ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Dorsey in the 3-4. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200244)

keg in kc 01-13-2009 10:14 PM

Hard to talk about defense when we don't have a head coach, much less a DC.

Let's say we do go 3-4, theoretically. Dorsey doesn't have the size to play NT. He might work outside, similar to the way I've seen the Patriots use Seymour. Maybe Tank would fit the Wilfork role, I don't know.

boogblaster 01-13-2009 10:18 PM

Maybe, but Hali hasn't shown much lately ... He should be jellin' now but he's goin' the other way ... Maybe its his bad feet but he sure din't impress me anymore ...

petegz28 01-13-2009 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogblaster (Post 5388418)
Maybe, but Hali hasn't shown much lately ... He should be jellin' now but he's goin' the other way ... Maybe its his bad feet but he sure din't impress me anymore ...

I think our entire defense was handicaped by the coaching staff. No way that many guys can suck that bad.

suds79 01-13-2009 10:22 PM

If we went to the 3-4, Dorsey would have to move to DE. Honestly? I wouldn't be against trying it.

But we have nobody on the roster who could play NT.

I was thinking we'd have to target that Cody guy from Alabama but I guess he's staying in school. :(

OnTheWarpath15 01-13-2009 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 5388430)
If we went to the 3-4, Dorsey would have to move to DE. Honestly? I wouldn't be against trying it.

But we have nobody on the roster who could play NT.

I was thinking we'd have to target that Cody guy from Alabama but I guess he's staying in school. :(

Sounds like Vonnie Holliday is going to be released, as is Tank Johnson.

:D

chiefzilla1501 01-13-2009 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zouk (Post 5387820)
Dorsey is way too short to be a 3-4 end.

It's possible, but I don't think height is nearly important as a 3-4 end as it is for a 4-3 end.

I think Dorsey would play decent as a 3-4 DE. No idea if he could transition to very good or great. Keep in mind that 3-4 DEs are more in the mold of tackles than they are DTs.

I can tell you one thing: Turk McBride is tailor-made for a 3-4 DE. Just throwing that out there right now.

I think it's very possible we bite the bullet and move to a 3-4 and gamble on whether Dorsey's the answer. Then again, if Steve Spagnuolo comes in, we might end up sticking in a 4-3.

chiefzilla1501 01-13-2009 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 5388430)
If we went to the 3-4, Dorsey would have to move to DE. Honestly? I wouldn't be against trying it.

But we have nobody on the roster who could play NT.

I was thinking we'd have to target that Cody guy from Alabama but I guess he's staying in school. :(

Nose Tackles are hard to find. But keep in mind that if we go 4-3, we have to find 2 pass rushing DEs, both of which are very difficult to find.

Direckshun 01-13-2009 10:39 PM

I've long thought Turk would be a great candidate for DE in a 3-4.

HMMMMMMMMMMmmm......................................

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-13-2009 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5387656)
Thank you, I was beginning to think I was alone in that opinion

Do you at least acknowledge how unimportant that position is in that defense?

The 3-4 is all about the NT and the rush backers. No team in history would spend a top 5 pick on a 3-4 DE.

Zouk 01-13-2009 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5388626)
Do you at least acknowledge how unimportant that position is in that defense?

The 3-4 is all about the NT and the rush backers. No team in history would spend a top 5 pick on a 3-4 DE.

Pick #5 is out of the question but pick #6 (Seymour) makes sense?

You and Mecca always with these rules....

FringeNC 01-13-2009 11:27 PM

I have no idea whether Dorsey can be successful in the 3-4, but I do think Pioli will bring in the 3-4. It's part of the "NE system" and that is what Pioli intends to implement here.

OnTheWarpath15 01-13-2009 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zouk (Post 5388661)
Pick #5 is out of the question but pick #6 (Seymour) makes sense?

You and Mecca always with these rules....

Interesting that our new GM is at least partially responsible for making that pick in 2001...

Chiefnj2 01-13-2009 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zouk (Post 5388661)
Pick #5 is out of the question but pick #6 (Seymour) makes sense?

You and Mecca always with these rules....

I'm pretty sure Seymour started on the inside, but you are right about some of the people and all of their "rules".

Basileus777 01-13-2009 11:32 PM

How high of a pick we spent on Dorsey is pretty much irrelevant now. He's on our roster and we should put him in a position to success regardless if that position was worth the pick. If Dorsey can play 3-4 DE and our coaching staff wants to play a 3-4, there's nothing wrong with having him play that position.

I doubt Dorsey can play DE in a 3-4 though.

keg in kc 01-13-2009 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zouk (Post 5388661)
Pick #5 is out of the question but pick #6 (Seymour) makes sense?

Seymour was drafted (and played) as a tackle, if I remember correctly, he was later moved to end after they drafted Wilfork (and he may still play inside on certain downs for all I know, I haven't watched a lot of recent Patriot games). As I recall, he was a relatively dominant player at tackle, and a key to their early success.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.