ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Teicher: Chiefs QB Thigpen gets the starting nod against Falcons (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=191902)

CoMoChief 09-18-2008 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5031866)
The game is still 60 minutes long, correct? Or did I miss a rule change?

Didn't know that points scored in the last 4 minutes don't count. That's going to change the recordbook quite a bit...

There is such thing as garbage time.........don't shit yourself......it does exsist.

Does it count? Sure........but you also have to take into consideration the situation at the end of the game. There was no way the chiefs were gonna win or were even remotely close to coming close.

You must get your football knowledge from KCJohnny.

Micjones 09-18-2008 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5031893)
Let's see...

Adjust the gameplan for your STARTING QB against a bad matchup...

Allowing for maximum protection against a team that does well at getting the QB can't be considered an adjustment of the gameplan?
:rolleyes:

Even where the matchup is favorable the boots and rollouts will likely only comprise a very small part of the playbook.

Quote:

Spoken like a true fan...
This should tell everyone all they need to know about you.
When I speak in favor of playing the best football player at a given position over those who are clearly inferior my loyalty as a fan can be called into question.

You hold a monopoly on bullshit.
And I've heard you're in the process of building houses.

OnTheWarpath15 09-18-2008 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5031982)
I look forward to seeing Thigpen roll out and horribly miss Devard Darling again.

Part of the deal playing a young QB.

He made a poor decision. He should have set his feet and made that throw - we know he has the arm to make it.

Or, we can put Huard back there, who's feet are permanently set, and still underthrows an open receiver.

Dude, if I didn't know better, I'd think Mic is a multiple account of yours.

You two will defend that POS to the death over something he did in 2006.

No one is saying Thigpen gives us the best chance to win for the season, that would be ridiculous. But he does give us the best chance for THIS GAME, played on a fast track, against a team with a strong front 4.

To be perfectly fair, NEXT week will tell the story of what Herm thinks of Huard, IMO. BRC's source has never been wrong, and it wouldn't surprise me if Damon was in the doghouse. So:

While I wouldn't be a fan of the move, I could see why Herm might go back to Huard against Denver, at home, against a weak front 4. He'll have a ton more time to get the ball out against Denver than he would against Atlanta.

Chiefnj2 09-18-2008 01:57 PM

[QUOTE=OnTheWarpath58;5031875]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5031870)

Cool.

You've not only shown your ignorance, you've shown you don't bother to read posts.

I've only mentioned, oh, say 10 times, that the bootleg is mostly ineffective against a 3-4 defense.

It would be even MORE ineffective when your QB rolls to the right, and meets Mike Vrabel in the backfield before your RT is even out of his stance.

Make up your mind. Is the offense DESIGNED to roll out or not? Or, does it mean that the OC can actually gameplan for a specific opponenet? You have proved through your ignorance and mammary thumping that the system isn't necessarily DESIGNED only for a mobile QB.

OnTheWarpath15 09-18-2008 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5032009)
Allowing for maximum protection against a team that does well at getting the QB can't be considered an adjustment of the gameplan?
:rolleyes:

Even where the matchup is favorable the boots and rollouts will likely only comprise a very small part of the playbook.



This should tell everyone all they need to know about you.
When I speak in favor of playing the best football player at a given position over those who are clearly inferior my loyalty as a fan can be called into question.

You hold a monopoly on bullshit.
And I've heard you're in the process of building houses.

In YOUR opinion, Huard is the better player.

Over something he did in 2006.

I'm not calling your loyalty into question, I'm calling your judgment into question.

If you can't see why Thigpen is a better option for THIS team, THIS WEEK, then you don't WANT to see.

Clearly inferior?

Look again.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=224

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=228

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=244

Micjones 09-18-2008 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5032010)
No one is saying Thigpen gives us the best chance to win for the season, that would be ridiculous. But he does give us the best chance for THIS GAME, played on a fast track, against a team with a strong front 4.

Thigpen's scrambling prowess has NEVER manifested itself in the NFL.
You're hinging an NFL gameplan against the best athletes in the Football Universe on his ability to run?

The key to having success, even when considering Thigpen, is to protect your QB. He will not beat this Atlanta defense with his legs.

Sure-Oz 09-18-2008 02:03 PM

Huard won't be here next year anyway, may as well see what the kid can do, maybe he can become a decent backup for us

and yes i saw how horrible he was last week

Micjones 09-18-2008 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5032031)
In YOUR opinion, Huard is the better player.

Cute, but it's not a matter of opinion.
The numbers bear that out.
You can argue with them if you'd like, but that makes your argument look like it's rooted in your distaste of Huard and not reality.

Quote:

I'm not calling your loyalty into question, I'm calling your judgment into question.
I would imagine that someone arguing with something other than logic would do just that.

triple 09-18-2008 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5032007)
There is such thing as garbage time.........don't shit yourself......it does exsist.

Does it count? Sure........but you also have to take into consideration the situation at the end of the game. There was no way the chiefs were gonna win or were even remotely close to coming close.

You must get your football knowledge from KCJohnny.

You moron.

After Thigpen's touchdown pass and his successful two-point conversion it was 16-8. They could have tied the game with another score.

How the hell is that "trash time" you imbecile? It was a 1 possession game.

OnTheWarpath15 09-18-2008 02:05 PM

[QUOTE=Chiefnj2;5032027]
Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5031875)

Make up your mind. Is the offense DESIGNED to roll out or not? Or, does it mean that the OC can actually gameplan for a specific opponenet? You have proved through your ignorance and mammary thumping that the system isn't necessarily DESIGNED for a mobile QB.

READ THE POSTS, CLAYTON.

I don't have time to hold your ****ing hand and babysit you through this.

Chrsit, I'm at the point now where I WISH they were starting Huard, we take our lumps, Damon takes his 6 sacks and 2 INT's, and you guys would quit your ****ing crying.

This week has answered every question possible about Chiefs fan's patience...

For the most part, they have NONE.

Micjones 09-18-2008 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple (Post 5032040)
You moron.

After Thigpen's touchdown pass and his successful two-point conversion it was 16-8. They could have tied the game with another score.

How the hell is that "trash time" you imbecile? It was a 1 possession game.

If you watched the game you know full well that the score was no indication of how lopsided that game was.

It was a 1 possession game, but our chance to tie the game hinged upon our ability to stop the run. Something we could not do... in our home stadium... in no danger of a successful Oakland air attack... when everyone watching knew Oakland was going to run.

Simply Red 09-18-2008 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple (Post 5031996)
whatever tools. thigpen will win us a game before croyle will.

Wow, Kind of ballsy for a young n00b.

OnTheWarpath15 09-18-2008 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple (Post 5032040)
You moron.

After Thigpen's touchdown pass and his successful two-point conversion it was 16-8. They could have tied the game with another score.

How the hell is that "trash time" you imbecile? It was a 1 possession game.

Whoops.

Call the wambulance, someone got knocked the **** out.

Better bring one with room for two gurneys...

Micjones 09-18-2008 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5032045)

READ THE POSTS, CLAYTON.

I don't have time to hold your ****ing hand and babysit you through this.

Chrsit, I'm at the point now where I WISH they were starting Huard, we take our lumps, Damon takes his 6 sacks and 2 INT's, and you guys would quit your ****ing crying.

This week has answered every question possible about Chiefs fan's patience...

For the most part, they have NONE.

If Chiefs fans are ANYTHING they are patient.

Brock 09-18-2008 02:07 PM

:LOL: People want Huard to play. I mean, Jesus, haven't we seen enough of him to realize he sucks out loud?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.