![]() |
Quote:
|
also wouldnt that be a huge cap hit if they just release him
|
Quote:
|
If Peterson made the trade for his rites
expect another retirement announcement with in the hour |
Obviously I'm biased, but no....Favre is better off sticking with the team that was built around his talents. Secondly I'd like to say that I'm proud of those on the planet who are voting to stick with the youth movement. It shows that some of the "True" fans are actually waking up.
|
If this team had ....
1. A good Oline 2. A good defense 3. only the QB position to fill before being considered the top 2-3 teams in the conference, then I say bring him in. Too bad we aren't involved in any of those situations. We have holes ****ing everywhere. |
Green Bay is one of the best teams in the NFC behind only DAL and NYG.
I don't see a problem in sitting Rodgers for another year. It's not like it will hurt his development. He's still really young. If Brett can be a prob bowl QB for another year then you have to start Brett Favre. It'd be one thing if Favre was playing like a Rams Joe Namath but he's not. He's still a legitimate top 5 QB in this league. He's been the face of that organization for years. You start Favre and say sorry to Rodgers and let him wait another year. GB owes that to Favre in all he's done for that organization. If Favre is playing like shit and is primarily the reason why GB is losing then you bench him and start Rodgers. If Rodgers wants to be traded then they trade him. Rodgers showed he can be good so I doubt GB would do something like that though they did draft Brohm. |
Quote:
We are a long way from making a run at the big show. The only reason Peterson would bring him is is to help fill the seats, but not even Carl could be that stupid. :hmmm: |
Quote:
For instance if the Chiefs were in the same position right now as Minnesota, It would be dumb not to trade for Favre for a 4th-5th rd pick. |
Quote:
Won one SB, and lead them to another, and thrown away several other opportunities, like last year when he threw that stupid int. in OT? |
Quote:
With the only exception of 2005, GB has at least been 8-8 in all of Favre's years starting as their QB. What did Derrick Thomas do for KC.......or Tony Gonzalez???? Winning the SB is great, but Favre has been one of the faces of the NFL. Peyton Manning only won a single title. You wanna dog on him too? Newsflash.........Winning the SB in the NFL is a very hard thing to do and many players on get to play in only one of them, maybe perhaps a couple if they are lucky enough. It would be one thing if Favre wasn't playing at a high level. But he is and just came off of a Pro Bowl season. You don't fix whats not broken. Favre should start in 2008 and if for whatever reason he sucks real bad, then you can bench him for not playing well. How many players on that team on offense want to see Favre come back. Players bust their asses for players like him. You really think any player on that team would reject Favre coming back because they think they need to move on? |
but what will the "No Favre League" do with out him.
Madden will have to find a new Knob to slobber over. |
You know Carl Delano has a boner just thinking about the possibilities.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.