ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Scout.com's Mock Draft - 04-03-2009 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=205512)

Blick 04-08-2009 02:15 PM

It's not bad, except I would've taken Sintim over English.

bigbucks24 04-08-2009 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5651309)
I wouldn't draft Phil Loadholt if he were the last OT left on the board and OT was the final piece of the SB puzzle.

Why? Would like your thoughts.

Mecca 04-08-2009 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5647650)
Not to be rude, but I can't imagine a worse situation for the Chiefs. We waste a #3 to get the second coming of Kawika Mitchell and Renaldo Nehemiah? Yeesh....

Anyone who's ever watched Maualuga and thinks that he is anything like Mitchell is a tard.

Mitchell was/is an athletic guy who isn't that great of a football player that transferred to South Florida so he could play...

Rey Maualuga is a 3 year starter at one of the best college programs around that is an outstanding player that is being downgraded due to his athletic testing...

They are nothing alike at all.

milkman 04-08-2009 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigbucks24 (Post 5651599)
Why? Would like your thoughts.

He's just a plodder.

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5652154)
He's just a plodder.

Wow.

That's just some ****in' great insight there.

I wouldn't draft him if he was the last OT on the planet and my team needed an offensive tackle because....*wait for it!*....he's a plodder.

That's ****ing great!

milkman 04-08-2009 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5652176)
Wow.

That's just some ****in' great insight there.

I wouldn't draft him if he was the last OT on the planet and my team needed an offensive tackle because....*wait for it!*....he's a plodder.

That's ****ing great!

I think most will figure out that I mean that he has slow feet and can't succesfully contend with speed rushers on the edge.

He is simply big and slow and lacks the athleticism and fluid feet that you need in the NFL at OT, even for the right side.

He makes Jordan Black look like a star quality LT by comparison.

But I spelled it out for you because you are intellectually challenged.

AustinChief 04-08-2009 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5652206)
He is simply big and slow and lacks the athleticism and fluid feet that you need in the NFL at OT, even for the right side.

FAIL.

If you really believe this... you either don't actually watch enough college football or you are so against the player that you have created a self-induced dellusion.

Loadholt is not the quickest guy but he should make a pretty damn good if not PROBOWL caliber RT on the right team. If he makes it to the very low 2nd or top of the 3rd I wouldn't hesitate to take him.

htismaqe 04-08-2009 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5652292)
FAIL.

If you really believe this... you either don't actually watch enough college football or you are so against the player that you have created a self-induced dellusion.

Loadholt is not the quickest guy but he should make a pretty damn good if not PROBOWL caliber RT on the right team. If he makes it to the very low 2nd or top of the 3rd I wouldn't hesitate to take him.

No freaking way, dude.

Loadholt should drop the "holt" off the end of his name, because that's all he is - a LOAD. He's not an NFL-caliber tackle on either side unless somebody gets ahold of him and lights a fire under his fat ass.

milkman 04-08-2009 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5652292)
FAIL.

If you really believe this... you either don't actually watch enough college football or you are so against the player that you have created a self-induced dellusion.

Loadholt is not the quickest guy but he should make a pretty damn good if not PROBOWL caliber RT on the right team. If he makes it to the very low 2nd or top of the 3rd I wouldn't hesitate to take him.

I watch enough college ball that I was calling Branden Albert a LT prospect last year before anyone, and took a lot of shit for it.

ChiefsCountry 04-08-2009 07:27 PM

Loadholt will struggle in the NFL. Orakpo and Dunlap proved that.

AustinChief 04-08-2009 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5652349)
No freaking way, dude.

Loadholt should drop the "holt" off the end of his name, because that's all he is - a LOAD. He's not an NFL-caliber tackle on either side unless somebody gets ahold of him and lights a fire under his fat ass.

#1 even based on his performance this year and at the senior bowl... that is wrong...
#2 he has worked a TON on his footwork since then and has improved significantly.
#3 he isn't really FAT, he is just HUGE.. the dude is damn athletic for someone at 6'8" ... 330lbs isn't obese at that height.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-08-2009 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5652292)
FAIL.

If you really believe this... you either don't actually watch enough college football or you are so against the player that you have created a self-induced dellusion.

Loadholt is not the quickest guy but he should make a pretty damn good if not PROBOWL caliber RT on the right team. If he makes it to the very low 2nd or top of the 3rd I wouldn't hesitate to take him.

Yeah, and Jake Long was a great pick at #1, and we should spend a mid-rounder on that douchebag from Michigan with 50 career tackles who put up a good bench # at his pro day even though he wasn't even a combine invite despite playing at a major school.

AustinChief 04-08-2009 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5652395)
I watch enough college ball that I was calling Branden Albert a LT prospect last year before anyone, and took a lot of shit for it.

ok fair enough. Maybe just Oklahomo football. I hate the Sooners but watched most of their games over the last few years ... and mark my words, he will be an excellent RIGHT tackle somewhere... unless some team is stupid and tries to plug him in at LT in a pass happy offense.

I honestly think he could be "servicable" at LT if you are a run crazy team... but I wouldn't draft him to take the risk...

OnTheWarpath15 04-08-2009 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5652176)
Wow.

That's just some ****in' great insight there.

I wouldn't draft him if he was the last OT on the planet and my team needed an offensive tackle because....*wait for it!*....he's a plodder.

That's ****ing great!

Says the guy that thinks ILB is as important a position as DE, OLB or DT.

AustinChief 04-08-2009 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5652471)
Yeah, and Jake Long was a great pick at #1, and we should spend a mid-rounder on that douchebag from Michigan with 50 career tackles who put up a good bench # at his pro day even though he wasn't even a combine invite despite playing at a major school.

If you'll remember I argued that Long would be great to get at #5 (our pick) and I was dead right. DESPITE, many on here claiming he could only play RT... and of course, looking back I think he IS a great pick at #1... but again, that was never the original argument...

..and now I get to be PROJECTED to be wrong on someone I thought we should spend a FOURTH round pick on...

Why don't you start by proving me WRONG first.. then project me to be wrong...

Just because Mecca (and I am assuming you) still can't admit you were wrong on Jake Long, doesn't mean you can "bully" me into thinking I don't know what I SEE.

Fact is, THE REST OF THE ****ING NFL knows Jake Long is a good LT and will only get better... deal with it.

Man up. admit being wrong and quit acting like GoChiefs


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.