You claimed I backed away. I didn't. He left the thread. He apologized, needlessly, for that, in this thread.

Is there a bottom of just how low you go on the intelligence ladder?

I'm not suddenly anything. But common sense suggests a progression.

Dorsey was a rookie in 2008, and he was being completely misused. The entire defensive front was young as hell, but they were all day-one picks. There was absolutely legit. talent there. Pioli wanted to go in a different direction, and thus there is a big setback. Many saw this as a mistake.

Flowers and Carr are above average CBs, and Page and Pollard had demonstrated a hint of promise. LB was an obvious weakness.

On offense, Bowe was looking like an emerging star, and Albert had a very solid rookie year. Most of the more knowledgeable posters on this site hated LJ and were calling for Charles (and a host of others) to be getting far more carries.

Your outside perspective is, frankly, not very informed to the details of our team. This is understandable because my knowledge of the Bills, for example, is fairly shallow.

But the difference is that I'm not over at BillsPlanet preaching from the rooftops.

You seem like a thoughtful, intelligent poster, but you've overplayed your hand with the Pioli defense (which I know you'll claim it's not) and analysis of the Chiefs.

You can put down your daddy's keyboard now.....Dane? No man it's written down in a draft bible somewhere...Dane?


PhilFree:arrow:

Jesus, you're ignorant.

This has nothing to do with him mowing the lawn.

It has everything to do with you getting owned, an d having no rebuttal, so you resorted to the "quality poster" bullshit.

You couldn't debate your point because he tore your argument apart, so you resorted to a personal attack. You backed away from your argument.

You did, however, pick it back up later, and continued to get owned.

Jesus.

If this were a prize fight, it would have been called rounds ago.

Changing from a 4-3 to a 3-4 is not a mistake. It's a system change. AS for the legit aspect of that line... Hali? Tyler? McBride? Come on, now....

Calling both Flowers and Carr above average is certainly questionable. Pollard needed to go, and much of this site understood that. If he succeeds elsewhere, that's good for him. He wasn't working out in Kansas City.

So it's Pioli's fault that Bowe showed up overweight and then took proscribed drugs to lose the weight? It's the fault of Pioli and company that Bowe has problems catching the ball, and that wasn't an issue before Pioli arrived? As for Albert, I believe it was Milkman who addressed that in the past, so I'll leave that for him.

It's funny, because I apparently knew enough to be pegging the team's win total at no more than 5, to talk about how the team would struggle because of the problem at NT, to want Pioli to get rid of LJ, etc...

When I first got here, I came and offered some opinion about how Pioli might run things, since he was coming from New England. Then the Cassel trade and the Sanchez pick in the draft happened, and a portion of you people lost your freakin' minds. I'm not preaching from the rooftops. I'm simply refuting some of the abject stupidity that Mecca, OTW, Hamas and company have been putting forth. I don't think Pioli is perfect, and I don't expect him to be. Some of you people have gotten to the point where you'd bitch if he shook twice after pissing, because you'd insist that 3 times was the magic number, and you'd insist the magic number was 2 if he shook it 3 times.

I claim it's not because it's not. Hell, from my position as a Patriots fan, it's better for my emotional well being if Pioli sucks ass, because that would make me more confident in the job that Belichick is doing since I could give him more credit for the past success. My interest in Pioli's moves is simply observational in nature. When I think he's screwed up I post it, and I'll continue to do so.

And you drop another step on that ladder.

I didn't get owned. I destroyed his argument by pointing out the statistical reality. He then fell back on a "2 wins" defense as if it was manufactured out of thin air when that was the Chiefs win total the year before Pioli's arrival. I even went to 3 wins afterwards, and that netted only one more team to his claim. 4 win seasons seem to be the general cutoff for contention in less than 4 years.

Face it, dipshit. Deez made a terrible argument.

You're an idiot AND you're wasting my time.

I took you off of ignore because, as could be easily predicted, you decided to drop in on draft weekend.

Seriously, nothing you say here matters.

No one gives a flying **** about you, your opinions - nothing.

You're a ****ing troll with absolute no good intentions, whatsoever.

So with that said, please stop posting. If not, go **** yourself with a dildo that has the image of Bill Belichick in the place you can shove it the furthest.

Au revoir, Douchetard.

LMAO

There's another county heard from.

Sorry, JPB. The votes from the voices in your head don't count.

I'm hurt, really. Your opinion meant so much to me. On a positive note, at least you figured it out about the offensive linemen. You have yourself a great week now!

I don't mind debating picks with other fans of the team but really the last thing anyone around here needs is JPB protecting Pioli like he's the baby Jesus, the act is old man.

I like this saying.... thanks Dane.

You would certainly know about an act getting old.

Isn't it bad enough that we have 1 Hootie running around without another one?

Talk about 360. He was being pretty cool until the second round, then he went back to being a ratard.