ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs What's with the Thigpen fixation?

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

What's with the Thigpen fixation? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202158)

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 5479900)

Interesting article from december shows that Brees was top-10 in the NFL in both hits and hurries to that point of the season: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/ext...d-hurries-2008

I have to admit I was surprised by that. The guy was only sacked 13 times in 600+ attempts and completed 65% of his passes, which aren't exactly the kind of numbers that shout 'under pressure'.

So, all of those guys in the bottom list were actually hit MORE than Ben in the first half, huh?

I don't think anybody's even mentioned Sanchez in the last 12 hours or so.

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5479925)

So, all of those guys in the bottom list were actually hit MORE than Ben in the first half, huh?

Apparently.

I'm trying to find hurries stats for the whole season, but not having much luck.

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 5479931)

I don't think anybody's even mentioned Sanchez in the last 12 hours or so.

This whole thing is about Thigpen and Sanchez.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5479654)

And in year four, he won a Super Bowl. So I'd say that the decision to start him mid-way into his rookie year paid off handsomely.

Because bottom line: Is that why they play the game? To win the Super Bowl?

No. They play the game so that we can tailgate and get drunk in the parking lot.

It's all about the Sunday Asphalt, Ribs, and Brew Social Club.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 5479941)

This whole thing is about Thigpen and Sanchez.

Really? I thought this thread had turned into "let's trade for Brees"...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 5479941)

This whole thing is about Thigpen and Sanchez.

I'm not seeing what you're seeing.

The whole thing is Thigpen and 'franchise quarterback', but I don't see anybody limiting that to Sanchez. Sanchez isn't even part of the discussion right now, and the last person to mention him (me) went into some detail about how he thinks he's too risky a pick. Nobody argued or even replied...

I love the logic of a True Fan.

Correlation implies Causation.

Brees throws the ball a lot, therefore, he gets sacked/hit a lot.

I remember all those shots Trent Green was taking with Bill Roaf, Shields, Waters, Weigmann, and Welbourne protecting him when he was throwing for 4k a year.... right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 5479950)

There's an underlying meaning to certain posters' messages. They're ripping everything in their path to proving Sanchez should be the pick at 3. Today it was Drew Brees. I don't mind the Thigpen criticism because I like Sanchez, but Brees doesn't deserve it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 5479900)

Quote:

The quarterback hits, of course, come from the official play-by-play. Official scorers are doing a better job of marking hits this year compared to last year, but there still are some very strange totals for certain teams because of scorers who seem to miss a lot of knockdowns. We've added a lot of hits to the official PBP thanks to the charting project, but that doesn't fully solve the problem. I'm sorry, but there's no way that last week's Pittsburgh-Dallas game had eight sacks but only one other play where a defender knocked the quarterback to the ground. And last week, the Bucs sacked Jeff Garcia five times but didn't knock him to the ground on any other play? Message to official scorer in Charlotte: I have my doubts.

Translation: Until hits taken are an official NFL stat, I have my doubts. Seems like there is no uniform guidelines as to what a hit is, or isn't.

For sake of conversation, let's play with these numbers.

Through 14 weeks, Brees was supposedly hit 36.5 times.

That averages out to 2.6 times per game.

So, the best we can do is assume he was hit 42 times over the course of the season.

Add that to the 13 sacks he took, and we have contact on 55 out of 635 pass attempts. Or contact every 11.5 pass attempts.

Roethlisberger wasn't on the list, so we don't have numbers to do the math - but it shows he was hurried the same number of times that Brees was.

Let's be fair and say that BR took HALF (which is being generous, IMO) of the hits that Brees took. 1.5 per game.

That's 21 hits over the course of the season, added to the 46 sacks he took. Contact on 67 plays over the course of the season, out of 469 pass attempts - or contact every 7 pass attempts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5479960)

Brees doesn't have that kind of line.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5479854)

WHAT?

Where has anyone mentioned Sanchez while debating your ridiculous statement that Brees would be just as effective in Pittsburgh as Rothlisberger?

WHAT THE ****?

Just because you say it's "ridiculous" doesn't make it so. I don't see what's ridiculous about the statement that Brees could do just as well. We're not talking about Joey Harrington here. We're talking about one of the top 3 most productive QBs in the league who happens to play in front of arguably one of the bottom 5 defenses in the league. And we're talking about a QB who spent most of the season without his top 2 wideouts and with his running backs injured all season.

And the blocking argument is definitely well within play. Basileus had a great point about the Pats' offensive line looking very human in 2008 without Brady. Brees is known for having one of the quickest releases in the game. Smart QBs are a lot harder to take down because they can smell the blitz from a mile away and exploit the living hell out of it. The Saints' o-line is nothing outstanding, but the QB makes them a lot better.

So let's flip this around. Could Big Ben be nearly as successful as he is now if he was in New Orleans? My guess would be a resounding "no."

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5479973)

Translation: Until hits taken are an official NFL stat, I have my doubts. Seems like there is no uniform guidelines as to what a hit is, or isn't.

For sake of conversation, let's play with these numbers.

Through 12 weeks, Brees was supposedly hit 36.5 times.

That averages out to 3 times per game.

So, the best we can do is assume he was hit 48 times over the course of the season.

Add that to the 13 sacks he took, and we have contact on 61 out of 635 pass attempts. Or contact every 10.4 pass attempts.

Roethlisberger wasn't on the list, so we don't have numbers to do the math - but it shows he was hurried the same number of times that Brees was.

Let's be fair and say that BR took HALF (which is being generous, IMO) of the hits that Brees took. 1.5 per game.

That's 24 hits over the course of the season, added to the 46 sacks he took. Contact on 70 plays over the course of the season, out of 469 pass attempts - or contact every 6.7 pass attempts.

You can't honestly say that Brees had 635 attempts last season and only got hit three times per game. You're stretching things again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 5480001)

You can't honestly say that Brees had 635 attempts last season and only got hit three times per game. You're stretching things again.

He made a logical projection from the stats we had in hand. Hard to argue with that.

And it doesn't make Brees a bad quarterback.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5479880)

I'm not saying if he's not sacked, he's not getting hit.

But it's pretty fair to say that if he's not getting sacked more than once a game, he's probably not getting hit much.

I can deduct that based on his stats, and the type of offense they run.

YOU are ASSUMING he's getting hit for NO OTHER REASON than he throws a lot.

You have NOTHING to back up that assumption.

I do.

Case ****ing closed.

SO ACTUALLY you have nothing to back up what you are sying? you are assuming that because payton manning doesnt gat hit much and they run the same type of offense that brees isnt hit much. i have watched the saints quite a bit and yeah he gets hit