Originally Posted by displacedinMN (Post 17706976)

The ESPN story

Kareem back 6 years after the Chiefs cut him.

BS--we had to cut him.The Browns were lucky we had to cut him.

If we could not have him, no one else should have.


I will never get past that.

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 17706604)

Yeah, if there's one thing Big Red struggles with, it's offensive football. It's too bad, really. Just think of all the **** we could have won.

Originally Posted by displacedinMN (Post 17706976)

The ESPN story

Kareem back 6 years after the Chiefs cut him.

BS--we had to cut him.The Browns were lucky we had to cut him.

If we could not have him, no one else should have.


I will never get past that.

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 17707008)

Exactly! KC did the "right" thing, and were the biggest losers in the whole deal.

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 17707069)

Cost them a Super Bowl. But if your 2018 team wins the Super Bowl, does Bob Sutton keep his job over the long haul? Spags was pretty important to winning the last 2 rings for KC. The domino effect is pretty interesting on this situation.

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 17706390)

:grovel:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chiefs RB Kareem Hunt: I’m excited to go shock the world and show that I still have it. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ChiefsKingdom?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ChiefsKingdom</a></p>&mdash; Rob Collins (@RobCollinsTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/RobCollinsTV/status/1838992718191542499?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Originally Posted by Sassy Squatch (Post 17707463)

Once again. The decision to cut Kareem Hunt had absolutely no bearing on the 2018 Super Bowl. He was not playing regardless. He was on the commissioners exempt list. The Chiefs did not cut him until after he was on that list.

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 17707069)

Cost them a Super Bowl. But if your 2018 team wins the Super Bowl, does Bob Sutton keep his job over the long haul? Spags was pretty important to winning the last 2 rings for KC. The domino effect is pretty interesting on this situation.

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 17707069)

Cost them a Super Bowl. But if your 2018 team wins the Super Bowl, does Bob Sutton keep his job over the long haul? Spags was pretty important to winning the last 2 rings for KC. The domino effect is pretty interesting on this situation.

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 17707563)

So Hunt is for sure playing this week?

Originally Posted by Bl00dyBizkitz (Post 17707566)

But winning that Super Bowl includes a win over Tom Brady in the playoffs.

I personally don't care that Pat is 0-2 against Tom in the playoffs, but I know every Patriot nut hugger on the planet will hold that stat against him until the end of time.

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 17707466)

That's completely fair to say. I'm thinking more along the lines that if Kareem stayed out of trouble to begin with, the 2018 Chiefs probably win the Super Bowl. That would create the interesting domino effect with Bob Sutton & Spags.