Do you really believe this, or are you exaggerating? I haven't seen one person say anything about this. In fact, the only people I have heard say they would rail management are the ones who said that if either Sanchez or Stafford is there, and we pass on them, then Pioli is a moron.

Either one of the QB's are worth investing in... Agree?

Neither will be the savior by they have the talent and potential to build a championship team around and give you 7-10 good years... And if they only win one superbowl or zero in that time frame, at least your building your team to make that leap into the top of the NFL for a 2-4 year period where you could actually compete for a championship...

Neither have to be the savior.... Only a tool would put unreal expectations on QB... But I would actually expect stupid expectations from some of this fanbase... They still long for Carl.

So Sanchez is now, a rapist, immature, being taken advantage by his brother, and not a good player.

Well, that's why you bring in the veteran stopgap. He serves both to mentor the young kid and to mollify the mob.

I really don't understand the thinking behind drafting a QB at #3 just to have him sit. What's he going to learn by watching that wily veteran Tyler Thigpen?

No, but I think you're misrepresenting some of the posters in this perceived crowd.

It's not QB or bust. It's just a realization that the overall top-tier talent in this draft is very, very weak, so you have to start to take away the prospects that just don't fit at all at that spot in the draft.

Couple this with the view of next year's class, which is important to consider when your franchise is as talent deprived as KC's is, and that's why you get the vocal supporters of the top two QB's.

It's not QB or bust. It's the conclusion of a more nuanced analysis.

Was Palmer a decade ago?

Seriously, you're making your "side" of this argument look every bit as idiotic as the Sanchez ballwashing committee.

Eli Manning sat for half a season before the Giants put him out there.

Jay Cutler sat for a year.

Rothlesbuger was planned to sit until the starter got hurt.

Your right it isnt... You need to start building a foundation and experience. Just like the people who want Cassell, They didnt even know he exsisted until last year when he put up good stats with an ALL STAR supporting cast...

Now people would be willing to allow him to lead their franchise, but not a rookie who never played in the NFL...

ITs just fear of the unknown... Fear of trying....

There is a reason that teams put a premium on QB's. It is clearly the most important position on the field. It is also the one that requires the holder of the position to be the most mature, the best leader, and the most able to withstand criticism.

The same dumbshit fans that think a QB or bust is the way to go in this draft, will lay all the blame at his feet or give him all the credit.

The same fans who blame Tyler Thigpen for every loss, are the same ones that will view him as a savior.

If he wasn't the 'savior' then why are so many people so vehemently defending the guy?

Gotta run fellas, it's been real.

I think you know better.

I don't want Casell. Just for the record.

I don't want Sachez either. I wish there was a franchise QB to draft at #3, just don't see one.

No. I honestly don't believe Sanchez is. I have questions about him, and even though no one wants to look at history, there has never been a QB with his experience amount to anything in the NFL. He may be great, but there is a much higher percentage that he busts.

If Pioli/Haley thinks otherwise, then I will be the biggest Sanchez supporter, and hope that I am wrong.

Then you go back to more reeruned stuff that NO ONE has said, but just keep repeating it if it somehow makes you feel better, or if you think it's funny or something.

Big Ben was also not a top five pick, nor a top 10 pick.