ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Clausen and Tate? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=224410)

Mr. Flopnuts 03-06-2010 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6581709)
I'm confused too. Because the corn i shit out last night ended up inside your skull.

Did the Jets draft a LT to replace the other first round LT they had already drafted two years prior? NO.

No. They didn't already have a first round pick at LT. So what they did is actually nothing like what you are advocating. They have zero in common.

And in fact what New York did after drafting their first round LT is then, 3 years later, trade up to #5 to pick a QBOTF.

We now have our second chance to do EXACTLY WHAT THE JETS DID: Draft a QB at #5 after having acquired a LT in a previous draft. And you're crying like a bitch about us wanting to do that.

You don't have the first god damn clue about what teams have done, or should do.


And how's that dumb secondary pick they made doing? What's his name....Revis?

Yeah, they totally blew an opportunity to draft OL there, for a silly playmaker in the secondary. What were they thinking, Sack of Testes?

Holy shit they passed on Joe Staley and Ben Grubbs for a ****ing CB.

Mother**** yes!

DeezNutz 03-06-2010 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6583087)
If you are happy giving Carl/Herm's guy one more year, then that's fine. We can draft Joe Barksdale with our first rounder next year and forgo any chance of a quality quarterback or receiver. Enjoy the safety if it makes you happy and think it's the best long term solution for the team. You've convinced me. I'll never post another pro-offensive line pick for this draft because you've made me see the light that Albert is elite and just needs another year in the system to finally have it click.

LMAO. LMAO.

I'm happy going with the more talented player, which is Albert.

But to the subtle bullshit above, yeah, I'd rather roll with a "Herm" guy now (scary1131) than any piece of ****ing shit that Pioli and his merry band of urethral sphincters have brought in thus far.

the Talking Can 03-06-2010 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6583087)
If you are happy giving Carl/Herm's guy one more year, then that's fine. We can draft Joe Barksdale with our first rounder next year and forgo any chance of a quality quarterback or receiver. Enjoy the safety if it makes you happy and think it's the best long term solution for the team. You've convinced me. I'll never post another pro-offensive line pick for this draft because you've made me see the light that Albert is elite and just needs another year in the system to finally have it click.

you could just say, "I'm wrong" and spare us all the drama....

Nightfyre 03-06-2010 08:04 PM

I bet dan williams is the pick at 5, but we will try to tra5e down so we can still pick him.
Posted via Mobile Device

Bowser 03-06-2010 08:17 PM

Tate would make me do the happy dance if he fell to our first pick in the second, and a Clausen pick at 5 wouldn't kill me, either.

Really, this team is so riddled with holes that it's real hard for them to completely swing and miss with the pick, unless it's another ****ing left tackle.

Nightfyre 03-06-2010 08:21 PM

I'm preparing myself to accept another half round reach. Dan williams. Some mockers have him going as late as 30. it is just too reminiscent of the wilfork pick.
Posted via Mobile Device

Bowser 03-06-2010 08:23 PM

Berry or Clausen, for my tastes. We need some playmakers in the worst way on this team.

BossChief 03-07-2010 03:32 AM

Honestly, our best option if we arent gonna take Clausen or Berry is to trade down..maybe even twice...a lot of second rounders this year would be mid firsts in a lot of drafts and we need a lot of players. If we could slide back to 15 or so and pick up a couple thirds and a second, we should do that.

The optimum draft for me (again, if we arent gonna take Berry or Clausen) would be to move back to 9 with buffalo and add a third and fourth or a second for compensation and then to move back to 13 or 14 and add another pick or two and then take BPA.

that would give us something like

1 first
3 seconds
2 thirds
2 fourths
3 fifths

to go forward with, that could go a very very long way in a draft like this...

Saccopoo 03-07-2010 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 6583679)
Tate would make me do the happy dance if he fell to our first pick in the second, and a Clausen pick at 5 wouldn't kill me, either.

Really, this team is so riddled with holes that it's real hard for them to completely swing and miss with the pick, unless it's another ****ing left tackle.

What do you mean "another left tackle?"

This team hasn't drafted a tackle since John Tait.

Albert was a guard.

Herm/Carl/Drafturbator projected him as a tackle. The guy never played the position in college.

DeezNutz 03-07-2010 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 6583633)
I bet dan williams is the pick at 5, but we will try to tra5e down so we can still pick him.
Posted via Mobile Device

There is much truthiness in this post.

After the '09 draft, many of us automatically were saying that Cody would be our guy in '10. Williams is the current Cody.

chiefzilla1501 03-07-2010 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6584201)
What do you mean "another left tackle?"

This team hasn't drafted a tackle since John Tait.

Albert was a guard.

Herm/Carl/Drafturbator projected him as a tackle. The guy never played the position in college.

Umm... yeah. That's why the Chiefs traded up to take him in the top 20. Because Guards are always picked in the top 20.

The guy was projected to play left tackle because he has outstanding footwork. And I've seen nothing that suggests otherwise. No idea if he'll continue to grow into his position, but the important part isn't how he started the season. It was how he continued to improve throughout the season.

Bowser 03-07-2010 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6584201)
What do you mean "another left tackle?"

This team hasn't drafted a tackle since John Tait.

Albert was a guard.

Herm/Carl/Drafturbator projected him as a tackle. The guy never played the position in college.

Yes, invest two years of the guy at tackle, and then move him back to guard. He had a sophomre slump to be sure, but he's no bust at left tackle. Who gives a shit if he didn't play tackle in college? He's played it in the NFL, and at times, played very well there. Do you move Ryan Clady or Joe Thomas because none of them played like Anthony Munoz in his prime in their second seasons? Hell no you don't. He beasted on Dummervil in the finale. The guy will be fine there going forward.

It would be a monumental ****up to move him anywhere but left tackle. This team needs IMPACT PLAYERS on both sides of the ball far more than it needs another rookie tackle coming in here, especially one that would be drafted in a position with players that could both fill holes and make an impact all at once in their rookie season. Say NO to Okung or any other tackle you can think of with our first round pick, and possibly even our two seconds. You want a right tackle? Get one in the fourth.

BossChief 03-07-2010 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6584201)
The guy never played the position in college.

Talking out of your ass again I see...and as usual you are wrong again.

His last few games in college were at LT smart guy.

milkman 03-07-2010 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6585053)
Talking out of your ass again I see...and as usual you are wrong again.

His last few games in college were at LT smart guy.

Actually, it was only two games and they were in the early/mid part of the season.

BossChief 03-07-2010 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6585637)
Actually, it was only two games and they were in the early/mid part of the season.

Details, details, point still holds that he did in fact play the position in college...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.