ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs sticking with spread offense? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=203950)

keg in kc 03-10-2009 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5570035)
When DV\AS were here we ran the ball alot and was successful at it. In Arizona they could hardly ever run successfully until they got to the playoffs. I guess that is the best time to get good at it.

That offense was predicated around the run about as much as any aggressive system can be. But that's not what I'm referring to. Even when the offense was at its peak, they had a very hard time executing late in games. They couldn't line up and just pound 2 or 3 yards when they needed it.

kcbubb 03-10-2009 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5570006)
Wasn't Cassel sacked more than any other QB?


sacks is not the only indicator of poor o line play. the ability to run the ball is important and the pats had (I think) the 6th best rushing offense in the league. the KC o line couldn't run block and they couldn't pass block for very long. I don't think it is a stretch to suggest that the pats o line is much better the Chiefs.

this really wasn't even what I was talking about.... someone suggested that the chiefs shouldn't use the spread bc it doesn't fit the talents of the team and I was pointing out that the spread helps our o line because they suck. and I can definitely see us using the spread on occasion to benefit the weak o line.

RustShack 03-10-2009 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5570194)
sacks is not the only indicator of poor o line play. the ability to run the ball is important and the pats had (I think) the 6th best rushing offense in the league. the KC o line couldn't run block and they couldn't pass block for very long. I don't think it is a stretch to suggest that the pats o line is much better the Chiefs.

this really wasn't even what I was talking about.... someone suggested that the chiefs shouldn't use the spread bc it doesn't fit the talents of the team and I was pointing out that the spread helps our o line because they suck. and I can definitely see us using the spread on occasion to benefit the weak o line.

LJ was leading the NFL in rushing yards or was second in rushing yards before we switched to the spread...

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-10-2009 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5570204)
LJ was leading the NFL in rushing yards or was second in rushing yards before we switched to the spread...

B-but...but...our rushing yards were GREATER in 08 once wqe switched to the Almighty Spread! :rolleyes:

SenselessChiefsFan 03-10-2009 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5570161)
So you admit to starting shit-storm threads? You do you know.

So here's my response, and it's one I know you were hoping for:

"Oh golly! I sure hope they do, because it would validate both the spread AND me, Nonsensical Chiefs Fan, and I would be right, right, RIGHT"!

(For once). :rolleyes:

Um, if shit-storm threads are ones that should provoke thought and conversation, then YES I do try to start them.

Actually, I don't really care about being right. Predicting what will happen does not mean you 'know' football. Many guys who predict all sorts of things know football. There are a myriad of factors that go into any decision the Chiefs make.

I do care about raising the level of understanding about football on this board. I would like to have intelligent conversation about my football team with other informed fans. They do not have to think like me, but I would prefer that their opinions come from logic based thought, and now some half assed radio sports jock.

SenselessChiefsFan 03-10-2009 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully (Post 5569908)
Neither of those teams ran the "spread."
They also didn't run the "Run 'n' Shoot."

They didn't run the spread option, but they did run the spread offense.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-10-2009 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5570235)
Um, if shit-storm threads are ones that should provoke thought and conversation, then YES I do try to start them.

Actually, I don't really care about being right. Predicting what will happen does not mean you 'know' football. Many guys who predict all sorts of things know football. There are a myriad of factors that go into any decision the Chiefs make.

I do care about raising the level of understanding about football on this board. I would like to have intelligent conversation about my football team with other informed fans. They do not have to think like me, but I would prefer that their opinions come from logic based thought, and now some half assed radio sports jock.

No.

SenselessChiefsFan 03-10-2009 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5569953)
So why do you think they ran it even though we didn't switch to it until Thigpen took over?

First, the Chiefs had the spread offense in the playbook before the season ever started, including the spread option. They were planning on doing a lot of zone running, bootlegs, etc. Brodie Croyle gets hurt.

Now, do you think Damon Huard could have run the spread? No.

Brodie comes back and gets hurt again.... Huard gets hurt.

Now, the other part of this is that LJ gets suspended.

The power runner for the power running game is suspended. The Offensive line is struggling to open up running lanes, or protect the QB.

So, there was much more to why the Chiefs ran the spread than just Thigpen.

SenselessChiefsFan 03-10-2009 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5570250)
No.

Sorry, but aren't you the same guy trying to argue that the Cassel/Vrabel deal had something to do with the other two players the Chiefs brought in? You argued that it was freed up roster/cap space when in fact those moves had NO bearing on the Pats cap or roster situation.

It is THIS kind of ignorance that I will work to eliminate.

Now, we can argue about what physical tools a player has. That is a matter of opinion. Many things are matters of opinions. But, lets please at least try to get the facts right.

Not to say I am always right on my facts. I make mistakes like anyone else... but lets own our mistakes, and then work to do better.

kcbubb 03-10-2009 12:27 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by RustShack View Post
LJ was leading the NFL in rushing yards or was second in rushing yards before we switched to the spread...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5570213)
B-but...but...our rushing yards were GREATER in 08 once wqe switched to the Almighty Spread! :rolleyes:

I don't think LJ was and even if he was, where would he have been without the Denver game??? the game would over inflate the stat.

SenselessChiefsFan 03-10-2009 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5569949)
Cassel was the #8 QB in the nation coming out of HS where he lined up under center. He went to USC who runs a pro style offense. He was the backup to Heisman trophy winner Carson Palmer who was drafted #1 overall and was also his roomate and best man in his wedding. Cassel almost beat out Matt Leinart in college. He still got some playing time and you would be foolish to think he didn't get any snaps in practice either. He has far more experience running a Pro Style offense than Thigpen does. Cassel also had better NFL coaching than Thigpen has received so far too.

Hey, you don't have to sell me on Cassel... I liked the move a good bit.

I agree that right now, Cassel is much more equipped to go under center. I agree that right now, Cassel is more ready than Thigpen to start for this team.

I just think that he will be running the spread a lot this year, and I know he ran it a lot last year... and had his best success in it.

kcbubb 03-10-2009 12:31 PM

the pats didn't get any cap relief from the vrabel trade???? was I misinformed???

SenselessChiefsFan 03-10-2009 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5570204)
LJ was leading the NFL in rushing yards or was second in rushing yards before we switched to the spread...

Wasn't LJ suspended when the Chiefs switched to the spread?

RustShack 03-10-2009 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5570282)
I don't think LJ was and even if he was, where would he have been without the Denver game??? the game would over inflate the stat.

He was near the top before that game but hey keep trying.

RustShack 03-10-2009 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5570294)
Hey, you don't have to sell me on Cassel... I liked the move a good bit.

I agree that right now, Cassel is much more equipped to go under center. I agree that right now, Cassel is more ready than Thigpen to start for this team.

I just think that he will be running the spread a lot this year, and I know he ran it a lot last year... and had his best success in it.

Oh yeah I know we will use it, the difference is Cassel CAN line and will also line up under center helping the offense a lot more.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.