ChiefsPlanet
Page 57 of 83 « First 74753545556 57 5859606167 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals ****OFFICIAL Royals at Blue Jays GDT 08/02**** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=293694)

KC_Connection 08-02-2015 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 11634798)
Moose being out isn't a conflict? Tell that to the royals players dumbass.
Moustakas being out is an injury, not a conflict.

tk13 08-02-2015 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 11633563)
That was for Moose, I'd imagine.
Just quoting myself to show that I'm not full of crap. I said that right after it happened.

RollChiefsRoll 08-02-2015 07:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 11634804)
Moustakas being out is an injury, not a conflict.
Brilliant semantics-parsing there. You should go into politics.

lewdog 08-02-2015 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 11634804)
Moustakas being out is an injury, not a conflict.
You don't think some of the players think your 3b should wear one when our 3b is out because of one? Jesus, do you watch this sport?

KC_Connection 08-02-2015 07:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RollChiefsRoll (Post 11634803)
You should watch more baseball.
Huh? Players get hit all the time unintentionally without teams throwing beanballs in some kind of hilarious attempt at retribution. If it was actually the way you're talking about, why are beanballs like this a rarity and not a regularity?

KC_Connection 08-02-2015 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 11634808)
You don't think some of the players think your 3b should wear one when our 3b is out because of one? Jesus, do you watch this sport?
I think that's a pretty hilarious rationalization for an intentional beanball, yes. Explains quite a bit why the Royals find themselves in these scenarios.

KC_Connection 08-02-2015 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RollChiefsRoll (Post 11634807)
Brilliant semantics-parsing there. You should go into politics.
So you're saying an unintentional HBP the day before is a good reason to hit somebody intentionally and start a conflict like this? Seriously?

lewdog 08-02-2015 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 11634813)
I think that's a pretty hilarious rationalization for an intentional beanball, yes. Explains quite a bit why the Royals find themselves in these scenarios.
This happens all the time. I'm not sure how you don't get that. Many not as obvious beanballs as today but HBP nonetheless.

RollChiefsRoll 08-02-2015 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 11634813)
I think that's a pretty hilarious rationalization for an intentional beanball, yes. Explains quite a bit why the Royals find themselves in these scenarios.
I think the more likely explanation is that Samardzija, Lawrie, and Donaldson still need therapy for their PTSD from last year.

tk13 08-02-2015 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 11634801)
Aside from the Diamondbacks, please name one team that retaliates consistently after someone gets hit. Maybe the Pirates after McCutchen gets beaned?
They all do. You are surely not that naive. They may not do it right away, but it happens. Someone made a reference to Curt Schilling, who said most all of his HBP were on purpose for one reason or another.

There was a story about Ed Farmer after that dust up a few weeks ago, and granted Ed Farmer is nuts... but there was a story about how once he waited two years to nail a guy for something he did wrong.

Reaper16 08-02-2015 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11634713)
I know that these threads had ten percent the posts in them last year. Hell, you're one of the five people in the KC metro who knew what baseball was in August, so you should be able to see how a pattern of asshattery keeps following the Royals, but I guess you can't pick all the low hanging fruit.
Orchard jobs a'plenty, I see.

lewdog 08-02-2015 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 11634814)
So you're saying an unintentional HBP the day before is a good reason to hit somebody intentionally and start a conflict like this? Seriously?
Had moose not been hurt than maybe nothing. Missing a game then yes, the chances of an opponent wearing one increase based on game circumstances.

KC_Connection 08-02-2015 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RollChiefsRoll (Post 11634799)
Well as long as you'll admit that Donaldson's tantrum and walk outside the batter's box after Madson buzzed him was just a mixture of roid rage and I-can't-believe-I-let-that-ball-go-by-in-the-2014-wild-card-game butthurtedness, then I'd say we've reached a détente.
Donaldson got emotional today (understandable considering he was thrown at and hit for no good reason and wanted his own retribution), but I do love how much he's gotten under the skin of you guys. ROFL

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 08-02-2015 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 11634808)
You don't think some of the players think your 3b should wear one when our 3b is out because of one? Jesus, do you watch this sport?
I guess the Astros owe the Royals an injured OF for 6-8 weeks

KC_Connection 08-02-2015 07:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 11634820)
Had moose not been hurt than maybe nothing. Missing a game then yes, the chances of an opponent wearing one increase based on game circumstances.
So you only hit guys intentionally unprovoked when your player has to sit out a game because of the previous unintentional HBP? Is that the rule we're making up to explain this away now?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:08 PM.
Page 57 of 83 « First 74753545556 57 5859606167 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.