ChiefsPlanet
Page 6 of 22 « First 2345 6 7891016 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Cassel signs 6-year $36 million contract (denied by Pioli) (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206587)

irishjayhawk 04-25-2009 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5705322)
The difference is Cassel has to be good right now he's 27 not 22.
True.

Mecca 04-25-2009 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoreLemonPledge (Post 5705320)
And not proven. And apparently would have cost a lot more.
One is 27 one is 22 you don't start developing a QB at 27 he has to be good now and he is a risky there's no doubt about that.

If he goes out there and looks blah we can't be talking about how he needs "time" because he isn't some young kid that just got drafted.

htismaqe 04-25-2009 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 5705324)
Not me, it does no good if Cassell is on the side line hurt because he doesnt have good blocking. We will then have Thigpen mania around here.
WE'RE GOING TO DRAFT OFFENSIVE LINEMEN IN THIS DRAFT.

WE DON'T NEED A ****ING LEFT TACKLE, WE HAVE A VERY GOOD ONE.

Dave Lane 04-25-2009 12:31 PM
Why the hell announce this now? Completely blows our we might take Sanchez threat??

An hour before the draft we are ****ing with this? Couldn't wait till tomorrow? Whats up???

Thig Lyfe 04-25-2009 12:31 PM
"hootie's african suckfari"

hahahahaha

Nightfyre 04-25-2009 12:31 PM
WTF is with the cost issue? Is it your money? Its not like we don't have the cap room and last I checked the money that makes up the cap comes from revenue sharing... For christ's sake... there is no reason to be cheap AT ALL.

milkman 04-25-2009 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 5705272)
The same people who will now rip Pioli for the 36 million he gave Cassel would have no problem if they gave Sanchez 70 million. Cassel has an NFL track record Stafford doesn't have and Stafford is getting a ridicuous contract. Cassel just agreed to commit to KC for 6 years. Well done.
Posted via Mobile Device
I love how one year is a "track record".

Rick Mirer had a pretty good rookie season.
Derek Anderson had a good year in '07.

I guess they had "track records" too.

Mecca 04-25-2009 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishjayhawk (Post 5705323)
On the flip side, if Sanchez flames out and Cassel doesn't, the Cassel move looks genius. Round two pick for a top 3 pick.

It all depends on how they pan out. I bet, when all said and done, it's a wash.
That decision in general is going to make or break us we'll either look brilliant or reeruned.

irishjayhawk 04-25-2009 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 5705332)
Why the hell announce this now? Completely blows our we might take Sanchez threat??

An hour before the draft we are ****ing with this? Couldn't wait till tomorrow? Whats up???
Only conclusion I can see is that we've traded #3.

Mecca 04-25-2009 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5705336)
I love how one year is a "track record".

Rick Mirer had a pretty good rookie season.
Derek Anderson had a good year in '07.

I guess they had "track records" too.
This will get ignored, always does.

irishjayhawk 04-25-2009 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5705337)
That decision in general is going to make or break us we'll either look brilliant or reeruned.
Or neither because it'll be a wash....

Hootie 04-25-2009 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsRacer (Post 5705333)
"hootie's african suckfari"

hahahahaha
bullshit!

ZootedGranny 04-25-2009 12:32 PM
Quote:
hootie's african suckfari
WTFFFF Hahahaha

DaWolf 04-25-2009 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 5705312)
Sanchez is considerably younger and with higher upside, however.
I wouldn't say considerably, I believe there is only a 3 year difference, and Cassel already has a year of NFL starting experience...

irishjayhawk 04-25-2009 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5705339)
This will get ignored, always does.
It's a good point, to be sure. But 1 year > 0 years. Don't ignore that.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:45 PM.
Page 6 of 22 « First 2345 6 7891016 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.