I’ve never thought that. But you’re somewhat obsessed with the idea of guys looking like women. Not judging. You be … you.

That's just not great logic though.

They were helping Texas all day, but then had to call them on several things for reasons? They'll ignore only certain things for the benefit of Texas, but not when it REALLY matters, like the two point conversion?

To answer your question though, the first DPI on the long pass was very questionable, IMO.

And again, I'm rooting for the upset and ultimately don't care... it's just insane to think the refs want Texas to win and then they call 10 penalties (or whatever it was) on them in the final 5 minutes and make it as hard as possible (except for not calling the targeting, of course), when they could have just ignored a penalty on the 2 point conversion and Texas probably wins.

Wow, thought he caught that.

Go for it.

Is Skattebo hungover?

It's just a joke I make about the agenda. You can't watch anything on TV without seeing that RuPaul Drag Race ad.

You play to win the game!

Avery Johnsoj absolutely does look like a chick and your coach looks old AF despite being in his 50's

Hangovers get Skattebo’s

Or not lose it with their crappy kicking game.

WTF are they reviewing? Easy as shit call

That's my point.

If the 'reviewed' penalty requires intent, I can see not calling it. I don't know that's the case, but I think it is.

But the 'real time' call DOESN'T require intent. You can have an inadvertent targeting when it's helmet to helmet contact against a defenseless receiver and I think that's an obvious example of it.

I'm not positive that's how the rule works, but I think it is. The review penalty requires intent and you could argue there wasn't intent there.

But it never should've come to that. it should've been a penalty on the field and that one I know doesn't require intent.

But so was targeting soooo...

Replay trying to cheat for texas again

It’s great they won’t let Texas bring Bevo into this stadium.