![]() |
Quote:
i just want new blood everywhere, after that there are no guarantees... |
Quote:
|
I like McDaniels, I'm just not sure he's seasoned enough to take on an entire team. Spag, on the other hand, I'm sure is.
|
Quote:
You should get your resume to Clark quick, because you ****ing know EVERYTHING - yet your reading comprehension really needs work. What part of "experienced in 43, 34 and 46" do you not understand? I've only mentioned it FOUR or FIVE times. He worked for the Ravens AS they made the switch from 43 to 34. IIRC, they ran the 43 under him at OU in the late 90's. If you don't like the guy as a candidate, just say so. But to claim he's a 34 "disciple" and is inflexible to run any other defense just because he runs a 34 NOW makes you look like a jackass. I'm not sure WTF happened to you recently, but you've gone from solid, open-minded football talk, to know-it-all-one who sucks the penis in a matter of a few months. |
GM: Pioli or Polian
HC: McDaniels, Garrett or Spag. [Garrett won't come here, though] (Hot-shot coordinators often don't pan out, though, but it's worth the risk.) The main thing is just to clear out the not-to-lose stench at Arrowhead. Please no one in any capacity who talks about a QB as a game manager, and has nightmares of a QB throwing an interception. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
GM - Chris Polian
HC - Josh McDaniels |
Quote:
#2) The last thing we need is another system only disciple that eschews the talent on hand for his ideal defense. That's how we went from 15th to 32nd Hell, depending on the season, Belichick has used a 4-3 or 3-4. He even used a prowl formation in certain games (against Bledsoe, and against the Bills in SB XXV). If you were a SF Giants fan, would you want the Giants to hire a manager who installs a pitch to contact philosophy and tells Tim Lincecum to start throwing nothing but two seamers? If you are a Cavs fan, would you want the coach to install the motion offense where LeBron becomes a cog rather than the driver of the O? Why would you minimize the talent you already have on hand just because you are married to a scheme that is no more or less successful than any other scheme on defense? It's myopic. |
Quote:
Polian Spag Might be a new breath of life for this franchise... |
GM: Pioli, he laughs at us then Polian
HC: Jeff Fisher, he laughs at us then Ryan or Sprag is okay and I'd have NP with Cohwer either. He's old school but he did change and his teams were always competitive no matter their talent level. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Seriously. I'm done. He's not MARRIED to a scheme. He runs a 34 hybrid NOW. He's run a 43 in the PAST. This isn't that difficult to understand. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yet, despite this, I'm not acknowledging anything you say or paying attention? And yet, you go on defending the concept of a 3-4, when it's plain as ****ing day that no one in their right mind would implement it with the talent we have here, unless you want to flush a top 5 draft pick one year into his career. And yet, despite saying that it's just part of a system he uses, you claim that Dorsey would work as a 3-4 end, despite the fact that you supposedly aren't saying that this is a possibility. I'm not the one calling people a one who sucks the penis because I disagree with them, either. You do this shit with Mecca all the time in draft threads. Yeah, I'm abrasive and I think I know a lot, but I'm also not hypocritical enough to call someone out on that when it's one of my biggest personality characteristics, as it is with you. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.