ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270480)

Mav 10-29-2013 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjosh006 (Post 10140149)
to add to this, the 2011 patriots, 2009 colts, 2008 cards, and 2007 patriots also say HAI!

You would put that Cards team on there? That was a really good defense. Hell that was a great super bowl period.

But yeah.

Good list.

bigjosh 10-29-2013 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 10140147)
The broncos last year say whatsup.

The 2011 15-1 packers say HI, Chiefs lone loss.

The 2007 pats.


Good post by you.

2010 is really the only super bowl I remember that one of these firepower offenses with a mediocre to poor d won it all.

bigjosh 10-29-2013 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 10140152)
You would put that Cards team on there? That was a really good defense. Hell that was a great super bowl period.

But yeah.

Good list.

what I was getting at is that it was a "high flying superpower offense"

you are right though I was hesitant to put them on there.

but they did have a **** of a good offense with warner there.

Mav 10-29-2013 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjosh006 (Post 10140156)
what I was getting at is that it was a "high flying superpower offense"

you are right though I was hesitant to put them on there.

but they did have a **** of a good offense with warner there.

oh absolutely. Not questioning it. Thought they were one of the more balanced teams, and that the Cards, Steelers was one of the better super bowls in a long time.

You are correct.

Mav 10-29-2013 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjosh006 (Post 10140153)
2010 is really the only super bowl I remember that one of these firepower offenses with a mediocre to poor d won it all.

Well, their d much like the 2011 Giants, were completely different animals in the playoffs.

The packers and im not even sure how, with everyone on the IR, just torched people.

BJ Raji, Nick Collins, all just ferocious.

Shogun 10-29-2013 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VONDIPSHIT (Post 10140123)
Well the Bronco's can actually win the Superbowl this year. KC well they were a nice story and all but everyone knows they are paper tigers with that offense they have. Teams that live by strong D, weak O and lived off of high turnover diff flame out when it really counts.

so....... kind of like Peyton Manning flames out when it counts? oh....

GoChargers 10-30-2013 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VONDIPSHIT (Post 10140123)
Teams that live by strong D, weak O and lived off of high turnover diff flame out when it really counts.

I don't disagree - but teams with Peyton Manning at quarterback usually flame out when it really counts too.

Mother****erJones 10-30-2013 05:26 AM

He's 1 and done like 8 of his 12 appearances

Mother****erJones 10-30-2013 05:26 AM

He's 1 and done like 8 of his 12 appearances

mdchiefsfan 10-30-2013 05:32 AM

Oh, and he's 1 and done like 8 of his 12 appearances


:D

Bearcat 10-30-2013 05:46 AM

Wait, so we've now come to the conclusion that the best all around teams have the best shot at winning in the playoffs?

Crazy talk.

Mr. Plow 10-30-2013 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 10140284)
Wait, so we've now come to the conclusion that the best all around teams have the best shot at winning in the playoffs?

Crazy talk.


Stupid theory.

Sandy Vagina 10-30-2013 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JF08 (Post 10139864)
Alex Smith rankings:

DYAR: 17th
DVOA: 17th
QBR: 18th

*I'd post the link, but CP has yet to allow me to do so. Ridiculous... (Got these from Football Outsiders.

As most of the Smith backers have said, he's been playing at a mid-tier level. The stats back up that statement. He hasn't needed to press for more because the defense has allowed him to play conservatively. Statistically, Smith has generally had better stats when playing from behind, as his conservative style of play does not lend itself to "fantasy football" type stats. But it does lend itself to wins...


Good post that shouldn't be overlooked. Yes, the KC offense... for all the crying here about it.. is currently ranked 16th in the league for efficiency. Not a number to strut around with extreme pride.. but it sure isn't the dumpster-fire that folks here are pouting about. :thumb:

dannybcaitlyn 10-30-2013 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 10140429)
Good post that shouldn't be overlooked. Yes, the KC offense... for all the crying here about it.. is currently ranked 16th in the league for efficiency. Not a number to strut around with extreme pride.. but it sure isn't the dumpster-fire that folks here are pouting about. :thumb:

I believe the fans are frustrated because there are many times this year the offense could have put the nail in the coffin during some games but were unable to capitalize on the opportunity.

Bearcat 10-30-2013 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 10140366)
Stupid theory.

Anyone who's ever wanted a franchise quarterback knows eleventy championships are guaranteed when you have a quarterback who throws for 6000 yards, even if your defense gives up 30 points per game.

It's either that or have a really good defense with no offense.

There's no point in discussing any other options, because they simply don't exist.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.