Ruled an interception, is the evidence conclusive?

Great coverage and play on the ball regardless.

3rd down. Get after it.

Breeland needed to coverup better so the camera couldn't overturn it.

Not a catch sadly

OK Stevie.

https://cdn.britannica.com/s:700x500...vie-Wonder.jpg

Call on the field was INT, it is close.

Wife had decided Henry's name is now "Turdhead."

Well if the officials ignore the part where he didnt have possession of the ball at all as it hit the ground under his stomach then yes they will not overturn it.

Was Ford lined up correctly?

I don't want controversy so let it be incomplete if so.


I want beat their ass no question asked

They’ll run on 3rd down

I agree. NOT conclusive.

That was a catch for Chris Hogan.

I cant see too well. At a bar. God....

It 'bounced back up' but not conclusively off the ground, overturn rules should predominate the decision.