![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm happy going with the more talented player, which is Albert. But to the subtle bullshit above, yeah, I'd rather roll with a "Herm" guy now (scary1131) than any piece of ****ing shit that Pioli and his merry band of urethral sphincters have brought in thus far. |
Quote:
|
I bet dan williams is the pick at 5, but we will try to tra5e down so we can still pick him.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Tate would make me do the happy dance if he fell to our first pick in the second, and a Clausen pick at 5 wouldn't kill me, either.
Really, this team is so riddled with holes that it's real hard for them to completely swing and miss with the pick, unless it's another ****ing left tackle. |
I'm preparing myself to accept another half round reach. Dan williams. Some mockers have him going as late as 30. it is just too reminiscent of the wilfork pick.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Berry or Clausen, for my tastes. We need some playmakers in the worst way on this team.
|
Honestly, our best option if we arent gonna take Clausen or Berry is to trade down..maybe even twice...a lot of second rounders this year would be mid firsts in a lot of drafts and we need a lot of players. If we could slide back to 15 or so and pick up a couple thirds and a second, we should do that.
The optimum draft for me (again, if we arent gonna take Berry or Clausen) would be to move back to 9 with buffalo and add a third and fourth or a second for compensation and then to move back to 13 or 14 and add another pick or two and then take BPA. that would give us something like 1 first 3 seconds 2 thirds 2 fourths 3 fifths to go forward with, that could go a very very long way in a draft like this... |
Quote:
This team hasn't drafted a tackle since John Tait. Albert was a guard. Herm/Carl/Drafturbator projected him as a tackle. The guy never played the position in college. |
Quote:
After the '09 draft, many of us automatically were saying that Cody would be our guy in '10. Williams is the current Cody. |
Quote:
The guy was projected to play left tackle because he has outstanding footwork. And I've seen nothing that suggests otherwise. No idea if he'll continue to grow into his position, but the important part isn't how he started the season. It was how he continued to improve throughout the season. |
Quote:
It would be a monumental ****up to move him anywhere but left tackle. This team needs IMPACT PLAYERS on both sides of the ball far more than it needs another rookie tackle coming in here, especially one that would be drafted in a position with players that could both fill holes and make an impact all at once in their rookie season. Say NO to Okung or any other tackle you can think of with our first round pick, and possibly even our two seconds. You want a right tackle? Get one in the fourth. |
Quote:
His last few games in college were at LT smart guy. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.