ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Why are the Chargers that much better? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=233141)

-King- 09-08-2010 07:43 PM

Top 5:

Brees
Rodgers
Manning
Brady
Rivers

Buck 09-08-2010 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 6987459)
Top 5:

Brees
Rodgers
Manning
Brady
Rivers

1. Manning
2. Brees
3. Rivers
4. Rodgers
5. Schaub

Not even being a homer. Brady, pretty much shat it up half the time last year.

Chiefs Pantalones 09-08-2010 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6987294)
Rivers imo is a top 5 QB in this league.

I'd agree.

In no particular order, IMO...

Brees
Peyton Manning
Ben "I'll take the rapist for 300 Alex" Roethlisberger
Brady
Rivers
Rodgers 5A

Chiefs Pantalones 09-08-2010 07:48 PM

Rodgers will enter into the discussion more credibly when he wins a playoff game, IMO. He's top, don't get me wrong, I'm just basing the list with wins added into the equation. There's no doubt he'll be winning playoff games soon, and a bunch.

Quesadilla Joe 09-08-2010 07:48 PM

I'd rather have Rodgers than Rivers just because he can make play outside of the pocket and has a stronger arm.

Buck 09-08-2010 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6987473)
I'd rather have Rodgers than Rivers just because he can make play outside of the pocket and has a stronger arm.

That's true, but I think Philip Rivers makes up for it with his leadership skills. I think Rodgers will get there soon though.

Chiefs Pantalones 09-08-2010 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6987473)
I'd rather have Rodgers than Rivers just because he can make play outside of the pocket and has a stronger arm.

I'd rather have Rivers because he's won playoff games and is more experienced in that aspect. I don't care about arm strength. I care about winning and accuracy. I'm not saying Rodgers isn't accurate, he's probably the most accurate downfield QB in the game, I'm just saying arm strength is overrated when talking about the qualities that you look for in a top QB.

milkman 09-08-2010 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder (Post 6987480)
I'd rather have Rivers because he's won playoff games and is more experienced in that aspect. I don't care about arm strength. I care about winning and accuracy. I'm not saying Rodgers isn't accurate, he's probably the most accurate downfield QB in the game, I'm just saying arm strength is overrated when talking about the qualities that you look for in a top QB.

Right now, all things taken into consideration, I'd take Rogers over any QB in the league.

He's young and getting better.

Chiefs Pantalones 09-08-2010 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6987512)
Right now, all things taken into consideration, I'd take Rogers over any QB in the league.

He's young and getting better.

Based on potential, I'd take him. Based on results, I'd take Rivers. Young, still plenty to improve on, already has plenty of big game experience, etc. I'd say it's a win-win either way really. Can't go wrong lol.

Buns 09-08-2010 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6987512)
Right now, all things taken into consideration, I'd take Rogers over any QB in the league.

He's young and getting better.

If I was building a franchise, I might take Stafford first. If I want to win now, Rivers or Rapelisburger.

siberian khatru 09-08-2010 08:13 PM

All this QB talk makes me cry.

Chiefs Pantalones 09-08-2010 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 6987536)
All this QB talk makes me cry.

No worries, Berry is gonna end Rivers' season, Brady style. That should make us feel better, eh? haha jk jk.

notorious 09-08-2010 08:26 PM

I just got on Chiefsplanet and this is the first thread I click on......




:facepalm:

Bewbies 09-08-2010 08:27 PM

If Rivers is a B Cassel has to be what, a T? Is that far enough below F?

siberian khatru 09-08-2010 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 6987594)
If Rivers is a B Cassel has to be what, a T? Is that far enough below F?

I think as someone said a little while ago, there's not enough letters in the alphabet to account for Cassel.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.