess.

You're the reeeeeeeing one, dude. I already said it's unlikely he becomes as good as AB.

It's not my fault you can't read entire sentences and instead only look at a few key words and infer incorrect meaning. It's called nuance.

O.city 05-02-2022 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16278364)
He didn’t say “his ceiling is AB”.

He said he “compares favorably to AB physically”.

Compares physically to AB, that's his ceiling.

I would assume that to mean ceiling as a player?

RealSNR 05-02-2022 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 16278412)
I admit that I wanted Christian Watson. I am tired of having tiny receivers. The tall receivers we have actually signed recently have been basically broke dick jags.

Sammy Watkins did make a difference to the offense, but didn't produce at a level that matched his physical skills.

Christian Watson is 6'4" and ran an official 4.36. You can't teach height.

Skyy Moore is 5'10" and ran an official 4.41 at the combine (even though initially it was a 4.37 I think)

They have nearly identical hand size, and played at roughly the same level of college football, except Watson was winning National Championships. 4 of them.

Having Championship experience is a valuable intangible for any player.

Players can improve their drop % with coaching and hard work. But players can't get taller.

So, initially I wanted Watson over Moore. But, I have come around on the fact that coming out of college, he fits the offense better.

Now, I am just hoping that Tyquan Thornton doesn't become a star.

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk

And yet for all of that championship experience, NDSU players don't really ever do shit in the NFL.

Like 2 seasons of Carson Wentz. Did one of those OL guys like Billy Turner make a Pro Bowl eventually? I can't even remember. I thought Kyle Emmanuel would be good, but he was kind of meh/crap. Dillon Radunz has started like one game so far.

There are a few other FCS schools with far more impressive track records of having great players in the NFL.

And again, that's not to say you should avoid NDSU just because of the school. But maybe we should just put to bed the notion that FCS championship experience makes you a better player in the pros, because actually it kinda doesn't.

MahomesMagic 05-02-2022 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 16278412)
I admit that I wanted Christian Watson. I am tired of having tiny receivers. The tall receivers we have actually signed recently have been basically broke dick jags.

Sammy Watkins did make a difference to the offense, but didn't produce at a level that matched his physical skills.

Christian Watson is 6'4" and ran an official 4.36. You can't teach height.

Skyy Moore is 5'10" and ran an official 4.41 at the combine (even though initially it was a 4.37 I think)

They have nearly identical hand size, and played at roughly the same level of college football, except Watson was winning National Championships. 4 of them.

Having Championship experience is a valuable intangible for any player.

Players can improve their drop % with coaching and hard work. But players can't get taller.

So, initially I wanted Watson over Moore. But, I have come around on the fact that coming out of college, he fits the offense better.

Now, I am just hoping that Tyquan Thornton doesn't become a star.

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk

I would much rather have Skyy than Watson.

RealSNR 05-02-2022 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16278450)
Compares physically to AB, that's his ceiling.

I would assume that to mean ceiling as a player?

In terms of speed, height/weight, and level of college competition, he compares to Antonio Brown. That's all that's being said.

Is any of that false?

If we went a step further and started speculating how likely he is to be as successful as Antonio Brown in the NFL, I think just about everybody would agree with you and say that the odds are pretty low.

Is that called a ceiling? If so, then yes, his ceiling is Antonio Brown.

staylor26 05-02-2022 10:55 AM

Yea let’s talk about Watson winning championships while ignoring that Moore was the more productive player by far.

Chiefnj2 05-02-2022 11:09 AM

KC had its choice of Pickens, Pierce and Moore, and ran the risk of a WR run when they moved back. It tells you they weren't wild about any of the 3, or they wouldn't have moved down. We'll never know who they liked better since their hand was forced by the two teams in front of them.

I don't think they could have gone wrong with Pierce or Moore. Lower floor and higher ceiling with Pickens.

ChiefsFanatic 05-02-2022 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16278468)
Yea let’s talk about Watson winning championships while ignoring that Moore was the more productive player by far.

Yeah, that was my only argument for Watson.

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk

suzzer99 05-02-2022 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 16278153)
The extra crazy part about that is, we had to watch WRs dropping balls more than most last year, and yet still this place overlooks hands in a WR and obsesses with size and speed.

Actually catching the damn ball is an important but overlooked part of the process.

staylor26 05-02-2022 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 16278517)
Yeah, that was my only argument for Watson.

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk

I didn’t say it was, but when you talk about “winning championships”, which is a team accomplishment, while completely ignoring the difference in production (individual), it reeks of a biased take.

DJ's left nut 05-02-2022 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16278352)
It's also getting a little silly where if you so much as compare a rookie to a great player, people freak the hell out.

A player comparison isn't saying a rookie will be as good as that player. It's saying they do many of the same things and/or have similar backgrounds and measurables.

It's okay if fans see what Skyy Moore did for a MAC school and say, "Hey, Antonio Brown did a lot of the same stuff in college. And they're kind of built the same way." They're not ****ing wrong.

NO HOW DARE YOU. YOU MAY NOT COMPARE SKYY MOORE TO AB. HE CAN BE SAMIE PARKER AND THAT'S ****ING IT! THAT'S ALL YOU GET!

If every 6'+ nominally productive passer out of the Big 10 has "Tom Brady's Ceiling!" then said comparisons simply aren't worth anything. And it goes without saying that any Big 10 passer SHORTER than that is Russell Wilson.

So if you come out of the Big 10, your ceiling is either Russell Wilson or Tom Brady. Cool.

If you want player comps to be worthwhile, I'm not sure why you'd cite outliers for them.

saphojunkie 05-02-2022 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16278585)
If every 6'+ nominally productive passer out of the Big 10 has "Tom Brady's Ceiling!" then said comparisons simply aren't worth anything. And it goes without saying that any Big 10 passer SHORTER than that is Russell Wilson.

So if you come out of the Big 10, your ceiling is either Russell Wilson or Tom Brady. Cool.

If you want player comps to be worthwhile, I'm not sure why you'd cite outliers for them.

player comps and saying they have the same ceiling are different though

RealSNR 05-02-2022 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16278585)
If every 6'+ nominally productive passer out of the Big 10 has "Tom Brady's Ceiling!" then said comparisons simply aren't worth anything. And it goes without saying that any Big 10 passer SHORTER than that is Russell Wilson.

So if you come out of the Big 10, your ceiling is either Russell Wilson or Tom Brady. Cool.

If you want player comps to be worthwhile, I'm not sure why you'd cite outliers for them.

The outlier was cited in the first place because one guy questioned a MAC player at that height to get open against NFL CBs.

In this case, yes, an outlier is warranted to disprove that argument. We got fixated on the AB thing, but someone else (I think saphojunkie) gave an entirely reasonable take that while true that all MAC WRs have a low percentage of hitting in the NFL, the percentage of DRAFTED MAC WRs hitting and sticking around in the NFL is actually pretty high. Not all that many busts among them.

DJ's left nut 05-02-2022 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16278594)
player comps and saying they have the same ceiling are different though

And I'm speaking primarily to ceiling.

If your 'ceiling' for Moore is Brown, you're being unrealistic to the point of a meaningless analysis.

If your 'comp' for Moore is Brown, you're flat out high.

If it's all semantics, so be it. But I see little utility in invoking the name of a HoF player in ANY capacity when talking about the 13th WR taken in this draft.

If the dude is Golden Tate that's a great pick. And if you're sitting there thinking 'nah, Great isn't good enough - what about AB?' then I think you're wasting your own time.

BigRedChief 05-02-2022 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 16278146)
You ****ing guys with the MAC.

Look up Antonio Brown. All of you. Now. Look at where he played. Look at his measurables. Then look at Skyy Moore.

**** you all very much.

This kid is going to be a stud. Bank it.

Comparing Combine numbers
Antonio Brown:

5-10
186 lbs
9" hands
4.57 40yd
13 bench
33.5 vertical
105 broad
6.98 3 cone
4.18 shuttle

Skyy Moore:

5-10
195 lbs
10 1/4" hands
4.41 40yd
15 bench
34.5 vertical
124 broad
7.13 3 cone
4.32 shuttle

DJ's left nut 05-02-2022 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16278595)
The outlier was cited in the first place because one guy questioned a MAC player at that height to get open against NFL CBs.

In this case, yes, an outlier is warranted to disprove that argument. We got fixated on the AB thing, but someone else (I think saphojunkie) gave an entirely reasonable take that while true that all MAC WRs have a low percentage of hitting in the NFL, the percentage of DRAFTED MAC WRs hitting and sticking around in the NFL is actually pretty high. Not all that many busts among them.

I don't think an outlier can 'disprove' an argument unless said argument is made in absolutes. "MAC receivers that high have never once in NFL history been productive NFL receivers!" can be disproven by citing an outlier.

Citing an outlier to rebut a trend, OTOH, don't work. That's what makes the guy an outlier.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.