good:D

Considering they started seasons with Neil O'Donnell, Kordell Stewart, Mike Tomczak and Tommy Maddox I'm going to go with yea.

or cushing or sintim

.

Oh, he's totally the wrong fit for the Chiefs. I think he'll do well in the league. But not until after holding a clipboard for a while.

You see, this is exactly the kind of poor argument I'm talking about...

In 2004, the Steelers were 15-1, and the mighty Ben Roethlisberger was the quarterback. They didn't win the Super Bowl because they were beaten by a 14-2 team. That team went on to win the Super Bowl.

In 2001, the Steelers were 13-3, without the Mighty Ben Roethlisberger. They didn't win the Super Bowl because they were beaten by an 11-5 Patriots team that had gone 7-1 in the second half of the season, with its only loss a close one to the team many thought was the best in the league. That Patriots team went on to avenge that loss by beating the Rams in the Super Bowl.

In other words, when the Steelers have faced the Patriots in the playoffs this decade, they've lost, even as favorites and no matter who's been the Steelers quarterback. Had the Patriots not been in the way, the Steelers might have 2 more Super Bowl wins this decade, one without the mighty Ben Roethlisberger.

He always had alot of say to begin with even when Donahoe was there...Donahoe took off to Buffalo I believe in 98 or 99.

when stafford and sanchez slip freeman will be there

Well, when you go from Neil O Donnell to Mike Tomczak to Kordell Stewart to Tommy Maddox, it sort of drives the point home.

Please stop living in fantasy land.

There's more of a chance of all 3 being gone by #20 than Freeman being there at 34.

Who'd they pass up?

so you have a 3 a 2 an udfa and a 1, they spent some higher picks there

Singletary already said he likes his young guys to battle it out. Rex Ryan said the same.

Brady's not a poor argument, as you well know. You don't like it as an example because the he tends to kill all your weak arguments.