No one's really bitching, we just don't know what we're going to do with the other LB spot. Edwards is too old and is a MLB, and would Kawika do well in place of Bell? I'm not a fan of putting a MLB at OLB.

.,.,

Pollard is perfect for an outside linebacker in the Cover 2. Heck I went back and read his scouting reports from the draft and said he should move to lb in a cover 2.

I think he would be a better fit at OLB than MLB in this scheme. He would be better than Bell no doubt in my mind.

We go from Jubilation of yeah we got a good one, to hey wait a minute, to Damnit Carl !!!! :cuss: in under 80 posts. That may be a record here.

ROFL ROFL ROFL

Man I love this place in the off season

I wouldn't mind this move one bit.

like it was ever in question....but it is still clear the chiefs aren't looking to win a superbowl. They are going to patch together a team to get to 7-8 wins and to win most of those games at home.

We really should have signed Benard last offseason.

There are some very good OLB's that will be around when we pick in both the 1st and 2nd...much deeper field than MLB.

possible .... i remember some rumors about Pollard being moved maybe.


but i still think that means we need to change our scheme so that the MLB doesn't drop into deep coverage so much. IMO it's a bad thing anyway.

asking a player to be a main focus of stopping the run AND then asking the player to be responsible for the deep middle on passing players is just begging for problems in coverage.

The Seahawks wish we would have.

Starting calibre?

if we had pollard, harris, and DJ that might be the fastest LB's in the nfl. Atleast in my theory.

but that logic doesn't apply to the LT position, it seems....my head is spinning

I'd say we need OT's about as bad as we need DT's. Gonna be tough to win if we can't score. :)