ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   I can't believe there's not a thread about Gun's interviews on the front page... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=140263)

Coogs 05-05-2006 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
I understand what you're saying and I'm right there with you. I can't stand Gunther.

But what's the point of going into next season thinking that we can't win as long as he's here?

I'm really thinkiing we can win, but it is going to be difficult. It seems to me as if most of the weaker opponents on our schedule have upgraded their talent significantly. Plus, I already think we are behind several teams as far a realistic possibilities of going to the Super Bowl as on May 5th. Indy, NE, Denver, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, to name a few.

I like the Head Coaching change. I like the new assistant coaching changes. But I am a little leary on Gun being the weak link that will prevent us from possibly going to the Super Bowl. It seems as if the new HC has come in and told the DC we are going to run the cover two. I'm thinking if Gun really believed in the cover two, then that would have been the staple of what we were doing, not something we are going to change to.

I think he is full of crap, and has been elected to Pope status around here because of a 4 down sereis against the Bills many years ago when he blitzed the hell out of Collins on first-and-goal late in the game.

If we go to the Super Bowl, I personally feel it wil be in spite of Gun instead of because of Gun.

htismaqe 05-05-2006 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs
I'm really thinkiing we can win, but it is going to be difficult. It seems to me as if most of the weaker opponents on our schedule have upgraded their talent significantly. Plus, I already think we are behind several teams as far a realistic possibilities of going to the Super Bowl as on May 5th. Indy, NE, Denver, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, to name a few.

I like the Head Coaching change. I like the new assistant coaching changes. But I am a little leary on Gun being the weak link that will prevent us from possibly going to the Super Bowl. It seems as if the new HC has come in and told the DC we are going to run the cover two. I'm thinking if Gun really believed in the cover two, then that would have been the staple of what we were doing, not something we are going to change to.

I think he is full of crap, and has been elected to Pope status around here because of a 4 down sereis against the Bills many years ago when he blitzed the hell out of Collins on first-and-goal late in the game.

If we go to the Super Bowl, I personally feel it wil be in spite of Gun instead of because of Gun.

Which of our weaker opponents upgraded any more than we did?

Cincy is soft, as soft as we have been under Vermeil. And Denver? Please.

The more I think about this draft and the more I read about the team, the less I think we're gonna go full-on Cover 2...

stevieray 05-05-2006 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs

If we go to the Super Bowl, I personally feel it wil be in spite of Gun instead of because of Gun.

wow. that's pretty harsh.

the Talking Can 05-05-2006 07:28 PM

one way or the other Gunther did something stupid...he played a player that was injured and sucked, or he "sacrificed" a year to let a player learn a new position...personally, I still think Gun is part of the problem....his schemes and talent evaluation skills are questionable...but we're stuck with him...

cdcox 05-05-2006 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs
I'Plus, I already think we are behind several teams as far a realistic possibilities of going to the Super Bowl as on May 5th. Indy, NE, Denver, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, to name a few.

No kidding. Consider the outcome the last time we faced each of these teams. [shudder]

milkman 05-05-2006 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray
wow. that's pretty harsh.

It is, and I agree with him.

stevieray 05-05-2006 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SideWinder
It is, and I agree with him.

ok.

and?

stevieray 05-05-2006 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox
No kidding. Consider the outcome the last time we faced each of these teams. [shudder]


We annihilated Cincy @ Arrowhead. We beat Denver @ Arrowhead.

I think we can hang with NE.

cdcox 05-05-2006 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray
We annihilated Cincy @ Arrowhead. We beat Denver @ Arrowhead.

I think we can hang with NE.

Sarcasm detector was needed. We beat each of these teams the last time we played them.

Granted they were all in Arrowhead.

milkman 05-05-2006 07:45 PM

Just going to cover a few things that have been mentioned.

Has anyone from the Chiefs come out and stated that we are going to convert to a cover two as our base D, or is this just an assumption based on the fact that Hermie has been named HC?


So Gunt, whose talent evalution has been suspect, is excited because the guys he wanted are the ones we got?

And we should be excited?

I'm not excited at all about Bell.
He lacks the speed to be an edge rusher, which is how Gunt intends to use him, as I understand it.

tk13 05-05-2006 07:48 PM

I think we can play with anybody. I get railed on for saying this but I still think schedule plays a part of it. Us and San Diego were two very good teams last year but our schedule beat us down. The players and coaches can't use that as an excuse but as an objective fan I do think it makes a difference. Pittsburgh had the easiest schedule of the three of us down the stretch and look what happened to them. Just like how Indy and Denver used easy schedules to catapult themselves into the bye games. Having to basically play 6 straight playoff games at the end of the year was just brutal. We proved we could play with a lot of those teams, and we got beat up by a couple of them. It's a small difference between great, good, and bad in the NFL.

milkman 05-05-2006 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray
ok.

and?

Just thought I'd let you know that someone out here agrees with him.

And I'll bet you aren't surprised by my opinion, either.

stevieray 05-05-2006 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox
Sarcasm detector was needed. We beat each of these teams the last time we played them.

Granted they were all in Arrowhead.

I misread, sorry.

Interestingly enough, I just watched the cincy game the other day.

It would've been nice if we didn't sustain injuries at each level of the defense. I'm just hoping that the other players respond like Kawika did, and the fact that we have a defensive minded HC can't hurt their psyche.

I love the O DV brought, but it was at the expense of the D. not only player wise ( no major push before last offseason), but mentally as well.

stevieray 05-05-2006 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SideWinder
Just thought I'd let you know that someone out here agrees with him.

And I'll bet you aren't surprised by my opinion, either.

Ya, I wonderd why you didn't just give him props.

stevieray 05-05-2006 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13
It's a small difference between great, good, and bad in the NFL.

And it appears to get smaller every year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.