Not really, no.

Boldin is Bowe's upside so....I like Dwayne Bowe and all but he isn't as good as Boldin is right now.

Boldin> Bowe. Boldin actually played some QB in college. I remember he played a bowl game as QB and sucked.

He was a QB in high school, FSU had him there because a bunch of guys were hurt or suspended I don't remember which.

Yes, Boldin is better right now, but it would be pretty dumb to trade a young reciever for a vet when the team is in the shape it is now.

Boldin's 28...Bowe is 24, so there isn't a huge huge age gap there.

Wow, I disagree.

Bowe has probably 8 more years of being a consistent, high quality receiving threat.

Boldin's got maybe 4 years.

Disagree, Boldin's game isn't and has never been straight speed, so much like Terrell Owens I expect him to be productive well into his 30's.

Only Chiefs fans could think Bowe was better than Johnson. LMAO

Well, I guess we'll see. I just think that 4 years is pretty huge when considering similar receivers.

And I think that T.O. is a freak. I'd be shocked if either Bowe or Boldin were consistently producing at that age, or anywhere near it.

By NFL standards it probably is. I have nothing to back this up, but my guess is that a 28 year old receiver is likely at his peak and will see his performance begin to recede. A 24 year old receiver is likely just entering his most productive years.

I don't see one single person here saying that. :rolleyes:

This is the way I look at WR's, a WR who relies on straight speed to get open is going to be done as soon as that speed goes so you're looking at right around 30.

Guys who use their size and power like a TO or a Boldin can last longer because their age isn't going to make them lose that.

Cmon, use some logic. They were comparing the players stats after 2 years in the league.

Like I said depends on the WR, I expect Fitzgerald to be productive well into his 30's also.

A guy like Steve Smith not so much.