![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The funny thing about this thread is that in 2 year's if cassle bust Gochiefs and sensiblechiefsfan
wont ever come back in here or post on the subject at all spineless homers..... |
Quote:
|
The dude has "bust" written all over his face.
|
The reason Cassle is number 1 on that list is becuase if he fail's Scott Pioli wold literally have set the chiefs franchise back 5-10 years.
|
Quote:
and you have to consider we will probably pick in the top 10 again and there are some pretty good qbs in the draft. bradford, mccoy, snead...and i cant think of anyone who usually picks that low that needs a qb. the raiders have fatmarcus. davis isnt smart enough to go with another qb if he fails. the lions just got stafford. jets have sanchez. maybe the rams, but i think they have other positons of need to fill. if cassel does fail and we get a qb that would only be a 2-3 year setback imo. but i believe that cassel is the man and we will go oline or wr next yr |
Quote:
What if the real truth is that Cassell "fails" because the OL cannot protect him??? Where does the blame go there? To Pioli, who should have realized his new team lacked jack @@@@ at OL and should have DONE SOMETHING about that, more than a fifth on Colin Brown, a small UFA contract to ancient Goff, and lucking out with tryout player Darryl Harris. |
No he wouldn't. Three tops. Probably not even. Pioli set up Cassel's contract and front loaded the hell out of it. The first three years he makes bank, but it's best either way you slice it.
If he kicks ass, you still have him locked up on the cheap for another three years making more room to sign "impact players" to make a run. If he fails, you're really only hurt for three years before you can afford to take the cap hit. Though, if we still have major cap space, and Cassel doesn't impress in his first two years, the Chiefs could draft a guy in the 2011 draft and if that guy is good enough to start as a rookie, there is really no reason he couldn't. We'd just being paying a lot for a backup for one year. Hell, even if, his contract would be small enough to keep as a backup, or trade for a pick. Easily one of the best moves of the offseason. Cutler for Orton is FAR AND AWAY the worst. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The reality is that Pioli knows Cassel as well as anyone. McDaniels also knows Cassel.... and McDaniels sabotaged his own QB situation in an effort to get him. Oh, and if you watched him in the Minnesota game, you saw what the Chiefs saw. Mobility and smart decisions. Time will tell. I will own up to it regardless of how it turns out. |
I probably wouldn't want to put too much stock from a goon that writes his so-called expert analysis from a (sounds of it) gay porn website.
I mean, what the **** is a "AskMen.com" anyways? Lame. |
Quote:
The only bad part of the Cassle ordeal is giving him the money so early.. We should have waited until half way into the regular season.. Trading a 2nd, I am fine with.. Though I would have rather had one of the two first QB's selected this past draft.. And it is funny that Cassel is ahead of: Winslow being traded for a 2nd and 5th plus new contract.,, Delhomme being given the contract at his age.. Stallworth, sorry but the legal system failed on the punishment.. Cutler ordeal in Denver and soon to be Marshall deal.. Seems to me the guy just set up the points on a dart board and picked rank from there.. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.