ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****The Skyy Moore Thread***** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343627)

Titty Meat 06-25-2022 09:05 PM

His routes are crisp hands are great I think he will be a productive player. Not sure about year 1 historically rookies haven't produced much. Kelce will be the #1 JuJu probably gets the most volume, MVS being the deep thread. Not bad not the best but with a HOF Coach, QB and top 5 oline yeah that will work.

Bowser 06-25-2022 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16348117)
His routes are crisp hands are great I think he will be a productive player. Not sure about year 1 historically rookies haven't produced much. Kelce will be the #1 JuJu probably gets the most volume, MVS being the deep thread. Not bad not the best but with a HOF Coach, QB and top 5 oline yeah that will work.

Yep. If Skyy gets 50 catches for about 650-700 and 4 or 5 TDs, that will be some stud production.

Chief Pagan 06-25-2022 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryker (Post 16348106)
Are you ****ing serious right now? I mean really? Training camp and pre-season has not even taken place! Let's call this draft pick a total LOSS before it begins. LMFAO! Wake up and follow the flow of the, wait for it, OFF SEASON!

Because I'm dubious that he will be the Chief's number one WR his rookie year, I should call the draft pick a total LOSS.

Yup, that totally follows.

I'll tell you what I'll call:

Skyy Moore will be the WR everyone wishes they had drafted in their fantasy football leagues next year.

ChiefsFanatic 06-25-2022 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 16347891)
I'm telling you. Skyy Moore will produce if given the snaps. Just wait. Yuuuge pick.

That's like saying, wow, that 6' guard is a great rebounder, when the tallest player on his team is 6'5".

Of course he is a great rebounder, because someone has to get the rebounds.

It doesn't matter how many snaps S2Y plays, it matters how many targets he gets. There is no formula for determining the number of targets per offensive snap.

I like S2Y, now that the draft is over, and I think he is going to perform well this year. With all new receivers, except for Hardman, what S2Y needs is to develop chemistry with PM2.

They all need to develop that chemistry, and so far, reports from Texas, and from OTAs and minicamp, the receiver who is ahead of the curve is MVS.

I honestly don't care who catches what, or scores the TDs, all I care about is the offense scoring more than the opposing teams offense, and not turning the ball over.

Andy Reid's offenses always score points. Period. It will work itself out.

Sent from my LM-V600 using Tapatalk

RaidersOftheCellar 06-25-2022 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16348113)
I don't think there's anything sneaky about it. I fully expect this to be a very solid receiving corps 4 or 5 deep. I think that's the whole idea, and Reid, Veach, and Mahomes expect that too.

I think a lot of people view the WRs as JAGs plus an unknown rookie.

UChieffyBugger 06-25-2022 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar (Post 16348169)
I think a lot of people view the WRs as JAGs plus an unknown rookie.

And those people would be clueless idiots.

dlphg9 06-26-2022 02:29 AM

It'll go Kelce 1, Hardman 2, and Moore 3 in terms of yards. Hardman will be the most productive WR on this team this year. Just wait and see. Kelce will hit 1300 yards, Hardman is gonna have 1100 and Moore will get around 800 yards. Its Hardman's contract year and if he explodes this year, then he's gonna get absolutely paid.

dlphg9 06-26-2022 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 16348147)
That's like saying, wow, that 6' guard is a great rebounder, when the tallest player on his team is 6'5".

Of course he is a great rebounder, because someone has to get the rebounds.

It doesn't matter how many snaps S2Y plays, it matters how many targets he gets. There is no formula for determining the number of targets per offensive snap.

I like S2Y, now that the draft is over, and I think he is going to perform well this year. With all new receivers, except for Hardman, what S2Y needs is to develop chemistry with PM2.

They all need to develop that chemistry, and so far, reports from Texas, and from OTAs and minicamp, the receiver who is ahead of the curve is MVS.

I honestly don't care who catches what, or scores the TDs, all I care about is the offense scoring more than the opposing teams offense, and not turning the ball over.

Andy Reid's offenses always score points. Period. It will work itself out.

Sent from my LM-V600 using Tapatalk

MVS will be lucky to break 400 yds this year.

ChiefsFanatic 06-26-2022 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 16348215)
MVS will be lucky to break 400 yds this year.

Really? OK. So, the chemistry between MVS and Mahomes is bullshit, is that what you are saying?

With a new receiving corp, Mahomes will have to have confidence in who he targets, and if he really does have chemistry, and is on the same page with MVS, then MVS will get a lot of targets.

I am not saying MVS is going to have 1,000 yards this season, but 400 seems really low.

Sent from my LM-V600 using Tapatalk

dlphg9 06-26-2022 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 16348225)
Really? OK. So, the chemistry between MVS and Mahomes is bullshit, is that what you are saying?

With a new receiving corp, Mahomes will have to have confidence in who he targets, and if he really does have chemistry, and is on the same page with MVS, then MVS will get a lot of targets.

I am not saying MVS is going to have 1,000 yards this season, but 400 seems really low.

Sent from my LM-V600 using Tapatalk

I don't care what kind of chemistry the 2 have shown in non padded practices. MVS just isn't good.

RaidersOftheCellar 06-26-2022 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 16348322)
I don't care what kind of chemistry the 2 have shown in non padded practices. MVS just isn't good.

Any particular reasoning behind saying that he “just isn’t good?”

He had a specific role in GB and did it well. IIRC he didn’t have a single drop last year. His speed is basically Hill-level. And he’s still an ascending young player.

What is he so bad at?

RealSNR 06-26-2022 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar (Post 16348351)
Any particular reasoning behind saying that he “just isn’t good?”

He had a specific role in GB and did it well. IIRC he didn’t have a single drop last year. His speed is basically Hill-level. And he’s still an ascending young player.

What is he so bad at?


I don’t have actual data or a set of plays in mind, but from watching GB games last year, he just always seemed to miscommunicate with Rodgers whenever he was targeted. That could be because of a bad or hurried throw, but it just happened so often. It just seemed like anything where MVS wasn’t wide open and had a perfectly thrown ball was always going to be incomplete.

We’ll see if that changes now that he’s apparently going to be given more responsibility than he got in GB.

It was just hard to watch any GB game last year and think, “Man Davante Adams is incredible but the rest of those turds kinda suck”

Easy 6 06-26-2022 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 16348322)
I don't care what kind of chemistry the 2 have shown in non padded practices. MVS just isn't good.

LMAO feels like we should go ahead and bookmark this one for future reference

Kiimo 06-26-2022 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar (Post 16348351)
Any particular reasoning behind saying that he “just isn’t good?”

of course there isn't he doesn't know shit about the guy

lawrenceRaider 06-26-2022 11:51 AM

Anyone else see the name Skyy Moore and wonder for a moment why a thread about a porn star is on the main lounge?

Not sure a performer with the same name exists, but it sounds like it should.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.