ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   MU ****The official NEW new conference realignment thread.**** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=255691)

Braincase 07-21-2012 08:34 PM

[quote=Saul Good;8758235]That's like eight grand right there.[/quote

Dude, when it's basketball season and you see a crowd of 3500 for your game against A&M in South Carolina, then I want to hear you bitch.

tredadda 07-21-2012 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade (Post 8757107)
If I were to paint my dream scenario assuming no ND:

SEC gets UNC and UVA

B12 gets FSU, Clemson, G Tech, V Tech, NC St and Louisville


SEC-Big12 Challenge over the first four weeks of the college season:

FSU-UF
GTech-UGA
Clemson-USC
NC St-UNC
VTech-UVA
Louisville-UK
UT-A&M
KU-MU
OU-Bama (Crimson and Cream vs Crimson Tide)
OSU-Tenn (Orange Crush)
ISU-Vanderbilt (We're in these conferences too!)
KSU-Auburn (Wildcats and Tigers)
TTech-Ole Miss (Red Raiders and Rebels)
Baylor-Miss St (Bears and Bulldogs)
WVU-LSU (Mountains and Swamps)
TCU-Arkansas (Jerry's Jumbo Jubilee)

Week 1:

East Coast Early: VTech-UVA
Noon: TTech-Ole Miss
Late Afternoon: TCU-Arkansas
Prime Time: WVU-LSU

Week 2:

East Coast Early: GTech-UGA
Noon: ISU-Vanderbilt
Late Afternoon: OSU-Tenn
Prime Time: OU-Bama

Week 3:

East Coast Early: NC St-UNC
Noon: Louisville-UK
Late Afternoon: KSU-Auburn
Prime Time: UT-A&M

Week 4:

East Coast Early: Clemson-USC
Noon: Baylor-Miss St
Late Afternoon: KU-MU
Prime Time: FSU-UF

Could you imagine the extra cash we could demand for that setup? That's a ratings bonanza ESPN couldn't refuse.

That would be amazing, especially if ND stays INDY in all this.

tredadda 07-21-2012 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8757730)
Are you speaking of last years game? It was a calculated move by the fan base for the removal of the head coach...and it worked.

Good thing to because many of us were scared shitless when hapless Turner Gill was beating you at halftime. Thank God that didn't end up staying true. I can't go another year with Gill and his circus.

But if it never happens I'd be completely fine with it. Missouri chose to leave the conference and end the series. I'm just saying that if this completely dreamed up scenario that HH has made actually happened that the best economical setup would be to pit KU against MU. Doesn't matter much to me either way.

So they are going to sell out all their home games this year then?

tredadda 07-21-2012 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8757895)
The KU fan just got off a Final Four run so many are probably busy recovering from the amount they spent traveling and purchasing tickets.

Championship game tickets aren't cheap.

But I wouldn't worry, if Weis can get the team back to its winning ways I'm sure the sell out crowds that packed Memorial Stadium will be back in no time. He has to prove himself first, that's how it works in sports generally.

ROFL

1. Winning ways? KU had one magical season in which they played no one good and dodged the major powers in the Big XII (except Mizzou whom they were summarily abused by). What winning ways do you speak of?

2. Weis was a failure at ND where he had access to superior resources in every way over KU, yet he will somehow succeed at KU? Heck he already failed to recruit the top football player in Kansas. Keep hoping Weis works the impossible, especially in a Big XII that you say is stronger now minus Mizzou and aTm and with the additions of WVU and TCU because in football all a KU fan has is hope.

Bambi 07-21-2012 09:00 PM

[QUOTE=Braincase;8758341]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8758235)
That's like eight grand right there.[/quote

Dude, when it's basketball season and you see a crowd of 3500 for your game against A&M in South Carolina, then I want to hear you bitch.

No need to wait that long.

http://media.columbiamissourian.com/..._w600_h600.jpg

ArrowheadHawk 07-21-2012 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8758350)
ROFL

1. Winning ways? KU had one magical season in which they played no one good and dodged the major powers in the Big XII (except Mizzou whom they were summarily abused by). What winning ways do you speak of?

2. Weis was a failure at ND where he had access to superior resources in every way over KU, yet he will somehow succeed at KU? Heck he already failed to recruit the top football player in Kansas. Keep hoping Weis works the impossible, especially in a Big XII that you say is stronger now minus Mizzou and aTm and with the additions of WVU and TCU because in football all a KU fan has is hope.

1. MU did not abuse KU that game. It was a one possesion game until the safety ended it.
2. If Weis does what he did at ND that will be a success. And he does good recruiting QBs. All it takes is a good one to be decent again.

Bambi 07-21-2012 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8758350)
ROFL

1. Winning ways? KU had one magical season in which they played no one good and dodged the major powers in the Big XII (except Mizzou whom they were summarily abused by). What winning ways do you speak of?

2. Weis was a failure at ND where he had access to superior resources in every way over KU, yet he will somehow succeed at KU? Heck he already failed to recruit the top football player in Kansas. Keep hoping Weis works the impossible, especially in a Big XII that you say is stronger now minus Mizzou and aTm and with the additions of WVU and TCU because in football all a KU fan has is hope.

Don't get so worked up. They haven't even played a game yet.

Weis went to two BCS games while at Notre Dame. People have this delusion of what Notre Dame is on the field. They will NEVER contend for the NC with their academic requirements. Jesus himself coaching the team wouldn't change that.

What they need to do is start buying players and drop pretty much all academic standards ala the SEC if they hope to get back in the big time.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-21-2012 09:05 PM

Winning ways

Yeah that didn't make any sense to me either.

tredadda 07-21-2012 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 8758358)
1. MU did not abuse KU that game. It was a one possesion game until the safety ended it.
2. If Weis does what he did at ND that will be a success. And he does good recruiting QBs. All it takes is a good one to be decent again.

But he won't. KU won't come even close to snagging the kind of talent ND did. That is why ol' Charlie was able to do what he did there although by ND standards equals failure. The Big XII is tough, he won't compete there, but keep hoping.

tredadda 07-21-2012 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8758359)
Don't get so worked up. They haven't even played a game yet.

Weis went to two BCS games while at Notre Dame. People have this delusion of what Notre Dame is on the field. They will NEVER contend for the NC with their academic requirements. Jesus himself coaching the team wouldn't change that.

What they need to do is start buying players and drop pretty much all academic standards ala the SEC if they hope to get back in the big time.

You are not serious right? Nothing you post could even mildly get me "worked up".

Bambi 07-21-2012 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8758369)
But he won't. KU won't come even close to snagging the kind of talent ND did. That is why ol' Charlie was able to do what he did there although by ND standards equals failure. The Big XII is tough, he won't compete there, but keep hoping.

Relax man, why are you so worried about KU? I mean, with your Notre Dame standards and everything I think you should just let go and let KU fans be worried about Charlie Weis.

WilliamTheIrish 07-21-2012 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8758359)
Don't get so worked up. They haven't even played a game yet.They will NEVER contend for the NC with their academic requirements. Jesus himself coaching the team wouldn't change that.



Notre Dame's standards for athletic scholarships is well below the standard for admission for the general student body. If you're good at football, ND will admit you. Just like any other school. Ask Tim Grunhard.

Saul Good 07-22-2012 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braincase (Post 8758341)
Dude, when it's basketball season and you see a crowd of 3500 for your game against A&M in South Carolina, then I want to hear you bitch.

What does a basketball game in South Carolina between teams from Missouri and Texas have to do with Kansas football tickets to their home opener costing less than a fin?

Pasta Little Brioni 07-22-2012 09:58 AM

Someone needs to lay off grandpa's cough syrup

mnchiefsguy 07-22-2012 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8758047)
I'm sorry? What did I lie about?

Ah, Hyprocritson....there are so many things, you can't just pick one.

Bambi 07-22-2012 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8759020)
Ah, Hyprocritson....there are so many things, you can't just pick one.

I'm waiting

mnchiefsguy 07-22-2012 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8757730)
Are you speaking of last years game? It was a calculated move by the fan base for the removal of the head coach...and it worked.

Good thing to because many of us were scared shitless when hapless Turner Gill was beating you at halftime. Thank God that didn't end up staying true. I can't go another year with Gill and his circus.

But if it never happens I'd be completely fine with it. Missouri chose to leave the conference and end the series. I'm just saying that if this completely dreamed up scenario that HH has made actually happened that the best economical setup would be to pit KU against MU. Doesn't matter much to me either way.

Lie #1 Hyprocritson. Show me some proof of an organized boycott of the game by KU fans, since you have such a grand conspiracy theory about it.

Lie #2....You know you care...there is not a single MU thread on this forum that you do not appear in, so quit lying about it.

And those are just from the last few pages of this thread....I could take the time to go through this thread and really make you look stupid... but you do such a good job of it by yourself, there really is no need.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-22-2012 11:42 AM

Pinocchioson's nose is growing by the second.

Bambi 07-22-2012 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8759233)
Lie #1 Hyprocritson. Show me some proof of an organized boycott of the game by KU fans, since you have such a grand conspiracy theory about it.

Lie #2....You know you care...there is not a single MU thread on this forum that you do not appear in, so quit lying about it.

And those are just from the last few pages of this thread....I could take the time to go through this thread and really make you look stupid... but you do such a good job of it by yourself, there really is no need.

1. I told my friend not to go to the game and he didn't go. Neither of us went. Calculated move, coach fired. That one's easy.

2. I cared about MU when they were my opponent. I doubt I've had any posts in any MU thread since July 1 when they left the conference. Feel free to go back and check and post proving me to be a liar.

I'm going out now but I'll be eager to see your results when I get back.

Let's hope it turns out better than your "everyone thinks KU is being stupid and/or petty" argument for you. That was downright embarrassing.

mnchiefsguy 07-22-2012 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8759282)
1. I told my friend not to go to the game and he didn't go. Neither of us went. Calculated move, coach fired. That one's easy.

2. I cared about MU when they were my opponent. I doubt I've had any posts in any MU thread since July 1 when they left the conference. Feel free to go back and check and post proving me to be a liar.

I'm going out now but I'll be eager to see your results when I get back.

Let's hope it turns out better than your "everyone thinks KU is being stupid and/or petty" argument for you. That was downright embarrassing.

Nice to know that two idiots who decide not to go to a KU constitutes a fan protest. You must be really, really, proud.

You once again show how much of a hypocrite you are...you feel free to use generalizations, yet you are the first to be critical when someone uses a generic term such as "everyone"

And the last few pages of this thread show that Mizzou is very much on your mind. Either that, or you have a creepy affection for Saul Good...which is it?

DaKCMan AP 07-22-2012 02:04 PM

Kasey Hill and now Chris Walker!!!

BOOYAH!

Titty Meat 07-22-2012 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8759580)
Kasey Hill and now Chris Walker!!!

BOOYAH!

Who?

DaKCMan AP 07-22-2012 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8759581)
Who?

#6 and #7 overall 2013 basketball prospects. Hill was already committed to Florida. Walker committed today, choosing Florida over Louisville & Kansas. This is already the most heralded (not best) recruiting class in Florida basketball history.

Bambi 07-22-2012 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8759580)
Kasey Hill and now Chris Walker!!!

BOOYAH!

Those are great pickups. Good to see that program coming back to be a real threat.

Titty Meat 07-22-2012 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8759597)
#6 and #7 overall 2013 basketball prospects. Hill was already committed to Florida. Walker committed today, choosing Florida over Louisville & Kansas. This is already the most heralded (not best) recruiting class in Florida basketball history.

Oh yeah? Well Walter Pitchford :)

DaKCMan AP 07-22-2012 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8759627)
Oh yeah? Well Walter Pitchford :)

He was never going to see the floor at Florida. Nevertheless, he was a good kid, wish him luck.

Saul Good 07-27-2012 11:41 AM

Nebraska isn't really going to wear the all red jersey with the giant black N on the front, right? I think they ripped off the Noid's outfit from the old Dominos commercials.

Saul Good 07-27-2012 11:43 AM

<br><br><br><img alt="" style="display:block;" src="https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcREOUy_nifDM2c5NHNUdMEskSFSnEQKn8eRTEEaSe2dFDs_Gzj-NQ"> <img alt="" style="display:block;width:242px;height:364px;" src="https://p.twimg.com/Ay0rJxzCMAEwZsM.jpg"></font></b><hr noshade color=#cccccc>

Saulbadguy 07-27-2012 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8771632)
<br><br><br><img alt="" style="display:block;" src="https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcREOUy_nifDM2c5NHNUdMEskSFSnEQKn8eRTEEaSe2dFDs_Gzj-NQ"> <img alt="" style="display:block;width:242px;height:364px;" src="https://p.twimg.com/Ay0rJxzCMAEwZsM.jpg"></font></b><hr noshade color=#cccccc>

Wow. ADIDAS schools are a joke. LOL.

Mr. Plow 07-27-2012 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8771632)


<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/bri0SA7FTf4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Saul Good 07-27-2012 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 8771678)
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/bri0SA7FTf4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Need the Family Guy clip. (I'm on my mobile.)

Mr. Plow 07-27-2012 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8771682)
Need the Family Guy clip. (I'm on my mobile.)


<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4FatuOa1zFc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

HolyHandgernade 07-30-2012 04:42 PM

Reports coming out that ESPN has agreed to the same price for the "Champions Bowl" as the Rose bowl gets: 80 million/year. On the B12 side of things, that is slightly over 4 million per team per year if we don't expand.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=159&f=4582&t=9186651

kstater 07-30-2012 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EMAWmeister
Quote:

Originally Posted by PowercatPat


Mizzou hasn't owned anything since 1865.

LMAO

Titty Meat 07-30-2012 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8759980)
He was never going to see the floor at Florida. Nevertheless, he was a good kid, wish him luck.

Seems like a solid player and a good complementary piece when you're building a program.

Setsuna 07-30-2012 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8759580)
Kasey Hill and now Chris Walker!!!

BOOYAH!

WOOT!

Bambi 07-30-2012 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade (Post 8778569)
Reports coming out that ESPN has agreed to the same price for the "Champions Bowl" as the Rose bowl gets: 80 million/year. On the B12 side of things, that is slightly over 4 million per team per year if we don't expand.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=159&f=4582&t=9186651

Lol, nice

DaKCMan AP 07-31-2012 06:58 AM

One of the top 2013 RB recruits, Greg Bryant, de-committed form Oklahoma. Probably now an Auburn lean.

Everyone wants to play in the SEC.

Bambi 07-31-2012 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8779605)
One of the top 2013 RB recruits, Greg Bryant, de-committed form Oklahoma. Probably now an Auburn lean.

Everyone wants to play in the SEC.

Other than 4 out of the 5 top recruits in the country don't you're spot on.

:thumb:

qabbaan 07-31-2012 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 8771652)
Wow. ADIDAS schools are a joke. LOL.

Those are the gayest uniforms I have ever seen.

DaKCMan AP 07-31-2012 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8779671)
Other than 4 out of the 5 top recruits in the country don't you're spot on.

:thumb:

As usual, 6 of the current top 10 classes are in the SEC.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/footbal...k/2013/all/all

Bambi 07-31-2012 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8779792)
As usual, 6 of the current top 10 classes are in the SEC.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/footbal...k/2013/all/all

Jesus, USC is destroying.

Must be giving out free houses again.

Saul Good 07-31-2012 10:24 AM

No Big 12 in the top 10 and only one in the top 20? Yikes

Bambi 07-31-2012 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8779918)
No Big 12 in the top 10 and only one in the top 20? Yikes

I know. It's crazy how all these networks keep giving these shitty football teams so much money.

Dr. Gigglepants 07-31-2012 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8779926)
I know. It's crazy how all these networks keep giving these shitty football teams so much money.

So they got their new TV deal worked out and signed? Congratulations!

Frazod 07-31-2012 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8779926)
I know. It's crazy how all these networks keep giving these shitty football teams so much money.

To be fair, most of them aren't shitty. Just one in particular, mainly.

Titty Meat 07-31-2012 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8779865)
Jesus, USC is destroying.

Must be giving out free houses again.

Yup. USC is also likely going to get Penn States RB who was the 2nd best RB in the conference behind Rex Burkhead.

Bambi 07-31-2012 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8780268)
So they got their new TV deal worked out and signed? Congratulations!

I don't think it's signed yet. I think they're waiting on two more teams in particular.

Dr. Gigglepants 07-31-2012 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8780379)
I don't think it's signed yet. I think they're waiting on two more teams in particular.

I am reading that UT wants to put one of its games on the LHN and that is holding up the entire contract. Same old UT? Or is it just good old American capitalism where each school should get to control their own TV rights regardless of what rules the rest of the conference has to adhere to? What say you?

mnchiefsguy 07-31-2012 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8780466)
I am reading that UT wants to put one of its games on the LHN and that is holding up the entire contract. Same old UT? Or is it just good old American capitalism where each school should get to control their own TV rights regardless of what rules the rest of the conference has to adhere to? What say you?

Texas trying to screw the Big XII and put another game on its own network? Say it is not so.....I thought the Big XII was one big lovefest now.

Bambi 07-31-2012 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8780466)
I am reading that UT wants to put one of its games on the LHN and that is holding up the entire contract. Same old UT? Or is it just good old American capitalism where each school should get to control their own TV rights regardless of what rules the rest of the conference has to adhere to? What say you?

link?

Dr. Gigglepants 07-31-2012 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8780534)
link?

Why don't you provide me with a link why the deal isn't done yet?

Bambi 07-31-2012 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8780482)
Texas trying to screw the Big XII and put another game on its own network? Say it is not so.....I thought the Big XII was one big lovefest now.

Texas gets what it wants = Texas runs everything

Texas is told no by it's conference brethren = Everyone hates each other and Texas runs everything

Missouri gets shipped out to play in the SEC East = Everyone in the SEC is equal

makes sense.

Bambi 07-31-2012 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8780544)
Why don't you provide me with a link why the deal isn't done yet?

I said "I think".

You said "I'm reading".

I'm waiting. I'm very interested in this link you'll be providing me.

Dr. Gigglepants 07-31-2012 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8780548)
I said "I think".

You said "I'm reading".

I'm waiting. I'm very interested in this link you'll be providing me.

Yes, I was reading it, which were the fruits of my Googling labor. If you're too lazy to look into it, GFY.

Bambi 07-31-2012 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8780552)
Yes, I was reading it, which were the fruits of my Googling labor. If you're too lazy to look into it, GFY.

wow, that was easy.

Try harder next time buddy.

Dr. Gigglepants 07-31-2012 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8780560)
wow, that was easy.

Try harder next time buddy.

Consider it a hypothetical question if that helps you out.

Bambi 07-31-2012 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8780572)
Consider it a hypothetical question if that helps you out.

uhhhh, okay?

That makes you guys look good.

LMAO

Mr. Plow 07-31-2012 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8780552)
Yes, I was reading it, which were the fruits of my Googling labor. If you're too lazy to look into it, GFY.


"I was reading it, but I....uhhh....you find the link to it."

LMAO

Frazod 07-31-2012 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 8780273)
To be fair, most of them aren't shitty. Just one in particular, mainly.

Hey Wickedtard, did you figure out who that one really shitty football team is yet?

I'll give you a hint - it shares many letters in common with Arkansas.

Dr. Gigglepants 07-31-2012 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8780591)
uhhhh, okay?

That makes you guys look good.

LMAO

Then care to elaborate on your "think" post?

Don't worry, I'll actually respond without resorting to requiring links to statements from conference and network officials about a sensitive subject, about which there will never be statements from those people until the actual document is signed.

Bambi 07-31-2012 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 8780608)
Hey Wickedtard, did you figure out who that one really shitty football team is yet?

I'll give you a hint - it shares many letters in common with Arkansas.

Why would FOX, ESPN, the SEC, etc all give the Big 12 so much money if it had any shitty football teams? Your statement makes no sense.

I assume you're talking about Kansas being that they had a couple really down years.

But we'e seen the potential Kansas has when it comes to football. There's no reason to believe what has once been achieved cannot come again.

For other schools, like say Missouri, you can say that because they've never accomplished anything the same level as say a KU.

So maybe you might want to chill until you guys actually show us something. You only come off as delusional.

Frazod 07-31-2012 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8780635)
Why would FOX, ESPN, the SEC, etc all give the Big 12 so much money if it had any shitty football teams? Your statement makes no sense.

I assume you're talking about Kansas being that they had a couple really down years.

But we'e seen the potential Kansas has when it comes to football. There's no reason to believe what has once been achieved cannot come again.

For other schools, like say Missouri, you can say that because they've never accomplished anything the same level as say a KU.

So maybe you might want to chill until you guys actually show us something. You only come off as delusional.

Right. Not winning a single conference game isn't shitty. It's..... charitable? LMAO

And of course, the coaches, the players and the AD from your single fluke season are all gone, and that puss schedule will never again be duplicated either, so sure, there's no reason to believe.... um.... what?

But hey, I'm sure your 79th ranked recruiting class will right the ship. :thumb:

Bambi 07-31-2012 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8780622)
Then care to elaborate on your "think" post?

Don't worry, I'll actually respond without resorting to requiring links to statements from conference and network officials about a sensitive subject, about which there will never be statements from those people until the actual document is signed.

I think they are trying to rope in FSU and Notre Dame in which the contracts would be torn up and completely re-written.

I only think this because these are the only two schools that have been mentioned specifically by Big 12 administrators during the Big 12 meetings a couple months ago.

Those are the only two schools that add any real value to the Big 12 at this point. If ND cannot be convinced then the deal will be finalized and signed. Which is probably what will end up happening...I think.

Bambi 07-31-2012 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 8780651)
Right. Not winning a single conference game isn't shitty. It's..... charitable? LMAO

And of course, the coaches, the players and the AD from your single fluke season are all gone, and that puss schedule will never again be duplicated either, so sure, there's no reason to believe.... um.... what?

But hey, I'm sure your 79th ranked recruiting class will right the ship. :thumb:

Better go tell ESPN and FOX. I don't think they got your memo.

TLO 07-31-2012 03:03 PM

Why do MU fans seem so butt-hurt about everything everywhere at all times? Did Jerry Sandusky pay the whole fanbase a visit?

Frazod 07-31-2012 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8780656)
Better go tell ESPN and FOX. I don't think they got your memo.

Apparently they got Iowa State's memo. The Cyclones need a chump they can run up on the score on!

Frazod 07-31-2012 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFan369 (Post 8780665)
Why do MU fans seem so butt-hurt about everything everywhere at all times? Did Jerry Sandusky pay the whole fanbase a visit?

I'm thinking it was just you.

TLO 07-31-2012 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 8780681)
I'm thinking it was just you.

Good one. :thumb:

Edit: Who's my **** team btw?

|Zach| 07-31-2012 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFan369 (Post 8780685)
Good one. :thumb:

Edit: Who's my **** team btw?

The fighting oranges?

TLO 07-31-2012 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 8780694)
The fighting oranges?

Oh yeah! :)

Dr. Gigglepants 07-31-2012 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8780652)
I think they are trying to rope in FSU and Notre Dame in which the contracts would be torn up and completely re-written.

I only think this because these are the only two schools that have been mentioned specifically by Big 12 administrators during the Big 12 meetings a couple months ago.

Those are the only two schools that add any real value to the Big 12 at this point. If ND cannot be convinced then the deal will be finalized and signed. Which is probably what will end up happening...I think.

Why do you "think" that UT would want those 2 power schools in their conference? I don't think a few extra million a year is as important to UT as it is to the other schools who would be all over adding those 2 schools.

ChiefsCountry 07-31-2012 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFan369 (Post 8780665)
Why do MU fans seem so butt-hurt about everything everywhere at all times? Did Jerry Sandusky pay the whole fanbase a visit?

So whose ****ing mult is this?

TLO 07-31-2012 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 8780705)
So whose ****ing mult is this?

I'm not a mult. I am not even going to participate in this thread.

RustShack 07-31-2012 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8780700)
Why do you "think" that UT would want those 2 power schools in their conference? I don't think a few extra million a year is as important to UT as it is to the other schools who would be all over adding those 2 schools.

Its not UT's conference anymore, and they are the ones trying to rope in ND the hardest. UT just has a single vote now, not all the pull of the conference.

Bambi 07-31-2012 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8780700)
Why do you "think" that UT would want those 2 power schools in their conference? I don't think a few extra million a year is as important to UT as it is to the other schools who would be all over adding those 2 schools.

Who says UT is driving it? UT is one of the schools against expansion apparently. The thought was the Big 12 needed to expand to make the SEC happy with the whole Champions Bowl thing. But that doesn't seem to be slowing anyone down.

Dr. Gigglepants 07-31-2012 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 8780733)
Its not UT's conference anymore, and they are the ones trying to rope in ND the hardest. UT just has a single vote now, not all the pull of the conference.

UT is proxy voting for TT, and OU, who will always go along with UT, is proxy voting for OSU. UT has 4 votes.

Why would UT want ND in their conference when the B12 champion is guaranteed a spot at the table? I don't think the money is worth it to them. All the rumblings about how the conference is best left at 10 comes from UT. It's a much easier path to the playoff, which is all that matters now.

Now, if the Champions Bowl really does require the B12 to have a CCG all that will change. How much truthiness is there to that requirement by the SEC? I haven't really seen anything that would pass the Wickedson smell test, but that's the only scenario where I see any more teams coming to the league.

Bambi 07-31-2012 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8780760)
UT is proxy voting for TT, and OU, who will always go along with UT, is proxy voting for OSU. UT has 4 votes.

Why would UT want ND in their conference when the B12 champion is guaranteed a spot at the table? I don't think the money is worth it to them. All the rumblings about how the conference is best left at 10 comes from UT. It's a much easier path to the playoff, which is all that matters now.

Now, if the Champions Bowl really does require the B12 to have a CCG all that will change. How much truthiness is there to that requirement by the SEC? I haven't really seen anything that would pass the Wickedson smell test, but that's the only scenario where I see any more teams coming to the league.

"Requirement" and "making someone happy" are nowhere near the same thing.

The idea that the SEC would require anything of the Big 12 is laughable.

Pitt Gorilla 07-31-2012 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8780765)
"Requirement" and "making someone happy" are nowhere near the same thing.

The idea that the SEC would require anything of the Big 12 is laughable.

If the SEC included that requirement in negotiations, the Big 12 WILL do it.

Dr. Gigglepants 07-31-2012 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8780765)
"Requirement" and "making someone happy" are nowhere near the same thing.

The idea that the SEC would require anything of the Big 12 is laughable.

Deals don't get done on "making someone happy" terms. If the deal says the CCG is required it will be required. If it doesn't say that a CCG is required then one isn't required. It either is or isn't, and yes the B12 will expand if it is required considering the stakes.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.