![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Without your years of analytical, objective insight and understanding as it relates to football, this place would be a maelstrom of chaos. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
You draft for safe players who produce right away. Guys like Tamba Hali are right up your ally. But I, like most other people would rather go the route of the talented guy who can be great rather than just a "good" player. I understand it takes time to develop, and don't give up on second year players. You on the other hand, are being counter productive because you fail to realize the adjustment Okung has to make coming from the spread is the same reason you don't want Albert. You are just a dumbass that doesn't understand the difference between schemes and the adjustments that need to be made. Also Albert is more talented that Okung. You do realize that if Iowa ran the Spread offense then their LT would be the #1 LT in the draft right now don't you? He is bigger and more athletic, but he doesn't play in a scheme that makes you look better than you really are.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How about All-Pro? Does that work for you better than Pro Bowl? The dude said he had a high ceiling. Higher than anyone in this draft. A guy with that high of a ceiling should be considered an All-Pro level type of guy, right? So I want to know, from the schmuck that originally said it, what he thinks gives Albert that high ceiling potential. |
Quote:
|
Campbell has a much higher ceiling than Okung...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't know why you are being so protective of a bad Carl Peterson pick. You are defending him being a legit LT as if he was your own flesh and blood. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So are you advocating a guy like Bryant with the first pick? Or Bradford? Or are you just happy being the parrot on OTW's shoulder? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.